Biomedical subjects

M Y Okamura

Publications and source records attributed to M Y Okamura.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Mechanism of proton transfer inhibition by Cd(2+) binding to bacterial reaction centers: determination of the pK(A) of functionally important histidine residues.

The bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (RC) uses light energy to catalyze the reduction of a bound quinone molecule Q(B) to quinol Q(B)H(2). In RCs from Rhodobacter sphaeroides the protons involved in this process come from the cytoplasm and travel through pathways that involve His-H126 and His-H128 located near the proton entry point. In this study, we measured the pH dependence from 4.5 to 8.5 of the binding of the proton transfer inhibitor Cd(2+), which ligates to these surface His in the RC and inhibits proton-coupled electron transfer. At pH <6, the negative slope of the logarithm of the dissociation constant, K(D), versus pH approaches 2, indicating that, upon binding of Cd(2+), two protons are displaced; i.e., the binding is electrostatically compensated. At pH >7, K(D) becomes essentially independent of pH. A theoretical fit to the data over the entire pH range required two protons with pK(A) values of 6.8 and 6.3 (+/-0.5). To assess the contribution of His-H126 and His-H128 to the observed pH dependence, K(D) was measured in mutant RCs that lack the imidazole group of His-H126 or His-H128 (His --> Ala). In both mutant RCs, K(D) was approximately pH independent, showing that Cd(2+) does not displace protons upon binding in the mutant RCs, in contrast to the native RC in which His-H126 and His-H128 are the predominant contributors to the observed pH dependence of K(D). Thus, Cd(2+) inhibits RC function by binding to functionally important histidines.

Aspartic Acid↗

PubMed2002

Determination of proton transfer rates by chemical rescue: application to bacterial reaction centers.

The bacterial reaction center (RC) converts light into chemical energy through the reduction of an internal quinone molecule Q(B) to Q(B)H(2). In the native RC, proton transfer is coupled to electron transfer and is not rate-controlling. Consequently, proton transfer is not directly observable, and its rate was unknown. In this work, we present a method for making proton transfer rate-controlling, which enabled us to determine its rate. The imidazole groups of the His-H126 and His-H128 proton donors, located at the entrance of the transfer pathways, were removed by site-directed mutagenesis (His --> Ala). This resulted in a reduction in the observed proton-coupled electron transfer rate [(Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B))Glu(-) + H(+) --> (Q(A)Q(B)(-)(*))GluH], which became rate-controlled by proton uptake to Glu-L212 [Adelroth, P., et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 14538-14546]. The proton uptake rate was enhanced (rescued) in a controlled fashion by the addition of imidazole or other amine-containing acids. From the dependence of the observed rate on acid concentration, an apparent second-order rate constant k((2)) for the "rescue" of the rate was determined. k((2)) is a function of the proton transfer rate and the binding of the acid. The dependence of k((2)) on the acid pK(a) (i.e., the proton driving force) was measured over 9 pK(a) units, resulting in a Brönsted plot that was characteristic of general acid catalysis. The results were fitted to a model that includes the binding (facilitated by electrostatic attraction) of the cationic acid to the RC surface, proton transfer to an intermediate proton acceptor group, and subsequent proton transfer to Glu-L212. A proton transfer rate constant of approximately 10(5) s(-)(1) was determined for transfer from the bound imidazole group to Glu-L212 (over a distance of approximately 20 A). The same method was used to determine a proton transfer rate constant of 2 x 10(4) s(-)(1) for transfer to Q(B)(-)(*). The relatively fast proton transfer rates are explained by the presence of an intermediate acceptor group that breaks the process into sequential proton transfer steps over shorter distances. This study illustrates an approach that could be generally applied to obtain information about the individual rates and energies for proton transfer processes, as well as the pK(a)s of transfer components, in a variety of proton translocating systems.

Bicarbonates↗

PubMed2002

Double mutant studies identify electrostatic interactions that are important for docking cytochrome c2 onto the bacterial reaction center.

