PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Måns Ehrenberg

Publications and source records attributed to Måns Ehrenberg.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

How initiation factors maximize the accuracy of tRNA selection in initiation of bacterial protein synthesis.

During initiation of bacterial protein synthesis, messenger RNA and fMet-tRNAfMet bind to the 30S ribosomal subunit together with initiation factors IF1, IF2, and IF3. Docking of the 30S preinitiation complex to the 50S ribosomal subunit results in a peptidyl-transfer competent 70S ribosome. Initiation with an elongator tRNA may lead to frameshift and an aberrant N-terminal sequence in the nascent protein. We show how the occurrence of initiation errors is minimized by (1) recognition of the formyl group by the synergistic action of IF2 and IF1, (2) uniform destabilization of the binding of all tRNAs to the 30S subunit by IF3, and (3) an optimal distance between the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and the initiator codon. We suggest why IF1 is essential for E. coli, discuss the role of the G-C base pairs in the anticodon stem of some tRNAs, and clarify gene expression changes with varying IF3 concentration in the living cell.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Trigger factor binding to ribosomes with nascent peptide chains of varying lengths and sequences.

Trigger factor (TF) is the first protein-folding chaperone to interact with a nascent peptide chain as it emerges from the ribosome. Here, we have used a spin down assay to estimate the affinities for the binding of TF to ribosome nascent chain complexes (RNCs) with peptides of varying lengths and sequences. An in vitro system for protein synthesis assembled from purified Escherichia coli components was used to produce RNCs stalled on truncated mRNAs. The affinity of TF to RNCs exposing RNA polymerase sequences increased with the length of the nascent peptides. TF bound to RNA polymerase RNCs with significantly higher affinity than to inner membrane protein leader peptidase and bacterioopsin RNCs. The latter two RNCs are substrates for signal recognition particle, suggesting complementary affinities of TF and signal recognition particle to nascent peptides targeted for cytoplasm and membrane.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Class-1 release factor eRF1 promotes GTP binding by class-2 release factor eRF3.

In eukaryotes, termination of mRNA translation is triggered by the essential polypeptide chain release factors eRF1, recognizing all three stop codons, and eRF3, a member of the GTPase superfamily with a role that has remained opaque. We have studied the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of the interactions between eRF3 and GTP, GDP and the non-hydrolysable GTP analogue GDPNP in the presence (K(D)(GDP)=1.3+/-0.2 muM, K(D)(GTP) approximately 200 muM and K(D)(GDPNP)>160 muM) as well as absence (K(D)(GDP)=1.9+/-0.3 muM, K(D)(GTP) 0.7+/-0.2 muM and K(D)(GDPNP) approximately 200 muM) of eRF1. From the present data we propose that (i) free eRF3 has a strong preference to bind GDP compared to GTP (ii) eRF3 in complex with eRF1 has much stronger affinity to GTP than free eRF3 (iii) eRF3 in complex with PABP has weak affinity to GTP (iv) eRF3 in complex with eRF1 does not have strong affinity to GDPNP, implying that GDPNP is a poor analogue of GTP for eRF3 binding.

GTP Phosphohydrolases↗

How initiation factors tune the rate of initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria.

The kinetics of initiator transfer RNA (tRNA) interaction with the messenger RNA (mRNA)-programmed 30S subunit and the rate of 50S subunit docking to the 30S preinitiation complex were measured for different combinations of initiation factors in a cell-free Escherichia coli system for protein synthesis with components of high purity. The major results are summarized by a Michaelis-Menten scheme for initiation. All three initiation factors are required for maximal efficiency (kcat/KM) of initiation and for maximal in vivo rate of initiation at normal concentration of initiator tRNA. Spontaneous release of IF3 from the 30S preinitiation complex is required for subunit docking. The presence of initiator tRNA on the 30S subunit greatly increases the rate of 70S ribosome formation by increasing the rate of IF3 dissociation from the 30S subunit and the rate of 50S subunit docking to the IF3-free 30S preinitiation complex. The reasons why IF1 and IF3 are essential in E. coli are discussed in the light of the present observations.

