PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M S Soloway

Publications and source records attributed to M S Soloway.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Results of a multicenter trial using the BTA test to monitor for and diagnose recurrent bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We compare the Bard BTA (bladder tumor antigen) test to voided cytology studies in patients undergoing surveillance cystoscopy for recurrent bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, blinded, multicenter trial was performed. RESULTS: A total of 499 patients underwent 1,014 cystoscopic examinations and tumor was identified in 151. The bladder tumor antigen test was more sensitive than cytology studies in detecting recurrent cancer (p < 0.001), being positive in 61 cases versus 25 for cytology. The trial in healthy volunteers and nonurological patients estimates bladder tumor antigen test specificity to be 95.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The bladder tumor antigen test is a simple, rapid and inexpensive adjunct to cystoscopy, and the results are equivalent or superior to those of voided cytology as performed in this trial.

Adult↗

Quality of life 12 months after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of radical prostatectomy (RP) upon quality of life (QOL) in patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with prostate cancer were recruited to evaluate the impact of RP upon QOL. The patients comprised two groups: the first group (n = 51) was evaluated 12 months or longer after RP; and the second group (n = 28) was evaluated 1 month prior to RP. All patients completed two previously reported QOL measures: the Functional Living Index Cancer (FLIC) and Profile of Mood States (POMS), and a series of questions which evaluated bladder, bowel and sexual function. RESULTS: Comparison of patients before RP with those after RP at 12 month follow-up revealed significant (P < 0.05) deterioration in sexual function, continence and hardship scores following RP while tension scores improved significantly. Although 10 other subscale parameters were analysed, no other differences were observed. Of the 51 post-RP patients, 46 (90%) stated that given a choice they would have their surgery again. CONCLUSION: The results reported show that RP has minimal overall impact upon patient QOL. Although minimal voiding and bowel dysfunction was reported, many patients were dissatisfied with post-operative sexual function.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Bladder neck preservation following radical prostatectomy: continence and margins.

Between December 1991 and January 1994, 134 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation. Forty-nine patients had a positive margin. Number and location of positive margins were analyzed. A tumor was identified at the bladder neck in 10 cases (7.5%). In all 10 patients with bladder neck involvement, a tumor was also identified at multiple other sites. These data suggest that preservation of the bladder neck during radical prostatectomy does not appear to compromise the efficacy of the procedure. Using a self-administered patient questionnaire, we evaluated the effect of bladder neck preservation upon continence in 36 patients. At the initial 3-month follow-up, 24 (67%) patients did not wear any pads. Another 7 (19%) wore pads occasionally, while 5 (14%) patients wore pads daily. To date only 1 of the 134 patients has developed an anastomotic stricture. Bladder neck preservation may aid in an earlier return of continence following radical prostatectomy and reduces anastomotic strictures. It does not appear to compromise the removal of the cancer.

Humans↗

Randomized prospective study comparing radical prostatectomy alone versus radical prostatectomy preceded by androgen blockade in clinical stage B2 (T2bNxM0) prostate cancer. The Lupron Depot Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: Nonrandomized clinical trials have suggested that preoperative androgen deprivation can decrease the likelihood of positive surgical margins in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. A multicenter prospective randomized trial compared radical prostatectomy alone to radical prostatectomy after 3 months of leuprolide acetate depot and flutamide in patients with stage cT2bNxM0 prostate cancer and a serum prostate specific antigen level less than 50 ng./ml. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomized 149 patients to undergo androgen deprivation and 138 to undergo lymphadenectomy with (137) or without (1) prostatectomy. Of the 154 patients randomized to the surgery alone group 144 underwent pelvic node dissection with (138) or without (6) prostatectomy. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in operating time, blood loss, need for transfusion, postoperative morbidity or length of hospital stay. There were 4 rectal and 2 ureteral injuries in the surgery alone group and none in the pretreatment group (p < 0.05). Patients who received androgen deprivation preoperatively had a significantly lower rate of capsule penetration (47% versus 78%, p < 0.001), positive surgical margins (18% versus 48%, p < 0.001) and tumor at the urethral margin (6% versus 17%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term followup data will be needed to determine whether there will be a lower incidence of biochemical relapse as determined by prostate specific antigen, local recurrence or metastasis, with an improvement in patient survival.

