Biomedical subjects

M Renvall

Publications and source records attributed to M Renvall.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1994

Compliance with social and safety recommendations in an outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment program.

BACKGROUND: A unique contribution of a comprehensive outpatient geriatric assessment is its focus on social and safety issues in the frail elderly. The impact of such programs depends on the caregiver and/or patient complying with safety and social recommendations offered by the assessment team. Compliance in this setting has not been previously described. METHODS: A telephone survey was conducted of self-reported compliance in 124 frail geriatric patients with a high prevalence of dementia 3-21 months after completing a comprehensive geriatric assessment program at the University of California, San Diego, Medical Center. RESULTS: The social and safety recommendations constituted 52.8% of all the recommendations offered. The overall compliance rate (total number of safety and social recommendations followed/total number offered x 100) was 50.2% (95% CI: 43.7-56.6). Highest compliance was achieved with recommendations to complete a prior directive for health care (80.6%) and to wear a medic-alert bracelet (57.5%). Patients complied poorly with recommendations to change a living situation (36.2%). Analysis of variance showed compliance to increase with time between the assessment and survey. Stratifying for time, we found higher compliance in patients with greater impairment in functional or cognitive status. Most noncompliance was due to disagreement with the recommendations offered or failure to implement acceptable recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with social and safety recommendations offered in a comprehensive geriatric assessment program approximates compliance observed in other clinical settings. In this setting compliance increases over time. When controlled for time, impairment in functional or cognitive status is associated with greater compliance.

Accidents, Home↗

PubMed1993

Practice patterns and the adequacy of residency training in consultation medicine.

OBJECTIVE: To describe consultation practice patterns of graduates of an internal medicine residency program and to determine whether they consider themselves to be adequately trained to practice in the area of internal medicine consultations. DESIGN: The authors surveyed graduates of the internal medicine residency program at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine from 1980 to 1989. Respondents described their practice types and the mechanics of consultations they currently perform, as well as the adequacy of their training in and frequency of encountering 74 clinical problems in the area of internal medicine consultation. Topics were categorized as Group I: excessive training; Group II: adequate training, frequently encountered; Group III: adequate training, infrequently encountered; Group IV: inadequate training, frequently encountered; and Group V: inadequate training, infrequently encountered. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Of 214 graduates, 91 returned surveys adequate for analysis. RESULTS: Internists prefer verbal communication with their colleagues and seeing surgical patients in the office prior to admission. Residents perceive that they have been excessively trained in preoperative evaluations of the asymptomatic and chronically ill adult and in several postoperative complications. Topics seen frequently in clinical practice but inadequately taught include: issues in convalescence and rehabilitation from surgical procedures, use of psychotropic medications, and management of eating disorders. CONCLUSIONS: To prepare residents for practice, program directors in consultation medicine might consider incorporating outpatient preoperative evaluation assessments, encouraging a liaison between surgeons and internists, and modeling verbal communication among colleagues. Consideration should be given for more didactic training for Group IV topics.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of venous thrombosis.

PURPOSE: Estrogen replacement therapy is believed by many physicians to cause thrombophlebitis and to be contraindicated in women at risk for this disease. However, clinical data supporting this assumption are scant, and further investigation is required. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested the estrogen-thrombophlebitis association in a case-control study. Charts of all consecutive women aged 45 years or older with a primary or secondary discharge diagnosis of thrombophlebitis, venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism were reviewed; 121 cases and 236 controls matched for age, year of admission, admitting service, and socioeconomic status were obtained. Hormone use and nonuse were validated in a subset of randomly selected women. RESULTS: Cases and controls, whose average age was 65 years, did not differ significantly on matching variables or on current use of exogenous estrogen (5.1% of cases versus 6.3% of controls). Other analyses that variously excluded women with a past history of thrombosis, women less than 50 years of age, women with thrombosis occurring after admission, and women whose estrogen use was indeterminate also did not support an increased risk of thrombotic disease. Adjustment for the presence of independent thrombotic risk factors did not alter the odds ratio for estrogen use. CONCLUSION: This case-control study of older women, unselected for other thrombotic risk factors, does not support the commonly held assumption that replacement estrogen increases the risk of venous thrombosis.

