PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

M S Kochar

Publications and source records attributed to M S Kochar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Response to a second single antihypertensive agent used as monotherapy for hypertension after failure of the initial drug. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.

BACKGROUND: An important issue in clinical practice is how to treat patients whose blood pressure does not respond to the first antihypertensive drug selected. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the antihypertensive response of patients who had failed to achieve their diastolic blood pressure goal (< 90 mm Hg at the end of 8 to 12 weeks of titration) with one of six randomly allocated drugs or placebo to the random allocation of an alternate drug. METHODS: We initially randomized 1292 men with diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 109 mm Hg to treatment with hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, captopril, clonidine hydrochloride, diltiazem hydrochloride (sustained release), prazosin hydrochloride, or placebo. Of 410 men in whom initial treatment failed, 352 qualified for randomization to the alternate drug. RESULTS: Of the 352 patients, 173 (49.1%) achieved their goal diastolic blood pressure, in 133 (37.8%) the alternate drug failed, and 46 (13.1%) left the study for various reasons. Overall response rates were as follows: diltiazem, 63%; clonidine, 59%; prazosin, 47%; hydrochlorothiazide, 46%; atenolol, 41%; and captopril, 37%. The best response rate for patients in whom hydrochlorothiazide failed was achieved with diltiazem (70%); after atenolol failure, clonidine (86%); after captopril failure, prazosin (54%); after clonidine failure, diltiazem (100%); after diltiazem failure, captopril (67%); and after prazosin failure, clonidine (53%). The combined response rate for patients initially randomized to an active treatment was 76.0%, which is similar to that achieved by the combination of two drugs in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that sequential single-drug therapy is a rational approach for treatment of hypertension in patients in whom initial drug therapy has failed.

Adult

Sequential monotherapy of hypertension.

In most cases, the antihypertensive therapy for an individual patient is selected through a process of trial and error. This study determined if, by treating each hypertensive patient sequentially, with six antihypertensive drugs, one from each of the major classes, one could decide on the best possible drug for control of hypertension. In a randomized open-label crossover study, 19 patients (16 male and 3 female), 28-70 years of age with a sitting diastolic blood pressure of 95-110 mm Hg were given atenolol, captopril, clonidine, indapamide, prazosin, and verapamil in a sequential manner. Each drug was started at the minimum recommended or lower dose and titrated upwards every 2 weeks, if well tolerated, until blood pressure was controlled (diastolic BP < 90 mm Hg). If blood pressure was controlled, the drug was continued for another 2 weeks. A washout period of at least 2 weeks was allowed between drugs. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced significantly with all of the six drugs. In 18 of the 19 patients, blood pressure was controlled with at least one of six drugs, frequently with the lowest dose. The authors conclude that if hypertension is not controlled with the lowest recommended dose of a drug, other antihypertensive drugs should be tried sequentially rather than increasing the dose or adding a second drug.

Adult

The provision of patient and family education.

Health-care professionals no longer have the option on whether or not to include patient health education into patient care. The U.S. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO) requires that patient and family education is provided in specifically identified areas. In order for health providing institutions to be approved, these standards must be met. Health-care providers, however, should realize that patient health education (PHE) can be delivered in a variety of ways and JCAHO does not set conditions as to which methods of delivery are applied. Several modes of PHE approaches are cited in this article, along with an example as to how to put them into practice.

Delivery of Health Care

Hypertension in elderly patients. The special concerns in this growing population.

Hypertension is quite common in the elderly population. Isolated systolic hypertension and diastolic hypertension are associated with cardiovascular complications. Like younger patients, the elderly may have labile hypertension. On the other hand, pseudohypertension, auscultatory gap, and postural hypotension are peculiar to the elderly. Obesity, atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis, baroreceptor insensitivity, decline in renal function, physical inactivity, and insomnia are factors that can lead to or aggravate hypertension in older patients. Secondary hypertension should be suspected if elevated blood pressure first appears late in life or becomes resistant to previously adequate treatment. Spontaneous hypokalemia can indicate primary aldosteronism. Elevation in the serum creatinine level of a patient taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor suggests bilateral renovascular hypertension. The goal of antihypertensive therapy is to prevent morbidity, disability, and death from complications and to maintain quality of life. Psychosocial factors may play an important role in controlling hypertension. Nonpharmacologic treatment, such as weight loss, salt restriction, and exercise, should always be tried prior to and in conjunction with medical therapy. Antihypertensive drugs often cause side effects and should be prescribed with caution. Always start with a low dose and gradually increase it if necessary. All drugs that reduce blood pressure in the younger individual also work in the elderly. ACE inhibitors and calcium blockers are particularly useful because of their low incidence of adverse effects.

