Cardiac transplantation in patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M T Olivari.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide elaborated by many cell types. Plasma ET-1 levels are significantly augmented in patients and experimental animals with heart failure. Enhanced levels of ET-1 may contribute to myocardial depression and alterations in sympathetic nerve activity in the setting of chronic heart failure. The effects of chronic blockade of endothelin A (ET(A)) receptors on the development and severity of experimental heart failure and sympathoexcitation were evaluated in these experiments using the specific ET(A) antagonist, PD156707. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four groups of conscious, chronically instrumented mongrel dogs were administered either PD156707 (750 mg orally thrice daily) or a placebo starting 1 day before ventricular pacing or a sham (nonpaced) period. Before pacing or the sham period, baseline hemodynamic and plasma norepinephrine (NE) measurements were made. Hemodynamic and NE measurements were made every 3 to 4 days for the next 28 days. All parameters were relatively stable in nonpaced dogs administered placebo. Paced placebo dogs showed classic hemodynamic and sympathoexcitatory changes indicative of heart failure. Nonpaced dogs administered PD156707 showed a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance beginning 3 days after drug administration. Myocardial function was not affected by PD156707 in nonpaced dogs. In paced dogs, PD156707 also reduced arterial pressure and peripheral resistance. Changes in myocardial function were small and insignificant. Paced dogs administered PD156707 showed an approximately 50% lower increase in plasma NE level from days 10 to 24 compared with paced dogs administered placebo (941.8 +/- 122.8 vs 501.1 +/- 92.6 pg/mL at 17 days; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that ET-1 contributes to the maintenance of arterial pressure in both sham dogs and dogs paced into heart failure. ET-1 does not appear to have a potent effect on inotropic state, but the data strongly suggest that ET-1 may contribute to the progressive deterioration of circulatory function in heart failure by mediating sympathoexcitation and enhancing plasma NE concentration.
BACKGROUND: Incomplete suppression of the renin-angiotensin system during long-term ACE inhibition may contribute to symptomatic deterioration in patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). Combined angiotensin II type I (AT1) receptor blockade and ACE inhibition more completely suppresses the activated renin-angiotensin system than either intervention alone in sodium-depleted normal individuals. Whether AT1 receptor blockade with losartan improves exercise capacity in patients with severe CHF already treated with ACE inhibitors is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with severe CHF despite treatment with maximally recommended or tolerated doses of ACE inhibitors were randomized 1:1 to receive 50 mg/d losartan or placebo for 6 months in addition to standard therapy in a multicenter, double-blind trial. Peak aerobic capacity (V(O2)) during symptom-limited treadmill exercise and NYHA functional class were determined at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of double-blind therapy. Peak V(O2) at baseline and after 3 and 6 months were 13.5+/-0.6, 15.1+/-1.0, and 15.7+/-1.1 mL. kg-1. min-1, respectively, in patients receiving losartan and 14.1+/-0.6, 14.3+/-0.9, and 13.6+/-1.1 mL. kg-1. min-1, respectively, in patients receiving placebo (P<0.02 for treatment group-by-time interaction). Functional class improved by at least one NYHA class in 9 of 16 patients receiving losartan and 1 of 17 patients receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan enhances peak exercise capacity and alleviates symptoms in patients with CHF who are severely symptomatic despite treatment with maximally recommended or tolerated doses of ACE inhibitors.
