PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Whitby

Publications and source records attributed to M Whitby.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Behavioural considerations for hand hygiene practices: the basic building blocks.

Hand hygiene is considered to be the most effective measure to prevent microbial pathogen cross-transmission and healthcare-associated infections. In October 2005, the World Health Organization (WHO) World Alliance for Patient Safety launched the first Global Patient Safety Challenge 2005-2006, 'Clean Care is Safer Care', to tackle healthcare-associated infection on a large scale. Within the Challenge framework, international infection control experts and consultative taskforces met to develop new WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare. The taskforce was asked to explore aspects underlying hand hygiene behaviour that may influence its promotion among healthcare workers. The dynamics of behavioural change are complex and multi-faceted, but are of vital importance when designing a strategy to improve hand hygiene compliance. A reflection on challenges to be met and areas for future research are also proposed.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

A study of the distribution of dose across the hands of interventional radiologists and cardiologists.

The magnitude and distribution of doses across the hands of interventional radiologists and cardiologists have been studied. The aims were to determine the region of highest dose, investigate variations in dose distribution, and propose an effective method for dose monitoring. Doses have been measured using sets of up to 18 thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) for 183 single procedures. Important factors influencing the dose to the hand are the type of procedure, particularly the access route, the X-ray equipment used, and the experience of the operator. Radiologists performing percutaneous procedures received the highest doses, because of the proximity of their hands to the X-ray tube. The majority of procedures involve a combination of twisting and prodding actions, and the relative proportions of each determine the parts of the fingers which receive a higher dose. For most interventional radiology and cardiology procedures the bases of the ring and little fingers receive the highest dose. However, during percutaneous procedures the tips of the middle and ring fingers could receive doses which were 20-30% higher than this. For radiologists and cardiologists with a mixed workload, monitoring using TLD rings located at the base of the little or the ring fingers on either hand should provide a reasonable estimate of dose to the most exposed area. Monitoring is recommended for operators who may receive over 50 mSv to their hands per year, and should be considered for operators carrying out therapeutic procedures involving patient dose-area products over 500 Gy cm2 per month.

Cardiology↗

A comparison of competing methods for the detection of surgical-site infections in patients undergoing total arthroplasty of the knee, partial and total arthroplasty of hip and femoral or similar vascular bypass.

Recent research suggests that the retrospective review of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-9-CM) codes assigned to a patient episode will identify a similar number of healthcare-acquired surgical-site infections as compared with prospective surveillance by infection control practitioners (ICP). We tested this finding by replicating the methods for 380 surgical procedures. The sensitivity and specificity of the ICP undertaking prospective surveillance was 80% and 100%, and the sensitivity and specificity of the review of ICD-10-AM codes was 60% and 98.9%. Based on these results we do not support retrospective review of ICD-10-AM codes in preference prospective surveillance for SSI.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

An investigation of contact transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Hand hygiene is critical in the healthcare setting and it is believed that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), for example, is transmitted from patient to patient largely via the hands of health professionals. A study has been carried out at a large teaching hospital to estimate how often the gloves of a healthcare worker are contaminated with MRSA after contact with a colonized patient. The effectiveness of handwashing procedures to decontaminate the health professionals' hands was also investigated, together with how well different healthcare professional groups complied with handwashing procedures. The study showed that about 17% (9-25%) of contacts between a healthcare worker and a MRSA-colonized patient results in transmission of MRSA from a patient to the gloves of a healthcare worker. Different health professional groups have different rates of compliance with infection control procedures. Non-contact staff (cleaners, food services) had the shortest handwashing times. In this study, glove use compliance rates were 75% or above in all healthcare worker groups except doctors whose compliance was only 27%.

Cross Infection↗

Handwashing in healthcare workers: accessibility of sink location does not improve compliance.

In spite of its importance, handwashing frequency in healthcare workers is generally low. The rebuilding and relocation of an 800-bed tertiary referral hospital on the same campus allowed assessment of the impact of easy accessibility to sinks on handwashing compliance. The new hospital design ensured that no clinical activity could occur more than 5 m (usually much less) from a sink. In the old hospital, clinical staff were often up to 30 m from a sink. Covert observation of nursing staff was undertaken in intensive care, infectious diseases, internal medicine and urology wards, over a total of 24 h during three consecutive days, two months before and one and 10 months after relocation to the new hospital. In all areas, handwashing compliance was greater before than after-patient contact. Initial increases (9-24%) in after-patient contact handwashing frequency following patient contact were demonstrated in units of both high and low clinical care activity one month after relocation. However, no sustained clinically significant improvement could be demonstrated nine months later. Glove use was shown to diminish compliance with handwashing protocols by as much as 25%. Improved accessibility to sinks does not lead to an improvement in healthcare workers' handwashing compliance.

