PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Zenati

Publications and source records attributed to M Zenati.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Assessment of left internal mammary artery graft patency and flow reserve after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.

Despite its merits, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB) has been criticized for variable left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft patency rates, prompting the frequent use of postoperative LIMA angiography. Noninvasive transthoracic Doppler interrogation of LIMA grafts has recently been shown to have utility for assessing patency and flow reserve after conventional bypass surgery, but data after MIDCAB has been limited. The objective of this study was to assess LIMA graft anatomy and physiology in 54 patients after MIDCAB using angiography and noninvasive LIMA Doppler imaging. The right internal mammary artery (RIMA) was studied as a control. LIMA flow reserve in response to adenosine was evaluated in a subgroup of 18 randomly chosen patients with patent grafts. LIMA angiographic patency was 93%. Forty-four patients (81%) had obtainable LIMA Doppler data. Patent grafts had a diastolic dominant flow pattern with a peak diastolic/systolic velocity ratio of 1.3 +/- 0.6 and a percent diastolic time-velocity integral (TVI) of 70 +/- 11%. These data were significantly different than the RIMA control values of 0.2 +/- 0.1 and 30 +/- 10%, respectively (p <0.05). Occluded grafts had absent flow or a systolic dominant pattern. Adenosine-induced increases in LIMA peak diastolic velocity from 48 +/- 20 to 105 +/-28 cm/s (p <0.05 vs baseline) and diastolic TVI from 21 +/- 10 to 37 +/- 19 cm (p <0.05 vs baseline), yielding adenosine/baseline ratios of 2.4 +/- 0.9 and 2.0 +/- 0.7, respectively, which was consistent with normal flow reserve. The diastolic flow velocity reserve response was inversely related to baseline diastolic flow (r = -0.69). In conclusion, MIDCAB can be associated with a high rate of LIMA potency and favorable physiologic Doppler flow patterns. Correlation of these findings to long-term patient outcome after MIDCAB is warranted.

Adenosine↗
PubMed1999

Alternative approach to multivessel coronary disease with integrated coronary revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Integrated coronary revascularization combines minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG) with left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention. We hypothesized that integrated coronary revascularization could result in successful revascularization in suitable patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. METHODS: Between September 1996 and January 1998, 31 consecutive patients underwent integrated coronary revascularization. Twenty-two were male; mean age was 69 years (46-86 years) and 42% were older than 75 years. Eight patients (26%) had a Parsonnet score greater than 20%. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 46.3% +/- 12%; 6 patients (19%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35%. RESULTS: The anastomosis time for MICABG with the internal thoracic artery was 14.6 +/- 5.2 minutes and the operating time was 105 +/- 20 minutes; 28 patients (90%) were extubated in the operating room. The internal thoracic artery anastomosis was patent in all 31 patients (100%). Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed before MICABG in 2 patients (7%), on the same day of MICABG in 16 patients (52%), on postoperative day 1 in 3 patients (9%), and on postoperative days 2 to 4 in 10 patients (32%). Postprocedure length of stay in the hospital was 2.7 +/- 1.0 days and 13 patients (42%) were discharged home on postoperative day 1 or 2. Three patients (9.6%) required repeat target vessel revascularization in the distribution of the previous percutaneous coronary intervention. All patients are alive without angina at a follow-up of 10.8 +/- 3.8 months. CONCLUSION: Our early results demonstrate that integrated coronary revascularization can be performed safely and effectively. Long-term results will be available from a prospective randomized trial now underway to compare integrated coronary revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Feasibility of combined percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Angioplasty has become an accepted treatment of patients with coronary artery disease and is now commonly used to treat patients with multivessel disease. The major disadvantage of angioplasty has been restenosis requiring repeat interventions with resultant loss of initial cost savings. Compared with the right and the circumflex coronary arteries, the left anterior descending artery (LAD) has been more adversely affected by restenosis. Recently, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) to the LAD through a small left anterior thoracotomy using the left internal mammary artery has been performed in some centers with excellent early results and with reduced costs compared with standard bypass surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed the first 31 consecutive patients treated in our institution with integrated coronary revascularization (ICR): MIDCAB to the LAD combined with PTCA of the other diseased vessels in patients with multivessel disease. Postoperative angiography in 84% of patients revealed a patent anastomosis and normal flow in the graft and bypassed vessel. Thirty-eight (97%) of 39 vessels were successfully treated percutaneously. At a mean follow-up of 7 months, all patients are currently asymptomatic. There have been 2 adverse clinical events, both related to angioplasty and not to MIDCAB. The average length of stay at the hospital after MIDCAB was 2.79+/-1.05 days. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results with ICR are encouraging and suggest that a randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing ICR with standard coronary artery bypass surgery for the revascularization of symptomatic patients with multivessel disease involving the LAD is warranted.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1998

