Biomedical subjects

M S Dar

Publications and source records attributed to M S Dar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Can extent of high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus predict the presence of adenocarcinoma at oesophagectomy?

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of Barrett's oesophagus complicated by high grade dysplasia is controversial. Recently, the extent of high grade dysplasia was described as a predictor of subsequent development of cancer in patients undergoing continued surveillance. However, there is no universal agreement on the definition of extent of high grade dysplasia. AIM: To determine if extent of high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus is a predictor of the presence of adenocarcinoma at the time of oesophagectomy. METHODS: Forty two patients with Barrett's oesophagus and high grade dysplasia who underwent oesophagectomy between 1985 and 1999 were identified from a prospective database. All pathological specimens, including preoperative endoscopic biopsies and post-oesophagectomy sections, were reviewed in a blinded fashion by one expert gastrointestinal pathologist to determine the extent of high grade dysplasia. The extent of high grade dysplasia was defined using two different criteria, one from the Cleveland Clinic and one from the Mayo Clinic. RESULTS: Twenty four of 42 patients (57%) had unsuspected cancer at the time of oesophagectomy. Using the Cleveland Clinic definition, 10 of 21 (48%) patients with focal high grade dysplasia had carcinoma compared with 14 of 21 patients (67%) with diffuse high grade dysplasia (p=0.35). Using the Mayo Clinic definition, adenocarcinoma was found in five of seven (72%) patients with focal high grade dysplasia compared with 19 of 35 (54%) with diffuse high grade dysplasia (p=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: The extent of high grade dysplasia, regardless of how it is defined, does not predict the presence of unsuspected adenocarcinoma at oesophagectomy. There is no evidence as yet that the extent of high grade dysplasia can be used as a basis for decision making in these patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

Modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination by mouse striatal A(1) adenosinergic receptor.

We have demonstrated that ethanol-induced motor incoordination is modulated by cerebellar adenosine A(1) receptor. This study represents an extension into another important brain motor area, the striatum that, unlike cerebellum, has high density of both A(1) and A(2A) receptors. Direct intra-striatal micro-infusion of Ro15-4513 (0.05, 0.5, 1 ng), a partial inverse-agonist of benzodiazepine, significantly and nearly dose-dependently attenuated ethanol-induced motor incoordination indicating mediation of ethanol's motor incoordination by striatum. Intra-striatal A(1)-selective agonist N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; 1, 2, 4 ng), A(1) = A(2A) non-selective agonist, 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA; 1.5, 3, 6 ng), and A(1)-selective antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX; 25, 50, 100 ng) dose-dependently accentuated and attenuated, respectively, ethanol-induced motor incoordination, strongly suggesting modulation by striatal adenosine A(1) receptor. Intra-striatal DPCPX significantly antagonized not only ethanol-induced motor incoordination but also its potentiation by intra-striatal CHA, R-(+)-N(6)-(2-phenylisopropyladenosine) (R-PIA), or NECA. No change in motor coordination occurred after the highest dose of CHA, R-PIA, or NECA followed by saline. Similarly, the highest intra-striatal dose of Ro15-4513 or DPCPX neither altered motor coordination or locomotor activity indicating relative selectivity of interaction with ethanol. Nearly 25-fold higher dose of A(2A)-selective agonist, CGS-21680, compared to CHA was necessary to produce a comparable potentiation of ethanol's motor incoordination perhaps suggesting a lack of or less significant striatal A(2A) involvement. Intra-striatal pertussis toxin (0.5 microg) pre-treatment markedly attenuated ethanol-induced motor incoordination as well as its potentiation by intra-striatal CHA. These results support that striatum is one of the brain motor areas mediating the motor impairing effects of acute ethanol and that the latter's modulation occurs via A(1)-selective receptors coupled to pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2001

Involvement of the cerebellar adenosine A(1) receptor in cannabinoid-induced motor incoordination in the acute and tolerant state in mice.

