PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Van de Velde

Publications and source records attributed to M Van de Velde.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Effect of sufentanil on minimum local analgesic concentrations of epidural bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in nullipara in early labour.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the effect of epidural sufentanil on relative analgesic potencies of epidural bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine by determining the minimum local analgesic concentrations during labour. METHODS: In a randomised, double-blind study, 171 parturients were allocated to one of six groups receiving a 10-mL bolus of bupivacaine, ropivacaine or levobupivacaine alone or with sufentanil 0.75 microg/mL. The concentration of local anaesthetic was determined by the response of the previous parturient using up-down sequential allocation starting at a concentration of 0.13% wt/vol with a testing interval of 0.01%. Effective analgesia was defined as a visual analogue pain score < or = 15/100 mm within 30 min and lasting for 30 min. Median effective concentrations were estimated and two-sided P < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: Local anaesthetic concentration, use of sufentanil and local anaesthetic drug were independent significant predictors of effective and ineffective analgesia. Bupivacaine was significantly more potent than levobupivacaine and ropivacaine. The relative potency ratios without sufentanil of 0.77:0.83:1.00 were reduced to 0.36:0.38:1.00 by the addition of sufentanil. The major factor influencing local anaesthetic requirements was the addition of sufentanil, which reduced overall requirements by a factor of 4.2 (95% CI 3.6-4.8); this effect was proportionately more enhanced for bupivacaine. CONCLUSIONS: Local anaesthetic requirements for bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine follow an analgesic potency hierarchy. Any potency differences are small when compared to the effect of sufentanil, which resulted in a four-fold reduction in local anaesthetic requirements. Sufentanil may also enhance the potency differences between bupivacaine and the two S-enantiomer agents.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed2006

Cryotherapy versus laser photocoagulation for threshold retinopathy of prematurity: impact on early postoperative clinical recovery.

In a retrospective study in preterms treated with either cryotherapy (n= 16, 2000-2001) or laser photocoagulation (n= 19, 2002-2005) for threshold retinopathy, a significant decrease in duration of postoperative ventilation, in postoperative administration of analgesics and in time until regain of full enteral feeding was documented in infants who received laser photocoagulation. We therefore conclude that - compared to cryotherapy - laser treatment for threshold retinopathy is associated with a faster clinical postoperative recovery.

Cryotherapy↗
PubMed2005

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia following combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: the effects of adding a continuous epidural infusion.

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is used to maintain epidural analgesia following initial intrathecal analgesia. This trial investigated whether a continuous background infusion with PCEA provides superior analgesia to PCEA alone among patients who received combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia during labour Eighty parturients were randomized to either PCEA alone (PCEA) or PCEA with a background infusion of ropivacaine 0.15% with sufentanil 0.75 microg/ml at 2 ml/h (PCEA + CEI). PCEA settings were a bolus of 4 ml of the same analgesic solution with a lockout interval of 15 minutes. Significantly more patients in the PCEA group required at least one anaesthetist intervention for breakthrough pain (27 [71%] vs 10 [25%] in the PCEA + CEI group, P<0.05). Consumption of local anaesthetic (excluding manually administered boluses) was similar between the groups. If anaesthetist-administered boluses were included, more local anaesthetic was consumed by the PCEA group (47.1 +/- 19.4 mg vs 35.6 +/- 12.0 mg in the PCEA + CEI group, P<0.05). We conclude that PCEA with a background infusion provides effective analgesia with less anaesthetist workload and reduced local anaesthetic consumption as compared with PCEA without a background infusion.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A prospective, randomized study was designed to compare the maternal and neonatal effects of conventional epidural anesthesia and combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSE) for Cesarean section in severe preeclamptic patients. Additionally, two strategies in the prophylactic management of hypotension in severe preeclamptic patients were evaluated: fluid preloading or prophylactic ephedrine. METHODS: Thirty nonlaboring women with severe preeclampsia (PET), scheduled for an elective Cesarean section, were randomised into three groups: epidural anesthesia with prophylactic fluid loading (EA-F), combined spinal epidural anesthesia with prophylactic fluid loading (CSE-F), or combined spinal epidural anesthesia with prophylactic ephedrine (CSE-V). Hemodynamic data were recorded prior and after induction of regional anesthesia at five-minute intervals. The total amount of intravenous administered fluid and the total dose of vasopressors were recorded. RESULTS: Hemodynamic data were similar between the three groups. The incidence and duration of hypotension was similar in all three groups. Significantly more ephedrine was used in the CSE-V group as compared to the CSE-F group. More lactated Ringer's solution was used in the CSE-F group as compared to the CSE-V group. There were no hypertensive episodes and none of the patients developed pulmonary edema. The time period from induction until the start of surgery and the duration of surgery were significantly shorter in both CSE-groups. Neonatal outcome was comparable between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSE) is a safe alternative to conventional epidural anesthesia in severe preeclamptic women and that the prophylactic use of ephedrine is effective and safe to prevent and treat spinal hypotension after combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section in severe preeclamptic women.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

General anaesthesia with target controlled infusion of propofol for planned caesarean section: maternal and neonatal effects of a remifentanil-based technique.