Abciximab and excessive bleeding in patients undergoing emergency cardiac operations.

BACKGROUND: Abciximab (ReoPro; Eli Lilly and Co, Indianapolis, IN) is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor and produces powerful inhibition of platelet function. Clinical trials of abciximab in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty have demonstrated a reduction in thrombotic complications and have encouraged the widespread use of this agent. We have observed a substantial incidence of excessive bleeding among patients who receive abciximab and subsequently require emergency cardiac operations. METHODS: The records of 11 consecutive patients who required emergency cardiac operations after administration of abciximab and failed angioplasty or stent placement were reviewed. RESULTS: The interval from the cessation of abciximab administration to operation was critical in determining the degree of coagulopathy after cardiopulmonary bypass. The median values for postoperative chest drainage (1,300 versus 400 mL; p < 0.01), packed red blood cells transfused (6 versus 0 U; p = 0.02), platelets transfused (20 versus 0 packs; p = 0.02), and maximum activated clotting time (800 versus 528 seconds; p = 0.01) all were significantly greater in the early group (cardiac operation < 12 hours after abciximab administration; n = 6) compared with the late (cardiac operation >12 hours after abciximab administration; n = 5) group. CONCLUSIONS: This report suggests that the antiplatelet agent abciximab is associated with substantial bleeding when it is administered within 12 hours of operation.

Abciximab↗
PubMed1998

Preoperative risk models for minimally invasive coronary bypass: a preliminary study.

OBJECTIVE: Available risk assessment models are designed for standard coronary artery bypass grafting. We hypothesized that minimally invasive coronary bypass could improve on predicted outcome in extremely high-risk patients (Parsonnet score > 20%) by the current risk models. METHODS: From September 1996 to September 1997, 27 consecutive extremely high-risk patients underwent minimally invasive coronary bypass. Seventeen patients were male; age was 73 +/- 12 years, and 63% of patients were older than 75 years. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 33.7% +/- 15% and 63% had an ejection fraction of less than 35%. The predicted 30-day mortality according to the System 97 model was 25.6% +/- 11.3%. The Parsonnet risk score was 36.2% +/- 11%; the predicted length of stay in the hospital was 15.3 +/- 3 days. The predicted risk of stroke according to the Multicenter Perioperative Stroke Risk Index was 22.3% +/- 11.7%. RESULTS: Minimally invasive coronary bypass was isolated in 20 patients and integrated with angioplasty and stenting in 7 patients. The observed 30-day mortality was 0% (P < .01 vs predicted): at an average follow-up of 10.8 +/- 4.1 months, 26 patients (96.3%) are alive without angina; one patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome died on postoperative day 40 of acute pancreatitis. No patient had a stroke or neurologic deficit (P < .01 vs predicted). Patency of internal thoracic artery anastomosis was confirmed by angiography in all 27 patients. No patient required reoperation. Eighteen patients (67%) were extubated in the operating room. The observed length of hospital stay after minimally invasive coronary bypass was 3.8 +/- 2.6 days (P < .01 vs predicted). CONCLUSION: On the basis of our results on a relatively small series of patients, we suggest that risk models geared for standard coronary bypass grafting may not be appropriate for minimally invasive coronary bypass.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

MIDCAB characteristics and results: the CardioThoracic Systems (CTS) registry.

