Persistence of increased amylase and lipase concentrations in acute pancreatitis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M Ventrucci.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The clinical validity of a continuous colorimetric method for measuring pancreatic lipase was assessed. 1,2-Diacylglycerol containing long-chain fatty acid residues was used as substrate, and the method was adapted to a discrete analyser. The dynamic range was ascertained up to at least 30-fold the upper reference limit. Precision tests on three control sera yielded overall CVs of 4.6% (mean value 21 U/l), 2.4% (115 U/l), and 1.0% (386 U/l), respectively. Using serum samples from normal subjects and patients with pancreatic and non-pancreatic disorders, the present method was compared with a turbidimetric method (r = 0.997; n = 281) and a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (r = 0.987; n = 93). The reference interval established on 121 healthy subjects was 8-57 U/l (central 95th percentile, median 22 U/l). The sensitivity of this lipase assay in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (100%, median 5.6-fold the upper reference limit) was equal to that of the pancreatic isoamylase assay, and higher than that of the total alpha-amylase assay (88.2%); the specificity for acute pancreatitis with respect to a group of patients with acute and chronic non-pancreatic abdominal diseases (91%) was higher than that of both pancreatic isoamylase (76%) and total alpha-amylase (71%).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We measured total plasma amino acid concentrations before and during pancreatic stimulation with secretin (1 clinical unit/kg/h) and caerulein (50 ng/kg/h) in 28 healthy volunteers, 60 patients with chronic pancreatitis (25 mild to moderate, 35 severe), and 22 patients with non-pancreatic digestive disease. In the healthy volunteers and patients with non-pancreatic digestive disease pancreatic stimulation caused a significant decrease (p less than 0.001) in plasma amino acid concentration, whereas in patients with chronic pancreatitis the decrease did not occur or was only slight. In six healthy volunteers and 24 patients with chronic pancreatitis (nine mild to moderate, 15 severe) repetition of the test using caerulein alone showed no significant differences from combined stimulation. Using the maximal per cent decrease in plasma amino acid concentration as an index of pancreatic function (lower normal limit 14%), 20 of the 25 patients with mild to moderate pancreatitis (80%) and 32 of the 35 with severe pancreatitis (91.4%) had values clearly below normal. The overall sensitivity of the test (86.7%) was significantly greater than that of the pancreolauryl test (64.2%) (p less than 0.02) and that of faecal chymotrypsin (66%) (p less than 0.05). None of the patients with non-pancreatic digestive disease had abnormal values. We conclude that the assessment of the decrease in the plasma amino acid concentration during pancreatic stimulation with secretin and caerulein is a simple, sensitive, and highly specific test of pancreatic function. The data obtained using caerulein stimulation alone suggest that the test can be further simplified, and made less costly, by eliminating the use of secretin.
A method has recently been developed for measuring serum pancreatic (P) isoamylase, using two monoclonal antibodies specific for salivary isoamylase. We performed this test on 67 healthy controls and 133 patients: 15 with acute pancreatitis, 53 with chronic pancreatitis (20 during painful relapse and 33 in clinical remission), 18 with pancreatic cancer, 41 with nonpancreatic disease with abdominal pain, five with macroamylasemia, and one with total pancreatectomy. Results were compared with those of a wheat germ inhibition method and with electrophoresis on cellulose acetate. A close correlation was found between the results of immunoinhibition assay and those of the other two tests. All patients with acute pancreatitis had abnormally high values in all three tests. In the group with chronic pancreatitis studied during painful relapse, 16 had an increase in P-isoamylase, as determined with the immunoinhibition assay, 13 with the wheat germ inhibition test, and 15 with electrophoresis. In the group with chronic pancreatitis in clinical remission, we found low values in one patient, by immunoinhibition assay, but found low values in 17 and 19 patients by wheat germ inhibition and electrophoresis, respectively. Low P-isoamylase values corresponded to a severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. In the group with pancreatic cancer, the three tests showed similar results, and the majority of the patients had normal values. In the patients with nonpancreatic diseases, abnormally high levels were found in five, by immunoassay, in four by electrophoresis, and in three by the wheat germ inhibition method. In the five cases with macroamylasemia, both inhibition assays erroneously demonstrated an abnormal P-isoamylase elevation. The results show that the three tests are equally useful for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, or chronic pancreatitis during an acute relapse. In these diseases, the immunoinhibition test would be the preferred assay because it is simple and rapidly performed.
