PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M William Lensch

Publications and source records attributed to M William Lensch.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Scientific and clinical opportunities for modeling blood disorders with embryonic stem cells.

Our considerable wealth of data concerning hematologic processes has come despite difficulties working with stem and progenitor cells in vitro and their propensity to differentiate. Key methodologies that have sought to overcome such limitations include transgenic/knock-out animals and in vitro studies using murine embryonic stem cells, because both permit investigation of the formation of hematopoietic tissue from nonhematopoietic precursors. Although there have been many successful studies in model animals for understanding hematopoietic-cell development, differences between lower vertebrates and humans have left gaps in our understanding. Clearly, human-specific strategies to study the onset of hematopoiesis, particularly the earliest events leading to the specification of both normal and abnormal hematopoietic tissue, could bring an investigational renaissance. The recent availability of human embryonic stem (hES) cells suggests that such a system is now at hand. This review highlights the potential of hES cells to model human hematologic processes in vitro with an emphasis on disease targets.

Animals↗

High-efficiency RNA interference in human embryonic stem cells.

RNA interference methodology suppresses gene expression, thus mimicking loss-of-function mutation and enabling in vitro and in vivo gene function analysis. In this study, we used retroviral and lentiviral vectors to deliver small interfering RNAs and report high-efficiency silencing of a green fluorescent protein (GFP) trans gene and the stem cell-specific transcription factors Oct4/POU5F1 and Nanog in human embryonic stem cells. Gene knockdown of Oct4 and Nanog promotes differentiation, thereby demonstrating a role for these factors in human embryonic stem cell self-renewal.

Antigens, Surface↗

Origins of mammalian hematopoiesis: in vivo paradigms and in vitro models.

Though a topic of medical interest for centuries, our understanding of vertebrate hematopoietic or "blood-forming" tissue development has improved greatly only in recent years and given a series of scientific and technical milestones. Key among these observations was the description of procedures that allowed the transplantation of blood-forming activity. Beyond this, other advances include the creation of a variety of knock-out animals (mice and more recently zebrafish), microdissection of embryonic and fetal blood-forming tissues, hematopoietic stem (HSC) and progenitor cell (HPC) colony-forming assays, the discovery of cytokines with defined hematopoietic activities, gene transfer technologies, and the description of lineage-specific surface antigens for the identification and purification of pluripotent and differentiated blood cells. The availability of both murine and human embryonic stem cells (ESC) and the delineation of in vitro systems to direct their differentiation have now been added to this analytical arsenal. Such tools have allowed researchers to interrogate the complex developmental processes behind both primitive (yolk sac or extraembryonic) and definitive (intraembryonic) hematopoietic tissue formation. Using ES cells, we hope to not only gain additional basic insights into hematopoietic development but also to develop platforms for therapeutic use in patients suffering from hematological disease. In this review, we will focus on points of convergence and divergence between murine and human hematopoiesis in vivo and in vitro, and use these observations to evaluate the literature regarding attempts to create hematopoietic tissue from embryonic stem cells, the pitfalls encountered therein, and what challenges remain.

Animals↗

LIF/STAT3 signaling fails to maintain self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells.

Murine embryonic stem (mES) cells remain undifferentiated in the presence of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) via LIF receptor (LIFR) signaling appears sufficient for maintenance of mES cell pluripotency. Anecdotal and contradictory accounts exist for the action of LIF in the culture of human embryonic stem cells, and the nature of LIF signaling and whether the LIF-STAT3 pathway is conserved in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) has not been systematically explored. In this study, we show that the LIFRbeta and the signaling subunit gp130 are expressed in hESCs and that human LIF can induce STAT3 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation in hESCs. Nevertheless, despite the functional activation of the LIF-STAT3 signaling pathway, human LIF is unable to maintain the pluripotent state of hESCs. Feeder-free culture conditions that maintain hESCs in an undifferentiated state do not show activation of STAT3, suggesting that distinct signaling mechanisms govern the self-renewal of hESCs.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

Acquired FANCA dysfunction and cytogenetic instability in adult acute myelogenous leukemia.

Myelodysplastic and leukemic stem cell clones that evolve in children and adults with Fanconi anemia universally bear complex cytogenetic abnormalities. The abnormalities are generally recurring deletions or chromosomal loss and involve precisely the same chromosomes with the same frequency as has been described in marrow cells from patients with secondary acute leukemia induced by alkylating agents. Reasoning that acquired Fanconi anemia protein dysfunction might contribute to cytogenetic instability in secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) cells, we analyzed leukemic cells bearing characteristic complex cytogenetic defects obtained from a 68-year-old man whose lymphoblasts showed no evidence of Fanconi anemia. Unlike the lymphoblasts, this myeloid leukemia cell line (UoC-M1) was hypersensitive to mitomycin-C (MMC) and diepoxybutane (DEB) and exhibited a marked decrease in nuclear FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2-L. Retroviral transduction of FANCA significantly reduced MMC sensitivity but FANCF, FANCG, and FANCC did not. Overexpression of FANCA restored levels of both FANCA and FANCG, whereas overexpression of FANCG or FANCC did not restore FANCA levels. The molecular mass of cytoplasmic FANCA, FANCG, FANCC, and nuclear FANCD2 were normal. All exons of FANCA and FANCG were sequenced, and no mutations were found. We conclude that perturbations of as yet unidentified factors that govern the binding activity or intracellular localization of FANCA may promote cytogenetic instability and clonal progression in patients with AML who do not have Fanconi anemia.

Aged↗