Bacteria↗

Interactions of the release factor RF1 with the ribosome as revealed by cryo-EM.

In eubacteria, termination of translation is signaled by any one of the stop codons UAA, UAG, and UGA moving into the ribosomal A site. Two release factors, RF1 and RF2, recognize and bind to the stop codons with different affinities and trigger the hydrolysis of the ester bond that links the polypeptide with the P-site tRNA. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) results obtained in this study show that ribosome-bound RF1 is in an open conformation, unlike the closed conformation observed in the crystal structure of the free factor, allowing its simultaneous access to both the decoding center and the peptidyl-transferase center. These results are similar to those obtained for RF2, but there is an important difference in how the factors bind to protein L11, which forms part of the GTPase-associated center of the large ribosomal subunit. The difference in the binding position, C-terminal domain for RF2 versus N-terminal domain for RF1, explains a body of L11 mutation studies that revealed differential effects on the activity of the two factors. Very recent data obtained with small-angle X-ray scattering now reveal that the solution structure of RF1 is open, as here seen on the ribosome by cryo-EM, and not closed, as seen in the crystal.

Cryoelectron Microscopy↗

The molecular mechanism of peptide-mediated erythromycin resistance.

The macrolide antibiotic erythromycin binds at the entrance of the nascent peptide exit tunnel of the large ribosomal subunit and blocks synthesis of peptides longer than between six and eight amino acids. Expression of a short open reading frame in 23 S rRNA encoding five amino acids confers resistance to erythromycin by a mechanism that depends strongly on both the sequence and the length of the peptide. In this work we have used a cell-free system for protein synthesis with components of high purity to clarify the molecular basis of the mechanism. We have found that the nascent resistance peptide interacts with erythromycin and destabilizes its interaction with 23 S rRNA. It is, however, in the termination step when the pentapeptide is removed from the peptidyl-tRNA by a class 1 release factor that erythromycin is ejected from the ribosome with high probability. Synthesis of a hexa- or heptapeptide with the same five N-terminal amino acids neither leads to ejection of erythromycin nor to drug resistance. We propose a structural model for the resistance mechanism, which is supported by docking studies. The rate constants obtained from our biochemical experiments are also used to predict the degree of erythromycin resistance conferred by varying levels of resistance peptide expression in living Escherichia coli cells subjected to varying concentrations of erythromycin. These model predictions are compared with experimental observations from growing bacterial cultures, and excellent agreement is found between theoretical prediction and experimental observation.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

The SAXS solution structure of RF1 differs from its crystal structure and is similar to its ribosome bound cryo-EM structure.

Bacterial class I release factors (RFs) are seen by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to span the distance between the ribosomal decoding and peptidyl transferase centers during translation termination. The compact conformation of bacterial RF1 and RF2 observed in crystal structures will not span this distance, and large structural rearrangements of RFs have been suggested to play an important role in termination. We have collected small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data from E. coli RF1 and from a functionally active truncated RF1 derivative. Theoretical scattering curves, calculated from crystal and cryo-EM structures, were compared with the experimental data, and extensive analyses of alternative conformations were made. Low-resolution models were constructed ab initio, and by rigid-body refinement using RF1 domains. The SAXS data were compatible with the open cryo-EM conformation of ribosome bound RFs and incompatible with the crystal conformation. These conclusions obviate the need for assuming large conformational changes in RFs during termination.

Cryoelectron Microscopy↗

The role of ribosomal protein L11 in class I release factor-mediated translation termination and translational accuracy.