Aged

A comparison of the safety of therapeutically equivalent doses of isradipine and diltiazem for treatment of essential hypertension.

We compared the safety of a new dihydropyridine calcium entry blocker, isradipine, with an equipotent dose of diltiazem in 174 mild hypertensives (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 95 to 105 mm Hg). After appropriate washout and placebo periods, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1.25 mg isradipine twice daily (Group I) or 40 mg diltiazem thrice daily (Group D). If DBP remained above 90 mm Hg, doses were increased to a maximum of 5 mg isradipine twice daily or 120 mg diltiazem thrice daily. Active therapy was given for a total of 12 weeks. Only 18 patients (nine from each group) did not complete the protocol. The patients were well-matched at baseline with a mean BP of 149/100 mm Hg for those who were randomized to isradipine and completed the protocol and 153/99 mm Hg for the diltiazem group. The responses to each drug were excellent with 72% of the isradipine patients and 73% of the diltiazem group having DBP less than 90 mm Hg at the completion of the study. Of the 156 patients who completed the protocol, only 18 patients (ten in Group I and eight in Group D) failed to respond. Both drugs were well-tolerated. No adverse reactions were reported by 68 percent of the patients in Group I and 65% of those in Group D. The most common side effect was headache (9.0% in Group I and 7.8% in Group D) followed by fatigue (5.2% in Group I and 3.9% in Group D). Age and race did not predict response to either agent but men responded slightly better to diltiazem than women. We conclude that isradipine and diltiazem are equally well tolerated and can be used successfully as a monotherapy to treat hypertension in a wide variety of patients.

Adult

Effects of reduction in dose and discontinuation of hydrochlorothiazide in patients with controlled essential hypertension.

We studied the effects of a reduction in dose of hydrochlorothiazide from 50 to 25 mg/d, and its discontinuation for up to 22 months in 36 well-controlled hypertensive patients. Hydrochlorothiazide was discontinued if the diastolic blood pressure remained less than or equal to 94 mm Hg after a 6-month period on the lower dose of hydrochlorothiazide. No other changes were made in medications or diet. Sitting systolic blood pressure rose from 135 +/- 15 mm Hg to 140 +/- 14 mm Hg on reduction of the hydrochlorothiazide dose and rose still further to 145 +/- 20 mm Hg on discontinuation. Even greater increases in standing blood pressure were observed. There were no significant effects on the diastolic blood pressure with reduction of dose or discontinuation of hydrochlorothiazide. A significant decrease in the serum uric acid and a rise in serum potassium occurred. There were no changes in serum glucose or lipids on reduction in the dose of hydrochlorothiazide; whereas, with discontinuation, the serum lipids and hemoglobin A1C fell significantly. These results suggest that the benefits of a reduced dose of hydrochlorothiazide may not be as great as considered heretofore.

Adult

Mentors in graduate medical education at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

In 1988, 40 senior faculty members at the Medical College of Wisconsin were surveyed to determine their perceptions of the extent and benefits of mentor relationships between faculty and residents. Seventy-eight percent thought mentor activity was feasible in their own departments; however, only 18% felt that a majority of residents in their departments had a mentor. Seventy-five percent reported having been a mentor, and 90% indicated they had a mentor either currently or previously. All 25 faculty who reported having a mentor felt that this arrangement had assisted them in their career advancement, 88% reported it had enhanced their personal development, and 72% indicated the relationship had helped them deal with stress. The mentor relationship appears to have significant benefits for the medical trainee and should be promoted.

Attitude of Health Personnel

Control of hypertension among diabetic patients.

We reviewed the data on 100 randomly selected patients who were treated for diabetes as well as hypertension in the Hypertension Clinic of the Zablocki VA Medical Center. We found that, while normal blood pressure (diastolic BP less than 90 mmHg) was achieved in 82% of the patients during the 3-year follow-up, diabetes control (fasting serum glucose less than 140 mg/dL during all follow-up visits) was achieved in only 17% of the patients. Despite extensive and repeated dietary counselling by dietitians, most patients failed to lose weight. The current methods employed to get the patients to lose weight are inadequate. Better methods are needed to achieve weight loss which could accomplish greater control of diabetes as well as hypertension.