Aged↗

PubMed1991

Recommendations for a change in living situation resulting from an outpatient geriatric assessment: type, frequency and risk factors.

We analyzed the outcomes of 480 comprehensive outpatient geriatric assessments to determine the frequency of recommendations for home help or a change in residence and to determine whether simple clinical observations could predict such recommendations. Fifty-eight percent (280) of the patients received no recommendation for a change in the living situation. Of the 200 patients receiving a recommendation for a change in living situation, 97 (49%) were felt to be able to stay at home with increased in-home support and/or day care, and 51.5% (103) were advised to seek placement. After adjusting for age and gender, risk factors predicting a recommendation for change were dementia (odds-ratio = 9.98), vision deficits (odds ratio = 2.02), lower education level compared to college (odds-ratio = 1.88 high school, 1.42 for less than high school), an increasing number of medical diagnoses (odds-ratio = 1.49 per diagnosis), and a functional impairment on the Katz index (odds-ratio = 1.09). The presence of these risk factors should lead to consideration of further evaluation of the home environment in this study. We conclude that geriatric patients presenting for a comprehensive outpatient evaluation commonly need a change in home situation, though most can remain in their home, and that simple clinical observations can be helpful in screening patients for further evaluation of their home environment.

Aged↗

PubMed1990

Cognitive function testing in comprehensive geriatric assessment. A comparison of cognitive test performance in residential and clinic settings.

Tests of cognitive function are frequently used in geriatric assessment, but the effect of test setting has rarely been explored. To determine the effect of testing site on the performance of elderly patients undergoing a comprehensive geriatric assessment, we administered the Mini-Mental State Exam to 116 geriatric patients in the clinic and at their residence. Their cognitive abilities varied from normal to severely impaired. The patients' scores were 1.5 +/- 3.6 (mean +/- SD) higher at their residence. The clinical importance of a difference in score of 1.5 is not clear. For this reason a second analysis was performed in which a difference in scores of five points or greater between settings was considered clinically meaningful. Twenty-five percent (29 of 116) differed by five points or more. Of these 29 patients, 22 (76%) tested better in the residential setting. These differences were statistically significant (P = .001). We conclude that the testing site may affect test performance and that in-home assessment may reveal the optimal cognitive function of geriatric patients.

Aged↗

PubMed1989

The yield of a home visit in the assessment of geriatric patients.

Elderly patients often have problems not easily detected during an office visit. We investigated the yield of a home visit by a geriatric nurse specialist as part of an interdisciplinary assessment process. Compared with the findings of an office-based assessment by a general internist, the home visit resulted in up to four new problems (median = 2, mean = 1.7, 95% confidence interval = 1.5-1.8) and one to eight new recommendations (median = 4, mean = 3.6, 95% confidence interval = 3.4-3.9). Twenty-three percent of the problems could have resulted in death or significant morbidity. The most frequent problems related to psychobehavioral difficulties (23.1% of problems involving 38.3% of patients), safety (21.6% of problems involving 35.7% of patients), and caregiver related problems (20.4% of problems involving 33.8% of patients). The most common recommendations related to safety (30.7% of recommendations involving 81.8% of patients), caregiver well-being (19.8% of recommendations involving 52.6% of patients), and social issues (12.7% involving 33.8% of patients). Baseline clinical information did not predict the yield of the home visit in this sample. We conclude that an in-home assessment contributes unique and meaningful information to the geriatric assessment process.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Reliability of drug histories in a specialized geriatric outpatient clinic.

To examine the reliability of drug histories of elderly outpatients, records of 122 frail elderly patients in a geriatric outpatient evaluation clinic were reviewed. Drug histories were taken by an internist during an initial clinical evaluation and by a nurse practitioner during a home visit. Home and office drug lists disagreed in 39 cases (32%). Roughly equal numbers of "extra" drugs were listed in the two settings. Number of medications (especially two or more), number of active medical problems (especially four or more), and depression were significant, independent predictors of an unreliable drug history. Neither dementia nor living situation was a significant predictor of an unreliable drug history. The only drugs associated with an unreliable history were megavitamins, beta-blockers, and centrally-acting antihypertensive agents. Using the home list as the reference, there were equal numbers of omission errors and commission errors in the office drug histories. Strategies to optimize the reliability of office drug histories need further investigation.

Aged↗