Cannabinoids are known to impair motor function in humans and laboratory animals. We have demonstrated an accentuation of cannabinoid (CP55,940)-induced motor incoordination in mice by the adenosine A(1) receptor-selective agonist N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) (4 ng) using an intracerebellar (ICB) microinjection method. This effect was mediated by the A(1) receptor because pre-treatment with ICB 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) (100 ng), an adenosine A(1) receptor selective antagonist, completely abolished the accentuation. Furthermore, ICB pre-treatment with DPCPX (100 ng) before ICB CP55,940 (15 microg) attenuated the motor incoordination suggesting a modulation by an endogenous adenosine A(1) system. ICB microinjection of CHA or DPCPX prior to ICB vehicle had no effect on normal motor coordination. ICB microinjection of dipyridamole (25 microg), an adenosine transport inhibitor, significantly accentuated the motor incoordination by ICB CP55,940 (15 microg), providing further support for the involvement of endogenous adenosine in the action of CP55,940. Tolerance to the motor incoordinating effect of ICB CP55,940 was demonstrated following 3 days of i.p. CP55,940 (0.1, 1 or 2 mg/kg every 12 or 24 h; total of six or three injections, respectively). Interestingly, animals which exhibited tolerance to ICB CP55,940 also demonstrated tolerance to the accentuating effect of ICB CHA suggesting cross-tolerance between adenosine agonists and cannabinoids. Cross-tolerance was also demonstrated following 3 days of i.p. CHA (0.25 or 1 mg/kg every 24 h; total of three injections) as further evidence of the modulatory role of the cerebellar adenosine system in the acute manifestation of CP55,940-induced motor incoordination. The involvement of cerebellar adenosine and the A(1) receptor in cannabinoid actions is circumstantially supported by previous evidence that CB(1) receptors and A(1) receptors are both localized on cerebellar granule cell parallel fiber terminals and basket cell neurons where they serve to inhibit the release of neurotransmitters.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2000

Cerebellar CB(1) receptor mediation of Delta(9)-THC-induced motor incoordination and its potentiation by ethanol and modulation by the cerebellar adenosinergic A(1) receptor in the mouse.

The effect of intracerebellar microinfusion of antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and other naturally occurring cannabinoid receptor (CB(1)) mRNA on Delta(9)-THC-induced motor impairment was investigated in mice. Delta(9)-THC (15-30 microgram/microliter intracerebellar) resulted in a significant motor impairment in a dose-related manner. The intracerebellar pretreatment with antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (3.0 microgram/100 nl/12 h; six administrations/mouse) virtually abolished Delta(9)-THC (15 and 25 microgram/1 microliter intracerebellar)-induced motor impairment. However, intracerebellar pretreatment with the mismatched oligodeoxynucleotide in exactly the same manner as the antisense was completely ineffective in altering the Delta(9)-THC-induced motor impairment. These results strongly suggest the involvement of CB(1) receptor in the expression of Delta(9)-THC-induced motor impairment. The intracerebellar microinfusion of adenosine A(1)-selective agonist, N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) (4 ng/100 nl) significantly enhanced Delta(9)-THC-induced motor impairment, suggesting a cerebellar A(1) adenosinergic modulation of motor impairment. A pretreatment with the antisense and the mismatched oligodeoxynucleotide also markedly attenuated and did not alter, respectively, the cerebellar A(1) adenosinergic modulation (enhancement) of Delta(9)-THC-induced motor impairment. There was no change in the normal motor coordination due to intracerebellar pretreatment with antisense and its mismatch, in the presence as well as absence of intracerebellar CHA indicating the selectivity of interactions with Delta(9)-THC. The Delta(9)-THC-induced motor incoordination was also significantly enhanced dose-dependently by systemic (i.p.) ethanol administration suggesting behavioral synergism between the two psychoactive drugs. Pretreatment (intracerebellar) with pertussis toxin (PTX) markedly attenuated Delta(9)-THC- and Delta(9)-THC+CHA-induced motor incoordination suggesting coupling of CB(1) receptor to PTX-sensitive G-protein (G(i)/G(o)). These data suggested co-modulation by cerebellar cannabinoid and adenosine system of Delta(9)-THC-induced motor impairment. Conversely, the results in the present study also suggested co-modulation by cerebellar adenosine A(1) and CB(1) receptors of ethanol-induced motor impairment, thereby indicating a possible common signal transduction pathway in the expression of motor impairment produced by Delta(9)-THC as well as ethanol.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination in the rat motor cortex.

