PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M S Loop

Publications and source records attributed to M S Loop.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1994

Visual suppression and its effect upon color and luminance sensitivity.

Psychophysical increment thresholds were compared for periods of phenomenological dominance or suppression produced by different stimulation of the two eyes. Three experimental procedures were used; binocular rivalry, permanent suppression and flash suppression. The amount of suppression produced by each procedure was evaluated under conditions intended to accentuate color or luminance system contribution to the detection of a spectral flash. All three procedures resulted in a different pattern of color and luminance suppression. Binocular rivalry suppressed color sensitivity more than luminance and within color, blue (439 nm) sensitivity was more suppressed than red (613 nm). Permanent suppression resulted in a similar pattern of suppression but only blue color sensitivity was reliably more suppressed than luminance sensitivity. Flash suppression produced distinctly different results such that blue color sensitivity was reliably less suppressed than luminance or red color sensitivity, which were not different from each other. Taken together these results provide clues as to where and when the physiological processes mediating visual suppression may be found in the nervous system.

Color Perception↗
PubMed1992

Spectral sensitivity of monocularly deprived cats.

The reports of rod-dominated psychophysical spectral sensitivity from the deprived eye of monocularly lid-sutured (MD) monkeys are intriguing but difficult to reconcile with the absence of any reported deprivation effects in retina. As most studies of MD retina have been from cat, we have examined psychophysically the increment threshold spectral sensitivity of MD cats using both reaction time and simultaneous two-choice behavioral procedures. Although the deprived eyes exhibited an absolute increment threshold sensitivity deficit, both rod and cone spectral sensitivity functions were obtained on large white backgrounds. This normal transition from rod to cone vision, as background luminance increased, was also found in threshold vs. intensity functions. Using their deprived eye, some cats exhibited a rod spectral sensitivity function when a smaller, normally photopic, background was used providing some support for a hypothesis that the rod-dominated spectral sensitivity observed in monkey may represent detection of scattered stimulus light. Alternatively monocular deprivation may reveal a rod-dominated mechanism which exists in monkey but not in cat.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Luminance sensitivity recovers quickly in monocularly deprived cats.

We measured increment thresholds, using a reaction time or two-choice behavioral technique, in three cats monocularly deprived of normal vision for 14-16 months. Luminance increment thresholds could be obtained as early as nine days after lid opening and improved by 0.5-2.0 log units over the next few weeks. Also, visual reaction times decreased during the sensitivity improvement. When compared to the data for grating discrimination, these results suggest that visual recovery from monocular deprivation may proceed at different rates for different psychophysical discriminations.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Peripheral field stimulation affects foveal flicker, but not color, sensitivity.

Human observers have different thresholds for flicker detection and color detection of a rapidly flickering spectral stimulus presented on a steady white background. A flickering surround, which did not overlap the stimulus or background, reduced flicker sensitivity but not color sensitivity for both monocular and binocular viewing. However, a flickering surround presented to one eye had no influence upon either color or flicker thresholds of the other eye.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Visual reaction time of cats to different spatial frequencies.

If physiological mechanisms similar to cat Y and X cells explain faster detection of low spatial frequencies by humans, then cats should show the same effect. We have tested this prediction by determining the visual reaction time of cats over a range of spatial frequencies and contrasts by training them to respond quickly when a vertical sine-wave grating was presented. At 50% contrast, the cat's visual reaction time increased monotonically from 0.25-2.0 cpd (cycle/deg). At every spatial frequency tested, the cat's reaction time increased monotonically as contrast decreased. By determining contrast threshold (70% detection) at each spatial frequency, it was possible to determine reaction times for different spatial frequencies at equal physical contrasts and equal "threshold equivalent" contrasts. Some of the cat's faster detection of low spatial frequencies was due to sensitivity differences and some was not. To determine if faster detection of low spatial frequencies was based upon Y cells, we took advantage of the fact that Y cells show a strong peripheral effect while X cells do not. Low and high spatial frequencies were detected in the presence of a flickering (7 Hz) or steady (70 Hz) surround. Surround frequency had no effect upon reaction times to 2.0 cpd but the flickering surround increased reaction times to 0.25 cpd. These results indicate that, in cats, rapid detection of low spatial frequencies is by Y cells and slower detection of high spatial frequencies is by X cells.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Photopic spectral sensitivity of the cat.

