PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Skok

Publications and source records attributed to M Skok.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Structure of epitopes recognized by the antibodies to alpha(181-192) peptides of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: extrapolation to the structure of acetylcholine-binding domain.

Using the alpha(181-192) peptides of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) and Ala-substituted peptide analogues, amino acid residues critical for specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) binding were identified. By means of 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (2D-NMR) analysis followed by molecular modeling, it was found that mAb binding resulted in stabilization of the free alpha3(181-192) peptide flexible conformation yielding an extended structure with residues 6-11 of the peptide being in direct contact with the Ab. Since the Ab binds the native AChR as well, it is suggested that the corresponding fragment of AChR alpha3 subunit is exposed to solution and also appears in extended conformation.

Alanine↗

The effect of loudness imbalance between electrodes in cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the effect of loudness imbalance between electrodes in patients using the 22-electrode cochlear implant (Cochlear Pty Ltd). It was hypothesized that speech perception scores would be greater when the loudness of electrodes was balanced at the comfort (C) levels than when the C levels were unbalanced. DESIGN: Ten adult patients received a monosyllabic word test (CNC) words) in quiet and a sentence test (CUNY sentences) in noise under two conditions: with C levels balanced for equal loudness and with unbalanced C levels. RESULTS: When the C levels across electrodes were pseudo-randomly unbalanced by 0 to +/- 20% of the electrodes' dynamic ranges (20% unbalancing), 6 of the 10 subjects showed a significant drop in sentence perception scores. Of these patients, none had a significant decrease in perception when the degree of unbalancing was halved. Of the four patients who showed no change with 20% unbalancing, three revealed a significant decline in sentence perception when the degree of unbalancing was doubled. There also were significant group effects for phonemes on the word test as well as for sentences in noise for the 20% unbalancing. CONCLUSIONS: The implications for clinical practice are that it is important to balance the C levels and that clinicians should be encouraged to refine methods for setting C levels in very young children, who may be using unbalanced MAPs. Nevertheless, although most patients revealed a statistically significant drop in sentence perception with 20% imbalance of the C levels, the changes in percentage scores often were only small.

Adolescent↗

Speech perception in children using the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy.

The Speak speech-processing strategy, developed by the University of Melbourne and commercialized by Cochlear Pty Limited for use in the new Spectra 22 speech processor, has been shown to provide improved speech perception for adults in both quiet and noisy situations. The present study evaluated the ability of children experienced in the use of the Multipeak (Mpeak) speech-processing strategy (implemented in the Nucleus Minisystem-22 cochlear implant) to adapt to and benefit from the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy (implemented in the Nucleus Spectra 22 speech processor). Twelve children were assessed using Mpeak and Speak over a period of 8 months. All of the children had over 1 year's previous experience with Mpeak, and all were able to score significantly on open-set word and sentence tests using the cochlear implant alone. Children were assessed with both live-voice and recorded speech materials, including Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant monosyllabic words and Speech Intelligibility Test sentences. Assessments were made in both quiet and in noise. Assessments were made at 3-week intervals to investigate the ability of the children to adapt to the new speech-processing strategy. For most of the children, a significant advantage was evident when using the Speak strategy as compared with Mpeak. For 4 of the children, there was no decrement in speech perception scores immediately following fitting with Speak. Eight of the children showed a small (10% to 20%) decrement in speech perception scores for between 3 and 6 weeks following the changeover to Speak. After 24 weeks' experience with Speak, 11 of the children had shown a steady increase in speech perception scores, with final Speak scores higher than for Mpeak. Only 1 child showed a significant decrement in speech perception with Speak, which did not recover to original Mpeak levels.

Adolescent↗