[Opioids and driving ability -- a problem unsolved?].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Accidents, Traffic↗
Biomedical subjects
M Strumpf
Publications and source records attributed to M Strumpf.
[Delayed negative pressure pulmonary edema].
A young athletic male adult (smoker) developed a pulmonary edema 30 min after the end of anaesthesia. Extubation was complicated by a laryngospasm. After artificial ventilation for 12 h the patient recovered completely.A negative pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE) develops after deep inspiratory efforts with an occluded airway. Such a maneuver leads to negative intrapleural pressures of -50 to -100 mmHg. This pressure gradient causes damage to the pulmonary capillaries, a transcapillary volume shift into the interstitium,and hemodynamic changes that increase the intrapulmonary blood volume. As a NPPE may occur with a delay of up to 1 h it is crucial to provide adequate monitoring for patients at risk. Symptomatic therapy usually leads to complete recovery within several hours.
Adult↗
[Novel potential uses of thalidomide in the management of pain? A review of the literature].
Thalidomide was introduced as a sedative and antiemetic agent to the European market in the late 1950s. However, it soon became clear that a hitherto unheard-of incidence of severe birth defects was due to the maternal use of thalidomide and the drug was withdrawn from the market. Despite its teratogenesis, thalidomide is currently being rediscovered because of its known spectrum of anticachectic, antiemetic, mildly hypnotic, anxiolytic, anti-inflammatory, antiangiogenic, and analgesic properties. The mechanism of action of thalidomide is probably based on its immunomodulatory effect, namely the suppression of production of tumor necrosis factor alpha and the modulation of interleukins. A striking but not well-known finding is the effectiveness of thalidomide as an analgesic or analgesic adjuvant. During the early era of thalidomide use, the drug was shown to enhance the analgesic efficacy of a combined treatment with acetylsalicylic acid, phenacetin, and caffeine (APC) by testing "normal volunteers, using electrical stimulation of teeth." The combination of thalidomide and APC was superior to other combinations (APC alone, APC and codeine) with respect to both the total analgesic effect and the duration of this analgesic effect. In 1965 thalidomide was found to be effective in treating the painful subcutaneous manifestations of the leprosy-associated erythema nodosum leprosum, a condition for which it eventually was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1998. In an animal model of neuropathic pain (chronic constriction injury), thalidomide was shown to reduce both mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. Recent studies documented the analgesic efficacy of thalidomide in treating painful mucocutaneous aphthous ulcers associated with HIV syndrome and Behcet's disease.However, to date there are no recent clinical trials that are specifically designed to explore the analgesic potential of thalidomide. In view of the current basic research and clinical findings,we suggest to investigate the potential benefits of thalidomide in severe pain conditions that respond poorly to common pain management approaches such as neuropathic pain, postherpetic neuralgia, or central pain phenomena. Because its mechanism of action is distinct from that of other drugs such as steroids, thalidomide offers the possibility of a combined treatment with other agents with nonoverlapping toxicities. We conclude that thalidomide, when used properly,may enrich the therapeutic regimen in the management of some pain-related conditions.
Analgesics↗
[Treatment of low back pain--significance, principles and danger].
Today, a wide range of efficient analgesic and non-analgesic drugs for the treatment of back pain are available. However, drugs should never be the only mainstay of a back pain treatment program. Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) are widely used in acute back pain. NSAIDs prescribed at regular intervals are effective to reduce simple back pain. The different NSAIDs are effective for the reduction of this pain. They have serious adverse effects, particularly at high doses, in the elderly, and on long-term administration. The new cyclooxygenase II-inhibitors have less gastrointestinal complications. But the long-term experiences are limited up to now. Considerable controversy exists about the use of opioid analgesics in chronic noncancer pain. Many physicians are concerned about the effectiveness and adverse effects of opioids. Other clinicians argue that there is a role for opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain, e. g. especially in chronic low back pain. There is a low incidence of organ toxicity in patients who respond to opioids. The incidence of abuse and addiction is likewise relatively low. The potential for increased function and improved quality of life seems to outweigh the risks. However, there is a lack of randomised controlled trials (RCT) on opioid therapy in a multimodal pain treatment approach. Clinical experience and some studies suggest administration of sustained release opioids because of better comfort for the patient and less risks for addiction. The opioids should be selected due to the specific side effects of the different drugs. For patients with pre-existing constipation transdermal fentanyl should be preferred. Antidepressant medications have been used for the treatment of chronic back pain, though there is only little scientific evidence for their effectiveness. There is no evidence for the use of antidepressants in acute low back pain. Trials of muscle relaxants for patients with acute back pain have used a wide range of agents, e. g. benzodiazepines. They mostly reduce acute back pain, but they have significant adverse effects including drowsiness and psychological and physical dependence even after relatively short treatment. Benzodiazepines are not indicated in the treatment of chronic back pain. Drugs are sometimes necessary for the patients to begin and persevere a multimodal treatment program. Drug therapy should be terminated as soon as other treatment strategies succeed. Unfortunately, no studies exist evaluating the place of analgesics within a multimodal treatment program.