1. The psychophysical spectral sensitivity of cats was assessed using a two-choice visual discrimination task by determining increment thresholds and critical flicker frequency on white and chromatic backgrounds. 2. For large increments, on 0.0, 0.3 and 3.0 cd/m2 white backgrounds, the cats were most sensitive to 497 nm indicating that these backgrounds are scotopic. On 30 and 300 cd/m2 white backgrounds, the cats were most sensitive to about 454 and 561 nm indicating that these backgrounds are photopic. Sensitivity to intermediate wave-lengths indicated independent action of 'blue' and 'green' cones. 3. For large increments, thresholds on photopic yellow and magenta backgrounds indicated the additive influence of 'blue' and 'green' cones. 4. Spectral sensitivity functions obtained with a critical flicker frequency criterion of 10 Hz on a 30 cd/m2 white background reflected only the activity of the 'green' cone while at 20 Hz the function reflected an additive contribution of both 'blue' and 'green' cones. 5. For small increments, on a 30 cd/m2 white or 96 cd/m2 orange background, sensitivity reflected only the activity of the 'green' cone. 6. The cat's photopic spectral sensitivity is influenced by the psychophysical test upon which it is based in a manner that is similar to what has been found for other vertebrates. No evidence was found for a 500 nm mechanism active at photopic levels.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1983

Increment thresholds in normal and binocularly deprived cats.

Increment thresholds on a white background were determined for normal and binocularly deprived (BD) cats over a wide luminance range. Threshold vs intensity curves had a slope of unity for both groups but the increment threshold (delta I/I) for normal cats was 0.09 while increment threshold for BD cats was 0.60. Absolute threshold was reliably better in normal cats. the deficit of BD cats is considered a potential result of their abnormal cortical physiology and/or abnormal lateral geniculate physiology.

Animals↗
PubMed1982

Evidence for luminance and quasi-sustained color mechanisms.

Reaction time distributions were determined in response to near-threshold intensity increments predicted to isolate either the opponent-color or luminance system. The reaction time histograms show a clear distinction between when the chromatic and achromatic systems detect the stimulus. Our results are consistent with previous reports suggesting the achromatic system is more sensitive to higher temporal frequencies than the chromatic system.

Color Perception↗
PubMed1982

Critical flicker frequency in monocularly deprived cats.

Critical flicker frequency (CFF) was determined for both eyes of long-term monocularly deprived (MD) cats over a wide luminance range. Although MD cats could discriminate flicker before and after lid opening, CFF of the deprived eye (30 Hz) was much lower than CFF of the non-deprived eye (40 Hz) and the CFF of the non-deprived eye was lower than a normal cat's monocular CFF (58 Hz). The CFF deficit of the deprived eye became less pronounced at low luminance levels. The observation (and magnitude) of a CFF deficit for the deprived eye is compatible with the reports of a Y-cell loss in LGNd. The CFF deficit of the non-deprived eye has no obvious explanation.

Animals↗
PubMed1982

Temporal contrast sensitivity in amblyopia.

Temporal contrast sensitivity functions were determined for the normal (20/20) and amblyopic eyes of five strabismic and/or anisometropic amblyopes and for both eyes of two nonamblyopes. In deep amblyopia (20/100+), contrast sensitivity was reduced at all temporal frequencies in the amblyopic eye, whereas no deficit was observed for subjects whose acuity was 20/40 or better. This result indicates that reduced temporal sensitivity is a significant component of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia.

Adult↗
PubMed1981

Critical flicker fusion in Siamese cats.

Critical flicker fusion was determined over a wide luminance range for six Siamese and four normal cats. The Siamese cats had the lowest CFF at all luminance levels when compared to normal and binocularly deprived (BD) cats. The Siamese cat's inferior temporal resolution is most likely due to their profound y-cell loss because (1) CFF is proportional to y-cell population across normal, BD, and Siamese cats; and (2) unlike BD cats, the visual cortex of Siamese cats is comparatively normal. The implication of this finding for the CFF of dark-reared cats and normal cats viewing a stimulus which does not stimulate y-cell is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1981

Acuity, luminance, and monocular deprivation in the cat.

Visual acuity was determined for both eyes of long-term monocular-deprived cats over a wide luminance range. The influence of luminance on the rate of pattern vision recovery was also examined. Unlike strabismic humans and cats, the acuity deficit of monocularly deprived cats is not luminance dependent. This acuity is much worse at all luminance levels in the deprived eye. Likewise, initial testing of the deprived eye at low luminance levels does not facilitate recovery of pattern vision. Therefore, monocular lid fusion results in a visual deficit that differs from the effects of strabismus but resembles the effects of anisometropia in man.

Animals↗
PubMed1980

Visual acuity following binocular deprivation in the cat.

Threshold visual acuity for three cats which were reared from birth to 4--12 months of age with bilateral lid closure was measured and compared to visual acuity in three cats which had the use of a non-deprived eye. The results indicate that binocular deprivation (BD) results in significant deficits in visual acuity which are proportional to the duration of deprivation. Threshold visual acuities were 3.7 cycles/deg. following 4 months of BD, 3.25 cycles/deg. following 7 months of BD and 2.55 cycles/deg. following 12 months of BD compared to acuities of 6.0, 6.5 and 6.8 cycles/deg9 for cats using a non-deprived eye. All BD cats had recovered from the initial visuomotor deficits, seen in these cats and reported in the literature, following lid-parting. The implication of such deficits in visual acuity on visual discrimination learning in BD cats is discussed.

Animals↗