It has been suggested from in vivo and cryoelectron micrographic studies that the large ribosomal subunit protein L11 and its N-terminal domain play an important role in peptide release by, in particular, the class I release factor RF1. In this work, we have studied in vitro the role of L11 in translation termination with ribosomes from a wild type strain (WT-L11), an L11 knocked-out strain (DeltaL11), and an L11 N terminus truncated strain (Cter-L11). Our data show 4-6-fold reductions in termination efficiency (k(cat)/K(m)) of RF1, but not of RF2, on DeltaL11 and Cter-L11 ribosomes compared with wild type. There is, at the same time, no effect of these L11 alterations on the maximal rate of ester bond cleavage by either RF1 or RF2. The rates of dissociation of RF2 but not of RF1 from the ribosome after peptide release are somewhat reduced by the L11 changes irrespective of the presence of RF3, and they cause a 2-fold decrease in the missense error. Our results suggest that the L11 modifications increase nonsense suppression at UAG codons because of the reduced termination efficiency of RF1 and that they decrease nonsense suppression at UGA codons because of a decreased missense error level.

Codon, Terminator↗

Over expression of a tRNA(Leu) isoacceptor changes charging pattern of leucine tRNAs and reveals new codon reading.

During mRNA translation, synonymous codons for one amino acid are often read by different isoaccepting tRNAs. The theory of selective tRNA charging predicts greatly varying percentages of aminoacylation among isoacceptors in cells starved for their common amino acid. It also predicts major changes in tRNA charging patterns upon concentration changes of single isoacceptors, which suggests a novel type of translational control of gene expression. We therefore tested the theory by measuring with Northern blots the charging of Leu-tRNAs in Escherichia coli under Leu limitation in response to over expression of tRNA(GAG)(Leu). As predicted, the charged level of tRNA(GAG)(Leu) increased and the charged levels of four other Leu isoacceptors decreased or remained unchanged, but the charged level of tRNA(UAG)(Leu) increased unexpectedly. To remove this apparent inconsistency between theory and experiment we postulated a previously unknown common codon for tRNA(GAG)(Leu) and tRNA(UAG)(Leu). Subsequently, we demonstrated that the tRNA(GAG)(Leu) codon CUU is, in fact, read also by tRNA(UAG)(Leu), due to a uridine-5-oxyacetic acid modification.

Anticodon↗

tmRNA-induced release of messenger RNA from stalled ribosomes.

A ribosome stalled on a truncated mRNA in the eubacterial cell can be rescued by tmRNA via a process called trans-translation. We demonstrate here that release of truncated mRNAs from stalled ribosomes accelerates significantly already after trans-peptidation following tmRNA binding to the ribosome. However, rapid release of truncated mRNA requires EF-G-dependent translocation of peptidyl-tmRNA from the A to the P site of the ribosome. We show also that the rate of mRNA release before and after peptidyl-tmRNA translocation correlates well with the rate of dissociation of deacylated tRNA, indicating that mRNA is retained on the ribosome mainly through codon:anticodon interaction with tRNA. The rate of mRNA release is reduced for mRNAs with strong Shine-Dalgarno (SD)-like sequences in the vicinity of the truncation site as well as for mRNAs with long 3' extensions downstream from the P-site codon. The reduced rate of release in the former case was due to a persisting SD-anti SD interaction between mRNA and the ribosome.

Binding Sites↗

Guanine-nucleotide exchange on ribosome-bound elongation factor G initiates the translocation of tRNAs.

BACKGROUND: During the translation of mRNA into polypeptide, elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes the translocation of peptidyl-tRNA from the A site to the P site of the ribosome. According to the 'classical' model, EF-G in the GTP-bound form promotes translocation, while hydrolysis of the bound GTP promotes dissociation of the factor from the post-translocation ribosome. According to a more recent model, EF-G operates like a 'motor protein' and drives translocation of the peptidyl-tRNA after GTP hydrolysis. In both the classical and motor protein models, GDP-to-GTP exchange is assumed to occur spontaneously on 'free' EF-G even in the absence of a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF). RESULTS: We have made a number of findings that challenge both models. First, free EF-G in the cell is likely to be in the GDP-bound form. Second, the ribosome acts as the GEF for EF-G. Third, after guanine-nucleotide exchange, EF-G in the GTP-bound form moves the tRNA2-mRNA complex to an intermediate translocation state in which the mRNA is partially translocated. Fourth, subsequent accommodation of the tRNA2-mRNA complex in the post-translocation state requires GTP hydrolysis. CONCLUSION: These results, in conjunction with previously published cryo-electron microscopy reconstructions of the ribosome in various functional states, suggest a novel mechanism for translocation of tRNAs on the ribosome by EF-G. Our observations suggest that the ribosome is a universal guanosine-nucleotide exchange factor for EF-G as previously shown for the class-II peptide-release factor 3.