1. On going work in our laboratory has shown that adenosine modulates ethanol-induced motor incoordination (EIMI) when given systemically as well as directly into the cerebral ventricles, cerebellum and corpus striatum of the rat and/or mouse. 2. The objective of this study was to determine what effect adenosine agonists and antagonists would have within the rat motor cortex on EIMI. 3. The participation of the motor cortex in EIMI was suggested when microinfusion of the anti-ethanol compound, Ro15-4513, an inverse agonist of the benzodiazepine binding site, directly into the motor cortex significantly attenuated EIMI. Further, the adenosine agonists N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) and 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino-5'-N-carboxaminoadenosine++ + hydrochloride (CGS-21680) significantly accentuated EIMI in a dose-related manner. The adenosine A1 receptor-selective agonist, CHA, appeared most potent in this modulatory effect when compared to the A2-selective agonist, CGS-21680. 4. The extent of diffusion of the adenosine drugs within the cortical tissue after their microinfusion was also checked by measuring the dispersion of microinfused [3H]CHA. The [3H]CHA dispersion study indirectly confirmed that the results of the present investigation were based on the effect of adenosine drugs within the motor cortex only. 5. Accentuation by the A1- and A2-selective adenosine agonists was significantly attenuated by the A1-selective antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) but not by the A2 receptor-selective antagonist 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC) further suggesting modulation mainly by the A1-subtype. 6. Pretreatment of the motor cortex with pertussis toxin (PT) significantly reduced the capacity of both A1- and A2-selective adenosine agonists to accentuate EIMI suggesting the involvement of a PT-sensitive Gi/Go protein. 7. These data support earlier work which showed that adenosine modulates EIMI within the central nervous system (CNS), most likely via the A1 receptor, and moreover, extend that work by including the motor cortex as a brain area participating in the adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor impairment.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1998

Rat striatal adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor impairment: possible role of striatal cyclic AMP.

We have previously reported the involvement of the striatum in acute ethanol-induced motor incoordination and the striatal adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination through A1 receptor-mediated mechanism(s). The present study, a continuation of our previous work, was carried out to investigate the possible functional correlation between striatal cyclic AMP and ethanol-induced motor incoordination, and its modulation by striatal adenosine in Sprague-Dawley rats. Forskolin (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 pmol), a known activator of adenylate cyclase, significantly attenuated ethanol-induced motor incoordination in a dose-dependent manner following its direct intrastriatal microinfusion. Forskolin also antagonized the accentuating effect of intrastriatal N6-cyclohexyladenosine on ethanol-induced motor incoordination. These results suggested that ethanol-induced motor incoordination might be functionally correlated to a decrease in the striatal cyclic AMP levels and that the striatal adenosine A1 receptors might modulate ethanol-induced motor incoordination through cyclic AMP signaling mechanism(s). Further support to this hypothesis was obtained by the actual measurement of the striatal cyclic AMP levels in the same experimental conditions as in motor coordination studies using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluoroscence detection. Regardless of the method (focused microwave irradiation, cervical dislocation or decapitation into a dry ice-ethanol mixture) used to kill the animals, a significant decrease in the striatal cyclic AMP levels was observed due to ethanol. Intrastriatal adenosine A1-selective agonist, N6-cyclohexyladenosine (24 ng), caused a further significant decrease in the striatal cyclic AMP levels in the ethanol- but not in the vehicle-treated animals. The further enhancement in the ethanol-induced decrease in the striatal cyclic AMP levels by intrastriatal N6-cyclohexyladenosine, therefore, functionally correlated with the observed potentiating effect of intrastriatal N6-cyclohexyladenosine on ethanol-induced motor incoordination. The effects of intrastriatal N6-cyclohexyladenosine+ethanol and of ethanol alone on the striatal cyclic AMP levels were blocked by intrastriatal pertussis toxin (500 ng) pretreatment, indicating the involvement of pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins (Gi, Go) and possibly of the adenosine A1 receptor coupled to the G-proteins in the striatum. Furthermore, ethanol alone significantly decreased the basal as well as the cyclic AMP-stimulated catalytic activities of the striatal cyclic AMP protein kinase, which were further reduced by intrastriatal N6-cyclohexyladenosine. The results of the present study therefore support an involvement of a cyclic AMP signaling pathway in the striatal adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination at the post-adenosine A1 receptor level.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1998

Involvement of kappa-opioids in the mouse cerebellar adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination.

