PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Vittori

Publications and source records attributed to M Vittori.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

The combination of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor increases the rate of haemopoietic recovery with clinical benefit after peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.

In order to investigate the effects of erythropoietin (EPO) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration after peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) we performed a phase I/II study in patients with high-risk cancer. 15 consecutive patients were treated wit recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF) at the dose of 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (s.c.) every 24 h until day + 12 and with recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) at the dose of 150 IU/kg s.c. every 48 h until day + 11 following PBPCT. Their haemopoietic recovery was compared to that obtained in eight historic and control patients who did not receive any cytokines after PBPCT. No side-effects were observed during EPO plus G-CSF treatment and the treatment was not discontinued in any of the patients before completion of the treatment plan. The administration of EPO plus G-CSF after PBPCT produced a significant increase in the rate of white blood cell (WBC) (P = 0.0005), polymorphonuclear leucocyte (PMN) (P = 0.0005) and platelet (PLT) (P = 0.0105) recovery compared to the control group. The acceleration in haemopoietic recovery observed in the EPO plus G-CSF-treated patients produced a significant reduction of the days with WBC < 1 x 10(9)/l (P = 0.0009), PMN < 0.2 x 10(9)/l (P = 0.0030) and PMN < 0.5 x 10(9)/l (P = 0.0006). EPO plus G-CSF-treated patients required a significantly lower number of single donor PLT transfusions (P = 0.0142) and did not experience neutropenic fever, but historic control patients experienced fever > 38 degrees C for a median period of 4 d (0-12) with a medial period of parenteral antibiotic administration of 7.5 d (0-17). The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter in the study group than in the historic control group (P = 0.0264). In conclusion, we can confirm that EPO plus G-CSF treatment is feasible and potentiates the haemopoietic recovery after PBPCT, thus simplifying the clinical management of cancer patients who undergo high-dose chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Evaluation of a novel automated protocol for the collection of peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus G-CSF using the Fresenius AS104 cell separator.

Forty-seven peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections were carried out on patients mobilized with chemotherapy and 63 on patients mobilized with chemotherapy plus G-CSF (Filgrastim), using the Fresenius AS104 cell separator and a novel automated PBSC collection protocol. As expected, cell yields were significantly higher in the series mobilized using chemotherapy plus G-CSF. The low platelet and red blood cell contamination permitted freezing of the apheresis product without further manipulation, other than plasma removal in both series. In patients mobilized with chemotherapy we obtained a MNC and a hemopoietic progenitor (CFU-GM, BFU-e, and CD34+ cells) collection efficiency comparable or superior to those reported by Bender (1992) with the Baxter CS3000 Plus after mobilization with cyclophosphamide. A significant decrease in MNC, BFU-e, and CD34+ cell collection efficiency was found in patients mobilized with chemotherapy plus G-CSF compared to those obtained in patients mobilized with chemotherapy alone. Ten patients achieved a prompt and stable engraftment after high dose chemotherapy and the infusion of cryopreserved PBSC collected using this protocol. Studies are in progress in order to improve MNC and hemopoietic progenitor collection efficiency in patients mobilized with G-CSF to obtain a graft in no more than one or two procedures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Five-year experience in PBSC collection: results of the Catholic University of Rome.

Several authors have reported a faster immunological and hemopoietic post-transplant reconstitution using autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) than using autologous bone marrow stem cells. A large number of PBSC can be collected by leukapheresis during the hematological recovery after induction or salvage chemotherapy. In our experience we demonstrated that several separators, even if they have different results in mononuclear cell (MNC) yields, red blood cell and platelet contaminations, are able to collect PBSC for autotransplantation in patients with several malignant diseases and different status of disease. Eighty three patients were submitted to 590 leukapheresis procedures using 4 different blood cell separators: the results showed that all employed protocols are efficient in the collection of peripheral MNC even if after the widespread use of granulocytecolony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the harvesting phase, the blood cell separator efficiency in terms of MNC is reduced. The use of GCSF in combination with other growth factors, during chemotherapy mobilization could simplify, in the future, this therapeutical program even if improvements in the efficiency of PBSC collection protocols are required.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Autologous blood stem cell harvesting and transplantation in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

We investigated the feasibility of a programme of autologous blood stem cell (ABSC) harvesting and transplantation in 13 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, previously untreated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy and entering a phase II study of high-dose cisplatin, etoposide and carboplatin with haematopoietic stem cell rescue. Prior to high-dose treatment all patients underwent two courses of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide. An 8-fold increase of the peripheral colony forming unit granulocytic-macrophage (CFU-GM) was observed during recovery from myelosuppression after the first chemotherapy course. The second course determined a 2.5-fold increase of peripheral CFU-GM. In 70% of enrolled patients (nine patients) we were able to perform ABSC harvesting by leukaphereses; in the apheresed patients we harvested an average of 20.8 x 10(4)/kg CFU-GM (range 10.9-37.0). Haematopoietic trilineage engraftment, established as the number of days necessary to reach white blood cells (WBC) greater than 1.0 x 10(9)/l, polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN) greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/l and platelets (PLT) greater than 50 x 10(9)/l, occurred very promptly and was sustained in the same series after high-dose cisplatin, carboplatin and etoposide, followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). In our experience we found a significant correlation (r = 0.77; P less than 0.05) between CFU-GM infused dose and the engraftment speed of PMN. We conclude that the combination of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide is effective in mobilizing haematopoietic progenitors in the peripheral blood of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, previously untreated by chemoradiotherapy. Moreover, ABSCT is capable of rapidly restoring the haematopoietic function after high-dose treatment and for this reason it represents a particularly advisable therapeutic option for the treatment of solid tumours because these patients are commonly older than 50 and can be excluded from bone marrow transplantation.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Comparison of the side effects of therapeutic cytapheresis and those of other types of hemapheresis.