Endomyocardial biopsy remains the 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of acute rejection after cardiac transplantation, but few guidelines exist to determine the indications for its use in pediatric cardiac transplant recipients. To determine the usefulness of surveillance endomyocardial biopsy, 176 biopsies were reviewed from 12 patients, aged 0.5-16 (average 9.7) yr, maintained on cyclosporine, azathioprine and prednisone immunosuppression, and followed 2.8-45.5 (average 26.3) months after cardiac transplantation. Children old enough to cooperate (n = 6) underwent biopsy on nine occasions in the first 6 months after transplantation and quarterly thereafter. Children too young to cooperate (n = 6) underwent biopsy with general anesthesia on four occasions in the first 6 months after transplantation and every 6 months thereafter. Additional biopsies were performed as warranted by symptoms or noninvasive tests. A new episode of acute rejection was present in 13 biopsies (7%); continuing or resolving rejection in 19 others (11%). Remaining biopsies had no evidence of rejection (82 biopsies, 47%), had lymphocytic infiltrates insufficient for diagnosis (47 biopsies, 27%), were inadequate for diagnosis (14 biopsies, 8%), or were consistent with ischemia (1 biopsy, 0.5%). During the first 6 postoperative months, eight of 101 biopsies were positive for rejection, three occurring on routine surveillance biopsy. After 6 months, five of 75 biopsies showed a new episode of rejection, only one occurring on routine surveillance biopsy. Based on this data, it is concluded that: 1) episodes of rejection are relatively uncommon with triple drug immunosuppression; 2) surveillance biopsies in the first 6 months after cardiac transplantation may show unsuspected rejection; and 3) routine surveillance biopsies more than 6 months after cardiac transplantation are unlikely to show rejection in the absence of symptoms or other tests.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Combined therapy with an angiotensin-II type I receptor (AT1) antagonist and an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor results in more complete suppression of the renin-angiotensin system. Accordingly, the blood-pressure response and safety of combining AT1-receptor blockade with losartan for ACE inhibition were evaluated in patients with congestive heart failure who were already treated with maximally recommended or tolerated doses of an ACE inhibitor. Forty-three patients with symptomatic congestive heart failure were evaluated biweekly for 1 month before addition of losartan and weekly during administration of losartan at a daily dose of 25 mg for the first week and 50 mg for the second week. Systolic blood pressure, which remained unchanged before addition of losartan, decreased from 122 +/- 18 mm Hg to 112 +/- 17 and 107 +/- 17 mm Hg (p < 0.001) after 1 week of 25 mg and 1 week of 50 mg losartan, respectively. Diastolic blood pressure also significantly decreased. The decreases in blood pressure were well tolerated by all patients, even by those in whom symptomatic hypotension developed during uptitration of ACE inhibition. Serum potassium and sodium and parameters of renal function remained unchanged. Combining AT1-receptor blockade with losartan to maximally recommended or tolerated ACE inhibition appears safe and leads to further vasodilatation in symptomatic patients with congestive heart failure.
Cyclosporine causes various platelet abnormalities. Whether it affects the ability of platelets to mediate vasodilation is unknown. Platelets were isolated from healthy volunteers and 13 heart transplant patients on cyclosporine. When perfused through preconstricted normal rabbit carotid arteries, activated platelets from transplant patients failed to cause vasorelaxation, whereas normal platelets produced significant vasodilation (-4.0 +/- 1.9% versus 30 +/- 3% [P < .0001] change in vessel diameter, respectively). When normal platelets were exposed to cyclosporine in vitro, they lost their ability to cause vasodilation in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. However, when activated and perfused through quiescent, N omega-nitro-L-arginine-pretreated arteries, platelets from transplant patients and normal platelets caused similar degrees of vasoconstriction. The amount of adenosine triphosphate in the supernatant from activated cyclosporine-exposed and control platelets was similar (1.7 +/- 0.4 versus 1.5 +/- 0.3 mumol/L [P = NS], respectively). However, concomitant perfusion of activated platelets from transplant patients impaired acetylcholine-mediated, endothelium-dependent vasodilation but perfusion of normal platelets did not. Although cyclosporine-exposed platelets showed an impaired ability to produce vasorelaxation, supernatant from the same platelets caused near normal vasodilation. Human platelets exposed to cyclosporine have an impaired ability to mediated vasodilation. This is not due to increased platelet-mediated vasoconstriction or a decrease in the release of platelet-derived nucleotides but rather to a short-acting compound released by cyclosporine-exposed platelets that interferes with endothelium-dependent vasodilation.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness and safety of diltiazem or lisinopril for treatment of hypertension after heart transplantation. BACKGROUND: Systemic hypertension is common after heart transplantation, and to date there are no randomized, prospective multicenter treatment trials. METHODS: Members of the Cardiac Transplant Research Database Group developed and implemented a prospective, randomized multicenter trial of the effectiveness and safety of diltiazem or lisinopril in the treatment of hypertension in cyclosporine-treated patients after heart transplantation. