PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Uçtaşli

Publications and source records attributed to M Uçtaşli.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage and bond strength of sealant in primary teeth.

This in vitro study investigated the effect of use of three dentine bonding agents: Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A.), Syntac (Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Optibond Dual Cure (Kerr, Romulus, MI, U.S.A.) on microleakage and shear bond strength of a fissure sealant (Helioseal F, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) bonded to either dry or wet (saliva contaminated) enamels of primary teeth. Newly extracted 112 non-carious primary teeth were sectioned and embedded in resin blocks. Eight groups were formed for each test. Each group consisted of 14 specimens. Group 1 and 2: fissure sealant was applied directly to etched enamel in dry and wet condition, respectively; Group 3 and 4: fissure sealant was applied onto etched and Scotch-bond Multi-Purpose Plus treated enamel in dry and wet condition, respectively; Group 5 and 6: fissure sealant was applied onto etched and Syntac treated enamel in dry and wet condition, respectively; Group 7 and 8: fissure sealant was applied onto etched and Optibond Dual Cure treated enamel in dry and wet condition, respectively. The results revealed that the use of an enamel-dentine bonding agent under fissure sealant increased the bond strength and decreased the microleakage. The use of enamel-dentine bonding agents under sealant in moisture contaminated conditions gave better results than applying sealant alone onto non-contaminated teeth. Finally, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus yielded the best results for both tests.

Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate↗

Flouride release from various restorative materials.

Fluoride release from six light-activated restorative materials, including two resinmodified glass-ionomers, two composites, and two compomers, was evaluated and compared with one conventional acid-based glass-ionomer cement. The amount and rate of release varied among the tested materials. Both resin-modified glass-ionomers and the conventional acid-base glass-ionomer cements released more fluoride then the composites and compomers (p < 0.05). Additionally, composite materials released less fluoride than compomer materials (p < 0.05). Release of fluoride by the tested materials showed a significant decrease after all the tested time intervals.

Acrylic Resins↗

Evaluation of coronal microleakage of four different glass-ionomer cements in endodontically treated teeth.

Four different glass-ionomer materials were evaluated for coronal microleakage in permanent lingual access restorations of endodontically treated anterior teeth. Forty extracted human anterior teeth were randomly divided into four groups following chemomechanical preparations and obturations with gutta-percha and sealer. Logobond, Aqua Ionobond, Ionoseal and Ketac-Cem were placed in 2 mm thickness over the gutta-percha obturation from cemento-enamel junction. Eight teeth were used as negative and positive controls. The teeth were thermocycled, coated with nail varnish and paraffin except around the access preparation. Next they were placed in dye and cleared to allow visualization of dye penetration. There was a tendency for the Ketac-Cem group to lack least but there were no statistically differences among the groups.

Analysis of Variance↗