PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Ychou

Publications and source records attributed to M Ychou.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Functional categories of TP53 mutation in colorectal cancer: results of an International Collaborative Study.

BACKGROUND: Loss of TP53 function through gene mutation is a critical event in the development and progression of many tumour types including colorectal cancer (CRC). In vitro studies have found considerable heterogeneity amongst different TP53 mutants in terms of their transactivating abilities. The aim of this work was to evaluate whether TP53 mutations classified as functionally inactive (< or=20% of wildtype transactivation ability) had different prognostic and predictive values in CRC compared with mutations that retained significant activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TP53 mutations within a large, international database of CRC (n = 3583) were classified according to functional status for transactivation. RESULTS: Inactive TP53 mutations were found in 29% of all CRCs and were more frequent in rectal (32%) than proximal colon (22%) tumours (P < 0.001). Higher frequencies of inactive TP53 mutations were also seen in advanced stage tumours (P = 0.0003) and in tumours with the poor prognostic features of vascular (P = 0.006) and lymphatic invasion (P = 0.002). Inactive TP53 mutations were associated with significantly worse outcome only in patients with Dukes' stage D tumours (RR = 1.71, 95%CI 1.25-2.33, P < 0.001). Patients with Dukes' C stage tumours appeared to gain a survival benefit from 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regardless of TP53 functional status for transactivation ability. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations that inactivate the transactivational ability of TP53 are more frequent in advanced CRC and are associated with worse prognosis in this stage of disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

p53 status and response to radiotherapy in rectal cancer: a prospective multilevel analysis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a prospective study, the predictive role of p53 status analysed at four different levels in identifying the response to preoperative radiotherapy in rectal adenocarcinoma. Before treatment, 70 patients were staged and endoscopic forceps biopsies from the tumour area were taken. p53 status was assessed by total cDNA sequencing, allelic loss analysis, immunohistochemistry, and p53 antibodies. Neoadjuvant treatment was based on preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. Response to therapy was evaluated after surgery by both pathologic downstaging and histologic tumour regression grade. In all, 35 patients (50.0%) had p53 gene mutations; 44.4% of patients had an allelic loss; nuclear p53 overexpression was observed in 39 patients (55.7%); and p53 antibodies were detected in 11 patients (16.7%). In the multilevel analysis of p53 status, gene mutations correlated with both nuclear protein overexpression (P < 0.0001) and loss of heterozygosity (P = 0.013). In all, 29 patients (41.4%) were downstaged by pathologic analysis, and 19 patients (29.2%) were classified as tumour regression grade 1. Whatever the method of evaluation of treatment response, no correlation between p53 alterations and response to radiotherapy was observed. Our results do not support the use of p53 alterations alone as a predictive marker for response to radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin compared with surgery alone for gastric cancer: 7-year results of the FFCD randomized phase III trial (8801).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for gastric cancer in a randomized controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After curative resection, stage II-III-IVM0 gastric cancer patients were randomly assigned to postoperative chemotherapy or surgery alone. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m(2) daily (5-day continuous infusion) was initiated before day 14 after resection. One month later, four 5-day cycles of 5-FU (1 g/m(2) per day) plus cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on day 2) were administered every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The study was closed prematurely after enrollment of 260 patients (79.7% N+), owing to poor accrual. At 97.8 months median follow-up, 5- and 7-year overall survival were 41.9% and 34.9% in the control group versus 46.6% and 44.6% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.22). Cox model hazard ratios were 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.02; P=0.063] for death and 0.70 (95% CI 0.51-0.97; P=0.032) for recurrence. An invaded/removed lymph nodes ratio >0.3 was the main independent poor prognostic factor identified by multivariate analysis (P=0.0001). Because of toxicity, only 48.8% of patients received more than 80% of the planned dose. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant survival benefit with this toxic cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, but a risk reduction in recurrence was observed.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

[Clinical practice guidelines: 2004 Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of patient with adenocarcinoma of the stomach--radiotherapy].

