PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Siffredi

Publications and source records attributed to M Siffredi.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of inhaled furosemide and cromolyn on bronchoconstriction induced by ultrasonically nebulized distilled water in asthmatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled furosemide has been shown recently to produce a protective effect against bronchoconstriction induced by several indirect stimuli, including ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW). Since there is a close parallel between its experimental effects and those reported for cromolyn,/it has been suggested that they may share some common mechanisms of action. Their protective effect, however, has never been compared directly. In this study, therefore, we have investigated the ability of equal doses (30 mg) of inhaled furosemide and cromolyn to modulate bronchoconstriction induced by UNDW in a group of ten asthmatic patients. METHODS: Subjects with documented bronchial response to UNDW were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Treatments were administered five minutes prior to increasing outputs of UNDW and the response was expressed as the provocative output causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PO20, in mL/min) and as the output-response slope. RESULTS: Geometric mean PO20 increased from 1.53 to 4.05 mL/min (P < .0004) after furosemide. After inhaling the highest output of UNDW (5.2 mL/min), PO20 was not measurable in six of ten patients when pretreated with furosemide and in all patients when pretreated with cromolyn. This difference was statistically significant (P < .05). Geometric mean values of output-response slope significantly decreased from 13.6 to 2.97 after furosemide (P < .0001) and from 13.6 to 1.43 (P < .0002) after cromolyn. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that cromolyn has a slightly greater anti-reactive activity in UNDW-induced bronchoconstriction compared to furosemide.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Does aortic regurgitation affect transmitral flow? An echo-Doppler study.

Recent studies suggest that the presence of aortic regurgitation can interfere with Doppler measurement of mitral pressure half-time in patients with mitral stenosis. Amongst the factors affecting the transmitral flow in aortic regurgitation a putative role may be played by the mechanical hit of the aortic regurgitant jet impinging on the anterior mitral leaflet, as is very often seen with Doppler Color Flow examination. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of pure aortic regurgitation on the transmitral flow in patients with normal mitral valves. We studied 35 patients affected by pure chronic aortic regurgitation but with a normal mitral valve and compared them with 30 normal subjects. In all the patients the aortic regurgitant jet was directed toward the anterior mitral leaflet. In all the patients and control subjects a standard echo-Doppler examination was performed, sampling the transmitral flow at the level of the tip of the mitral leaflets. In 7 patients and 11 normal subjects the transmitral flow was also sampled at the level of the mitral annulus. Patients with aortic regurgitation showed significantly higher values of the mitral pressure half-time (61.04 +/- 15.14 vs 50.59 +/- 7.07 ms, P < 0.05) and of the time-velocity integral of the total transmitral flow, while the other parameters of transmitral flow, the mitral annulus diameter and the mitral stroke volume didn't show statistically significant differences. The comparison of the pressure half-time and time-velocity flow values measured at the level of the mitral annulus between patients and normal subjects didn't show significant differences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