Escherichia coli↗

What makes ribosome-mediated transcriptional attenuation sensitive to amino acid limitation?

Ribosome-mediated transcriptional attenuation mechanisms are commonly used to control amino acid biosynthetic operons in bacteria. The mRNA leader of such an operon contains an open reading frame with "regulatory" codons, cognate to the amino acid that is synthesized by the enzymes encoded by the operon. When the amino acid is in short supply, translation of the regulatory codons is slow, which allows transcription to continue into the structural genes of the operon. When amino acid supply is in excess, translation of regulatory codons is rapid, which leads to termination of transcription. We use a discrete master equation approach to formulate a probabilistic model for the positioning of the RNA polymerase and the ribosome in the attenuator leader sequence. The model describes how the current rate of amino acid supply compared to the demand in protein synthesis (signal) determines the expression of the amino acid biosynthetic operon (response). The focus of our analysis is on the sensitivity of operon expression to a change in the amino acid supply. We show that attenuation of transcription can be hyper-sensitive for two main reasons. The first is that its response depends on the outcome of a race between two multi-step mechanisms with synchronized starts: transcription of the leader of the operon, and translation of its regulatory codons. The relative change in the probability that transcription is aborted (attenuated) can therefore be much larger than the relative change in the time it takes for the ribosome to read a regulatory codon. The second is that the general usage frequencies of codons of the type used in attenuation control are small. A small percentage decrease in the rate of supply of the controlled amino acid can therefore lead to a much larger percentage decrease in the rate of reading a regulatory codon. We show that high sensitivity further requires a particular choice of regulatory codon among several synonymous codons for the same amino acid. We demonstrate the importance of a high fraction of regulatory codons in the control region. Finally, our integrated model explains how differences in leader sequence design of the trp and his operons of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium lead to high basal expression and low sensitivity in the former case, and to large dynamic range and high sensitivity in the latter. The model clarifies how mechanistic and systems biological aspects of the attenuation mechanism contribute to its overall sensitivity. It also explains structural differences between the leader sequences of the trp and his operons in terms of their different functions.

Journal Article↗

Mapping the interaction of SmpB with ribosomes by footprinting of ribosomal RNA.

In trans-translation transfer messenger RNA (tmRNA) and small protein B (SmpB) rescue ribosomes stalled on truncated or in other ways problematic mRNAs. SmpB promotes the binding of tmRNA to the ribosome but there is uncertainty about the number of participating SmpB molecules as well as their ribosomal location. Here, the interaction of SmpB with ribosomal subunits and ribosomes was studied by isolation of SmpB containing complexes followed by chemical modification of ribosomal RNA with dimethyl sulfate, kethoxal and hydroxyl radicals. The results show that SmpB binds 30S and 50S subunits with 1:1 molar ratios and the 70S ribosome with 2:1 molar ratio. SmpB-footprints are similar on subunits and the ribosome. In the 30S subunit, SmpB footprints nucleotides that are in the vicinity of the P-site facing the E-site, and in the 50S subunit SmpB footprints nucleotides that are located below the L7/L12 stalk in the 3D structure of the ribosome. Based on these results, we suggest a mechanism where two molecules of SmpB interact with tmRNA and the ribosome during trans-translation. The first SmpB molecule binds near the factor-binding site on the 50S subunit helping tmRNA accommodation on the ribosome, whereas the second SmpB molecule may functionally substitute for a missing anticodon stem-loop in tmRNA during later steps of trans-translation.

Base Sequence↗

Mechanism for the disassembly of the posttermination complex inferred from cryo-EM studies.

