PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

M W Rouse

Publications and source records attributed to M W Rouse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Binocular accommodative facility testing reliability.

This study evaluated the reliability of the 1-min binocular accommodative facility test by extending the testing period for 2 additional minutes. Subjects, ages 8 to 12 years, were tested for an initial 1-min period, to identify 2 groups, high fail (greater than 3, but less than 8 cpm, N = 30) and low fail (less than 3 cpm, N = 30), and then tested for an additional 2 min. The low fail group had greater test-retest reliability in both minutes 2 and 3. Both groups improved (high fails mean = 0.93 cpm, low fails mean = 0.37 cpm), but no clear statistical difference was found between groups. When diagnostic classification was monitored over the 3 min, 40% of high fails passed, whereas no low fails passed. The 1-min testing method appears reliable if the initial rate is less than 3 cpm. For patients whose initial rate is between 3 and 8 cpm, extended testing (1 to 2 additional minutes) may be needed to arrive at an accurate diagnosis, especially if presenting symptoms are absent.

Accommodation, Ocular

Comparative study of computer-based and standard clinical accommodative facility testing methods.

Two methods for assessing accommodative facility were compared: the Computer Orthoptics Diagnostic Program and the standard Lens Flipper Method. In random fashion, 40 visually normal [modified clinical technique (MCT) screening] subjects, ages 10 to 18 years, were tested monocularly and binocularly on both methods. Scatter-plot comparisons of the data showed no apparent relation between the two methods, with correlation coefficients close to zero for both monocular (r = 0.0205) and binocular (r = 0.1180) results. In addition, the subject's diagnostic classification (pass or fail) was compared between the two methods. The kappa statistic indicated a low level of agreement between the two methods both monocularly and binocularly. These results suggest that the Computer Orthoptics' diagnostic test is not a valid method for diagnosing accommodative facility deficiencies.

Accommodation, Ocular

Management of infantile-onset esotropia.

Background information on the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and differential diagnosis of infantile-onset esotropia is presented. A brief overview of early development of binocularity is also presented to set the stage for management, as well as a sequential treatment plan for two age groups of infantile esotropes: 1) infants and toddlers, and 2) preschool and "older" patients. Flowcharts and case examples are included to highlight the management principles for attaining maximum binocular function.

Adolescent