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients with hypertension (blood pressure > or = 140/90 mm Hg) after heart transplantation were randomized for > or = 3 months of treatment. Of 55 diltiazem-treated patients, 21 (38%) were responders (diastolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg), 23 (42%) were nonresponders (diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg), and 11 (20%) were withdrawn from the study. Of 61 lisinopril-treated patients, 28 (46%) were responders, 22 (36%) were nonresponders, and 11 (18%) were withdrawn. There was no difference in baseline characteristics or percent responders between the two groups. Systolic pressure decreased from 157 +/- 2.3 to 130 +/- 2.0 mm Hg (mean +/- 1 SEM) in the diltiazem-treated responders and from 153 +/- 2.1 to 127 +/- 2.7 mm Hg in the lisinopril-treated responders (p < 0.0001). Diastolic pressure decreased from 100 +/- 0.9 to 85 +/- 1.6 mm Hg in the diltiazem-treated responders and from 100 +/- 1.0 to 84 +/- 2.0 mm Hg in the lisinopril-treated responders (p < 0.0001). There were a total of 35 reported adverse events, 22 of which led to withdrawal of the patient from the study. All drug-related side effects were considered minor and resolved with discontinuation of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that both diltiazem and lisinopril are safe for treatment of hypertension after heart transplantation, although titrated monotherapy with either drug controlled the condition in < 50% of patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Subjective improvement and normalization of exercise tolerance are reported by most of patients after heart transplantation. However, objective measurements often do not confirm the subjective improvement. This disparate observation may be related to the methods used to test exercise tolerance. We postulated that an individualized, more gradual exercise protocol might allow a more accurate assessment of exercise tolerance than standard protocols for patients with transplanted, denervated hearts. METHODS: Eleven stable heart recipients exercised on a treadmill using two different protocols. Protocol A was a standard Naughton's protocol, and protocol B was an individualized Naughton's protocol, in which the slope of the treadmill was increased only after a steady state in heart rate and oxygen consumption had been achieved and maintained for 30 seconds. RESULTS: Patients exercised longer and reached a higher workload with protocol B than with protocol A. Time to anaerobic threshold was significantly prolonged by protocol B. Minute ventilation and oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold were significantly higher with protocol B than with protocol A. At peak exercise, heart rate, oxygen consumption, oxygen pulse, and minute ventilation were similar with the two protocols and exceeded 75% of the predicted corresponding maximal values for a normal matched population. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an individualized, gradual exercise protocol for heart transplant recipients detected a significantly better submaximal exercise capacity than a standard protocol, which is more consistent with the subjective improvement in functional capacity in this population.
A pretransplant diagnosis was compared with the diagnosis made after macroscopic and microscopic examination of the explanted hearts in 112 cardiac transplant recipients. A coronary angiogram was recorded in 87.5% and endomyocardial biopsy was performed in 12.5% of patients within 1 year of the transplant. Echocardiograms were obtained in all patients. Before transplantation, 57.1% of patients were classified as having ischemic cardiomyopathy and 33.9% were classified as having idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). At explantation, severe coronary artery disease was found in all patients with a pretransplant diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy, in 9 patients with a pretransplant diagnosis of IDC (6 of them had a "normal" pretransplant angiograms), and in 3 of the 4 patients with presumptive alcoholic cardiomyopathy. Left ventricular hypertrophy, undetected on echocardiography, was found at autopsy in 11 patients with presumed IDC, and acute myocarditis was found in 3 patients with a pretransplant diagnosis of IDC. A correct pretransplant diagnosis can lead to different management (e.g., bypass surgery rather than transplant), and may also portend different pre- and post-transplant prognoses. The results of this study suggest that an "in-depth" search for a cause should be conducted in all patients with heart failure, regardless of their clinical presentation. Our study also emphasizes the limitations of coronary angiography and echocardiography in patients with IDC and the need for improving current diagnostic techniques in these patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this study was to determine whether chemosensitive ventricular afferent activation in humans evokes a diffuse pattern of reflex vasodilation involving the skeletal muscle circulation of all the extremities or a highly specified pattern of vasodilation that is limited to the rather small vascular bed of the forearm. In 10 patients with innervated ventricles and 7 patients with denervated ventricles resulting from heart transplantation, we performed simultaneous plethysmographic recordings of blood flow in the forearm and calf during chemosensitive ventricular afferent activation with intracoronary Renografin. In patients with innervated ventricles, intracoronary Renografin evoked directionally opposite vascular responses in the forearm and calf: forearm resistance decreased from 50 +/- 11 to 31 +/- 8 units, whereas calf resistance increased from 42 +/- 7 to 59 +/- 9 units (P < 0.05, calf vs. forearm). Forearm vasodilation was eliminated after heart transplantation, indicating that this is a reflex response caused by ventricular afferents. In contrast, calf vasoconstriction was well preserved despite ventricular deafferentation, indicating that this response is caused by mechanisms other than ventricular afferent activation, possibly the sinoaortic baroreceptors. Taken together, these findings document a remarkable degree of specificity in the effects of cardiac afferent activation on the reflex regulation of regional vasomotor tone in humans.