Aged↗

Results of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and the effect of chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Radical cystectomy continues to be one of the primary modalities of treatment for locally advanced bladder cancer. However, long-term survival after cystectomy has improved only marginally in the last decade, and still, nearly half of the patients die from the disease within 5 years. Adjuvant treatments such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy have been used, but a clear advantage has not been demonstrated. METHODS: The authors reviewed 130 patients who underwent radical cystectomy by the same surgeon as treatment for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Morbidity, postoperative mortality, overall survival time, and accuracy of clinical staging as well as the effect of perioperative chemotherapy were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall actuarial survival rate at 2, 5, and 10 years was 80%, 53%, and 45%, respectively. The survival rate based on T-classification at 5 years was 82%, 65%, and 28% for less than pT2, pT2, and greater than pT2, respectively. Regional lymph node status had a significant effect on survival. The 5-year survival rate for all patients with negative nodes was 65%, whereas patients with positive nodes had a 18% 5-year survival rate. The overall clinical staging error was 61.5%, with 41.5% of the cancers understaged. Of the patients with cTis, 60% were found to be of greater extent than pT1 tumors. No apparent survival advantage was noted for those patients who received perioperative chemotherapy when compared with patients who were followed conservatively or received chemotherapy upon relapse. These results, however, are not conclusive because this was an observation study and the number of patients was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Only a modest improvement in survival time after radical cystectomy has been observed in the last decade, despite the use of adjuvant treatments such as radiation and chemotherapy. The pathologic (pT) classification is the most accurate prognostic indicator. Clinical errors in classification are common and impair the evaluation of neoadjuvant treatments. A high incidence of invasive tumors of greater extent than pT1 was found among patients with clinical cTis; this supports an aggressive approach when these patients do not respond promptly to intravesical chemotherapy. Prospective randomized studies are needed to evaluate objectively the benefit of perioperative adjuvant treatment in locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Aged↗

Androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy for T2b and T3 prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to improve on the results of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T2b and T3 prostate cancer, a selected group of patients received androgen deprivation for three to sixteen months prior to surgery. METHODS: Fifteen men with clinical T2b and 22 with small T3 tumors received a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (n = 34) or a bilateral orchiectomy (n = 3) three to sixteen months prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy. The prostate was evaluated with particular attention to tumor grade, presence of extracapsular extension, tumor at the inked margin, seminal vesicle invasion, and tumor in the lymph nodes. RESULTS: No patient had clinical or chemical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) progression during androgen deprivation. The PSA level declined a mean 90 percent and remained above 4 ng/mL in only two patients. The prostate volume decreased an estimated 30-50 percent. Prostate cancer at the inked margin was found in 15 (41%) and seminal vesicle involvement in 11 (30%) patients. Five (14%) had tumor in regional lymph nodes. There was no difference in regard to positive margins or lymph node metastases between those clinically staged as T2b and those preoperatively staged as T3. Fourteen patients have received adjuvant therapy (13 androgen deprivation, one radiation therapy). None has progressed (mean follow-up, 38.4 months). Of 23 who did not receive immediate additional therapy, six (26%) had progression, as was evident from an increase in PSA and have since been treated. Only one continued to progress. Thirty-five of the 37 patients are alive. Seventeen (46%) are tumor free (PSA < 0.4 ng/mL) without further androgen deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Only a prospective randomized trial can determine whether androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy has a role. The results from this trial are encouraging for several reasons. The prostate is much smaller as a result of androgen deprivation and this may facilitate surgery. Although the great majority of these patients were expected to be margin positive, 60 percent had negative margins and only 14 percent had positive lymph nodes.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

Stage T1A carcinoma of prostate.

When presented with a post-TURP patient with pathologically confirmed Stage T1a disease, several points should be considered (Fig. 1). Is the patient's anticipated longevity and quality-of-life likely to be affected by the confirmed diagnosis? From current knowledge, men over the age of seventy or with co-morbid risk factors probably will not be adversely affected, and no treatment is required apart from expectant follow-up with semiannual DRE and serum PSA determinations. The group at risk seems to be the young patient with a Stage T1a tumor who is likely to survive more than ten years after the diagnosis. Data showing progression rates without treatment as high as 16-25 percent at eight to ten years seem to indicate the need for additional therapy. If the patient belongs to this category and is ready to pursue more aggressive treatment, reestablishing the diagnosis might be suggested, as well as an evaluation of the pre- and post-TUR PSA levels. This can be done by TRUS-guided biopsies of the prostate (or repeat TURP, which we regard as less preferable). If residual tumor is not found, we would counsel a "wait and see" approach. If subsequent tissue sampling identifies other than well-differentiated cancer or indicates the likelihood of more extensive cancer than the T1a staging, treatment would be suggested. If the restaging reveals some residual well-differentiated disease that would not alter the initial staging of T1a, the patient should be offered the alternatives of close monitoring, radical prostatectomy, or radiation therapy. Until prognostic factors such as DNA ploidy and nuclear roundness are better studied, we are unable to counsel the patient on the biologic significance/aggressiveness of his Stage T1a disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens. How much is adequate?