The present case series evaluated maternal and neonatal effects of remifentanil, combined with propofol, during general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. Following written informed consent, ten patients scheduled for semi-elective caesarean section were recruited to this prospective, unblinded trial. All patients with non-reassuring fetal status were excluded. A 0.50-micrograms/kg bolus of remifentanil was given intravenously, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.20 micrograms.kg(-1)min(-1). Anaesthesia was induced using propofol target controlled infusion set at a blood concentration of 5 micrograms/mL, 45 s after the remifentanil bolus. Following tracheal intubation the propofol target was reduced to 2.5 micrograms/mL and remifentanil maintained at 0.20 micrograms.kg(-1)min(-1). Mean arterial pressure remained stable throughout anaesthesia. Two patients experienced episodes of hypotension (mean arterial pressure decrease >20%). Although neonatal depression occurred in six babies and assisted mask ventilation was required briefly, recovery was rapid without the need for naloxone or tracheal intubation. Umbilical artery pH was >7.20 in all infants. We conclude that the results of the present case series using a remifentanil/propofol-based technique of general anaesthesia for caesarean section provide a basis to study the safety of this technique in a larger population. Under the conditions of the present trial, this anaesthetic technique seems safe for mother and infant, provided adequate precautions are taken to manage brief, self-limiting infant respiratory depression. At the moment we cannot advise the routine use of this technique, especially since it has not been studied in situations of fetal compromise.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A multicentre trial comparing different concentrations of ropivacaine plus sufentanil with bupivacaine plus sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal concentration of ropivacaine for bolus-only patient-controlled epidural labour analgesia, three different doses of ropivacaine were evaluated in comparison with bupivacaine in a double-blinded multicentre study. METHODS: Four hundred-and-fifty labouring parturients at term in three different academic institutions were randomized to four groups receiving bupivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil 0.75 microg mL(-1), ropivacaine 0.125% or 0.175% with sufentanil 0.75 microg mL(-1), or ropivacaine 0.2%. After an initial bolus of 10 mL of the study solution, and once visual analogue scores (VAS) were below 30 mm, patient-controlled epidural analgesia was initiated with a bolus of 4 mL, a lockout interval of 15 min and without a background infusion. Variables studied were the quality of analgesia, incidence of side-effects, the degree of motor blockade, and the mode of delivery. RESULTS: Bupivacaine 0.125% and ropivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil proved equally effective in providing labour analgesia without a difference in local anaesthetic consumption (48.6 +/- 23 mg bupivacaine vs. 52.1 +/- 38 mg ropivacaine), motor blockade or mode of delivery. Ropivacaine 0.175% plus sufentanil enhanced the quality of analgesia of the initial loading dose, whereas ropivacaine 0.2% without sufentanil increased the consumption of local anaesthetics (80.2 +/- 34 mg; P < 0.05) and the degree of motor blockade. CONCLUSION: Despite recent studies indicating that bupivacaine and ropivacaine may not be equipotent, both local anaesthetics provided equi-effective analgesia at equal doses without a difference in side-effects.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMed2004