BACKGROUND: Acute vascular rejection (AVR) is characterized by vascular injury and systolic graft dysfunction and is often associated with elevated panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) to HLA antigens. Plasmapheresis has been shown to improve the otherwise poor prognosis of AVR, but its use is often complicated and limited by hypotension. METHODS AND RESULTS: In three cardiac transplant recipients with severe hemodynamic compromise during AVR, refractory to standard therapy, extracorporeal immunoadsorption was performed using a protein A column. Plasma was removed at 10 to 20 cm3/min, passed through the column, and reinfused. All three patients had negative pretransplant PRAs. PRA rose before or during AVR and became negative in all three patients following immunoadsorption. Time course and number of treatments required to decrease PRA to < 5% varied. Concomitant with a decrease in PRA, histological findings and ventricular function improved and normalized. Ejection fraction rose from 23 +/- 2 to 56 +/- 8% and shortening fraction from 14 +/- 7 to 36 +/- 7%, P < .05 (both). One patient died from infection 2 months after resolution of AVR; the other two patients are alive 25 and 31 months after AVR with normal left ventricular function and coronary arteries. In both, since initial immunoadsorption course, PRA has remained negative and no rejection has occurred. In two patients, a circulating donor-specific or donor-related anti-HLA class I antibody was identified and removed by protein A column. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest that (1) immunoadsorption is effective in removing circulating immunoglobulins and is well tolerated; (2) AVR is preceded by or associated with circulating antibodies against HLA class I antigens; (3) their removal is temporarily associated with recovery of graft function and normalization of biopsy; and (4) anti-HLA class I antibodies can mediate vascular injury if they appear in the post-transplant period.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to review specific outcomes of patient referrals and the utility of selection criteria for heart transplantation at a single transplant center and to assess important trends over a 5-year period. BACKGROUND: Although patient selection criteria are important for the clinical success of heart transplantation and the optimal utilization of the limited supply of donor organs, there are few data regarding actual outcomes and whether selection criteria are facilitating the identification of the most appropriate patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 511 consecutive referrals of adult patients with heart failure from January 1, 1987 to December 31, 1991. Patients were followed up to one of five end points: 1) acceptance onto the transplant waiting list, 2) rejection from the transplant waiting list, 3) death, 4) referral to another program, and 5) still pending evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 511 referred patients, 221 (43%) were accepted onto the waiting list, 222 (43%) were rejected, 39 (8%) died before the evaluation was completed, 15 (3%) were referred to another program and 14 (3%) are still pending evaluation. The rates for acceptance and rejection each year ranged between 30% and 51% and there were no consistent trends in the acceptance/rejection ratio from 1987 to 1991. Of the 221 patients accepted onto the waiting list, 115 (52%) underwent transplantation, 50 (22%) died, 12 (5%) were removed from the list because of clinical improvement, 9 (4%) were referred to another program and 35 (16%) are still on the waiting list. The continuing shortage of donor organs resulted in a marked increase in the size of the waiting list from 12.6 patients in 1987 to 36.5 in 1991, as well as a marked increase in the time on the waiting list before transplantation. Over 5 years, 50 patients were considered "too well" for transplantation (23% of all rejections). Of these 50 patients, 43 (86%) are alive and 7 were lost to follow-up during a mean period of 28.6 months (range 4 to 62). All 12 patients who were taken off the active transplant list because of improvement in symptoms, ejection fraction or peak exercise oxygen consumption are alive with a mean follow-up period of 27.7 months (range 11 to 61). CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm the fact that transplant referrals are a selected group of patients with a high mortality rate, as 8% died before the evaluation could be completed and 22% died while waiting for a suitable donor organ. Furthermore, patient selection criteria are able to identify a small subset of patients with a low mortality risk as patients who were rejected because they were too well or taken off the list for clinical improvement have a reasonably good prognosis.
Congestive heart failure (CHF) has been associated with the development of restrictive ventilatory abnormalities and decreased pulmonary diffusing capacity. Whether these physiologic changes reflect permanent alterations of lung anatomy or result solely from potentially reversible alterations of lung water is not known. To examine this issue, we reviewed the pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and cardiac catheterization data from recipients of successful heart transplants prior to and 1 year after transplantation. Thirty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria (median age, 52 years). The median duration of symptomatic CHF prior to transplantation was 22 months (range, 3 to 72 months). After transplantation, spirometry revealed an improvement in FEV1 from 75.8 +/- 3.5 to 99.1 +/- 2.8 percent of predicted and FVC from 81.3 +/- 3.7 to 101.6 +/- 3.0 percent of predicted (p < 0.001). The FEV1/FVC ratio remained unchanged at 80 percent. Nonsmokers and former smokers had similar improvements in spirometry after transplantation. The TLC improved from 91.1 +/- 3.3 to 105.5 +/- 2.9 percent of predicted (p < 0.001); this improvement was due to an increase in inspiratory capacity. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide was decreased before transplantation and showed a small decline after transplantation from 82.3 +/- 3.2 to 76.8 +/- 2.6 percent of predicted (p < 0.05). After correction of severe CHF by cardiac transplantation, normalization of FEV1, FVC, and TLC can be anticipated. Diffusing capacity, however, may actually decline after transplantation.