Analgesics, Opioid↗
[Chronic pain. Organizational aspects in the treatment].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Journal Article↗
[Postdural puncture headache: diagnosis, prevention and therapy].
Lumbar puncture (LP) is a routine technique performed for a variety of procedures, e.g. diagnosis, administration of drugs, myelography and spinal anaesthesia. Postdural puncture headache is a common complication (30-40% in diagnostic LP). Prevention can be accomplished by using small-gauge needles (< or = 25 G) or pencil-point needles (22 G). Therapy should be carried out in a stepwise approach. The first step is bedrest, use of analgetics, i.v. fluids and an adequate guidance of the patient. The second step comprises special drug therapy. Several methods of pharmacologic management have been presented in the literature, but most of these are case reports. There is a lack of large double-blind placebo-controlled studies. Theophylline, caffeine, ACTH and sumatriptan are potentially promising agents for the treatment of postdural puncture headache. The efficacy of theophylline has been proven in a double-blind and placebo-controlled study. There are a few studies and case reports reporting that caffeine p.o. and i.v. is effective in the treatment of postdural puncture headache, but recurrence of headache after caffeine therapy is frequent. ACTH acts on a complex hormonal system. The treatment with sumatriptan has been reported in only a few case reports. The third step, and one of the most effective treatments of postdural puncture headache, is the epidural blood patch. The success rate ranges between 80 and 97%.
English Abstract↗
[Coenesthesia--an important differential diagnosis in chronic pain syndromes].
BACKGROUND: Coenesthesias can be defined as disorders of body perception or body hallucinations, projected in different parts of the body. Patients complain of intractable pain or dysesthesia. These symptoms are reported even from organs where we usually have no perception. Coenesthesia must be regarded as a symptom that can be observed in various psychiatric diseases, e.g., schizophrenia. However, in rare cases coenesthesias can be documented in neurological diseases, e.g., intracranial tumors or infections. Therefore, accurate assessment of possible differential diagnoses is important. In late stages, coenesthesias can easily be recognized because of their "bizarre" character. In early stages, however, patients often complain of intractable, unlocalizable burning pain. They frequently undergo operations because of their great suffering. The drug treatment of first choice is neuroleptics, but the results are unpredictable. CASES AND THERAPY: The case studies of three patients are presented and discussed (patient 1 with coenaesthetic schizophrenia, patient 2 with coenesthesia in the course of a delusional (paranoid) disorder; patient 3 with coenesthesia caused by carcinomatous meningitis).
English Abstract↗
[Pharmacist's attitudes towards opioid prescription].
UNLABELLED: The prescription of strong opioids underlies a special legislation. The attitude of the pharmacists towards the long-term treatment with these analgesics and their opinion about the legislation is unknown in Germany and other European countries. METHODS: A questionnaire was included in the Journal "Mitteilungsblatt der Apothekerkammer Westfalen-Lippe" and send to all 2300 pharmacists of the region Westfalen-Lippe in December 1997. RESULTS: 797 (35%) questionnaires were returned. In 82.4% of the pharmacies strong opioids are kept in stock. However, 140 pharmacists do not have opioids in stock due to too many different preparations or low prescription rate. 54% of the pharmacists warn their patients about endangering by the medication. The fear of psychological addiction (48.1%) is the main argument, also in patients with regular intake of the opioids (20.1%) and related to long acting opioids (10.8%). Nevertheless, 73% of the pharmacists advocate for a liberalization and 10.7% for an abolishment of the actual prescription laws. DISCUSSION: The importance of the therapy with strong opioids is well accepted by the pharmacists. An ease of the prescription is demanded to improve the situation of the patients with chronic pain. However, the majority of the pharmacists warns the patients about this medication. Contact between prescribing doctors and pharmacists and an intensified education concerning the therapy with opioids are needed in addition to the education of the medical staff and the liberalization of the prescription laws.
