PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Tanda

Publications and source records attributed to M Tanda.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Changes in autonomic modulation to the heart and intracellular catecholamines. A longitudinal study in differentiated thyroid carcinoma during short-term hypothyroidism and thyroid hormone replacement.

BACKGROUND: The effects of thyroid deprivation on the autonomic modulation to the heart remain controversial. METHODS: In this study in patients followed for thyroid carcinoma, we investigated (1) heart rate variability parameters and the baroreflex gain and (2) intracellular catecholamine levels in circulating lymphocytes during short-term hypothyroidism (phase 1) and after reinstitution of TSH-suppressive thyroid hormone replacement (phase 2). RESULTS: The RR interval value (p < 0.01) and systolic blood pressure (p < 0.05) were higher in phase 1 than in phase 2. The low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) ratio was significantly lower in the hypothyroid state (p < 0.05), with a higher HF component (p < 0.05). After adjusting for mean RR interval in the regression model, the difference between the power of RR interval oscillations calculated in the two states was greater for the LF band (p = 0.005) and it was borderline significant for the HF band (p = 0.052). The baroreflex gain alpha(LF) index was similar in the two phases. The stimulus-induced cellular production of norepinephrine and epinephrine in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was significantly higher in phase 2. CONCLUSION: The neurally-mediated influences on the sinus node and the study of intracellular catecholamine production suggest a reduced sympathoexcitation in hypothyroidism compared with the treatment phase. The early increase in blood pressure observed after thyroid hormone withdrawal is not due to impaired sensitivity of the baroreflex arc.

Autonomic Nervous System↗
PubMed1984

Immunohistochemical distribution of the antigenic determinants detected by monoclonal antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen.

By using four distinct monoclonal antibodies to CEA, the molecular profile of which was clarified in our accompanying companion paper, immunohistochemical distribution of the antigenic determinants on both cancerous and noncancerous tissues as well as fetal tissues was studied with the use of the immunoperoxidase method. All of the monoclonal antibodies recognize different antigenic determinants on the tissue section. None of the antibodies stained granulocytes in the peripheral blood or in the normal liver tissues tested. Three of our monoclonal antibodies stained columnar epithelial cells in morphologically normal colonic mucosa; however, monoclonal antibody YK024 did not stain them. This antibody was also found to be unreactive with intestinal metaplasia lesions of the stomach, but reacted with a 16-wk-old fetal stomach as well as with cancerous parts of the colon and of the stomach. Moreover, it was found that this monoclonal antibody mainly reacted with moderately or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma lesions of the colon and the stomach. Periodic acid treatment in this study, together with trypsin treatment on the antigen as described in our accompanying companion paper, may suggest that this antibody recognizes the carbohydrate antigenic determinant in nature.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1983

Human gastric cancer-associated antigens and carcinoembryonic antigen detected by monoclonal antibodies.

The serologic and molecular characterization of four monoclonal antibodies to human gastric cancer cells and to CEA were described and the immunohistologic patterns of reactions with freshly obtained gastrointestinal tissues were examined. Monoclonal antibody YK004, which was secreted by the hybridoma constructed with the gastric carcinoma cell line KATO III, reacted with an antigenic determinant preferentially expressed on human gastric and colonic carcinoma cells, but it failed to bind any nonmalignant tissues tested except the stomach. Although this antibody reacted with fetal digestive tract tissues, it failed to immunoprecipitate CEA. Monoclonal antibodies YK013 and YK024 prepared in the same manner by immunizing with the gastric carcinoma cell line KATO III reacted with antigenic determinants on CEA, but not on NCA or NCA2. The antigenic profiles recognized by these two antibodies were found to be identical by sequential immunoprecipitation experiments. However, the antigenic determinant recognized by antibody YK013 may be different from that recognized by antibody YK024, since the immunohistologic reactivity patterns in carcinoma tissue sections were clearly different. Monoclonal antibody AS001, which was secreted by the hybridomas constructed with purified CEA as immunogen, immunoprecipitated CEA molecule with a single antigenic structure of 200 Kd, which was different from the antigenic profile detected by two other monoclonal antibodies, YK013 and YK024. The unique distribution of the antigenic determinants recognized by our monoclonal antibodies on cancerous tissues suggests that antibodies might be able to detect the unique determinants of the circulating CEA molecule or CEA-related molecules in the serum of cancer patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