Using rotorod performance as the test response, possible modulation and co-modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination by the cerebellar kappa-opioid and adenosine A1 receptors was studied. A dose-related accentuation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination was observed after direct cerebellar microinfusion of three kappa-opioid receptor agonists: U-50488, U-62066, and bremazocine. On the contrary, significant and dose-related attenuation of ethanol's motor impairment was produced by intracerebellar nor-binaltorphimine, a kappa-opioid receptor antagonist. Furthermore, the accentuation by kappa-agonists was virtually abolished by kappa-antagonist nor-binaltorphimine. Therefore, the accentuation and attenuation by kappa-opioid receptor agonists/antagonist, respectively, was through specific kappa-opioid receptors. Pretreatment with the intracerebellar adenosine A1-selective agonist, N6-cyclohexyladenosine, further enhanced the ethanol-induced motor incoordination and its accentuation by intracerebellar kappa-opioid receptor agonists. Ethanol-induced motor incoordination was markedly attenuated by intracerebellar pertussis toxin (PTX) pretreatment, suggesting an involvement of PTX-sensitive G protein in the expression of motor incoordinating effect of ethanol. Additionally, the intracerebellar PTX also markedly attenuated the accentuation by kappa-opioid agonists of ethanol-induced motor impairment, suggesting participation of PTX-sensitive GTP-binding G protein (Gi, Go) in the kappa-opioid modulation of ethanol's motor impairment. It also confirms that kappa-opioid receptors are linked to PTX-sensitive G protein. The functional similarity between kappa-opioid and adenosine A1 receptors in increasing ethanol's motor incoordination, together with their anatomical co-localization primarily on the axons and axonal terminals of the cerebellar granule cells, suggests a possible common catalytic unit of adenylate cyclase as the basis of modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination by both receptor mechanisms.

Alcoholic Intoxication↗

PubMed1997

The striatal adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination in rats: possible role of chloride flux.

Previous studies from our laboratory have provided strong evidence that brain adenosine modulates acute ethanol (i.p.)-induced motor incoordination (MI) through receptor mediated mechanism(s). Recently, we have reported the involvement of the striatum in ethanol-induced MI as well as the striatal adenosinergic modulation of the ethanol-induced motor deficit. The present study was thus designed to further characterize the modulatory effect of striatal adenosine on ethanol-induced MI and to look for its functional correlation with chloride flux within the rat striatum. Intrastriatal microinfusion of adenosine A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) and antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), significantly accentuated and attenuated, respectively, the motor incoordinating effect of ethanol while having no effect on the normal motor coordination in saline-treated control animals. These data confirmed the role of striatal adenosine in ethanol-induced MI. The selectivity of interactions between adenosine A1 agonist and antagonist and ethanol was further confirmed by the study in which neither intrastriatal CHA nor DPCPX significantly altered the MI induced by sodium pentobarbital. Previously, we have shown that intrastriatal Ro15-4513 not only significantly attenuated ethanol-induced MI but also blocked its accentuation by intrastriatal CHA. It is well known that Ro15-4513 antagonizes many, but not all, CNS effects of ethanol by blocking the ethanol potentiation of GABA-stimulated uptake of chloride. Therefore, experiments using striatal microsac preparations were carried out to investigate the possible modulation of chloride conductance by CHA and its relationship to ethanol. High concentrations of CHA (10 and 100 nM) increased the total chloride uptake by the striatal microsacs. Corresponding to the ethanol-adenosine interaction observed behaviorally, a much lower concentration (1 nM) of CHA, being ineffective itself, significantly enhanced the stimulatory action of ethanol on chloride uptake. This effect was blocked by either Ro15-4513 (100 nM) or DPCPX (10 nM). The modulatory effect of GABA and/or ethanol on chloride influx was also evaluated, and the results supported the appropriateness to use striatal microsac preparations in the present study. Overall, the data suggested a functional interaction between ethanol and striatal adenosine and further supported the hypothesis that striatal adenosine might, in part, modulate ethanol-induced MI through its effect on chloride conductance through chloride channels coupled to GABA-benzodiazepine receptor complex.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1997

Mouse cerebellar adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination: possible involvement of cAMP.