Cytochrome c2 (cyt) is the mobile electron donor to the reaction center (RC) in photosynthetic bacteria. The electrostatic interactions involved in the dynamics of docking of cyt onto the RC were examined by double mutant studies of the rates of electron transfer between six modified Rhodobacter sphaeroides RCs in which negatively charged acid residues were replaced with Lys and five modified Rhodobacter capsulatus Cyt c2 molecules in which positively charged Lys residues were replaced with Glu. We measured the second-order rate constant, k2, for electron transfer from the reduced cyt to the oxidized primary donor on the RC, which reflects the energy of the transition state for the formation of the active electron transfer complex. Strong interactions were found between Lys C99 and Asp M184/Glu M95, and between Lys C54 and Asp L261/Asp L257. The interacting residues were found to be located close to each other in the recently determined crystal structure of the cyt-RC complex [Axelrod, H., et al. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. (in press)]. The interaction energies were approximately inversely proportional to the distances between charges. These results support earlier suggestions [Tetreault, M., et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 8452-8462] that the structure of the transition state in solution resembles the structure of the cyt-RC complex in the cocrystal and indicate that specific electrostatic interactions facilitate docking of the cyt onto the RC in a configuration optimized for both binding and electron transfer. The specific interaction between Asp M184 and Lys C99 may help to nucleate short-range hydrophobic contacts.

Cytochrome c Group↗

PubMed2001

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: decrease of proton transfer rate by mutation of surface histidines at H126 and H128 and chemical rescue by imidazole identifies the initial proton donors.

The pathway for proton transfer to Q(B) was studied in the reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The binding of Zn(2+) or Cd(2+) to the RC surface at His-H126, His-H128, and Asp-H124 inhibits the rate of proton transfer to Q(B), suggesting that the His may be important for proton transfer [Paddock, M. L., Graige, M. S., Feher, G. and Okamura, M. Y. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 6183-6188]. To assess directly the role of the histidines, mutant RCs were constructed in which either one or both His were replaced with Ala. In the single His mutant RCs, no significant effects were observed. In contrast, in the double mutant RC at pH 8.5, the observed rates of proton uptake associated with both the first and the second proton-coupled electron-transfer reactions k(AB)(()(1)()) [Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B)-Glu(-) + H(+) --> Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B)-GluH --> Q(A)Q(B)(-)(*)-GluH] and k(AB)(()(2)()) [Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B)(-)(*) + H(+) --> Q(A)(-)(*)(Q(B)H)(*) --> Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-)], were found to be slowed by factors of approximately 10 and approximately 4, respectively. Evidence that the observed changes in the double mutant RC are due to a reduction in the proton-transfer rate constants are provided by the observations: (i) k(AB)(1) at pH approximately pK(a) of GluH became biphasic, indicating that proton transfer is slower than electron transfer and (ii) k(AB)(2) became independent of the driving force for electron transfer, indicating that proton transfer is the rate-limiting step. These changes were overcome by the addition of exogenous imidazole which acts as a proton donor in place of the imidazole groups of His that were removed in the double mutant RC. Thus, we conclude that His-H126 and His-H128 facilitate proton transfer into the RC, acting as RC-bound proton donors at the entrance of the proton-transfer pathways.

Alanine↗

PubMed2001

Simultaneous replacement of Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn increases proton uptake by Glu-L212 upon first electron transfer to QB in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the first electron transfer to the secondary quinone acceptor Q(B) is coupled to the protonation of Glu-L212, located approximately 5 A from the center of Q(B). Upon the second electron transfer to Q(B), Glu-L212 is involved in fast proton delivery to the reduced Q(B). Since Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 play an important role in the proton transfer to the Q(B) site [Paddock, M. L., Adelroth, P., Chang, C., Abresch, E. C., Feher, G., and Okamura, M. Y. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6893-6902], we investigated the effects of replacing one or both Asp residues with Asn on proton uptake by Glu-L212 using FTIR difference spectroscopy. Upon the first electron transfer to Q(B), the amplitude of the proton uptake by Glu-L212 at pH 8 is increased in the single and double mutant RCs, as is evident from the larger intensity (by 35-55%) of the carboxylic acid band at 1727 cm(-1) in the Q(B)(-)/Q(B) difference spectra of mutant RCs, compared to that at 1728 cm(-1) in native RCs. This implies that the extent of ionization of Glu-L212 in the Q(B) ground state is greater in the mutants than in native RCs and that Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 are at least partially ionized near neutral pH in native RCs. In addition, no changes in the protonation state or the environment of these two residues are detected upon Q(B) reduction. The absence of the 1727 cm(-1) signal in all of the RCs lacking Glu-L212, confirms that the positive band at 1728-1727 cm(-1) probes the protonation of Glu-L212 in native and mutant RCs.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

PubMed2001

Interaction between cytochrome c2 and the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: effects of charge-modifying mutations on binding and electron transfer.