Low-dose combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia vs. conventional epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section in pre-eclampsia: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Epidural anaesthesia is the preferred technique of anaesthesia for Caesarean section in pre-eclampsia. Spinal anaesthesia is considered by some as a safe and effective alternative, which is especially useful in emergency situations. Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia, using low doses of local anaesthetics with opioids, is effective and reduces the incidence of hypotension in normal pregnancy. We performed a retrospective chart analysis to evaluate the effects of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia on maternal haemodynamics and fetal outcome compared to conventional epidural anaesthesia. METHODS: A retrospective anaesthesia chart analysis of all pre-eclamptic patients who underwent Caesarean section over a 4 yr period was performed. Patient characteristic, obstetric, haemodynamic, fetal and neonatal data were gathered and analysed according to the anaesthetic technique used. RESULTS: Seventy-seven pre-eclamptic parturients undergoing Caesarean section were identified (26 women were severely pre-eclamptic and 51 demonstrated mild pre-eclampsia). Epidural anaesthesia was performed in 62 patients and combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia was performed in 15. No differences in patient characteristic and obstetric data were noted. Highest mean arterial pressure prior to anaesthesia was comparable between the groups (epidural: 106 +/- 12 vs. combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia: 109 +/- 18 mmHg) as well as the lowest recorded mean arterial pressure following anaesthesia (epidural: 93 +/- 13 vs. combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia: 98 +/- 17 mmHg). In the combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia group more ephedrine was used compared to the epidural group (14.6 +/- 4.4 vs. 3.6 +/- 4.6 mg, P < 0.05). However, more lactated Ringer's was used in the epidural group. Umbilical artery pH was lower in the epidural group (7.26 +/- 0.01 vs. 7.29 +/- 0.02, P < 0.05). Similar results were noted in 26 severely pre-eclamptic patients. Seven women underwent combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia and 19 underwent epidural anaesthesia in the severely pre-eclamptic group. Also more ephedrine was used in the combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia group. A tendency towards a lower umbilical artery pH was observed in the epidural group but this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia appears to be safe as anaesthetic technique for pre-eclampsia and severe pre-eclampsia. However, it is important to consider the retrospective design of the study and the large number of epidural anaesthetics performed.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Intrathecal sufentanil and fetal heart rate abnormalities: a double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial comparing two forms of combined spinal epidural analgesia with epidural analgesia in labor.

UNLABELLED: Combined spinal epidural analgesia (CSE) for labor pain relief has become increasingly popular. However, the effect of intrathecal sufentanil on the incidence of uterine hyperactivity and fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities remains controversial. We hypothesized that the use of intrathecal sufentanil in a dose of 7.5 microg is more likely to induce a nonreassuring FHR tracing than a small dose of spinal sufentanil combined with bupivacaine or epidural analgesia. Three-hundred parturients were randomized into three groups. In the first group, epidural analgesia was initiated with 12.5 mg of bupivacaine, 12.5 microg of epinephrine, and 7.5 microg of sufentanil in a volume of 10 mL (EPD group). In Group 2, initial intrathecal analgesia consisted of 2.5 mg of bupivacaine, 2.5 microg of epinephrine, and 1.5 microg of sufentanil (BSE group); in Group 3, spinal analgesia consisted of 7.5 microg of sufentanil (SUF group). Analgesia was maintained in all groups with patient-controlled epidural analgesia using bupivacaine 0.125%, 1.25 microg/mL of epinephrine, and 0.75 microg/mL of sufentanil (bolus, 4 mL; lockout, 15 min). Cardiotocography was monitored continuously 15 min before analgesia and for 60 min after the start of analgesia. The quality of analgesia, labor, and neonatal outcome and side effects were recorded. Twenty-four percent of patients in the SUF group developed FHR abnormalities (bradycardia or late decelerations) during the first hour after initiation of analgesia compared with 12% in the BSE group and 11% in the EPD group. Uterine hyperactivity occurred in 12% of parturients in the SUF group but in only 2% in the other groups. Onset of analgesia was more rapid in both CSE groups as compared with the EPD group. However, 29% of patients in the BSE group developed severe hypotension, requiring IV ephedrine (29% in the BSE group versus 7% and 12% in the EPD and SUF groups, respectively). All these differences reached statistical significance. The present data corroborate previous recommendations of caution when performing CSE using a large dose (7.5 microg or more) of spinal sufentanil because of the risk of uterine hyperactivity and FHR abnormalities. IMPLICATIONS: Combined spinal epidural analgesia (CSE) produces pain relief during labor. Fetal heart rate changes after CSE using intrathecal sufentanil have been reported. We performed a randomized, blinded trial confirming that fetal heart rate changes are more frequent after CSE using 7.5 micro g of intrathecal sufentanil as compared with other forms of neuraxial labor analgesia.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Management of fetal pain during invasive fetal procedures. A review.

In recent years, fetal stress and analgesia draw more and more attention. Evidence that fetuses show a significant endocrinological and hemodynamical response to invasive stimuli, and that these responses can be blocked by analgesia, suggests that fetuses experience a stress response, even if this does not signify they experience "pain". Moreover, it is becoming increasingly clear that experiences of pain of a fetus will be "remembered" by the developing nervous system, perhaps for the entire life of the individual, which can probably lead to abnormal behavioural patterns or altered nociception. But up to now, the entire mechanism of fetal stress response and the optimal analgesic drug, dose and route of administration is not so clear.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Remifentanil for foetal immobilisation and maternal sedation during endoscopic treatment of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome : a preliminary dose-finding study.