As an extension of our previous work pertaining to brain adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination, the effect of direct intracerebellar administration of the A1-selective adenosine agonist, N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) on ethanol-induced motor incoordination was evaluated. Marked accentuation of ethanol-induced motor impairment by CHA was observed. No change in the normal motor coordination was noted when CHA administration was followed by saline instead of ethanol. Intracerebellar cAMP or its analog, 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP, significantly inhibited ethanol's motor impairment in a dose-related manner as well as abolished CHA's accentuating effect on ethanol-induced motor incoordination. These observations suggested a possible involvement of cAMP in the adenosinergic modulation and in the expression of ethanol-induced motor incoordination. Further support was provided by the observation of a marked accentuation and attenuation in a dose-related manner of ethanol-induced motor impairment as well as CHA's accentuation of ethanol's motor impairment by intracerebellar miconazole and forskolin, respectively. However, equimolar intracerebellar doses of miconazole and forskolin (inhibitor and stimulator of adenylyl cyclase, respectively) failed to significantly alter ethanol-induced motor incoordination probably due to their mutual functional antagonism. The expression of adenosinergic modulation and that of ethanol-induced motor impairment most likely involved Gi protein-coupled receptor(s) (such as adenosine receptors). The involvement of receptors linked to pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins was suggested because intracerebellar pertussis toxin pretreatment markedly inhibited ethanol-induced motor incoordination as well as CHA's accentuation of ethanol's motor impairment. Finally, cAMP, unlike its antagonism to CHA's accentuation, failed to antagonize the accentuation of ethanol-induced motor impairment by intracerebellar GABA(A) agonist (+)-muscimol. This indicated selectivity of cAMP participation in G protein coupled receptor (such as adenosine)-mediated response and not in ionic channel coupled receptor (such as GABA(A))-mediated mechanism. Overall, the data suggested a possible involvement of cerebellar adenylyl cyclase-cAMP signalling pathway in the adenosinergic modulation of ethanol's ataxia.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1996

Mouse cerebellar GABAB participation in the expression of acute ethanol-induced ataxia and in its modulation by the cerebellar adenosinergic A1 system.

The possible modulation and of co-modulation by the cerebellar GABAB and adenosine A1 receptors of ethanol-induced motor impairment were investigated in the mice using rotorod performance as the test response. Direct cerebellar microinfusion of GABAB agonist, baclofen, and antagonist, phaclofen, into the permanently cannulated mice, produced a dose-dependent accentuation and attenuation, respectively of ethanol-induced motor impairment. The baclofen and phaclofen exhibited accentuation and attenuation, respectively, via GABAB receptors linked to pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein. A comodulation by the cerebellar adenosine A1 receptors was also observed because intracerebellar microinfusion of adenosine agonists NB-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA), 5'-N-ethylcarbox-amidoadenosine (NECA), and 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenyl-ethylamino-5'-N-ethylacarbox- amidoadenosine (CGS-21680), and antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1, 3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), also accentuated and attenuated, respectively, ethanol-induced motor impairment. The accentuation of ethanol-induced motor impairment by baclofen was further enhanced after the intracerebellar microinfusion of CHA, suggesting a co-modulation by the co-localized adenosine A1 receptors. A similar response was observed after the intracerebellar microinfusion of adenosine A1 = A2 agonist NECA and the several-fold higher dose of adenosine A2-selective agonist CGS-21680. Ethanol-induced motor impairment was markedly blocked by intracerebellar A1-selective antagonist, DPCPX, as well as by the intracerebellar pertussis toxin pretreatment suggesting again a co-modulation by the adenosine A1 receptors and the involvement of pertussis toxsin-sensitive G protein, respectively. The almost 25-fold higher dose of CGS-21680 to accentuate and DPCPX to attenuate, respectively, ethanol-induced motor impairment together with the reported cerebellar localization of adenosine A1 subtype only, suggested A1 receptor activation by NECA and CGS-21680. The functional similarity between GABAB and adenosine A1, receptors associated with their anatomical co-localization on the cerebellar granule cells, mainly axons and axonal terminals, may suggest a possible common adenylate cyclase catalytic unit as the basis of modulation of ethanol's motor impairment by these two receptor mechanisms.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1995

Antagonism by intracerebellar Ro15-4513 of acute ethanol-induced motor incoordination in mice.