Gloves, Protective↗

Histoplasmosis in Australia: a report of a case with a review of the literature.

Histoplasmosis is a rare but serious fungal infection commonly presenting as mucosal ulceration of the oral cavity. It is increasingly recognized in Australia but the source of infection remains obscure and it is likely to be under-diagnosed. We report a case of chronic mucosal ulceration which failed to fully respond to periodontal therapy. Histology and culture of a gingival biopsy was consistent with histoplasmosis, and the patient responded favourably to treatment with oral itraconazole. Histoplasmosis may present to general dental practitioners as chronic mucosal ulceration and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of such lesions. Diagnosis is best made by culture and histology of biopsy specimens.

Antifungal Agents↗

Trends in mortality rates for infectious and parasitic diseases in Australia: 1907-1997.

AIMS: To characterize long-term mortality trends for infectious and parasitic diseases in Australia during the twentieth century, explore influencing factors and provide suggestions to health policy-makers. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted. Deaths due to communicable diseases from 1907 to 1997 were tallied, according to the International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9). Trends in infectious disease mortality in overall population and in the 0-4 years age group were examined and standardized by sex. Death rates were also studied for: (i) diarrhoea/enteritis, (ii) pneumonia and all respiratory diseases and (iii) tuberculosis. RESULTS: There has been a substantial decline in -mortality from communicable diseases over the study period. The death rate dropped from 258.9 per 100,000 population in 1907 to 7.2 per 100,000 population in 1997. Six phases of the decline were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of improved living conditions and access to readily available treatments over the twentieth century played an important role in the reduction of infectious disease mortality in Australia.

Age Distribution↗

Investigation using an advanced extremity gamma instrumentation system of options for shielding the hand during the preparation and injection of radiopharmaceuticals.

Staff preparing and injecting radiopharmaceuticals in hospitals may receive significant radiation doses to their hands. These doses may be high enough to warrant that they be classified as radiation workers. The influence of local shielding on finger doses has been investigated. Staff preparing radioactive liquids in a radionuclide dispensary and drawing up and injecting radiopharmaceuticals in a nuclear medicine department have been studied. Measurements have been recorded with an electronic extremity dose monitor, an advanced extremity gamma instrumentation system (AEGIS), worn near to the finger tip. The electronic dosimeter allows the pattern of doses received during different procedures to be determined. Doses received for individual manipulations during many routine sessions have been recorded for different staff members. Dose distributions around shielded vials and syringes have also been measured using AEGIS. In the radionuclide dispensary the vials from which radioactive liquids are dispensed are held in tungsten shields, whereas in nuclear medicine simple lead pots are used. Syringe shields are employed for some parts of dispensing and patient injections. Data on dose distributions have been used in interpretation of results from monitoring. Use of syringe shields during dispensing reduced the finger dose by 75-85%. The peaks in dose rate were 60% lower, and periods of exposure to high dose rates were reduced in length by a third because of the restriction in the region of high dose rate. The extremity doses to staff dispensing and injecting radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine were of similar magnitude. Doses received during dispensing varied from 10 to 555 microGy depending upon whether the vial containing the radiopharmaceutical was directly handled or not. Dose received from individual injections varied from 1 to 150 microGy depending on the degree of difficulty experienced during the injection.

Drug Compounding↗

Application of ALARP to extremity doses for hospital workers.

The implementation of ALARP for hospital workers is considered in relation to extremity doses. Criteria are proposed which could provide guidance in determining strategies for both implementing radiation protection measures and dose monitoring for the extremities. Two groups of hospital workers have been studied, namely interventional radiologists/cardiologists, and radionuclide staff preparing and administering radiopharmaceuticals. The radiology procedures can give high doses to both the hands and legs. Those to the legs can be reduced by the use of lead rubber shields. Study of the distribution of dose across radiologists' hands has identified the ring position on the little finger as the appropriate position for dose monitoring. The variations in dose across the hands of radionuclide workers are greater, with the tip likely to receive the highest dose. The protection strategy will need to be determined for each department, because of the wide range in techniques used in handling radiopharmaceuticals. It is hoped that the criteria could aid balanced decision-making about the appropriate protection strategy and ensure that protection measures are in place where they are required, but avoid their introduction where they are unnecessary.

Extremities↗

Radiation doses to the legs of radiologists performing interventional procedures: are they a cause for concern?