The electrostatic interactions governing binding and electron transfer from cytochrome c(2) (cyt c(2)) to the reaction center (RC) from the photosynthetic bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides were studied by using site-directed mutagenesis to change the charges of residues on the RC surface. Charge-reversing mutations (acid --> Lys) decreased the binding affinity for cyt c(2). Dissociation constants, K(D) (0.3--250 microM), were largest for mutations of Asp M184 and nearby acid residues, identifying the main region for electrostatic interaction with cyt c(2). The second-order rate constants, k(2) (1--17 x 10(8) M(-1) s(-1)), increased with increasing binding affinity (log k(2) vs log 1/K(D) had a slope of approximately 0.4), indicating a transition state structurally related to the final complex. In contrast, first-order electron transfer rates, k(e), for the bound cyt did not change significantly (<3-fold), indicating that electron tunneling pathways were unchanged by mutation. Charge-neutralizing mutations (acid --> amide) showed changes in binding free energies of approximately 1/2 the free energy changes due to the corresponding charge-reversing mutations, suggesting that the charges in the docked complex remain well solvated. Charge-enhancing mutations (amide --> acid) produced free energy changes of the same magnitude (but opposite sign) as changes due to the charge-neutralizing mutations in the same region, indicating a diffuse electrostatic potential due to cyt c(2). A two-domain model is proposed, consisting of an electrostatic docking domain with charged surfaces separated by a water layer and a hydrophobic tunneling domain with atomic contacts that provide an efficient pathway for electron transfer.

Cytochrome c Group↗

PubMed2001

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: cooperation between Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 facilitates proton transfer to the secondary quinone (QB).

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides uses light energy to reduce and protonate a quinone molecule, Q(B) (the secondary quinone electron acceptor), to form quinol, Q(B)H2. Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 have been proposed to be components of the pathway for proton transfer [Axelrod, H. L., Abresch, E. C., Paddock, M. L., Okamura, M. Y., and Feher, G. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1542-1547]. To test the importance of these residues for efficient proton transfer, the rates of the proton-coupled electron-transfer reaction k(AB)(2) (Q(A-*)Q(B-*) + H+ <==>Q(A-*)Q(B)H* --> Q(A)Q(B)H-) and its associated proton uptake were measured in native and mutant RCs, lacking one or both Asp residues. In the double mutant RCs, the k(AB)(2) reaction and its associated proton uptake were approximately 300-fold slower than in native RCs (pH 8). In contrast, single mutant RCs displayed reaction rates that were < or =3-fold slower than native (pH 8). In addition, the rate-limiting step of k(AB)(2) was changed from electron transfer (native and single mutants) to proton transfer (double mutant) as shown from the lack of a dependence of the observed rate on the driving force for electron transfer in the double mutant RCs compared to the native or single mutants. This implies that the rate of the proton-transfer step was reduced (> or =10(3)-fold) upon replacement of both Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn. Similar, but less drastic, differences were observed for k(AB)(1), which at pH > or =8 is coupled to the protonation of Glu-L212 [(Q(A-*)Q(B))-Glu- + H+ --> (Q(A)Q(B-*)-GluH]. These results show that the pathway for proton transfer from solution to reduced Q(B) involves both Asp-L210 and Asp-M17, which provide parallel branches to the proton-transfer pathway and through their electrostatic interaction have a cooperative effect on the proton-transfer rate. A possible mechanism for the cooperativity is discussed.

Aspartic Acid↗

PubMed2000

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: both protons associated with reduction of QB to QBH2 share a common entry point.

The reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides uses light energy for the reduction and protonation of a quinone molecule, Q(B). This process involves the transfer of two protons from the aqueous solution to the protein-bound Q(B) molecule. The second proton, H(+)(2), is supplied to Q(B) by Glu-L212, an internal residue protonated in response to formation of Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-). In this work, the pathway for H(+)(2) to Glu-L212 was studied by measuring the effects of divalent metal ion binding on the protonation of Glu-L212, which was assayed by two types of processes. One was proton uptake from solution after the one-electron reduction of Q(A) (DQ(A)-->D(+)Q(A)(-)) and Q(B) (DQ(B)-->D(+)Q(B)(-)), studied by using pH-sensitive dyes. The other was the electron transfer k(AB)((1)) (Q(A)(-)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(B)(-)). At pH 8.5, binding of Zn(2+), Cd(2+), or Ni(2+) reduced the rates of proton uptake upon Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-) formation as well as k(AB)((1)) by approximately an order of magnitude, resulting in similar final values, indicating that there is a common rate-limiting step. Because D(+)Q(A)(-) is formed 10(5)-fold faster than the induced proton uptake, the observed rate decrease must be caused by an inhibition of the proton transfer. The Glu-L212-->Gln mutant reaction centers displayed greatly reduced amplitudes of proton uptake and exhibited no changes in rates of proton uptake or electron transfer upon Zn(2+) binding. Therefore, metal binding specifically decreased the rate of proton transfer to Glu-L212, because the observed rates were decreased only when proton uptake by Glu-L212 was required. The entry point for the second proton H(+)(2) was thus identified to be the same as for the first proton H(+)(1), close to the metal binding region Asp-H124, His-H126, and His-H128.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2000

Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers.

The bacterial reaction center couples light-induced electron transfer to proton pumping across the membrane by reactions of a quinone molecule Q(B) that binds two electrons and two protons at the active site. This article reviews recent experimental work on the mechanism of the proton-coupled electron transfer and the pathways for proton transfer to the Q(B) site. The mechanism of the first electron transfer, k((1))(AB), Q(-)(A)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(-)(B), was shown to be rate limited by conformational gating. The mechanism of the second electron transfer, k((2))(AB), was shown to involve rapid reversible proton transfer to the semiquinone followed by rate-limiting electron transfer, H(+)+Q(-)(A)Q(-)(B) ifQ(-)(A)Q(B)H-->Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-). The pathways for transfer of the first and second protons were elucidated by high-resolution X-ray crystallography as well as kinetic studies showing changes in the rate of proton transfer due to site directed mutations and metal ion binding.

Benzoquinones↗

PubMed2000

Determination of the binding sites of the proton transfer inhibitors Cd2+ and Zn2+ in bacterial reaction centers.

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides couples light-driven electron transfer to protonation of a bound quinone acceptor molecule, Q(B), within the RC. The binding of Cd(2+) or Zn(2+) has been previously shown to inhibit the rate of reduction and protonation of Q(B). We report here on the metal binding site, determined by x-ray diffraction at 2.5-A resolution, obtained from RC crystals that were soaked in the presence of the metal. The structures were refined to R factors of 23% and 24% for the Cd(2+) and Zn(2+) complexes, respectively. Both metals bind to the same location, coordinating to Asp-H124, His-H126, and His-H128. The rate of electron transfer from Q(A)(-) to Q(B) was measured in the Cd(2+)-soaked crystal and found to be the same as in solution in the presence of Cd(2+). In addition to the changes in the kinetics, a structural effect of Cd(2+) on Glu-H173 was observed. This residue was well resolved in the x-ray structure-i.e., ordered-with Cd(2+) bound to the RC, in contrast to its disordered state in the absence of Cd(2+), which suggests that the mobility of Glu-H173 plays an important role in the rate of reduction of Q(B). The position of the Cd(2+) and Zn(2+) localizes the proton entry into the RC near Asp-H124, His-H126, and His-H128. Based on the location of the metal, likely pathways of proton transfer from the aqueous surface to Q(B) are proposed.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed2000

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: replacement of Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 with asn reduces the proton transfer rate in the presence of Cd2+.

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides converts light into chemical energy through the reduction and protonation of a bound quinone molecule Q(B) (the secondary quinone electron acceptor). We investigated the proton transfer pathway by measuring the proton-coupled electron transfer, k(AB)((2)) [Q(A)Q(B) + H(+) --> Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-)] in native and mutant RCs in the absence and presence of Cd(2+). Previous work has shown that the binding of Cd(2+) decreases k(AB)((2)) in native RCs approximately 100-fold. The preceding paper shows that bound Cd(2+) binds to Asp-H124, His-H126, and His-H128. This region represents the entry point for protons. In this work we investigated the proton transfer pathway connecting the entry point with Q(B) by searching for mutations that greatly affect k(AB)((2)) ( greater, similar10-fold) in the presence of Cd(2+), where k(AB)((2)) is limited by the proton transfer rate (k(H)). Upon mutation of Asp-L210 or Asp-M17 to Asn, k(H) decreased from approximately 60 s(-1) to approximately 7 s(-1), which shows the important role that Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 play in the proton transfer chain. By comparing the rate of proton transfer in the mutants (k(H) approximately 7 s(-1)) with that in native RCs in the absence of Cd(2+) (k(H) >/= 10(4) s(-1)), we conclude that alternate proton transfer pathways, which have been postulated, are at least 10(3)-fold less effective.

