Biomedical subjects

Maarten L P Dirkx

Publications and source records attributed to Maarten L P Dirkx.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Dosimetric pre-treatment verification of IMRT using an EPID; clinical experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In our clinic a QA program for IMRT verification, fully based on dosimetric measurements with electronic portal imaging devices (EPID), has been running for over 3 years. The program includes a pre-treatment dosimetric check of all IMRT fields. During a complete treatment simulation at the linac, a portal dose image (PDI) is acquired with the EPID for each patient field and compared with a predicted PDI. In this paper, the results of this pre-treatment procedure are analysed, and intercepted errors are reported. An automated image analysis procedure is proposed to limit the number of fields that need human intervention in PDI comparison. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Most of our analyses are performed using the gamma index with 3% local dose difference and 3mm distance to agreement as reference values. Scalar parameters are derived from the gamma values to summarize the agreement between measured and predicted 2D PDIs. Areas with all pixels having gamma values larger than one are evaluated, making decisions based on clinically relevant criteria more straightforward. RESULTS: In 270 patients, the pre-treatment checks revealed four clinically relevant errors. Calculation of statistics for a group of 75 patients showed that the patient-averaged mean gamma value inside the field was 0.43 +/- 0.13 (1SD) and only 6.1 +/- 6.8% of pixels had a gamma value larger than one. With the proposed automated image analysis scheme, visual inspection of images can be avoided in 2/3 of the cases. CONCLUSION: EPIDs may be used for high accuracy and high resolution routine verification of IMRT fields to intercept clinically relevant dosimetric errors prior to the start of treatment. For the majority of fields, PDI comparison can fully rely on an automated procedure, avoiding excessive workload.

Electronic Data Processing↗

PubMed2006

Fast, daily linac verification for segmented IMRT using electronic portal imaging.

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) requires dedicated quality assurance (QA). Recently, we have published a method for fast (1-2 min) and accurate linac quality control for dynamic multileaf collimation, using a portal imaging device. This method is in routine use for daily leaf motion verification. The purpose of the present study was to develop an equivalent procedure for QA of IMRT with segmented (static) multileaf collimation (SMLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The QA procedure is based on measurements performed during 3- to 8-month periods at Elekta, Siemens and Varian accelerators. On each measurement day, images were acquired for a field consisting of five 3 x 22 cm(2) segments. These 10 monitor unit (MU) segments were delivered in SMLC mode, moving the leaves from left to right. Deviations of realized leaf gap widths from the prescribed width were analysed to study the leaf positioning accuracy. To assess hysteresis in leaf positioning, the sequential delivery of the SMLC segments was also inverted. A static 20 x 20 cm(2) field was delivered with exposures between 1 and 50 MU to study the beam output and beam profile at low exposures. Comparisons with an ionisation chamber were made to verify the EPID dose measurements at low MU. Dedicated software was developed to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and to correct for image distortion. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The observed long-term leaf gap reproducibility (1 standard deviation) was 0.1 mm for the Varian, and 0.2 mm for the Siemens and the Elekta accelerators. In all cases the hysteresis was negligible. Down to the lowest MU, beam output measurements performed with the EPID agreed within 1+/-1% (1SD) with ionisation chamber measurements. These findings led to a fast (3-4 min) procedure for accurate, daily linac quality control for SMLC.

Calibration↗

PubMed2004

SIFT: a method to verify the IMRT fluence delivered during patient treatment using an electronic portal imaging device.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy patients are increasingly treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and high tumor doses. As part of our quality control program to ensure accurate dose delivery, a new method was investigated that enables the verification of the IMRT fluence delivered during patient treatment using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID), irrespective of changes in patient geometry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Each IMRT treatment field is split into a static field and a modulated field, which are delivered in sequence. Images are acquired for both fields using an EPID. The portal dose image obtained for the static field is used to determine changes in patient geometry between the planning CT scan and the time of treatment delivery. With knowledge of these changes, the delivered IMRT fluence can be verified using the portal dose image of the modulated field. This method, called split IMRT field technique (SIFT), was validated first for several phantom geometries, followed by clinical implementation for a number of patients treated with IMRT. RESULTS: The split IMRT field technique allows for an accurate verification of the delivered IMRT fluence (generally within 1% [standard deviation]), even if large interfraction changes in patient geometry occur. For interfraction radiological path length changes of 10 cm, deliberately introduced errors in the delivered fluence could still be detected to within 1% accuracy. Application of SIFT requires only a minor increase in treatment time relative to the standard IMRT delivery. CONCLUSIONS: A new technique to verify the delivered IMRT fluence from EPID images, which is independent of changes in the patient geometry, has been developed. SIFT has been clinically implemented for daily verification of IMRT treatment delivery.