OBJECTIVE: The CardioThoracic Systems (CTS) registry of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) was established to examine baseline characteristics of patients undergoing this surgical procedure, document details of the procedures including grafting techniques and post-operative complication rates, and assess post-operative graft patency. METHODS: A total of 508 consecutive patients who had MIDCAB using CTS instrumentation between April 1996 and March 1997 at 35 international centers were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of patients, 27% of whom were women, was 63 years. Eight percent had previous coronary artery bypass surgery. While nearly all patients had significant stenoses in the left anterior descending artery, 23% had disease in two vessels and 9% in three vessels. Almost all procedures used the left internal mammary artery, with 7% employing multiple or sequential grafts. The entire surgical procedure lasted on average 135 min (median 2 h), with a mean time of 14 min to perform anastomosis. Surgical approaches, including anastomosis technique and method used to maintain bloodless field, varied widely across clinical centers. In-hospital complication rates were relatively low, with 0.6% mortality (0% perioperative), 1.2% conversion to sternotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass, 1.4% conversion to sternotomy without bypass, and 5.5% redo or reintervention. In total, 92% of patients were free from all of these events at hospital discharge; women showed a strong trend toward increased risk for major in-hospital events compared with men. Rib fracture was the most common complication, reported in 12% of patients. Post-operative angiography, performed in 83 patients at an average 2.2 days post-procedure, found full patency in 78 (94%). CONCLUSIONS: The CTS registry data indicates that in the great majority of patients, MIDCAB using CTS instrumentation was performed safely and with acute success. Comparative studies, most importantly clinical trials, are needed to determine the types of patients who benefit most from this procedure, as well as its longer-term outcome.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗
PubMed1998

Lung volume reduction or lung transplantation for end-stage pulmonary emphysema?

OBJECTIVE: As the waiting period for lung transplant (LT) candidates with end-stage pulmonary emphysema (COPD) continues to increase, there is a need for alternative treatments to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with COPD. We hypothesized that lung reduction (LR) may avoid the need for subsequent LT in patients on the waiting list that are also candidates for LR. METHODS: From July 1994 to December 1995, 20 patients received LR as alternative to LT. The average age was 58 +/- 7 years; 11 were males. Eighteen patients had primary COPD and two had alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Eighteen LRs were thoracoscopic (two bilateral and 16 unilateral) and two were done through a median sternotomy. RESULTS: At a follow-up of 32 +/- 4 months, 19 patients are alive (19/20 = 95%). Fifteen patients (15/20 = 75%) are currently off the LT list and doing well: FEV1 is 40 +/- 18% predicted at 2 years compared with 22.7 +/- 6% before LR (P < 0.001); FVC is 84 +/- 13% at 2 years compared with 55 +/- 7% (P < 0.001) and the RV is 145 +/- 59% compared with 270 +/- 58% (P < 0.001). One patient (5%) required extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after LR to the contralateral side of the first procedure and subsequently died. Two patients (10%) are currently listed for LT because of persistent symptoms. One patient (5%) in whom deterioration was secondary to exposure to toxic fumes, underwent successful LT. One patient (5%) is doing well from the pulmonary standpoint but is being worked up for new severe coronary artery disease (CAD). The freedom from LT is 95% (19/20) and the freedom from repeat LR is 85% (17/20). CONCLUSIONS: LR has the potential to offer an effective palliative alternative to LT in 75% of selected patients up to 32 months of follow-up. Widespread use of bilateral LR is anticipated to further improve the results.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Resource utilization for minimally invasive direct and standard coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCABG) has been recently reintroduced into the cardiac surgical armamentarium for selected patients with suitable coronary anatomy. We hypothesized that MIDCABG had the potential for similar immediate results with decreased perioperative morbidity and decreased resource utilization compared with standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: From January 1996 to August 1996, 17 MIDCABG patients were compared with 33 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 0.50 who underwent CABG with standard technique. No significant differences were observed between the two groups for preoperative variables that are known to affect cost and resource utilization. Length of stay in the hospital was 2.5 +/- 0.8 days for MIDCABG and 5.9 +/- 2 days for CABG (p < 0.0001); length of stay in the intensive care unit was 12.3 +/- 3.3 hours for MIDCABG compared to 32.3 +/- 12.6 hours for the CABG group (p < 0.0001). RESULTS: Forty-one percent of MIDCABG patients were extubated in the operating room and 59% were discharged home on the first or second postoperative day versus none in the CABG group (p < 0.0001). Significantly less morbidity was observed in the MIDCABG group compared with CABG. Total ratio of cost-to-charge was $12,885 +/- $1,511 for MIDCABG and $21,260 +/- $5,497 for CABG (p < 0.0001), with an average savings of $8,375. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive CABG is associated with significant reduction of resource utilization and morbidity related to inital hospitalization compared with CABG.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for lung transplant recipients with primary severe donor lung dysfunction.