Twin to twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) affects 10 to 15% of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Untreated, perinatal loss exceeds 80%, of which survivors have a great risk for long-term neurological disorders as psychomotor retardation or cerebral palsy. TTTS can be treated using foetoscopy and selective ablation of the twin-to-twin blood vessels under local or regional anaesthesia. However, local or regional anaesthesia does not always result in excellent maternal comfort, nor does it provide foetal immobilisation, necessary for optimal surgical conditions. Using a continuous infusion rate of remifentanil 0.1 microg/kg/min, perfect foetal immobilisation and excellent maternal sedation was achieved. Only mild respiratory acidosis was observed as a result of mild respiratory depression. In no mother apnoe occurred. All haemodynamic parameters, both foetal and maternal, remained stable during the procedure. Maternal sedation, respiratory depression and foetal immobilisation were quickly reversible following cessation of the remifentanil infusion.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Continuous spinal analgesia for labor pain in a parturient with aortic stenosis.

Aortic stenosis in pregnancy carries a high fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Spinal analgesia/anesthesia is considered by many to be contraindicated in these patients. The rapid onset of sympathetic block induces hypotension, which can result in myocardial hypoperfusion and myocardial ischemia. We describe a case of moderate to severe aortic stenosis, diagnosed during pregnancy, in which pain relief during labor and delivery was managed using a continuous spinal catheter. Pure intrathecal opioid analgesia was used initially to maintain hemodynamic stability. However after two bolus administrations of sufentanil, analgesia was further maintained using ropivacaine and sufentanil. A spinal catheter was chosen to provide reliable anesthesia, which could be extended rapidly for cesarean section.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2003

Cryotherapy for threshold retinopathy: perioperative management in a single center.

Perioperative management and complications during and after surgery were reviewed in a population of premature infants who received cryotherapy because of threshold retinopathy by retrospective analysis of medical, anaesthetic, and ophthalmologic files. Infants (n=31) who received cryotherapy between January 1, 1996 and January 1, 2001 and were treated during the neonatal period in the unit were included in the study. Cryotherapy was performed under general anesthesia on the neonatal ward. Neonatal and preoperative characteristics of this cohort point to a vulnerable group of infants with a preoperative weight of 1622 g (1519 to 1862 g), bronchopulmonary dysplasia criteria applying in 29 of 31 patients and methylxanthins prescribed in 26 of 31 patients. No single cryotherapy session had to be interrupted because of systemic complications. Still marked cardiorespiratory instability was documented until 36 hours postoperative in 8 patients. Performing surgical procedures on the neonatal ward is a feasible option. Perioperative management in infants who received cryotherapy is used as an illustration of this approach.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2001

Effects of amniodistention with carbon dioxide on fetal acid-base status during fetoscopic surgery in a sheep model.

BACKGROUND: Because the data from previous experiments on the fetal effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) amniodistention in endoscopic fetal surgery are conflicting, we set out to evaluate the fetal acid-base status during CO2 amniodistention, with or without maternal hyperventilation, using a sheep model for endoscopic surgery. METHODS: We assigned 26 pregnant ewes undergoing amniodistention with CO2 (4-5 mmHg intraamniotic pressure) to one of the following three groups: group I had fetal surgery + no maternal hyperventilation (n = 10); group II had fetal surgery + maternal hyperventilation (n = 10); group III had no fetal surgery + maternal hyperventilation (n = 6). Hyperventilation kept CO2 at 29-31 mmHg; in its absence, pCO2 ranged from 38 to 41. Fetal surgery consisted of fetoscopic tracheal clipping. Maternal blood pressure (mean, 98/69 mmHg) and heart rate (mean, 72 bpm) were kept at values comparable to human pregnancy. Fetal and maternal blood gas measurements were taken every 15 min during 1 h of amniodistention. RESULTS: The ranges for baseline mean fetal pCO2 (mmHg) and pH were 51-55 and 7.24-7.25, respectively, in all study groups. After 1 h of amniodistention, mean +/- SEM values of fetal pCO2 and pH were 88 +/- 3 and 7.06 +/- 0.03 in group I, 69 +/- 4 and 7.13 +/- 0.02 in group II, and 71 +/- 5 and 7.14 +/- 0.04 in group III, respectively. Therefore, maternal hyperventilation attenuated but could not prevent significant fetal hypercarbia and acidosis. Fetal surgical manipulation had no effect on these observations. CONCLUSION: CO2 amniodistention should not be considered for clinical practice until ways of preventing its effects on the fetal acid-base status can be demonstrated.

Acid-Base Equilibrium↗
PubMed2001

Anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Although anaesthesia for Caesarean section is predominantly performed using regional techniques of anaesthesia, general anaesthesia will remain essential for subgroups of obstetric patients, especially those who are at high risk of complications. In the present review, recent reports that addressed issues regarding general and regional anaesthesia in Caesarean section will be discussed.

Journal Article↗