CONTEXT: "The Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French regional cancer centers, and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To elaborate clinical practice guidelines for patients with stomach adenocarcinoma. These recommendations cover the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of these tumors. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. The Standards, Options and Recommendations are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. RESULTS: Adjuvant radiation therapy alone is not a standard treatment for patients with stomach adenocarcinoma. Adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy is not a standard treatment for patients with stage II or III stomach adenocarcinoma R0, with Dl or D2 lymphadenectomy who have undergone surgery. Following surgical resection, adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy should be proposed to patients without denutrition with a lymphadenectomy < Dl (fewer than 15 lymph nodes examined) and those with T3 and/or N+ tumours following the protocol used in the MacDonald trials (SWOG-9008) (Level of evidence B1). Adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy can be administered to patients without denutrition with DI or D2 lymphadenectomy and with involvement of regional lymph nodes (N2 or N3).

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

[Concomitant use of radiotherapy and gemcitabine: preclinical findings and clinical practice].

Gemcitabine is pyrimidine analog which has demonstrated antitumoral activity in a variety of solid tumors. Laboratory studies demonstrating that gemcitabine is a potent radiosensitizer led to a variety of trials combining radiation and gemcitabine. In the clinic, phase I-II studies are still trying to determine the optimal dose and schedule which could be use in daily clinical practice. This review summarizes the mechanisms of interaction between radiotherapy and gemcitabine and presents several therapeutic schemes for each tumor location.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Potentiation of ionising radiation by targeting tumour necrosis factor alpha using a bispecific antibody in human pancreatic cancer.

The aim of this study was to treat carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-expressing pancreatic carcinoma cells with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) and simultaneous radiation therapy (RT), using a bispecific antibody (BAb) anti-TNFalpha/anti-CEA. TNFalpha used alone produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the clonogenic capacity of the cultured cells. Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle progression confirmed the accumulation of cells in G(1) phase after exposure to TNFalpha. When TNFalpha was added 12 h before RT, the surviving fraction at 2 Gy was 60% lower than that obtained with irradiation alone (0.29 vs 0.73, respectively, P<0.00001). In combination treatment, cell cycle analysis demonstrated that TNFalpha reduced the number of cells in radiation-induced G(2) arrest, blocked irreversibly the cells in G(1) phase, and showed an additive decrease of the number of cells in S phase. In mice, RT as a single agent slowed tumour progression as compared with the control group (P<0.00001). BAb+TNFalpha+RT combination enhanced the delay for the tumour to reach 1500 mm(3) as compared with RT alone or with RT+TNFalpha (P=0.0011). Median delays were 90, 93, and 142 days for RT alone, RT+TNFalpha, and RT+BAb+TNFalpha groups, respectively. These results suggest that TNFalpha in combination with BAb and RT may be beneficial for the treatment of pancreatic cancer in locally advanced or adjuvant settings.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