English Abstract↗
[Posttraumatic pain. Causes and therapeutic possibilities].
Each patient has the right of a dedicated pain therapy according to the state of the art. However an efficient pain therapy is not possible without knowing the cause of pain. In most posttraumatic pain situations peripheral nociceptors are activated and normal afferences are conducted via an intact nociceptive system. In contrast, neuropathic pain pain is caused by lesions of the nervous system itself. Mechanisms of central sensibilization and involvement of the sympathetic nervous system may lead to chronification of such pain conditions. The therapeutic regime of nociceptive and neuropathic pain is demonstrated by algorithms of treatment modalities. Apart from classic non-opioid analgesics, co-analgesics and opioids have an important status in chronic pain management as well. Prescription of these substances has to follow strictly defined standards of pain therapy. Blockades with local anaesthetics as mono-therapy of chronic pain are obsolete. In posttraumatic pain, however, a certain number of adjuvant blockades or infiltrations of triggerpoints may be helpful. The exceptional place of sympathetic blockades are in diagnosis and therapy of sympathetic maintained pain (SMP).
Ankle Injuries↗
[Con: patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗
[Staged analgesic therapy in tumor pain].
Overall, pain is one of the most common symptoms associated with cancer and often produces greater anticipatory distress than other features of the disease. Drug selection depends on the intensity of pain rather than on the specific pathophysiology. Mild to moderate pain can often be treated effectively by so-called "weak" opioids. Non-opioid analgesics, like acetyl-salicylic acid or paracetamol can be added according to the "analgesic ladder" proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). Opioids should be given on a fixed time schedule thereby, preventing pain from recurring. Additional rescue doses (approximately 50 degrees, of baseline single dose) are given for breakthrough pain. Noninvasive (oral, rectal, sublingual, transdermal and intranasal) routes of application should be maintained as long as possible to preserve independence and mobility. When treatment by infusion therapy (subcutaneous, intravenous, epidural) has been elected, the addition of patient controlled analgesia (PCA), which permits patients to administer a preset amount of narcotic at preset intervals, is an effective means to manage breakthrough and incident pain in selected patients. Antidepressants, anticonvulsants and some antiarrhytmics are used as co-analgesics. Oral medication alone can guarantee pain relief in about 95% of the patients. The WHO analgesic ladder has proven effective in all settings of patients care.
Analgesics↗
[A survey of physicians' knowledge about pain therapy with strong opioid analgesics].
INTRODUCTION: The WHO analgesic ladder, including the use of strong opioid analgesics for the treatment of cancer pain, is widely accepted. However, the use of opioids for the treatment of non-cancer pain is still controversial. This study investigates doctors' medical knowledge about basic aspects of pain management. Additionally, we determined whether the deficiencies in the treatment of patients suffering from pain are based on the rigorous national narcotic control system in Germany. METHODS: We investigated the juridical and technical knowledge of physicians specializing in pain therapy by a questionnaire. During a postgraduate course the knowledge about pain therapy according to the WHO analgesic ladder and the beliefs concerning the narcotic regulations in Germany were evaluated. The survey participants were asked to rate their attitudes on a 10-point analogue scale (1=disagreement, 10=full agreement). The participants were also asked to indicate occupational criteria such as specialty, clinical practice area, and postgraduate years of practice. Descriptive statistics for the mean values were used. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three questionnaires were completed. The majority of participants worked at departments of anaesthesiology. Some 51.1% of the participants had no specific multiple-copy prescriptions for opioid analgesics. Only 72% of the physicians knew from which governmental institution they could order multiple-copy prescriptions. In general, more doctors would prescribe opioids by the use of normal forms. The controlled substance laws were seen as an impediment by the majority of participants, without relevant differences as to their years of practice. The regulations were regarded as ineffective protection against illegal use of opioids. Treatment of pain with strong opioid analgesics was seen as beneficial for the patients. The use of strong opioids for long-term treatment was recommended, and psychological addiction was regarded as non-existent. CONCLUSION: Therapy with strong opioids is accepted practice, but significant deficits of legal and technical knowledge uphold the undertreatment of patients suffering from cancer and non-cancer pain. Patients with a legitimate need for pain relief by strong opioids are the unintended victims of tight narcotic regulations and deficits in medical education. An ease of regulatory conditions is mandatory to reduce the reluctance for prescribing opioids. On the other hand intensified continuous medical education is mandatory to reduce the undertreatment of patients with severe pain conditions.
