Biomedical subjects

M Stabl

Publications and source records attributed to M Stabl.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1990

Tolerability of moclobemide, a new reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase-A, compared with other antidepressants and placebo.

Moclobemide, a new selective and reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A (RIMA), has been compared with various tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in numerous controlled studies. Pooled data from these studies, comprising 1656 patients, as well as the consideration of individual trials, show that moclobemide is far better tolerated than the TCAs. Its side effects mainly comprise mild degrees of nausea and dizziness at the beginning of treatment in a small proportion of patients. Age and sex do not affect the tolerability of moclobemide: it is equally well tolerated by elderly patients. In 2300 patients treated with moclobemide in doses up to 600 mg/day, without dietary restrictions, there was no tyramine-related hypertensive reaction. It is concluded that moclobemide may be the second-generation antidepressant doctors were waiting for--equally effective as the classical antidepressants but far better tolerated.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Review of comparative clinical trials. Moclobemide vs tricyclic antidepressants and vs placebo in depressive states.

Moclobemide is a reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) which preferentially inhibits type-A MAO. In the present communication the results obtained with moclobemide in various clinical trials are reviewed. To this day, the antidepressant efficacy of moclobemide has been compared to that of placebo in four trials. The antidepressant efficacy of moclobemide (300-600 mg/d; N = 164) was found to be superior to that of placebo (N = 162) and comparable to that of imipramine (100-200 mg/d; N = 164) in a 6-w., double-blind, multicentre study, in patients suffering from a Major Depressive Episode (DSM-III). Two smaller trials, strongly suggest that moclobemide is more efficacious than placebo for the treatment of endogenous depression (ICD-9) and for the treatment of Dysthymic Disorders (DSM-III). The antidepressant efficacy of moclobemide was compared to that of imipramine, desipramine, clomipramine and amitriptyline. The antidepressant efficacy of moclobemide (300-600 mg/d; N = 189) was found to be comparable to that of imipramine (100-200 mg/d; N = 192) in a 4-w., double-blind, multicentre study, in patients suffering from a Major Depressive Episode. This finding is supported by the results obtained in 12 other smaller studies, using either imipramine, desipramine, clomipramine or amitriptyline as comparator drug. When the tolerability of moclobemide, as judged by reported and observed adverse events, is compared to that of placebo, it appears that only nausea is reported significantly more frequently with moclobemide than with placebo (9.5% vs 4.8%). In the trials comparing moclobemide to tricyclic antidepressant drugs (TCAs), the tolerability of moclobemide was constantly found to be superior to that of the TCAs; in particular the incidence of anticholinergic side effects was low with moclobemide and was significantly higher with the TCAs. The cardiovascular tolerability of moclobemide tended to be superior to that of the TCAs. Physical examination, hematology and clinical chemistry did not seem to be affected by treatment in any of the studies summarized in this review.

Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic↗

PubMed1989

Efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide compared with imipramine in depressive disorder (DSM-III): an Austrian double-blind, multicentre study.

The antidepressant efficacy, tolerability, and safety of moclobemide, a reversible, monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor, were compared with those of imipramine in parallel groups of patients with a major depressive episode, in a 4-week, multicentre (17 centres), randomised study. A total of 381 patients were randomly allocated to either treatment; they were not required to avoid tyramine-rich foods. Drop-out rates were comparable in both groups at about 17%. Judged primarily on the HRSD, no significant differences in efficacy were observed between the groups, but the number of patients presenting with adverse events, as well as the total number of adverse events, was greater with imipramine. Cardiovascular tolerability was satisfactory and physical examination, body weight, and laboratory values were essentially unaffected in both groups.

Adjustment Disorders↗

PubMed1988

Antidepressant drug therapy: associated risks.

Aspects of risks associated with treatment with three classes of antidepressants: tricyclic (TCA), second generation ("new") antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI), are discussed. Moclobemide, a benzamide derivative, is a new MAOI antidepressant with reversible and preferential inhibition of the A-form of monoamine oxidase. Moclobemide is free of liver toxicity and the risk of a pressor response with tyramine-containing food is so low that strict diet restrictions are unnecessary. That MAOIs have a low incidence of side effects, particularly so called anticholinergic side effects is also true for moclobemide. A serious risk with antidepressant drugs is that the patient will use them to attempt suicide. Therefore important aspects of antidepressants are that they should take effect rapidly and be safe in overdose. No deaths from overdose have been observed with toloxatone, the only reversible MAOI antidepressant on the market to date. It is concluded that the new reversible MAOI antidepressant moclobemide is similar to other antidepressants in terms of efficacy but very noticeably superior in terms of tolerance and safety.

Aged↗

PubMed1980

[Return to work and pensioning of state insured myocardial infarction patients (author's transl)].

With reference to an enquiry among a total of 961 patients of a longitudinal myocardial infarction study (replies from 97%) participants in the study and drop-outs were compared with regard to questions on returning to work and pensioning. The results point to the effectiveness of follow-up care within the scope of this longitudinal study which consists essentially of the combination of inpatient curative treatment and regular follow-up outpatient examinations with a six-monthly rhythm. 85% of the participants in the longitudinal study have taken up work again after the infarction compared with only 66% of the drop-outs. At the time of the enquiry in 1976, after an average of 45 months care in the study, 68% of the participants were working, on the other hand only 48% of the drop-outs with an average care of only 4 months were working.

Germany, West↗