An open phase I study assessing the feasibility of the triple combination: oxaliplatin plus irinotecan plus leucovorin/ 5-fluorouracil every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose of irinotecan and oxaliplatin with a fixed 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) regimen in patients with metastatic solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial was designed to evaluate escalating doses of oxaliplatin and irinotecan, starting at 60 mg/m2 and 90 mg/m2, respectively, given at day 1 with the full-dose LV5FU2 regimen, given on days 1 and 2 as follows: folinic acid 200 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus and 600 mg/m2 22 h continuous infusion, every 2 weeks. The second cohort of patients was treated at the recommended dose for oxaliplatin and irinotecan with the simplified LV5FU regimen: on day 1, a 2-h infusion of folinic acid (400 mg/m2), followed by a 10-min intravenous bolus of 5-FU (400 mg/m2), followed by a continuous infusion of 5-FU (2400 mg/m2) over 46 h. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were treated at the following dose levels (oxaliplatin/irinotecan mg/m2): 60/90, 60/120, 85/120, 85/150, 85/180, 85/200 and 85/220 and seven patients were treated at the recommended dose with the simplified LV5FU scheme. The MTD was reached at dose level 85/220 mg/m2 but the recommended dose chosen for the second step was 85/180 mg/m2 to keep a better compliance with the biweekly schedule. Main grade 3/4 toxicities per patient included the following: neutropenia in 78% (febrile episodes in 12%), diarrhea in 27%, nausea/vomiting in 24% and peripheral neuropathy in 37% (Lévi's scale). Antitumor activity was observed at almost all dose levels. Most objective responses were observed in digestive malignancies, since 10 out of 11 were obtained in five colorectal cancers, two pancreatic cancers, two cholangiocarcinoma and one gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for the triple association is 85/180 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin and irinotecan, respectively, with LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU. The antitumor activity in gastrointestinal malignancies should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Hepatic arterial infusion using pirarubicin combined with systemic chemotherapy: a phase II study in patients with nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A prospective phase II study was performed to determine the feasibility, efficacy and safety of arterial hepatic infusion (HAI) using pirarubicin combined with intravenous chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1991 to April 1994, 75 patients with unresectable colorectal metastases confined to the liver were included in this multicenter study to receive intra-arterial hepatic pirarubicin and a systemic monthly regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid. Sixty-four patients were analyzed in the intention-to-treat analysis and 61 in the per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: Tolerance of this regimen was rather good; however, functional catheter problems were observed in 29 patients (45%) resulting in failure of HAI in 21 cases (33%) after a median of three cycles; vomiting grade 3 was present in 12.5% of patients, neutropenia grade 4 in 23% and alopecia grade 3 in 19%. The overall response rate was 31.9% in intention-to-treat analysis, and 39.3% in per-protocol analysis. Extrahepatic progression was reported in only 21.7% of patients. Time to hepatic progression and extra-hepatic progression was 8.3 and 15 months, respectively, in intention-to-treat analysis, and 11 and 18 months, respectively, in per-protocol analysis. Median survival was 19 and 20 months in intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the combination of intra-arterial pirarubicin and intravenous chemotherapy demonstrated some efficacy and good tolerance in the treatment of isolated colorectal liver metastases. This treatment seems to prevent extra-hepatic spread and prolong survival time. The results of this study have to be confirmed by new trials using more active systemic chemotherapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Colorectal cancer in the adjuvant setting: perspectives on treatment and the role of prognostic factors.

In patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) who have undergone potentially curative resection, adjuvant treatment with 6 months' of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid (FA) is generally accepted as standard treatment and leads to a 5% to 10% improvement in absolute survival when compared with a no-chemotherapy control. In stage II CRC, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has yet to be established. In metastatic CRC, randomized trials of irinotecan have consistently demonstrated that use of the drug, either alone or in combination with 5-FU/FA, prolongs survival. To investigate whether this benefit can be extended to patients with earlier disease, a series of multicenter trials are randomizing stage III colon cancer patients to adjuvant 5-FU/FA regimens with or without the addition of irinotecan. The role of adjuvant irinotecan is also being assessed in stage II colon cancer and in patients with rectal tumors. The risk/benefit ratio of adjuvant therapy in both stage III and stage II disease would be decreased if patients at the highest risk of relapse could be identified. Data from retrospective analyses suggest that DNA indexes, angiogenesis and some genetic/biological markers (loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 18 and the presence of microsatellite instability) identify prognostic differences in colon cancer patients. Their value as a guide to the intensity of adjuvant therapy required should be tested by randomized trial, as should the use of markers such as thymidilate synthase overexpression as a means of tailoring drug choice to tumor characteristics.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2003