The purpose of this study was to ascertain the magnitude and distribution of doses to the legs of radiologists when performing interventional procedures. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD100 chips were used to measure simultaneously doses to the lower limbs and, for comparison, the hands during 100 interventional procedures. Results show leg dose was dependent upon type and complexity of procedure, equipment used and whether lead protection was available. Where no lead protection was used, the doses to the lower limbs were frequently similar to or higher than those received by the hands. The mean dose to the legs ranged from 0.19 mSv to 2.61 mSv per procedure, compared with 0.04 mSv to 1.25 mSv to the hands. During transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and embolisation procedures the leg dose could be as much as 2-3 times greater than that to the hands. When lead protection was used, the dose to the legs was reduced significantly to 0.02 mSv to 0.5 mSv per procedure. A clear linear relationship was shown between the dose-area product (DAP) reading and the dose to the feet of the radiologist. As a "rule of thumb", a DAP reading of 100 Gy cm(2) will give a dose of 1 mSv to the legs, if no lead protection was used, dropping to approximately 0.02 mSv if lead protection was present. This study demonstrates that the dose to the legs of radiologists can be higher than that to the hands when no lead protection is used. The inclusion of a lead screen to protect the legs is an effective method of dose reduction when performing interventional procedures.

Embolization, Therapeutic↗

Post-discharge surveillance: can patients reliably diagnose surgical wound infections?

Post-discharge surgical wound infection surveillance is an important part of many infection control programs. It is frequently undertaken by patient self-assessment, prompted either by a telephone or postal questionnaire. To assess the reliability of this method, 290 patients were followed for six weeks postoperatively. Their wounds were photographed and also covertly assessed for signs of infection by two experienced infection control nurses (ICNs). Patients also responded to a postal questionnaire seeking evidence of infection at both week four and week six post-surgery. Correlation between the patient's assessment of their wound and the ICNs diagnosis was poor (r = 0.37) with a low positive predictive value (28.7%), although negative predictive value was high (98.2%). Assessment of photos for signs of infection by two experienced clinicians also correlated poorly with the ICNs diagnosis of infection (r = 0.54). The patient's recall of prescription of an antibiotic by their general practitioner (GP) for wound infection during the postoperative period correlated best with the ICNs diagnosis (r = 0.76). This latter measure, particularly when confirmed by the GP in those patients reporting an infection, appears to provide the most valid and resource efficient marker of post-discharge surgical wound infection.

Aftercare↗

Risk of death from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of death from healthcare-associated (nosocomial) bacteraemia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and compare it with that of nosocomial bacteraemia caused by methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), by meta-analysis of selected studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE, Current Contents and Cochrane Library were searched for the period January 1978 (or earliest date of the database, if later than 1978) to December 2000. STUDY SELECTION: Studies which compared mortality of nosocomial MRSA and MSSA bacteraemia. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nine studies were analysed. All but one found an increased relative risk (RR) of death from MRSA bacteraemia, with RR ranging from 0.89 to 4.94. Meta-analysis showed that patients with MRSA bacteraemia have an RR of death, compared with patients with MSSA bacteraemia, of 2.12 (95% CI, 1.76-2.57) using the fixed-effect method, and 2.03 (95% CI, 1.55-2.65) using the random-effect method. CONCLUSION: MRSA bacteraemia is associated with a real increase in risk of death, further justifying ongoing MRSA surveillance and control in healthcare facilities.

Aged↗

The application of statistical process control charts to the detection and monitoring of hospital-acquired infections.

The monitoring of infection control indicators including hospital-acquired infections is an established part of quality maintenance programmes in many health-care facilities. However, surveillance data use can be frustrated by the infrequent nature of many infections. Traditional methods of analysis often provide delayed identification of increasing infection occurrence, placing patients at preventable risk. The application of Shewhart, Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) statistical process control charts to the monitoring of indicator infections allows continuous real-time assessment. The Shewhart chart will detect large changes, while CUSUM and EWMA methods are more suited to recognition of small to moderate sustained change. When used together, Shewhart and EWMA methods are ideal for monitoring bacteraemia and multiresistant organism rates. Shewhart and CUSUM charts are suitable for surgical infection surveillance.

Australia↗

Hypercalcaemia and elevated 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) levels associated with disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in AIDS.

Hypercalcaemia may complicate granulomatous diseases, such as tuberculosis and sarcoidosis, and various AIDS-related opportunistic infections and malignancies. We report here two patients with AIDS and disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection who developed symptomatic hypercalcaemia several weeks after commencing antimycobacterial chemotherapy, and in whom inappropriately elevated 1,25(OH)(2)D(3)levels were documented. Although vitamin D supplementation may have contributed, no other cause for the hypercalcaemia was found. The biochemical and clinical similarities between these cases and other hypercalcaemic granulomatous diseases suggest a common mechanism related to macrophage activation and dysregulated vitamin D production.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Standardising surveillance of nosocomial infections: the HISS program. Hospital Infection Standardised Surveillance.