The serum behavior of amylase, pancreatic isoamylase, lipase, trypsinogen, and elastase 1 was studied in 145 patients with pancreatic disease and in 66 patients with abdominal pain of nonpancreatic origin, for the purpose of evaluating the relative diagnostic utility of their assays. In 34 patients with acute pancreatitis, serum lipase, trypsinogen, and elastase 1 were elevated in all 34, pancreatic isoamylase in 33 (97%) and amylase in 30 (88%). Ten of these acute pancreatitis patients were followed sequentially for seven days: the variations in their serum enzyme levels were parallel, although the lipase, trypsinogen, and particularly the elastase 1 elevations persisted longer than did those of amylase and pancreatic isoamylase. Among the patients with chronic pancreatitis, either in painful relapse (N = 19) or with pancreatic cysts (N = 15), the respective percentages of enzymes elevations were: 79 and 80% for elastase 1, 68 and 67% for trypsinogen, 63 and 73% for pancreatic isoamylase, 58 and 60% for lipase, 53 and 60% for amylase. In the 52 chronic pancreatitis patients studied during clinical remission, serum enzyme behavior varied greatly, and a majority of the assays (60%) were normal; even in the case of severe pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, normal as well as abnormally high and low enzyme values were seen. Highly variable enzyme behavior was also seen in the 40 patients with pancreatic cancer, and elastase I was the most frequently (35%) elevated enzyme in this group as well. Among the patients with abdominal pain of nonpancreatic origin, abnormally high enzyme levels were present in percentages ranging from 6% for lipase to 21% for trypsinogen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
We studied serum elastase 1 concentrations in patients with pancreatic disease to assess its diagnostic value and compare its sensitivity and specificity with that of amylase and pancreatic isoamylase. Markedly raised concentrations of elastase 1 were found in all twenty-nine patients with acute pancreatitis (amylase was elevated in all but three and pancreatic isoamylase in all but one). Serial measurements of the three enzymes in acute pancreatitis showed that elastase remained elevated longer than amylase and pancreatic isoamylase. The majority of chronic pancreatitis patients studied during a painful relapse (16 out of 21, 76 per cent) had elastase concentrations above the upper normal limit. Amylase and pancreatic isoamylase were elevated in 11 (52 per cent) and in 13 (62 per cent), respectively. Most patients with chronic pancreatitis studied during clinical remission (39 out of 43) had serum elastase levels either within (n = 24) or below (n = 15) the control range. The latter had severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and steatorrhoea. In carcinoma of the pancrease, 20 out of 32 (63 per cent) had abnormal serum elastase concentrations; 16 were higher and 4 lower than the control range. Amylase was abnormal in 10 (31 per cent) (8 high, 2 low), and pancreatic isoamylase was abnormal in 16 (50 per cent) (11 high, 5 low). In 46 control patients with non-pancreatic abdominal pain, serum elastase concentrations were not significantly different from those in healthy controls. Elastase was slightly raised in two, whereas amylase and pancreatic isoamylase were elevated in seven and eight, respectively. We conclude that serum elastase 1 is a highly sensitive and specific indicator of pancreatic disease.