Docetaxel and radiotherapy and pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase 1 trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly docetaxel delivered concurrently with radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with histologically proven locally non-resectable advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were enrolled in this study. Patients received 4 weekly doses of docetaxel by 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion with 40 Gy of external beam radiation therapy during 4 weeks. Patients who were stabilized or in response, received 2 additional cycles of docetaxel with a 10 Gy boost of radiotherapy. Doses were escalated at 10 mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of 3 new patients until MTD was observed. RESULTS: Four patients received docetaxel at 20 mg/m2/week, 3 at 25 mg/m2/week, 3 at 30 mg/m2/week, and 3 at 35 mg/m2/week. All patients, except 2, were given the treatment in its integrity. The most common toxicities were nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and abdominal pains. Except for 1 patient, all toxicity was reversible and did not exceed grade 3. Hematologic toxicity was mild and has not required treatment interruption. 28% of the patients had to be rehospitalized. A total of 73 cycles was administered with a mean of 4 cycles per patient (2-6). CONCLUSION: Even the MTD was not reached, dose escalation was stopped at 35 mg/m2/week. This dose is comparable to the ones previously published using docetaxel in combination with radiotherapy in other tumors. Three patients achieved stable disease and 1 patient an objective response. This combination of weekly docetaxel and radiotherapy shows a feasible and well-tolerated regimen, with, nonetheless, a significant rate of rehospitalization, for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

High-dose, single-agent irinotecan as first-line therapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of single-agent, high-dose irinotecan (CPT-11, Campto) 500 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks were investigated as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled into the study to receive a first cycle of therapy with irinotecan at a dose of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, which could be escalated to 500 mg/m(2) for the second and subsequent cycles depending on toxicity. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics were determined in the intent to treat (ITT) population and the high-dose population (i.e. patients who had received at least three cycles of irinotecan, the second and third at 500 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Of 49 patients enrolled into the study (ITT population), 31 (63%) received at least three cycles of treatment with cycles 2 and 3 at an irinotecan dose of 500 mg/m(2) (the high-dose population). The response rates (RR) for the ITT and high-dose populations were 24.5% and 35.5%, respectively. The main grade 3/4 toxicities per cycle in the ITT and high-dose populations were neutropenia 22% and 17%, febrile neutropenia 5% and 3%, and diarrhoea 12% and 7%, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 were investigated in 31 patients in cycle 1 and 22 patients in cycle 2. Irinotecan clearance and SN-38 exposure were not sufficiently correlated with toxicity in cycle 1 to identify patients for dose increase in subsequent cycles. The exposure to irinotecan and SN-38 increased in proportion to dose from 350 to 500 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that high-dose irinotecan can be safely administered as first-line monotherapy to approximately two-thirds of patients who present with advanced CRC following a selective first cycle.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

[Chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of gastric adenocarcinomas: real progress?].

Frequency of local and distant failures after gastrectomy has led to extended lymph nodes dissection to obtain a better locoregional control. However, five year survival rates were not significantly different between patients undergoing D2 and D1 lymphadenectomy, and higher morbidity and post operative deaths were reported in large randomised trials (respectively 25% vs 48% and 4 vs 13%). Additionally, several metanalysis failed to demonstrate a significant survival advantage with adjuvant chemotherapy. The results of the first trial demonstrating one advantage to adjuvant post-operative chemoradiotherapy should modify the standard care. Disease free and overall survival after surgery alone and after surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were respectively 31% vs 48% and 41% vs 50%. The intergroup trial demonstrate that better local control improve survival if radiation fields include stamps, tumour bed, proximal nodal chains and nodes corresponding to D2 extended lymph nodes dissection. Treatment was feasible with few severe toxic effects (1%). Of the 281 patients, 17% stopped treatment because toxic effects. Technical modalities of radiotherapy and post-operative nutrition support, which are critical points of interest for this treatment, are also discussed.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Multicenter non-randomized phase II study of raltitrexed (Tomudex) and oxaliplatin in non-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, phase II, open-label study evaluated the antitumor efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed (Tomudex) in non-pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) and raltitrexed 3 mg/m(2) intravenously on an outpatient basis every 3 weeks. All patients had histologically proven metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, performance status <or=2 and good baseline organ function. Most (56%) had only one disease site. All patients were assessed for safety, and 66 of 69 eligible patients were assessed for response. RESULTS: A total of 404 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles per patient (range 1-12 cycles). Relative dose intensities were 0.98 and 0.98 for oxaliplatin and raltitrexed, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) among treated patients were as follows: neutropenia (21 patients, 30%), asthenia (eight, 11%), diarrhea (12, 17%), liver function test abnormalities (24, 34%), nausea (nine, 13%) and vomiting (nine, 13%). Two treatment-related deaths occurred (hematotoxicity in one patient and gastrointestinal toxicity in the other) and two further deaths were possibly related to treatment (hepatic dysfunction in one patient and neuropathy in the other). Thirty-seven objective responses (one complete) were obtained [objective response rate 54%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 42% to 65%] in eligible patients. The median response duration was 8.5 months (95% CI 6.7-12.2 months), while median progression-free and overall survival among eligible patients were 6.2 (95% CI 5.1-6.9 months) and 14.6 months (95% CI 11.0-18.9 months), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms the feasibility of the raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin combination and its activity in non-pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

