Albanian contribution to the treatment of refugee renal patients from Kosovo.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Albania↗
Biomedical subjects
M Tase
Publications and source records attributed to M Tase.
Influence of obesity on the diagnostic value of electrocardiographic criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy.
Easily applicable, clinically relevant electrocardiographic criteria are needed to screen large populations for left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a population of 380 hypertensive patients of both sexes, whether obesity modified the diagnostic performance of Sokolow-Lyon and Cornell voltage criteria by comparing them with echocardiographic evaluations using different indexation methods for LV mass presentation (body surface area and various powers of the height variable). For the population as a whole, Cornell voltage was better correlated to LV mass than was Sokolow-Lyon voltage (r = 0.48 and 0.36, respectively). The poorest performance of Sokolow-Lyon voltage was observed among obese patients (best r = 0.1 and 0.21 in obese women and men, respectively). Sensitivities were assessed at a 95% specificity level. In nonobese patients, using sex-adjusted voltage values (43 and 36 mm in men and women, respectively, for Sokolow-Lyon voltage, and 28 and 25 mm for Cornell voltage), the sensitivities of Cornell voltage and Sokolow-Lyon voltage were similar in men and women (near 22% and 36%, respectively), whatever the indexation method used for LV mass. In obese patients, Cornell voltage sensitivity was similar to that of nonobese patients, whereas Sokolow-Lyon voltage had a much poorer sensitivity (<10%). For simple LV hypertrophy detection criteria, Sokolow-Lyon voltage should be avoided in obese hypertensive patients and replaced by the Cornell voltage criteria, which are not influenced by the presence of obesity.
Body Mass Index↗
[Left atrial contractility function in hypertension].
UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was the assessment of the left systolic atrial function (LSAF) in 45 hypertensive subjects (HS) with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). (LV mass index) (LVMI) (> 134 g/m2 for men, > 110 g/m2 for women) and in 32 normal subjects (NS). The both groups were matched for age, body surface, heart rate and LV fractional shortening. Left atrial volume (LAV) was calculated by the formula: LAV = 8 A1 x A2/3 pi l in which A1 is the area of the four-chamber view, A2 is the area of the two-chamber view and L is common length in the two views. The atrial function contractility was evaluated by the following parameters: 1. LA stroke volume (LASV) = LAV - LAMV where LAV is the volume before atrial systole and LAMV is the LA minimal volume. 2. LA ejection fraction (LAEF) = LASV/LAV. 3. Atrial ejection force (AEF) = peak A/MOA in which peak A wave is the maximal late diastolic velocity and MOA is the mitral orifice area. 4. Atrial transport (AT) = A/M in which M area is under the mitral velocity curve and A-area under the late diastolic velocity curved assessed by Doppler echo. [table: see text] Thus all above parameters are significantly increased in HS. In HS, LASV is correlated to LAV (r = 0.84; p < 0.001) and to LVMI (r = 0.32; p < 0.05). LAEF is correlated to peak A (r = 0.90; p < 0.001) and LVMI (r = 0.34; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In HS with LVH in comparison with N, the increase of the LA contractility is considered to be urged by the increase of LAV (Frank-Starling's law). These data could be explained by the less distensibility of LV chamber in relation to LVH.
Adolescent↗
Which definition for echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy?
Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy is diagnosed on the basis of LV mass measurement at echocardiography. However, various thresholds for defining LV hypertrophy have been published, ranging from 111 to 134 g/m2 and from 100 to 125 g/m2 in men and women, respectively. The aim of our study was to evaluate variations in the prevalence of LV hypertrophy induced by the application of different threshold values among hypertensive subjects. LV mass was calculated in 349 hypertensive patients from an M-mode LV tracing obtained by left parasternal view in 83% and by subcostal view in 17% of patients. The prevalence of LV hypertrophy ranged from 17% to 39%, according to the threshold value applied (from 10% to 47%, and from 19% to 39% in women and men, respectively). As expected, the prevalence of LV hypertrophy in obese patients of both sexes was higher when applying the usual height-indexed threshold (143 and 102 g/m for men and women, respectively) than when applying the usual body surface area-indexed threshold (134 and 110 g/m2 for men and women, respectively). The use of normalized thresholds when comparing different indexation methods (in this case, 145 g/m for men, 120 g/m for women) will minimize these variations in part due to the threshold choice. Considering the clinical and therapeutic implications associated with the presence of LV hypertrophy, better standardization of definitions is needed; this could be based either on better-designed cooperative normality studies or meta-analysis of risk stratification.
Adult↗
[Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of right and left ventricular filling in hypertension].
Left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) filling was evaluated by pulsed doppler echocardiography in 56 hypertensive (HTN) untreated patients and in 30 normotensive (N) subjects, matched for age, body surface and heart rate. HTN were classified in two groups: HTN1: with normal LV mass index (LV mi) (< 135 g.m-2 for men, < or = 115 g.m.-2 for women); HTN2: with increased LV mi (> or = 135 g.m-2 for men, > or = 115 g.m-2 for women). All subjects had normal systolic function by echo. We derived: LV wall thickness (h), antero-posterior radius (r), h/r ratio, LV mi, ratio of early to late filling (E/A) in both ventricle. RESULTS. h and h/r were significantly in HTN1 (p < 0.01 vs N) and particularly in HTN2 (p < 0.001 vs N and HTA1). E/ALV and E/ARV were significantly decreased (p < 0.001) in both HTA compared to N. There was no significant difference between HTN1 and HTN2 concerning E/ALV and E/ARV. Relations of E/ALV and E/ARV with age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), LV mi, h, h/r: [table: see text] E/ALV is correlated to E/ARV (r = 0.37; p < 0.01) only in HTA. CONCLUSIONS. 1) In HTN in comparison with N: h, h/r are higher in the presence but also in the absence of increased LV mi. 2) In N and HTN: E/ALV and E/ARV are better correlated to h (and also to h/r in N) than to LV mi. Though the respective values of E/ALV and E/ARV are identical, they are correlated significantly only in HTN. 3) In the absence of the direct measures of the RV pressures and volumes, the interpretation of the results concerning the RV filling in uncertain. Only in HTN, they could be explained at least in part by the diastolic interplay between the two ventricles.
Adult↗