Aspartic Acid↗

PubMed1999

Observation of the protonated semiquinone intermediate in isolated reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: implications for the mechanism of electron and proton transfer in proteins.

A proton-activated electron transfer (PAET) mechanism, involving a protonated semiquinone intermediate state, had been proposed for the electron-transfer reaction k(2)AB [Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B)(-)(*) + H(+) <--> Q(A)(-)(*)(Q(B)H)(*) --> Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-)] in reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides [Graige, M. S., Paddock, M. L., Bruce, M. L., Feher, G., and Okamura, M. Y. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 9005-9016]. Confirmation of this mechanism by observing the protonated semiquinone (Q(B)H)(*) had not been possible, presumably because of its low pK(a). By replacing the native Q(10) in the Q(B) site with rhodoquinone (RQ), which has a higher pK(a), we were able to observe the (Q(B)H)(*) state. The pH dependence of the semiquinone optical spectrum gave a pK(a) = 7.3 +/- 0.2. At pH < pK(a), the observed rate for the reaction was constant and attributed to the intrinsic electron-transfer rate from Q(A)(-)(*) to the protonated semiquinone (i.e., k(2)AB = k(ET)(RQ) = 2 x 10(4) s(-)(1)). The rate decreased at pH > pK(a) as predicted by the PAET mechanism in which fast reversible proton transfer precedes rate-limiting electron transfer. Consequently, near pH 7, the proton-transfer rate k(H) >> 10(4) s(-)(1). Applying the two step mechanism to RCs containing native Q(10) and taking into account the change in redox potential, we find reasonable values for the fraction of (Q(B)H)(*) congruent with 0.1% (consistent with a pK(a)(Q(10)) of approximately 4.5) and k(ET)(Q(10)) congruent with 10(6) s(-)(1). These results confirm the PAET mechanism in RCs with RQ and give strong support that this mechanism is active in RCs with Q(10) as well.

Benzoquinones↗

PubMed1999

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: inhibition of proton transfer by binding of Zn2+ or Cd2+.

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides converts light into chemical energy through the light induced two-electron, two-proton reduction of a bound quinone molecule QB (the secondary quinone acceptor). A unique pathway for proton transfer to the QB site had so far not been determined. To study the molecular basis for proton transfer, we investigated the effects of exogenous metal ion binding on the kinetics of the proton-assisted electron transfer kAB(2) (QA-*QB-* + H+ --> QA(QBH)-, where QA is the primary quinone acceptor). Zn2+ and Cd2+ bound stoichiometrically to the RC (KD </= 0.5 microM) and reduced the observed value of kAB(2) 10-fold and 20-fold (pH 8.0), respectively. The bound metal changed the mechanism of the kAB(2) reaction. In native RCs, kAB(2) was previously shown to be rate-limited by electron transfer based on the dependence of kAB(2) on the driving force for electron transfer. Upon addition of Zn2+ or Cd2+, kAB(2) became approximately independent of the electron driving force, implying that the rate of proton transfer was reduced (>/= 10(2)-fold) and has become the rate-limiting step. The lack of an effect of the metal binding on the charge recombination reaction D+*QAQB-* --> DQAQB suggests that the binding site is located far (>10 A) from QB. This hypothesis is confirmed by preliminary x-ray structure analysis. The large change in the rate of proton transfer caused by the stoichiometric binding of the metal ion shows that there is one dominant site of proton entry into the RC from which proton transfer to QB-* occurs.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1998

Proton uptake by carboxylic acid groups upon photoreduction of the secondary quinone (QB) in bacterial reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: FTIR studies on the effects of replacing Glu H173.