A randomised trial comparing 5-FU with 5-FU plus cisplatin in advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is moderately efficient as a treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but patient survival and quality of life has improved with this modality in some trials. In a previous phase II trial, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin (FUP) yielded a 26.5% response rate and a 29% survival rate at 1 year. The present study aimed to compare FUP with 5-FU alone, which was the control arm in former Mayo Clinic trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated cytologically or histologically proven metastatic or locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were deemed measurable or evaluable. Chemotherapy regimens consisted of a control FU arm (5-FU 500 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days) and the investigational FUP arm (continuous 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 or day 2). In both arms, chemotherapy was repeated at day 29. RESULTS: Two-hundred and seven patients from 18 centres were randomised: 103 in the FU arm and 104 in FUP arm. Treatment arms were balanced with respect to performance status grade 0-1 (83% versus 86%, respectively) and the presence of metastases (92% versus 89%, respectively). The median number of cycles administered was two in both arms (range 0-14). Five patients did not receive any chemotherapy and 45 received only one cycle. Toxicity (WHO grade 3-4) was lower with FU than with FUP (20% versus 48%, P <0.001), as was neutropenia (6% versus 23%), vomiting (4% versus 17%) and toxicity-related deaths (one versus four early in the trial). The response rate was low in both arms, but superior in the FUP arm: 12% versus 0% (intention-to-treat analysis, P <0.01). The survival rates at 6 months were 28% and 38% for the FU and FUP arms, respectively, and 1-year survival rates were 9% and 17% (log-rank test, P = 0.10). One-year progression-free survival was 0% with FU versus 10% with FUP (log-rank test, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In advanced pancreatic carcinomas with a poor prognosis, FUP was superior to FU in terms of response and progression-free survival, but not in terms of overall survival. The low response rate is partly related to the number of patients who received only one cycle of chemotherapy. A more effective, better tolerated version of this FUP combination is needed.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

[Contribution of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative evaluation for very low rectal cancer].

UNLABELLED: Abdominoperineal resection is the standard treatment of very low rectal carcinoma. Pretherapeutic evaluation of locoregional extension relies mainly on digital rectal examination. The interest of endorectal ultrasonography to assess lateral and inferior margins is still to be determined. AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the ability of endorectal ultrasonography to evaluate the possibility of conservative anal sphincter surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1996 and June 1998, 34 patients (20 men, 14 women, mean age: 61 years, range: 43-80) have been treated for rectal adenocarcinoma. Endorectal ultrasonography was made with a linear probe (EUP-U33). Before treatment, the mean distance between the lower pole of the tumor and the anal verge was 3.9 cm (range: 2-5), and between the lower pole and the puborectalis sling 2.3 mm (range: 0-7). A uTN classification was made. Preoperative treatment was radiotherapy (40 Gy in 4 patients, 60 Gy in 24 patients), or radiochemotherapy (6 patients). Pre- and post-radiotherapy endorectal ultrasonography results were compared to the patholocical analysis of operative specimen. RESULTS: Wall infiltration was correctly evaluated in 57% of patients after radiotherapy. In 26/34 cases, a safe plane existed before and after radiotherapy, and correlation of endorectal ultrasonography with histology was 96%. For patients without safe plane, correlation with histology was 75%. CONCLUSION: For very low rectal tumors, with an aggressive sphincter conservation approach, endorectal ultrasonography allows to assess sphincter invasion with 96% fiability when safe plane exists.

Adult↗