PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Schull

Publications and source records attributed to M Schull.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients.

CONTEXT: High levels of variation and inefficiency exist in current clinical practice regarding use of cervical spine (C-spine) radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. OBJECTIVE: To derive a clinical decision rule that is highly sensitive for detecting acute C-spine injury and will allow emergency department (ED) physicians to be more selective in use of radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted from October 1996 to April 1999, in which physicians evaluated patients for 20 standardized clinical findings prior to radiography. In some cases, a second physician performed independent interobserver assessments. SETTING: Ten EDs in large Canadian community and university hospitals. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 8924 adults (mean age, 37 years) who presented to the ED with blunt trauma to the head/neck, stable vital signs, and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinically important C-spine injury, evaluated by plain radiography, computed tomography, and a structured follow-up telephone interview. The clinical decision rule was derived using the kappa coefficient, logistic regression analysis, and chi(2) recursive partitioning techniques. RESULTS: Among the study sample, 151 (1.7%) had important C-spine injury. The resultant model and final Canadian C-Spine Rule comprises 3 main questions: (1) is there any high-risk factor present that mandates radiography (ie, age >/=65 years, dangerous mechanism, or paresthesias in extremities)? (2) is there any low-risk factor present that allows safe assessment of range of motion (ie, simple rear-end motor vehicle collision, sitting position in ED, ambulatory at any time since injury, delayed onset of neck pain, or absence of midline C-spine tenderness)? and (3) is the patient able to actively rotate neck 45 degrees to the left and right? By cross-validation, this rule had 100% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 98%-100%) and 42.5% specificity (95% CI, 40%-44%) for identifying 151 clinically important C-spine injuries. The potential radiography ordering rate would be 58.2%. CONCLUSION: We have derived the Canadian C-Spine Rule, a highly sensitive decision rule for use of C-spine radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. If prospectively validated in other cohorts, this rule has the potential to significantly reduce practice variation and inefficiency in ED use of C-spine radiography.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Canadian CT head rule study for patients with minor head injury: methodology for phase II (validation and economic analysis).

Prospective validation on a new set of patients is an essential test of a new decision rule. However, many clinical decision rules are not prospectively assessed to determine their accuracy, reliability, clinical sensibility, or potential impact on practice. This validation process is important because many statistically derived rules or guidelines do not perform well when tested in a new population. The methodologic standards for a validation study are similar to those described in the article on phase I for derivation studies in the August 2001 issue of Annals of Emergency Medicine. The goal of phase II is to prospectively assess the accuracy, reliability, and acceptability of the decision rule in a new set of patients with minor head injury. This will determine the clinical utility of the rule and is essential if such a rule is to be widely adopted into clinical practice.

Canada↗
PubMed2001

The Canadian CT Head Rule Study for patients with minor head injury: rationale, objectives, and methodology for phase I (derivation).

Head injuries are among the most common types of trauma seen in North American emergency departments, with an estimated 1 million cases seen annually. "Minor" head injury (sometimes known as "mild") is defined by a history of loss of consciousness, amnesia, or disorientation in a patient who is conscious and talking, that is, with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15. Although most patients with minor head injury can be discharged without sequelae after a period of observation, in a small proportion, their neurologic condition deteriorates and requires neurosurgical intervention for intracranial hematoma. The objective of the Canadian CT Head Rule Study is to develop an accurate and reliable decision rule for the use of computed tomography (CT) in patients with minor head injury. Such a decision rule would allow physicians to be more selective in their use of CT without compromising care of patients with minor head injury. This paper describes in detail the rationale, objectives, and methodology for Phase I of the study in which the decision rule was derived. [Stiell IG, Lesiuk H, Wells GA, McKnight RD, Brison R, Clement C, Eisenhauer MA, Greenberg GH, MacPhail I, Reardon M, Worthington J, Verbeek R, Rowe B, Cass D, Dreyer J, Holroyd B, Morrison L, Schull M, Laupacis A, for the Canadian CT Head and C-Spine Study Group. The Canadian CT Head Rule Study for patients with minor head injury: rationale, objectives, and methodology for phase I (derivation). Ann Emerg Med. August 2001;38:160-169.]

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Determining appropriateness of coronary thrombolysis in the emergency department.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the appropriateness of decision-making by emergency physicians regarding coronary thrombolysis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients admitted over a period of 13 months from a tertiary care center emergency department with a diagnosis of an acute ischemic coronary syndrome. Both thrombolysed and nonthrombolysed patients were eligible for inclusion. The decisions of emergency physicians to use or not use thrombolytics were compared with standard Canadian guidelines, based on the blinded assessments of two reviewers. Appropriateness was estimated with the use of adjusted kappa statistics, and a hierarchical statistical model was developed to estimate the distribution of appropriate decision-making rates for individual emergency physicians. RESULTS: The overall adjusted kappa for appropriateness was .85 (95% confidence interval [CI], .76 to .94). The appropriateness rate for thrombolysed patients was 80.6% (95% CI, 62.5 to 92.5), and for nonthrombolysed patients it was 97.2% (95% CI, 91.9 to 99.4). The distribution of individual emergency physician appropriateness rates had an estimated mean of 91.3% and a 95% CI of 81.3% to 97.7%. Complication rates were not significantly different from previously published rates. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates excellent agreement between emergency physicians' decisions regarding thrombolysis and standard Canadian guidelines, based on an adjusted kappa statistic. The distribution of individual emergency physician appropriateness rates and the appropriateness rate for nonthrombolysed patients are estimated for the first time.

Adult↗