Prostate glands from 52 patients with clinical stage B carcinoma were examined using two sampling techniques. After fixation and conization of the apical portions, each gland was serially sectioned with sections mounted whole on oversized glass slides and examined for pathologic features of prognostic importance. A second examination was subsequently conducted on the same tissue using only alternate sections. No differences in tumor type, grade, Gleason score, multiplicity, or capsular penetration were detected in 75% of cases. The discrepancies that did occur were most often minor variations in multiplicity and Gleason score. Of the 20 glands with capsular penetration observed with the serial sectioning method, 17 (85%) were detected using alternate sectioning. The surgical margin was involved in two of the three invasive foci that would have been missed. Although the topography is better displayed, the authors' examinations indicated no significant advantage to whole mount sections compared with sections mounted on standard-sized glass slides. Considering the most effective use of resources, as well as the current modalities available for patient monitoring, the results support the use of an alternate sectioning method for pathologic examination of specimens removed for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Carcinoma↗

Management of ureteral and renal pelvic recurrence after cystectomy.

Relatively few data are available on UT TCC following cystectomy. In most circumstances nephroureterectomy is the treatment of choice. The risk of bilateral disease is small (2% to 4%); however, in patients with bilateral UT TCC, a solitary kidney, or poor renal function and low-stage, low-grade TCC, renal preservation by local resection and/or topical therapy may be effective. In high-grade or high-stage disease, whenever feasible nephroureterectomy should be performed.

Carcinoma, Transitional Cell↗

Prognostic factors in metastatic prostate cancer.

Androgen deprivation therapy is the initial treatment choice for metastatic disease. When enrolling patients into androgen deprivation trials, it is important to consider stratification of enrollees based on prognostic factors that have been identified as important in determining the likelihood of response. Prognostic factors are also helpful in identifying which patients are less likely to respond to treatment; this information also would help to counsel patients. Performance status is an important prognostic factor; however, its impact is minimal because the great majority of men who receive treatment for advanced disease have a normal performance status. Hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, and a semiquantitative grading scale for the number of metastatic foci on the bone scan are useful prognostic factors. The pretreatment serum testosterone level is a powerful prognostic factor. Patients with a low serum testosterone level have a shorter progression-free survival than men whose pretreatment serum testosterone level is above normal. The prognostic importance of pretreatment serum testosterone level has been evaluated in studies using treatment methods that lower this level to castrate levels. Recently, we found that serum testosterone level was not a prognostic factor for men taking the nonsteroidal antiandrogen, Casodex (Zeneca, Wilmington, DE), which does not alter the serum testosterone level. The pretreatment serum prostatic-specific antigen also is a prognostic factor. This antigen may be the best single method for monitoring patients in regard to response to or progression following therapy. The return of the prostatic-specific antigen level to normal (< 4 ng/ml), or the decline in the prostatic-specific antigen level of > 90% indicates a prolonged progression-free survival. In the future, it will be interesting to incorporate both the initial prognostic factors as well as monitor the prostatic-specific antigen into a multivariate analysis, which will be highly predictive of a man's response to treatment.

Acid Phosphatase↗

Prognostic factors in stage D2 prostate cancer treated with a pure nonsteroidal antiandrogen.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic factors have been shown to be important when stratifying patients with prostate cancer into randomized trials and counseling the individual patient regarding his chances of response to treatment. However, there are no reports on prognostic factors in patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer treated with a pure antiandrogen as monotherapy. METHODS: The authors studied a variety of possible prognostic factors among 150 patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with an antiandrogen (Casodex, Imperial Chemical Industries, Wilmington, DE). RESULTS: In a univariate analysis, performance status; extent of disease (EOD); pretreatment hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) levels; and extent of disease (EOD) on bone scan all were found to be significant prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Pretreatment serum testosterone levels, identified as one of the most important prognostic factors, was not identified as significant in the current study. CONCLUSIONS: Although the pretreatment testosterone level was shown to be an important prognostic factor in previous studies, using other modes of androgen ablation (reducing testosterone to below castrate levels), the current study suggest it may not be a helpful factor if the therapy used is antiandrogens as monotherapy. This may relate to the different mode of action of antiandrogens, which do not reduce serum testosterone levels.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Antiandrogenic agents as monotherapy in advanced prostatic carcinoma.