The side effects of a series of 2418 hemapheresis procedures performed in a total of 570 subjects (patients and donors) are described. Patients with various diseases were subjected to plasmapheresis (926 procedures in 181 patients) or cytapheresis (305 procedures in 89 patients). One hundred twelve plasmapheresis procedures and 1075 of cytaphereses were also performed in 300 blood donors. A total of 225 complications involving 107 patients (39.6%) occurred during 196 (15.9%) therapeutic procedures. Among the blood donors only 45 complications, involving 35 patients (11.6%) occurred during 45 procedures (4.2%). The complications seen with therapeutic plasmaphereses were circulatory disturbances (38% of all those observed), citrate reactions (27%), technical problems (20%), allergic reactions (9%) and miscellaneous complications (6%). Therapeutic cytaphereses were complicated by citrate reactions (44%), technical problems (25%), circulatory disturbances (14%), allergic reactions (11%) and miscellaneous complications (6%). Complications in the blood donor group included circulatory disturbances (51%), technical problems (36%) and various other problems (13%). No infectious complications or deaths were observed. The probability that adverse reactions will occur depends on the condition of the patient, the frequency of the sessions and the volume of fluid exchanged. Evaluation of the main risk factors, use of less intensive protocols and interruption of the session at the first sign of disturbances will help improve patient tolerance of these procedures.

Blood Donors↗
PubMed1991

Semiautomated autologous bone marrow processing for transplantation.

This paper describes the development of a semiautomated procedure for autologous bone marrow processing, prior to ex vivo manipulation and/or cryopreservation. This procedure was employed with a pediatric bowl (125 ml Latham bowl) and the automated DuPont Stericell processor. We have obtained a mononuclear cell recovery of 85% and a hemopoietic progenitor cell recovery of 81% (CFU-GM; BFU-E), with a red cell removal of 84%. We believe that a reliable and standardized bone marrow processing procedure is the basic necessity for a bone marrow transplantation program.

Automation↗
PubMed1991

Rationale for large scale bone marrow hemopoietic stem cell manipulation.

Many years have passed since the first attempt in marrow grafting was performed (1939). During this period several techniques have been developed in marrow processing and manipulation to overcome bone marrow transplant complications: the ABO barrier in case of major incompatibility between donor and recipient, the graft-versus-host disease due to the presence of allogeneic mature T-lymphocytes in cellular suspension and the neoplastic cell residue in autografts. At the end, the final volume of autologous mononuclear cell suspension must be frozen and an optimized cryopreservation allows a cell viability and subsequently an adequate medullar repopulating capacity.

Blood Group Incompatibility↗
PubMed1991

High dose chemotherapy with cisplatin, VP16 and carboplatin with stem cell support in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors treated 4 patients suffering from advanced ovarian cancer with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell (APBSC) or autologous bone marrow stem cell (ABM) as hematopoietic support. In three patients were collected peripheral blood stem cells using a fully automated blood cell separator during hematopoietic recovery following aplasia induced by non-intensive chemotherapy (cisplatin 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1,500 mg/m2). Hemopoietic reconstitution of the four patients submitted to APBSC or ABM support after high-dose chemotherapy (cisplatin 100 mg/m2, VP16 650 mg/m2 and carboplatin 1,800 mg/m2) showed the low hematological toxicity of our treatment with APBSC support. Moreover, the drug combination of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide has clinical activity in ovarian cancer and it is an optimal association to mobilize and harvest large number of PBSC.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

A comparison between two different procedures for bone marrow processing: a semiautomated procedure vs manual starch sedimentation.

After high-dose chemotherapy, autologous cryopreserved bone marrow infusion is employed to restore rapidly the compromised hematopoietic function. An efficient bone marrow processing reduces the infusion toxicity produced by hemolized red cells, granulocytes and platelets clumping and DMSO amount; moreover it increases freezing efficacy, a critical step in autologous bone marrow grafting techniques. Gravity sedimentation technique with 6% hydroxyethyl-starch (HES) or a semiautomated procedure using a blood cell processor were used in our center to manipulate ex-vivo the collected bone marrow. In our experience we compared these two different procedure and we evaluated their efficiency.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A preliminary survey of Italian experience on bone marrow harvesting, processing and manipulation. The Italian Cooperative Study Group on Cell Manipulation in Hematology.

The following report describes the initial stage of the activity of the Italian Cooperative Study group on cellular manipulation in hematology consisting of a retrospective evaluation of data regarding bone marrow (BM) harvesting processing, and proceedings from 20 Italian Centers. Two thousand, three hundred and eighty-four BM have considered: 1073 were performed for autografts and 1311 for allografts. A cohort of adverse effects in marrow harvesting were reported by 7 Centers out of 20, including one death caused by tracheomalacia during the anesthesia. Twelve Centers used blood separators as a mean for marrow processing. Eight Centers used the RBC removal technique in major donor/recipient AB0 incompatibility. Ficol-Hipaque gradient was employed in 7 Centers. T-depletion were accomplished with monoclonal antibodies in 7 Centers and elutriation in two Centers. Fifteen Centers provided to purge the residual tumour cells with chemicals (11), immunological (4) and chemo-physical means (1).

Bone Marrow Transplantation↗