Aged

Suicide and the stress of residency training: a case report and review of the literature.

Suicide rates among physicians have been reported to be twice that of the general adult population. Few data are available, however, regarding suicide among resident physicians. A case study of the suicide of a male intern is discussed. The literature is reviewed to elucidate potential contributory factors including reported causes and manifestations of stress among resident physicians, suicide rates among physicians including house staff with considerations of sex, and common personality characteristics of physicians and medical students. Recommendations are extended which may assist in early recognition and treatment of individuals at risk of impairment and suicide.

Adult

An evaluation of mood states among first-year residents.

To examine the need for preventive and treatment interventions, a prevalence study was conducted to ascertain the rate of depressive symptomatology and other negative mood states among 112 first-year residents. The participation rate was 54%. Subjects (N = 61) were administered the Beck Depression Inventory and Profile of Mood States in personal interview sessions. The Profile measures five negative mood states, namely, "tension-anxiety," "depression-dejection," "anger-hostility," "fatigue-inertia," "confusion-bewilderment," and one positive state, "vigor-activity." A 15.5% rate of depression was found, which is lower than a rate of 23.5%, also measured by Beck's inventory, among a sample of university undergraduates and 19.9% among an adult sample from the general population. No differences were observed among residency programs or sex on Beck's scale; however, significantly higher scores were found for women on the "depression-dejection" dimension of the Profile. The mean scores on all negative mood dimensions of the Profile were below the mean for university undergraduate norms. Neither sleep nor hours worked over the past week were associated with increased Beck scores. These results indicate that sleep deprivation and long work hours did not contribute to depression among the subjects who participated in the study. Female interns, however, appear to be at increased risk of depression, and adequate support systems need to be provided.

Depression

Comparison of nifedipine and propranolol used in combination with diuretics for the treatment of hypertension.

One hundred patients participated in a double-blind, randomized study to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of sustained-release nifedipine and propranolol in hypertensive patients whose diastolic blood pressure exceeded 95 mm Hg while receiving diuretic therapy. Nifedipine (mean dose, 79.6 mg per day) decreased blood pressure by 11.4/10.5 mm Hg; propranolol (mean dose, 198.4 mg per day) decreased blood pressure by 13.5/10.3 mm Hg. Reduction of diastolic blood pressure to below 90 mm Hg was achieved in 63 percent of nifedipine-treated patients and in 57 percent of propranolol-treated patients. Nifedipine therapy was associated with an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and a decrease in serum triglyceride levels. In contrast, propranolol therapy was associated with a decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and an increase in serum triglyceride levels. Nifedipine is as effective as propranolol in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension whose blood pressure is inadequately controlled by diuretic therapy.

Adult

Controlled multicenter study of the antihypertensive effects of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of 394 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Lisinopril (LIS) is a lysine analog of enalaprilat, the active metabolite of enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI). Unlike enalapril, the precursor of enalaprilat, LIS is not a prodrug but has equal ACEI efficacy and potency and a slightly longer duration of action after oral administration. Short-term (12 weeks) and long-term (24 weeks) blood pressure control has been studied with LIS, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), and LIS + HCTZ when given once a day. Drug treatment had three phases: (i) 2-4 weeks of single-blind placebo washout; (ii) 12 weeks of double-blind comparison therapy with LIS 20, 40, and 80 mg vs. HCTZ 12.5, 25, and 50 mg, vs. LIS + HCTZ 20 + 12.5, 40 + 25, and 80 + 50 mg; (iii) 13-24 weeks single-blind LIS vs. LIS + HCTZ. Starting double-blind therapy at the lowest dose, all three groups doubled the dose at weeks 4 and 8 if BP was not controlled with sitting diastolic BP (SDBP) less than 90 mm Hg. At the end of 12 weeks of double-blind therapy, uncontrolled HCTZ-only and LIS-only treatment groups were advanced to combination LIS + HCTZ therapy but uncontrolled LIS + HCTZ patients were dropped. Mean BP reductions (systolic/diastolic, mm Hg) for all three groups after 12 weeks of double-blind comparison therapy were: (i) LIS (n = 162), -16.6/-12.5; (ii) HCTZ (n = 155), -10.4/-6.8; (iii) LIS + HCTZ (n = 74), -23.9/-18.2 with p less than 0.01 for all groups compared to baseline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult