PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M W Hsiung

Publications and source records attributed to M W Hsiung.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Correlation between voice handicap index and voice laboratory measurements in dysphonic patients.

Factors underlying voice disorders can be categorized into three distinct domains: emotional, physical, and functional. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI) subjectively evaluates voice disorders in terms of these three factors. On the other hand, Voice Laboratory Measurements (VLM) use objective criteria to evaluate the severity of voice disorders. Use of these two different tests (VHI and VLM) on dysphonic patients has, however, tended to yield results that vary widely in their conclusions. This report reviewed 135 testing sessions on dysphonia patients. Seventy-nine of the tests were VHI, and 56 were VLM. All VHI and VLM parameters were entered into a statistical program and analyzed using a Pearson correlation. The results show that each VHI parameter provides a significant level of reliability (P < 0.01) when compared with other VHI parameters. Four VLM parameters also demonstrated significant reliability (P < 0.01) in comparison with other VLM parameters. However, when comparing across testing methods, VHI and VLM parameter reliability is shown to be poor (P > 0.05). With such a large discrepancy between the results of VHI and VLM testing, no objective parameter can yet be regarded as a definitive prognostic factor in a subjective evaluation of dysphonic patients.

Adolescent↗

Failed medialization laryngoplasty: management by revision surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cause of immediate and late medialization laryngoplasty failures and to describe their management. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in 20 patients who underwent revision surgery after failed medialization laryngoplasty. Analysis was based on preoperative spiral CT scan, preoperative and postoperative videostrobolaryngoscopy, and phonatory function measures. RESULTS: Three major types of failures were identified. The most common problem was arytenoid rotation with a persistent posterior glottic gap (11 of 20). Malposition or wrong size of the implants resulted in a lateralized vocal fold or false vocal fold medialization (6 of 20). Three patients had implants that were extruding. Late atrophy and bowing resulted in a glottal gap (2 of 20). One patient had fibrosis around the implant requiring removal. Spiral CT scan of the larynx located the implant precisely and showed the degree of arytenoid rotation. Patients with arytenoid rotation and posterior gap had revision medialization combined with arytenoid adduction. Revision medialization was performed in 11 patients, arytenoid adduction in 12 patients, lipoinjection in 2 patients, and 4 implants were removed. The voice was improved in 15 patients. Improved voice was correlated with improved phonation time and reduced phonatory airflow rates. CONCLUSION: Immediate and late failures of medialization laryngoplasty are due to several possible causes. Revision surgery is feasible and highly successful. To select between the surgical alternatives work up should include preoperative analysis of vocal function, videostrobolaryngoscopic analysis, and spiral CT of the larynx.

Adult↗

Fat augmentation for glottic insufficiency.

OBJECTIVES: Fat lipoinjection augmentation for glottic insufficiency has been used in patients with vocal fold paralysis. Relatively little information is available on the effectiveness of fat injection in patients with vocal atrophy, intubation trauma, and post-hemilaryngectomy defects. STUDY DESIGN: This paper retrospectively compares the efficiency of fat injection in patients with vocal cord paralysis (n = 9), vocal scar (n = 13), and vocal atrophy (n = 11). METHODS: The perceptual acoustic, phonatory function, and videolaryngostroboscopic data were evaluated before and after fat augmentation in 33 patients. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 9.7 months. Nineteen patients had excellent results. Three patients had no change. Five patients had late failure. Six patients were lost to follow-up. Phonatory function showed significant improvement in jitter, shimmer, noise-to-harmonic ratio, maximal phonation time, grade, asthenia, and breathiness (P < .05). Videolaryngostroboscopic rating showed significant improvement in right linearity of the vocal fold edge, amplitude of vocal fold vibration, excursion of the mucosal wave, vibratory behavior, and phase symmetry (P < .05). Anterior defects did better than posterior defects. Small vocal fold defects did better than large defects. CONCLUSIONS: Fat injection is a good autogenous implant and may be considered as an option in management of patients with vocal fold scar, defect, or atrophy. Reabsorption of fat is a problem, but the procedure may be repeated.

Adipose Tissue↗

Uric acid estimation: a comparison of the manual uricase-UV and the phosphotungstate auto-analyzer methods.

1. Uric acid estimations by the uricase-UV and the autoanalyzer colorimetric procedures were compared. 2. At all levels of serum uric acid concentration measured, results with the uricase-UV method were significantly lower than those with the phosphotungstate method. 3. The data indicate that the critical uric acid level (measured by the autoanalyzer) at which allopurinol, uricosuric, and other agents are instituted should be decreased approximately 10 per cent when determinations are done by the uricase method.

Autoanalysis↗