Pure antiandrogens have a quality-of-life advantage over other androgen ablation methods in the treatment of patients with prostatic cancer because they do not reduce the serum testosterone and therefore do not have a marked inhibitory effect on libido and potency. The long half-life of two of the three currently studied pure antiandrogens permits once-a-day administration, which should enhance patient compliance. With continued administration, there is a gradual rise in serum testosterone, and the clinical impact of this requires additional study using randomized Phase III trials. Proper stratification of patients at entry into such studies with documentation of various prognostic factors will add statistical value and enable physicians to draw better conclusion on the relative efficacy of these agents.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Cigarette smoking: a review of possible associations with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer.

There are conflicting data on the effect of cigarette smoking on serum levels of the various sex hormones. Some studies suggest that cigarette smoke produces an antiestrogenic effect. Smoking may also affect the metabolism of other sex steroids such as testosterone and adrenal hormones, and thereby influence the incidence of benign and malignant growth of the prostate. Epidemiologic studies analyzing a possible association between cigarette smoking and prostate cancer are not conclusive, although some show a positive relationship. The etiology of BPH is undoubtedly multifactorial. Estrogens as well as androgens may be involved in the pathogenesis of BPH. There are several studies that indicate that cigarette smokers have a lower likelihood of requiring surgery for BPH. Growth of the prostate may not correlate with serum levels of androgens and estrogens. The local hormonal milieu of the target cells in the prostate are probably more critical than the more easily measured serum levels. This review examines the literature dealing with cigarette smoking and both BPH and prostate cancer. If there is an effect, then elucidation of the mechanism by which smoking affects the growth of the prostate may improve our understanding of BPH and prostate cancer, and may suggest preventive strategies for high risk groups.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Significance of androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy, with special reference to prostate-specific antigen.

A total of 37 selected patients with clinical stage T2b or T3 prostate cancer received androgen deprivation prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy. A luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analog alone was given to 15 individuals; 19 received an LHRH analog with flutamide. Three underwent bilateral orchiectomy instead of chemical castration. The duration of androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy varied from 3 to 16 months, with 31 individuals undergoing induction therapy for 3-6 months. Three received androgen deprivation for more than 1 year. In all, 15 patients had clinical stage T2b disease and 22, stage T3 prostate cancer. The prostate size decreased approximately 30%-50% following induction therapy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values decreased in all 19 instances where this was obtained. In all, 6 of 15 (40%) patients with clinical T2b lesions and 9 of 22 (41%) with clinical T3 tumors had a positive surgical margin; 5 (13%) had 1 or more positive lymph nodes. Androgen deprivation was continued following surgery in 13 cases. Only one patient received postoperative radiation therapy. After a mean follow-up period of 33 months, 35 (95%) patients are alive. Two patients died, one of poorly differentiated prostate cancer with subsequent metastasis and one of a myocardial infarction 33 months after surgery without showing any evidence of disease. Of 23 patients without postoperative adjuvant therapy, 6 (26.1%) progressed (PSA level, > 0.4 ng/ml). None of the patients who underwent adjuvant therapy progressed over a follow-up period of 6-75 months (mean, 38 months).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

The evaluation and follow-up of patients with Ta, Tcis, and T1 bladder cancer.

Endoscopic evaluation and transurethral resection are the most important steps in the management of patients with bladder cancer. While multifocality is primarily a prognostic factor with respect to tumor recurrence, tumor grade and depth of invasion are prognostic regarding progression in stage. Transurethral resection biopsies of the prostate should always been obtained in patients with high grade tumors. Follow-up of patients should be individualized: patients with risk for progression, but not necessarily for recurrence, should be followed more closely than patients with low-grade tumors and low risk for progression. In this setting cytology is especially helpful because most high-grade tumors will be detected by cytology. Intravesical therapy is indicated in patients with high-grade tumors, carcinoma in-situ and multiple low grade tumors. While there is a growing body of evidence that BCG is superior to intravesical chemotherapy, one also has to take into account the more frequent and more serious side effects of BCG when compared with mitomycin C or thiotepa.

Carcinoma in Situ↗