Head and Neck Neoplasms↗

PubMed2004

A treatment planning study evaluating a 'simultaneous integrated boost' technique for accelerated radiotherapy of stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: As local tumour control is poor in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a radiotherapy planning study was performed to evaluate the potential for treatment acceleration by using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique in patients who had completed induction chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Co-registered pre- and post-chemotherapy planning CT scans from 10 patients who showed tumour regression after induction chemotherapy were used to compare different treatment schedules: (a) a sequential boost plan delivering, in 2 Gy per fraction, 50 Gy to the pre-chemotherapy tumour volume, followed by a sequential boost of 20 Gy to the post-chemotherapy tumour volume; (b) a SIB technique in which the pre- and post-chemotherapy tumour volumes were treated to different dose levels during each treatment fraction using identical total doses and number of fractions as above; (c) progressively more hypofractionated schedules that delivered the SIB technique in 25 and 20 once-daily fractions; (d) the actual clinical treatment plan in which 70 Gy was delivered to the pre-chemotherapy tumour volume in 35 daily fractions. Differences in the fractionation schemes used for these plans were accounted for by using the normalised total dose (NTD) for comparison, thereby assuming an alpha/beta ratio of 10 Gy for tumour and 3 Gy for normal tissues. The risk of normal tissue toxicity was estimated using the average lung NTD, the lung volume receiving NTD > 20 Gy, the oesophageal volume receiving NTD > 50 Gy, and the length of full circumference irradiated to at least 50 Gy. RESULTS: With respect to the sequential boost technique, the SIB technique improved the sparing of the normal tissues in all patients. In most patients, the SIB plan could also be delivered in 25 fractions without increasing the estimated normal tissue toxicity. With SIB25, the mean lung NTD was reduced from 12.1 to 11.7 Gy, and the fraction of healthy lung tissue receiving NTD > 20 Gy by 2% on average. Although the length and volume of oesophagus irradiated to at least 50 Gy increased for some of the patients, the observed values were less than that was the case for the actual delivered treatment. However, special care should be taken to avoid exceeding the spinal cord tolerance in patients whose tumours are located close to the cord. CONCLUSIONS: A SIB technique that delivers at least 50 Gy to the pre-chemotherapy tumour volume permits accelerated radiotherapy in patients with stage III NSCLC without increasing the expected risks of normal tissue toxicity. By reducing the overall treatment time, the SIB technique may improve local tumour control and survival.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

PubMed2003

Two-dimensional measurement of photon beam attenuation by the treatment couch and immobilization devices using an electronic portal imaging device.

In our institution, an individualized dosimetric quality assurance protocol for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is being implemented. This protocol includes dosimetric measurements with a fluoroscopic electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for all IMRT fields while the patient is being irradiated. For some of the first patients enrolled in this protocol, significant beam attenuation by (carbon fiber) components of the treatment couch was observed. To study this beam attenuation in two-dimensional, EPID images were also acquired in absence of the patient, both with and without treatment couch and immobilization devices, as positioned during treatment. For treatments of head and neck cancer patients with a 6 MV photon beam, attenuation of up to 15% was detected. These findings led to the development of new tools and procedures for planning and treatment delivery to avoid underdosages in the tumor.

Artifacts↗

PubMed2002

Fast and accurate leaf verification for dynamic multileaf collimation using an electronic portal imaging device.

A prerequisite for accurate dose delivery of IMRT profiles produced with dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC) is highly accurate leaf positioning. In our institution, leaf verification for DMLC was initially done with film and ionization chamber. To overcome the limitations of these methods, a fast, accurate and two-dimensional method for daily leaf verification, using our CCD-camera based electronic portal imaging device (EPID), has been developed. This method is based on a flat field produced with a 0.5 cm wide sliding gap for each leaf pair. Deviations in gap widths are detected as deviations in gray scale value profiles derived from the EPID images, and not by directly assessing leaf positions in the images. Dedicated software was developed to reduce the noise level in the low signal images produced with the narrow gaps. The accuracy of this quality assurance procedure was tested by introducing known leaf position errors. It was shown that errors in leaf gap as small as 0.01-0.02 cm could be detected, which is certainly adequate to guarantee accurate dose delivery of DMLC treatments, even for strongly modulated beam profiles. Using this method, it was demonstrated that both short and long term reproducibility in leaf positioning were within 0.01 cm (1sigma) for all gantry angles, and that the effect of gravity was negligible.

Calibration↗