The possible antiethanol effect of intracerebellarly microinjected Ro15-4513 was investigated using motor incoordination as the test response. The results of this study further confirmed reports from this and other laboratories that this partially negative ligand of benzodiazepine selectively attenuated and nearly reversed the motor impairment of acute ethanol. The attenuation observed after microinjections of doses of 0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 ng was significant and dose related. There was no effect on normal coordination when the highest dose, 0.5 ng, was administered followed by saline instead of a test dose of ethanol. When 0.5 ng of Ro15-4513 alone was microinjected into the cerebellum, no significant change in the locomotor activity was observed. Even a 10-fold higher intracerebellar dose (5 ng) of Ro15-4513 administered alone produced no significant changes in locomotor activity. This suggests that attenuation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination was most likely due to the selective antiethanol effect of Ro15-4513 at the dose range used in the present investigation. The antiethanol effect of intracerebellar Ro15-4513 also reaffirmed the well-known belief that the cerebellum is an important brain region for ethanol's motor-impairing effect. The results also indirectly suggest the inhibition of GABAA-gated chloride ion channel activity as the most likely basis of Ro15-4513's antiethanol effect.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

In vivo effects of (-)-nicotine on ethanol-induced increase in glucose utilization in the mouse cerebellum.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible in vivo effects of (-)-nicotine, ethanol, and an adenosine agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) when injected individually as well as in various combinations on glucose utilization in the fresh cerebellar slices of mice. Mice received ICV (-)-nicotine or CHA followed 5 min later by a test dose of ethanol (2 g/kg; IP). Animals were killed 20 min postethanol treatment and fresh slices (300 microns) of cerebellum were incubated in a glucose medium in Warburg flasks using 14C-glucose as a tracer. Trapped 14CO2 was counted to estimate glucose utilization. Ethanol treatment markedly accentuated glucose utilization, whereas the pretreatment with (-)-nicotine (125 and 250 ng, ICV) resulted in a significant attenuation in the ethanol-induced increase in glucose utilization. However, ICV (-)-nicotine (125 ng) alone did not produce any change in the cerebellar glucose utilization. The attenuation of ethanol-induced increase in glucose utilization by (-)-nicotine was nearly totally blocked by ICV hexamethonium, a purported nicotinic antagonist, suggesting participation of cholinergic-nicotinic receptors. The (-)-nicotine pretreatment also significantly attenuated both the ICV CHA (25 ng)-induced increase in glucose utilization and the accentuation of ethanol-induced increase in glucose utilization by CHA. The antagonistic effect of (-)-nicotine on CHA- and ethanol-induced increase in glucose utilization indicating an interaction between (-)-nicotine and ethanol and between (-)-nicotine and adenosine may suggest involvement of postreceptor (nicotinic and adenosine) mechanisms including ionic channels.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1995

Possible role of striatal adenosine in the modulation of acute ethanol-induced motor incoordination in rats.

Several reports from our laboratory have suggested the involvement of the brain adenosinergic system in ethanol-induced motor incoordination (EIMI). This study is an extension of the previous work and pertains to the evaluation of the role of the striatal adenosine in EIMI in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Using the motor incoordination induced by 1.5 g/kg of ethanol (ip) as a test response, the possible behavioral interactions between ethanol and adenosine agonists and antagonists in the striatum were investigated. Intrastriatal (IST) administration of adenosine A1-, A1 = A2-, and As-selective agonists, R(-)N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA), 5'-N-ethylcarboxamido-adenosine (NECA), and 5'-(N-cyclopropyl)-carboxamidoadenosine, respectively, significantly and dose-dependently accentuated EIMI when evaluated by rotorod test, suggesting the striatal adenosinergic modulation of EIMI. No significant change in normal motor coordination was noted, even when the highest IST doses of adenosine agonists were followed by saline instead of ethanol, suggesting that the observed behavioral interactions of these drugs were selective to ethanol. Hippocampus, which is known not to be involved in the normal motor functions, was selected as a control brain area because of the presence of high density of adenosine receptors, as well as the high levels of adenosine. Intrahippocampal NECA failed to alter EIMI, indicating the specific role of striatal and not hippocampal adenosinergic system in the modulation of EIMI. The potentiating effects of adenosine agonists N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) and CGS-21680 on EIMI were blocked by adenosine A1- and A2-selective antagonists, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine and 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine, respectively, suggesting the participation of specific adenosine receptors in this functional interaction. A role for the adenosine A1 receptor in the striatal adenosinergic modulation of EIMI was favored based on the rank-order potency of adenosine agonists. IST pretreatment with pertussis toxin (PT), but not with PT beta-oligomer, nearly completely eliminated the accentuation of EIMI by CHA, further supporting the favored role of adenosine A1 receptors in EIMI. Histological and IST [3H]R-PIA distribution data confirmed that the observed behavioral effects were caused by exclusive striatal distribution of intrastriatally microinjected drugs. Data obtained suggested modulation of acute EIMI by striatal adenosine receptor-mediated mechanism(s) and the coupling of these adenosine receptor to the PT-sensitive Gi protein.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1995