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Glu H173, located approximately 7 A from the center of the secondary quinone acceptor QB, is expected to contribute to proton uptake upon QB- formation in response to the movement of an electron in its vicinity. Steady-state FTIR difference spectroscopy provides a method to monitor proton uptake by carboxylic acids upon photochemical changes. The FTIR spectra corresponding to the photoreduction of QB were obtained at pH 7 for RCs containing Glu (native), Gln (EQ H173), or Asp (ED H173) at the H173 site. No new bands were observed in the carboxylic acid region (1770-1700 cm-1) in any of the mutant RCs compared to native RCs. In addition, the positive band at 1728 cm-1, previously assigned to Glu L212 [Nabedryk, E., Breton, J., Hienerwadel, R., Fogel, C., Mäntele, W., Paddock, M. L., and Okamura, M. Y. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 14722-14732], remained present in all of the mutant RCs. This result shows that Glu H173 is not a major contributor to proton uptake upon QB- formation and further strengthens the assignment of the 1728 cm-1 band to Glu L212. An increase in the 1728 cm-1 band was observed in the EQ H173 RCs compared to that of either the ED H173 or native RCs. These changes are consistent with Glu and Asp at H173 remaining ionized in the QB and QB- states. Changes in the absorption regions of the semiquinone and amide or side chain groups in the spectra of the mutant RCs suggest slight changes in the protein structure compared to those of native RCs, which could contribute to the altered kinetics observed in the mutant RCs.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

PubMed1998

Conformational gating of the electron transfer reaction QA-.QB --> QAQB-. in bacterial reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides determined by a driving force assay.

The mechanism of the electron transfer reaction, QA-.QB --> QAQB-., was studied in isolated reaction centers from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides by replacing the native Q10 in the QA binding site with quinones having different redox potentials. These substitutions are expected to change the intrinsic electron transfer rate by changing the redox free energy (i.e., driving force) for electron transfer without affecting other events that may be associated with the electron transfer (e.g., protein dynamics or protonation). The electron transfer from QA-. to QB was measured by three independent methods: a functional assay involving cytochrome c2 to measure the rate of QA-. oxidation, optical kinetic spectroscopy to measure changes in semiquinone absorption, and kinetic near-IR spectroscopy to measure electrochromic shifts that occur in response to electron transfer. The results show that the rate of the observed electron transfer from QA-. to QB does not change as the redox free energy for electron transfer is varied over a range of 150 meV. The strong temperature dependence of the observed rate rules out the possibility that the reaction is activationless. We conclude, therefore, that the independence of the observed rate on the driving force for electron transfer is due to conformational gating, that is, the rate limiting step is a conformational change required before electron transfer. This change is proposed to be the movement, controlled kinetically either by protein dynamics or intermolecular interactions, of QB by approximately 5 A as observed in the x-ray studies of Stowell et al. [Stowell, M. H. B., McPhillips, T. M., Rees, D. C., Soltis, S. M., Abresch, E. & Feher, G. (1997) Science 276, 812-816].

Binding Sites↗

PubMed1997

Proton and electron transfer to the secondary quinone (QB) in bacterial reaction centers: the effect of changing the electrostatics in the vicinity of QB by interchanging asp and glu at the L212 and L213 sites.

The bacterial reaction center (RC) plays a central role in photosynthetic energy conversion by facilitating the light induced double reduction and protonation of a bound quinone molecule, QB. Two carboxylic acid residues, Asp-L213 and Glu-L212, located near QB, were previously shown to be important for proton transfer to QB. In this work, the ability of Glu to substitute for Asp at L213 and Asp to substitute for Glu at L212 was tested by site-directed mutagenesis. Both single mutants and a double mutant in which Asp and Glu were exchanged between the two sites were constructed. The electron transfer rate constants kBD (D+QAQB- --> DQAQB), and kAB(2) (DQA-QB- + H+ --> DQA(QBH)-), that are known to be sensitive to the energy of the QB- state, were found to be altered by Asp/Glu substitutions. Both rates were fastest ( approximately 10-fold) in RCs with Asp at both sites, slowest with Glu at both sites ( approximately 50-fold) and relatively unchanged by the caboxylic acid exchange. These changes could be explained if Asp was predominantly ionized and Glu was predominantly protonated at both sites (pH 7.5). The charge recombination kBD suggests an observed approximately 5 pKa unit difference of Glu over Asp. Modeling of kBD by strong electrostatic interactions ( approximately 3-4 pKa units) among negatively charged acids and QB- indicated a lower intrinsic pKa for Asp compared to Glu at either site of approximately 2-3 units. The mechanism of the kAB(2) reaction was determined to be the same in all mutant RCs as for native RCs. A quantitative explanation of the effect of the electrostatic environment on kAB(2) was obtained using the two-step model proposed for native RCs [Graige, M. S., Paddock, M. L., Bruce, J. M., Feher, G., & Okamura, M. Y. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 9005-9016] which involves fast protonation of the semiquinone followed by rate-limiting electron transfer. Using simple models for the quinone/quinol conversion rate, it is shown that the optimal electrostatic potential for the QB site is close to that found in native RCs.