English Abstract↗
Compensation for health-related loss of income.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cost of Illness↗
Long-term treatment of cancer pain with transdermal fentanyl.
The long-term therapy of 51 patients using transdermal fentanyl was evaluated. The transdermal therapy was performed for 158 days (range, 15-855 days). The need for increasing dosages of transdermal fentanyl was caused by the progression of the underlying cancer disease (mean initial dose, 69.5 micrograms fentanyl/hr; mean final dose, 167.7 micrograms fentanyl/hr). The transdermal system was changed every third day. Application intervals had to be shortened in 23.5% of the patients. Pain reduction was good throughout the study. Severe side effects did not occur. Constipation and the need for laxatives occurred less frequently than with previously administered oral morphine. Skin tolerance of the transdermal system was good. The treatment of cancer pain with transdermal fentanyl can be performed as a long-term therapy and result in good pain relief. Considering its specific pharmacokinetic properties, it is an alternative medication on step III of the World Health Organization's guidelines for cancer pain management.
Administration, Cutaneous↗
Experiences with the prescription of opioids: a patient questionnaire.
Forty-three German patients who had been treated with strong opioids were questioned about their experiences during therapy. The prescription of opioids was well accepted by most patients. Some, however, felt stigmatized by taking opioids. Fourteen patients (33%) were asked by their relatives, friends, or other patients about the special prescription form. Six patients (14%) had difficulties in redeeming the prescription at the pharmacy, seven patients (16%) were warned against taking the medication by the pharmacist, 21 patients observed that their general practitioner (GP) was mistrustful about the treatment, and 16 patients (37%) reported that the GP terminated the therapy. Despite the beneficial effect for the patient, opioid treatment started and supervised in a pain clinic is not always continued by the GP. In Germany, it may not be possible to administer opioid therapy outside of a specialized pain clinic. In those few cases in which an opioid therapy is successfully instituted, difficulties continue due to prejudices, insufficient education, and complicated prescription laws.
Adult↗
[Headache--differential diagnosis and therapy].
Only few guidelines exist for the therapy of chronic pain syndromes but are available for headache. It is important to know the therapeutic principles and apply them to the patients. The education of a patient suffering from headache is a main factor for a successful therapy. Physician and psychologist together in cooperation with the patient can achieve a better quality of life for the patient. New developments of the medication used for the therapy of chronic headache will result in a better symptom control in the next years.
Analgesics↗
[Sympathetic reflex dystrophy and phantom pain. Diagnosis, therapy and prognosis].
The incidence of phantom limb pain has been significantly underestimated for many years. However, studies published during the recent decade indicate that the real incidence of phantom limb pain may be between 60% and 90%. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) occurs with an incidence of about 15.000 new cases every year in Germany. Both diseases show early centralisation and chronification. Hence, only early diagnosis and onset of correct therapy in time provide significant pain reduction. When therapy is started too late, prognosis in regard to sufficient pain reduction is poor. Phantom limb pain can be prevented by proper anaesthesia. Several studies could show the benefit of perioperative continuous regional anaesthesia . None of the patients treated with a combination of local anaesthetics and low dose morphine developed phantom limb pain. Therapy of choice for RSD is the sympathetic blockade. The most suitable method is intravenous regional sympathetic blockade (IVRSB) with guanethidine (2).
Anesthesia, Local↗