Ribosome recycling, the disassembly of the posttermination complex after each round of protein synthesis, is an essential step in mRNA translation, but its mechanism has remained obscure. In eubacteria, recycling is catalyzed by RRF (ribosome recycling factor) and EF-G (elongation factor G). By using cryo-electron microscopy, we have obtained two density maps, one of the RRF bound posttermination complex and one of the 50S subunit bound with both EF-G and RRF. Comparing the two maps, we found domain I of RRF to be in the same orientation, while domain II in the EF-G-containing 50S subunit is extensively rotated (approximately 60 degrees) compared to its orientation in the 70S complex. Mapping the 50S conformation of RRF onto the 70S posttermination complex suggests that it can disrupt the intersubunit bridges B2a and B3, and thus effect a separation of the two subunits. These observations provide the structural basis for the mechanism by which the posttermination complex is split into subunits by the joint action of RRF and EF-G.

Cryoelectron Microscopy↗

Splitting of the posttermination ribosome into subunits by the concerted action of RRF and EF-G.

After peptide release by a class-1 release factor, the ribosomal subunits must be recycled back to initiation. We have demonstrated that the distance between a strong Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence and a codon in the P site is crucial for the binding stability of the deacylated tRNA in the P site of the posttermination ribosome and the in-frame maintenance of its mRNA. We show that the elongation factor EF-G and the ribosomal recycling factor RRF split the ribosome into subunits in the absence of initiation factor 3 (IF3) by a mechanism that requires both GTP and GTP hydrolysis. Taking into account that EF-G in the GTP form and RRF bind with positive cooperativity to the free 50S subunit but with negative cooperativity to the 70S ribosome, we suggest a mechanism for ribosome recycling that specifies distinct roles for EF-G, RRF, and IF3.

Base Sequence↗

The cryo-EM structure of a translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli.

The 70S ribosome and its complement of factors required for initiation of translation in E. coli were purified separately and reassembled in vitro with GDPNP, producing a stable initiation complex (IC) stalled after 70S assembly. We have obtained a cryo-EM reconstruction of the IC showing IF2*GDPNP at the intersubunit cleft of the 70S ribosome. IF2*GDPNP contacts the 30S and 50S subunits as well as fMet-tRNA(fMet). IF2 here adopts a conformation radically different from that seen in the recent crystal structure of IF2. The C-terminal domain of IF2 binds to the single-stranded portion of fMet-tRNA(fMet), thereby forcing the tRNA into a novel orientation at the P site. The GTP binding domain of IF2 binds to the GTPase-associated center of the 50S subunit in a manner similar to EF-G and EF-Tu. Additionally, we present evidence for the localization of IF1, IF3, one C-terminal domain of L7/L12, and the N-terminal domain of IF2 in the initiation complex.

Cryoelectron Microscopy↗

The role of tRNA as a molecular spring in decoding, accommodation, and peptidyl transfer.

Translation is the process by which the genetic information contained in mRNA is used to link amino acids in a predetermined sequential order into a polypeptide chain, which then folds into a protein. Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are the adapter molecules designed to provide the "lookup" from codons to amino acids. Cryo-EM has provided evidence that the ribosome, as a molecular machine, undergoes many structural changes during translation. Recent findings show that the tRNA structure itself undergoes large conformational changes as well, and that the decoding process must be seen as a complex dynamic interplay between tRNA and the ribosome.

Cryoelectron Microscopy↗

A time-resolved investigation of ribosomal subunit association.

The notion that the ribosome is dynamic has been supported by various biochemical techniques, as well as by differences observed in high-resolution structures of ribosomal complexes frozen in various functional states. Yet, the mechanisms and extent of rRNA dynamics are still largely unknown. We have used a novel, fast chemical-modification technique to provide time-resolved details of 16 S rRNA structural changes that occur as bridges are formed between the ribosomal subunits as they associate. Association of different 16 S rRNA regions was found to be a sequential, multi-step process involving conformational rearrangements within the 30 S subunit. Our results suggest that key regions of 16 S rRNA, necessary for decoding and tRNA A-site binding, are structurally altered in a time-dependent manner by association with the 50 S ribosomal subunits.

Base Pairing↗