Aspartic Acid↗

PubMed1997

Light-induced electrogenic events associated with proton uptake upon forming QB- in bacterial wild-type and mutant reaction centers.

Light-induced voltage changes (electrogenic events) were measured in wild-type and site-directed mutants of reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides oriented in a lipid monolayer adsorbed to a Teflon film. A rapid increase in voltage associated with charge separation was followed by a slower increase attributed to proton transfer from solution to protonatable amino-acid residues in the vicinity of the QB site. In native reaction centers the proton-transfer voltage had a pH-dependent amplitude with two peaks at pH 4.5 and pH 9.7, respectively. In the Glu-L212-->Gln RCs the high-pH peak was absent, whereas in the Asp-L213-->Asn RCs the low-pH peak was absent and the high-pH peak was shifted to lower pH by about 1.3 pH units. The amplitudes of the electrogenic phases as a function of pH follow approximately the measured proton uptake from solution (P.H. McPherson, M.Y. Okamura, G. Feher, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, vol. 934, 1988, pp. 348-368) and are ascribed to proton transfer to amino acid residues upon QB- formation. The peak around pH 9.7 is ascribed to proton uptake predominantly by Glu-L212 and the peak around pH 4.5 to proton uptake predominantly by Asp-L213 or a residue strongly interacting with Asp-L213.

Hydrogen-Ion Concentration↗

PubMed1996

Co-crystallization and characterization of the photosynthetic reaction center-cytochrome c2 complex from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

The photosynthetic reaction center (RC) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and cytochrome c2 (cyt c2), its physiological secondary electron donor, have been co-crystallized. The molar ratio of RC/cyt c2 was found by SDS-PAGE and optical absorbance changes in the co-crystals to be 4. The crystals diffracted X-rays to 3.5 angstroms. However, the resolution degraded during data collection. A data set, 82.5% complete, was collected to 4.5 angstroms. The crystals belong to the tetragonal space group P4(3)2(1)2, with unit cell dimensions of a = b = 142.7 angstroms and c = 254.8 angstroms. The positions of the RCs in the unit cell were determined by molecular replacement. A comparable search for the cyt c2 by this method was unsuccessful because of the small contribution of the cytochrome to the total scattering and because of its low occupancy. The cyt c2 was positioned manually into patches of difference electron density, adjacent to the periplasmic surface of the M polypeptide subunit of the RC. The difference electron density was not sufficient for precise positioning of the cyt c2, and its orientation was modeled by placing the exposed edge of the heme toward the primary donor of the reaction center D and by forming pairs for electrostatically interacting RC and cyt c2 amino acid residues. The RC-cyt c2 structure derived from the co-crystal data was supported by use of omit maps and structure refinement analyses. Cyt c2 reduces the photooxidized primary donor D+ in 0.9 +/- 0.1 micros in the co-crystals, which is the same as the fast electron transfer rate in vivo and in solution. This result provides strong evidence that the structure of the complex in the co-crystal is the same as in solution. Two additional methods were used to investigate the structure of the RC-cyt c2 complex: (i) Docking calculations based on interprotein electrostatic interactions identified possible binding positions of the cyt c2 on the RC. The cyt c2 position with the lowest electrostatic energy is very similar to that of the cyt c2 in the proposed co-crystal structure. (ii) Site-directed mutagenesis was used to modify two aspartic acid residues (M184 and L155) on the periplasmic surface of the RC. Cyt c2 binding affinity to these RCs and electron transfer rates to D+ in these RCs support the co-crystal structure of th RC-cyt c2 complex.

Binding Sites↗