Primary severe donor lung dysfunction (DLD) is a significant complication after lung transplantation (LTx), and a high mortality is reported with conventional therapy. The purpose of this report is to review the experience of the University of Pittsburgh with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for primary severe DLD after LTx. From September 1991 to May 1995, 220 LTx were performed at our center. Eight patients (8/220 = 3.6%) with severe DLD after LTx required ECMO support. The age of LTx recipients was 44 +/- 5 years (mean +/- SD); seven patients were female and one was male. Indications for LTx were: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in four patients, bronchiectasis in two, and pulmonary hypertension in two. There were three single LTx and five bilateral LTx. The interval from LTx to institution of ECMO was 5.6 +/- 3.2 h (range 0-10 h). Three patients were supported with veno-venous (v-v) ECMO and five had veno-arterial (v-a) ECMO. The duration of ECMO support was 7.3 +/- 4.8 days (range 3-15 days). activated glotting time (ACT) was maintained between 110 and 180 s with intermittent use of heparin. Seven patients (7/8 = 87%) were successfully weaned from ECMO and six patients (6/8 = 75%) were discharged home; they are currently alive after a follow-up of 17 +/- 10.1 months. One patient died on ECMO support for refractory DLD and another died 2 months after ECMO wean from multisystem organ failure. At 6 months follow-up, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) is 2.35 +/- 0.91 (75% +/- 17.4% predicted) and mean forced vital capacity (FVC) is 2.53 +/- 0.81 (64% +/- 14% predicted). We conclude that ECMO can be lifesaving when instituted early after primary severe DLD. The v-v ECMO support is preferred when the patient is hemodynamically stable and adequate long-term function of the allograft is anticipated.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Role of lung reduction in lung transplant candidates with pulmonary emphysema.

BACKGROUND: The average waiting time for candidates for lung transplantation (LTx) with end-stage emphysema is 21 months with a 15% mortality. We hypothesized that lung reduction might offer an alternative to LTx. METHODS: Of 95 patients with end-stage emphysema evaluated by our LTx program, 45 were accepted for both lung reduction and LTx and 35 underwent lung reduction. RESULTS: All 35 patients survived lung reduction. Thirty patients had a follow-up of 3 months. There was a significant improvement (p < 0.05) of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (0.64 to 0.97 L), forced vital capacity (2.12 to 2.76 L), residual volume (5.62 to 4.26 L), maximum voluntary ventilation (28.1 to 38.5 L/min), 6-minute walk (904 to 1,012 feet), Borg dyspnea index (3.7 to 2.4), and arterial carbon dioxide tension (44.9 to 41.6 mm Hg). Twenty patients (66%) were removed from the LTx list due to their significant improvement (group A). Compared with the remaining 10 patients with 3 months of follow-up (group B), percent increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (70% in group A versus 27% in group B) and in forced vital capacity (41% group A versus 18% group B) and percent decrease in residual volume (26% group A versus 1.5% group B) were significantly better in group A (p < 0.01). Seven patients in group B were bridged to LTx; 6 of these patients (86%) had hypercarbia before lung reduction compared with 8 (40%) in group A (p < 0.05). All are alive after LTx: the forced expiratory volume in 1 second is 53% and the forced vital capacity is 64% of predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Lung reduction is safe and effective in selected LTx candidates with end-stage emphysema and has the potential to provide an alternative to LTx. Long-term follow-up is warranted to confirm these results.

Adult↗