Possible central adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced alterations in [14C]glucose utilization in mice.

The possible role of brain adenosine in acute ethanol-induced alteration in glucose utilization in the whole brain, as well as in the specific brain areas (cerebellum and brain stem), was investigated. Mice were killed 20-min postethanol, and the fresh tissue slices (300 microns) of brain and/or specific brain areas were incubated for 100 min in a 5.5 mM glucose medium in Warburg flasks using [6-(14)C]glucose as a tracer. Trapped 14CO2 was counted to estimate glucose utilization. Ethanol (2 g/kg, i.p.) markedly increased the glucose utilization in whole brain and in both motor areas of brain. Theophylline (50 mg/kg, i.p.), an adenosine antagonist, significantly reduced ethanol-induced increase in glucose utilization in whole brain, as well as in brain areas. However, adenosine agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) on the contrary, significantly accentuated ethanol-induced increase in glucose utilization in these tissues that was nearly completely blocked by theophylline pretreatment. Theophylline alone did not produce any significant change in glucose utilization, whereas CHA alone (in vivo and in vitro) significantly increased glucose utilization, as well as ethanol-induced increase in glucose utilization in an additive manner. Relevant supportive data were obtained by experiments in which adenosine deaminase (ADA), p-sulfophenyltheophylline (8-SPT), and CHA were administered in vitro to the slice preparations. Both ADA and 8-SPT were effective in almost completely blocking the ethanol-induced increase in glucose utilization, whereas CHA further enhanced the ethanol-induced increase in glucose utilization in an additive manner.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adenosine↗

PubMed1994

Intracerebellar nicotinic-cholinergic participation in the cerebellar adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination in mice.

Many epidemiological studies have suggested a high correlation between the use of tobacco and ethanol, the two most frequently abused psychoactive drugs. Recently, we reported behavioral interactions between (-)-nicotine, (-)-cotinine and ethanol within the CNS. The present report is a confirmation and an extension of that study. Using a 2 g/kg ethanol-induced motor incoordination (EIMI) as the test response, possible behavioral interactions between (-)-nicotine, (-)-cotinine and ethanol and between (-)-nicotine, (-)-cotinine and adenosine agonist + ethanol in the cerebellum were investigated. (-)-Nicotine, 0.625, 1.25 and 5 ng intracerebellarly (ICB) significantly attenuated EIMI in a dose-related manner. Likewise, ICB injection of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng (-)-cotinine, a major metabolite of nicotine, significantly attenuated EIMI after the same i.p. dose of ethanol as in case of (-)-nicotine but less markedly compared to (-)-nicotine. No change in normal motor coordination was observed when the highest dose of (-)-nicotine or (-)-cotinine was injected ICB followed by saline control, suggesting selectivity of their behavioral interactions with ethanol. The attenuation of EIMI by (-)-nicotine and (-)-cotinine was blocked by ICB hexamethonium (1 microgram) and trimethaphan (100 ng), the purported nicotinic-cholinergic antagonists. Finally, the ICB injection of adenosine agonists, N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) or 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), produced marked accentuation of EIMI which was significantly antagonized by ICB (-)-nicotine and (-)-cotinine. The data obtained in the present study suggested, for the first time, a cerebellar adenosinergic-nicotinic cholinergic interaction and modulation of EIMI. The data also suggested participation of cerebellar nicotinic-cholinergic receptors in EIMI.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1994

Intrastriatal Ro15-4513 functionally antagonizes ethanol-induced motor incoordination and striatal adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination in rats.