Standardised surveillance of nosocomial infections in Australia had not been addressed until June 1998 when the New South Wales Health Department funded the development and implementation of the first standardised surveillance system for hospital infection: the Hospital Infection Standardised Surveillance program (HISS). The introduction of a standardised surveillance system needs to balance the requirements of a Health Department and the needs of hospitals. The Health Department requires data to develop aggregated rates for the setting of thresholds for all nosocomial infections while hospitals require rates to reflect the quality of clinical care and provide data for evidence-based infection control practices. The Hospital Infection Epidemiology and Surveillance (HIES) Unit has attempted to balance these requirements using a 'sentinel surveillance' approach with standardised definitions and methodology. The HISS program utilizes eICAT software modified for its standardised requirements of data collection. To date, 10 hospitals surveyed sentinel multiple resistant organisms (MRO), eight also elected sentinel surgical procedures (SSP) and intravascular device-related bacteraemia (IVDRB) modules, and two the seasonal respiratory syncytial (RSV) and rota-virus modules in paediatric patients. The surgical site infection rates in three commonly monitored SSP were 1.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-3.9%) for coronary artery bypass (CABG), 3.3% (95% CI 1.4-6.8%) lower segment Caesarean section (LSCS) and 7.7% (95% CI 3.4-14.6%) colorectal surgery. The rate of IVDRB was 4.7 per 1000 central venous catheter days (95% CI 2.2-8.6) and 1.1 per 1000 peripheral line-days (95% CI 0.1-3.9). Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) accounted for 99% of all new infections diagnosed with an endemic MRO.

Adolescent↗

The comparative efficacy of intravenous cefotaxime and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in preventing infection after neurosurgery: a prospective, randomized study. Brisbane Neurosurgical Infection Group.

The objective of the investigation was to determine the comparative efficacy of cefotaxime versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the prophylaxis of patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. In this prospective randomized open study, 780 adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy, shunt surgery or stereotactic surgery were randomized to receive preoperative cefotaxime (1 g) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160 mg trimethoprim, 800 mg sulfamethoxazole) as prophylaxis: 613 patients were available for analysis, of whom 315 received cefotaxime and 298 received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Forty-two patients (6.9%) experienced 49 postoperative infections, with no significant difference between treatment groups. The most common infections unrelated to neurosurgery were urinary tract infections (17 cases) and pneumonia (seven cases). Fifteen neurosurgical infections occurred, comprising 11 wound infections, two shunt infections and two cerebral abscesses. Neurosurgical infection rates were similar in the cefotaxime group (2.5%) and the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group (2.3%). We concluded cefotaxime and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole administered as single dose prior to neurosurgery are equally effective in controlling neurosurgical infection and postoperative infection at remote sites.

Adult↗

Nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: is it any worse than nosocomial methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the comparative virulence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA) by consideration of predisposing factors and outcomes in patients infected with these organisms in the healthcare setting. DESIGN: Analysis of an historical cohort of 504 bacteremic patients (316 MSSA and 188 MRSA), examining factors associated with mortality. SETTING: A 916-bed, university-affiliated, tertiary referral hospital. RESULTS: Risk factors for the development of MRSA include male gender, admission due to trauma, immunosuppression, presence of a central vascular line or an indwelling urinary catheter, and a past history of MRSA infection. Overall mortality was 22%. Death due to bacteremia was significantly greater in the MRSA group (risk ratio, 1.68; P<.05), although these patients were not found to be more likely to die due to underlying disease during treatment of bacteremia. In those patients who recovered from bacteremia, no significant differences for the outcome of death could be determined between the MRSA and MSSA groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is a general consensus in the published literature that MRSA bacteremia is more likely to be associated with death, and we confirm this conclusion. However, in contrast to other studies, our MRSA cohort does not appear to be more at risk of death due to underlying disease during treatment for bacteremia. Similarly, the general consensus that MRSA patients have an increased overall mortality was not confirmed in our study. Differences in comorbidities of patients may provide some explanation of these conflicting results, while an alternate explanation is that MRSA strains are more virulent than MSSA in some centers. Perhaps the most plausible explanation is that treatment is provided earlier and in a more aggressive fashion in some centers, leading to an overall lower mortality rate in all staphylococcal bacteremias in these institutions.

Australia↗