Poor design of behavioural experiments gets poor results: examples from intertidal habitats.
Many patterns of distribution and abundance of intertidal animals are explained by processes of movements of animals, selecting particular habitats or levels on the shore, or interacting with other species. Movements of intertidal animals have therefore been studied over many years. During this long history, much intertidal ecology has changed in focus from broad-scale to small-scale patterns and processes, although there has been recent refocus on a combination of many scales. Simultaneously, there has been an increase in the incidence of field experiments and growing recognition that behaviour is more flexible than originally thought. This review examines changes in the ways that experiments on movements on intertidal animals have been and are being done, taking into account these changes in emphasis. Although some progress has been made, there is still a long way to go. The idea is still prevalent that behaviour is simple, rather invariant and that the animals respond to broad-scale cues that have traditionally been of interest to many investigators. This means that many experiments are still designed to minimise (or ignore) natural variation in behaviour rather than to measure it and that any associated disturbances are considered irrelevant and therefore not evaluated. Understanding the role that behaviour has in establishing and maintaining many of the patterns observed on intertidal shores is crucial to our understanding of the ecology of these habitats. Better experiments, designed logically with appropriate controls to evaluate realistic processes and to measure how behaviour varies among places and from time to time can only improve this understanding.