The variations of serum levels of amylase, pancreatic isoamylase, lipase, trypsinogen, and elastase 1 were evaluated in 21 patients with acute pancreatitis. The patients were studied for a mean period of 7 consecutive days (range 5-12 days) after admission to the hospital. On the day of onset of acute pancreatitis, all enzyme levels were abnormally high; pancreatic isoamylase showed the greatest increase compared with its upper normal limit, whereas the increase increment for elastase 1 was the lowest. Subsequently, all enzyme levels except elastase 1 decreased in a parallel fashion. On the eighth day of the study only elastase 1 levels were above normal values in all patients examined, while abnormally high values of lipase were found in 85% of the patients, trypsinogen in 58% of the patients, pancreatic isoamylase in 43%, and total amylase in 23%. These results indicate that, for the early diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, the determination of any of these enzymes is equally efficient, but that elastase 1 is the most sensitive marker of acute pancreatic damage in later stages of the disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The secretion of bicarbonate, lipase, and chymotrypsin into the duodenum in response to exogenous stimulation with secretin, 1 CU/kg-h, plus caerulein, 100 ng/kg-h, was investigated in 12 patients, on an average, 20.7 months after total gastrectomy and in 14 control subjects. The secretion of bicarbonate and lipase was significantly lower in patients than in controls. The reduction in outputs compared with the control values was 47.9%, 38.7%, and 24.2% respectively for bicarbonate, lipase, and chymotrypsin. Eight of the 12 patients (67%) had steatorrhoea. No significant correlation was found between this parameter and lipase output. It is concluded that the exocrine pancreatic function is impaired in the majority of patients subjected to total gastrectomy. The impairment, which particularly affects bicarbonate and lipase, is generally mild to moderate.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Phosphorylcholine and homocysteine have an important choleretic action and also potentiate exocrine pancreatic secretion by way of stimulation and a more effective preparation of the substrate against attack by lipolytic enzymes. The protection offered by pancreatic enzymes in the correction of the digestive insufficiency in the endoluminal stage is also known. An analysis was therefore made of the action of an association of phosphorylcholine homocysteine and digestive enzymes in cases of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and primary or secondary malabsorption. This action was evaluated on the basis of the reduction of elimination of steatorrhoea. For this purpose, faecal lipids were determined with the method proposed by van de Kramer et al. The most significant results were obtained in cases where digestive insufficiency was most marked, where correction of the pancreatic enzyme deficiency and improved biliary function were particularly required.
Serum amylase, pancreatic isoamylase, lipase, trypsinogen and elastase-1 were measured in 100 consecutive patients who were emergency admissions to a surgical department, and in 27 selected patients with proven acute pancreatitis who served as controls. The final diagnoses in the 100 patients of the study group were: acute pancreatitis in eight patients, other digestive diseases in 87, and urogenital tract diseases in five. In the control group, pancreas-specific enzymes were abnormally high in all patients and amylase in 26 out of 27. In the study group, all enzymes were markedly high in all eight patients with acute pancreatitis. In the remaining 92 patients, serum amylase was abnormally high in seven, and at least one pancreatic enzyme was elevated in 16. These elevations were generally mild. The diagnostic efficiency, i.e., the percentage of patients correctly classified, was 96% for pancreatic isoamylase and lipase, 93% for amylase, 91% for elastase-1, and 84% for trypsinogen. We conclude that serum lipase turbidimetric assay is the most suitable test for emergency diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, because it is highly sensitive and specific and simply and quickly performed.
Serum levels of amylase, pancreatic isoamylase, lipase, trypsinogen, and elastase 1 were determined in 41 patients with pancreatic carcinoma and compared with those 71 patients with chronic pancreatitis and 17 patients with digestive non-pancreatic carcinoma, in an attempt to evaluate their relative values in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Trypsinogen and elastase 1 levels were the most frequently abnormal (56%), followed by pancreatic isoamylase (39%), lipase (34%), and amylase (27%). In 4 patients with resectable cancer levels of all serum enzymes were within normal limits, with the single exception of a low trypsinogen level in one patient. No significant differences in the behavior of serum enzymes were found between patients with pancreatic cancer and those with chronic pancreatitis or digestive non-pancreatic cancer. The results of our study indicate that measurement of serum pancreatic enzymes is of limited usefulness in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.