To study the role of the striatum in modulating the effects of adenosine agonists and benzodiazepine inverse agonists on acute ethanol-induced motor impairment, we evaluated the effect of direct intrastriatal Ro15-4513 [0.625, 1.25 and 2.5 ng], a partial inverse agonist of benzodiazepine receptor, on ethanol-induced motor incoordination. A significant and nearly dose-dependent antagonism by Ro15-4513 was observed, which suggests involvement of the striatum in ethanol-induced motor incoordination. No effect of IST Ro15-4513 on motor incoordination induced by Na-pentobarbital (10 mg/kg, i.p.) was noted, indicating the selectivity of the antiethanol action of Ro15-4513. The IST adenosine agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) markedly accentuated ethanol-induced motor incoordination in a dose-related manner, suggesting a striatal adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination. The IST Ro15-4513 also significantly antagonized the accentuating effects of CHA on ethanol-induced motor incoordination. No change in normal motor coordination was observed after IST CHA or Ro15-4513 when followed by saline administration instead of ethanol. No accentuating effect by intrahippocampal CHA on ethanol-induced motor incoordination was seen, which suggests the selectivity of striatal adenosinergic modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination. There was no significant radioactivity present in the systemic circulation, in the CSF or in brain areas other than striatum after intrastriatal [3H]Ro15-4513 or [3H]CHA and ethanol injection. Data obtained so far support the involvement of striatum in ethanol's ataxia as well as striatal adenosinergic modulation of the central effect(s) of ethanol, possibly through Ro15-4513-sensitive mechanism(s).

Adenosine↗

PubMed1993

Central behavioral interactions between ethanol, (-)-nicotine, and (-)-cotinine in mice.

A high correlation between alcohol use and smoking has long been suggested by epidemiological data. We examined the potential behavioral interactions between ethanol and nicotine using ethanol-induced motor incoordination as the test response in mice. Effect of pretreatment of various doses of (-)-nicotine, (-)-cotinine, a major metabolite of nicotine, and (+)-nicotine administered ICV on ethanol (IP)-induced motor incoordination was investigated. (-)-Nicotine (0.19, 0.38, 0.77 and, 1.54 nmoles ICV) produced significant attenuation of motor incoordination due to ethanol (2 g/kg IP) in a nearly dose-related manner which was blocked by ICV hexamethonium and trimethaphan, both purported nicotinic antagonists. (-)-Cotinine (0.35, 0.70, 1.41 nmole ICV) produced similar attenuation but was les potent than (-)-nicotine. Attenuation by (+)-nicotine (0.19, 0.38, and 0.77 nmoles ICV) was also significant but only at 0.77 nmole dose level. (+)-Nicotine-induced attenuation of motor incoordination by ethanol was antagonized by nicotinic antagonists. Data obtained suggest a central behavioral interaction between ethanol and nicotine at least through the participation of cholinergic nicotinic receptors.

Alcoholic Intoxication↗

PubMed1993

Brain adenosinergic modulation of acute ethanol-induced motor impairment.

A striking similarity in the pharmacology of ethanol and adenosine provided circumstantial evidence for possible modulation by brain adenosine of the CNS effects of ethanol. We were first to report that ethanol-induced motor impairment is modulated by brain adenosine. Further studies showed that ethanol-induced motor impairment is modulated by adenosine centrally rather by a peripheral hemodynamic change, in part, because icv-injected [3H]R-PIA did not escape into peripheral circulation. Within the cerebellum ethanol-induced motor impairment is functionally related to an increase in the maximum number of adenosine receptors, an inhibition of adenosine uptake, an increase in adenosine release and, in an adenosine-sensitive manner, with a decrease in glutamate release. Although A2 receptor affinity and A2/A1 affinity ratio correlate better with the ED50 of adenosine agonists to accentuate ethanol-induced motor impairment, the high affinity cerebellar A1 receptors appear equally important, in part, because R-PIA vs S-PIA showed 40-fold greater potency in accentuating ethanol-induced motor impairment. Recent data from this laboratory point toward the presence of specific adenosinergic sites in the cerebellum which modulate ethanol-induced motor impairment through adenosine A1 receptors, the latter appear coupled via Gi protein to AC-cAMP system. These data further support our hypothesis that brain adenosine modulates ethanol-induced motor impairment.

Adenosine↗