PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Malcolm L Snead

Publications and source records attributed to Malcolm L Snead.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Physical dissection of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha in regulating the mouse amelogenin gene.

The amelogenin gene is tightly regulated at the temporal and spatial level in accord with the developmental requirement for tooth formation. Previous studies have shown that CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPalpha) is a transactivator of the mouse X-chromosomal amelogenin gene. C/EBPalpha contains four highly conserved regions (CR) named CR1, CR2, CR3, and CR4. Transient transfection assays showed that CR2 in isolation had an exceptional capacity to enhance transcription from the 2.3 kb mouse amelogenin promoter. The remaining conserved regions of C/EBPalpha, either in isolation or in selected combinations, were less effective in amelogenin transactivation than the full length C/EBPalpha. Msx2 has previously been shown to antagonize C/EBPalpha through protein-protein interactions with C/EBPalpha, and the carboxyl-terminus of Msx2 is required for protein-protein interactions. Co-immunoprecipitation analyses identified that the carboxyl-terminal domain (residues 218-359) of C/EBPalpha is required for the C/EBPalpha-Msx2 protein-protein interactions.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2006

Ectopic expression of dentin sialoprotein during amelogenesis hardens bulk enamel.

Dentin sialophosphpoprotein (Dspp) is transiently expressed in the early stage of secretory ameloblasts. The secretion of ameloblast-derived Dspp is short-lived, correlates to the establishment of the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ), and is consistent with Dspp having a role in producing the specialized first-formed harder enamel adjacent to the DEJ. Crack diffusion by branching and dissipation within this specialized first-formed enamel close to the DEJ prevents catastrophic interfacial damage and tooth failure. Once Dspp is secreted, it is subjected to proteolytic cleavage that results in two distinct proteins referred to as dentin sialoprotein (Dsp) and dentin phosphoprotein (Dpp). The purpose of this study was to investigate the biological and mechanical contribution of Dsp and Dpp to enamel formation. Transgenic mice were engineered to overexpress either Dsp or Dpp in their enamel organs. The mechanical properties (hardness and toughness) of the mature enamel of transgenic mice were compared with genetically matched and age-matched nontransgenic animals. Dsp and Dpp contributions to enamel formation greatly differed. The inclusion of Dsp in bulk enamel significantly and uniformly increased enamel hardness (20%), whereas the inclusion of Dpp weakened the bulk enamel. Thus, Dsp appears to make a unique contribution to the physical properties of the DEJ. Dsp transgenic animals have been engineered with superior enamel mechanical properties.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2006

A new locus for autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta on chromosome 8q24.3.

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a collective term used to describe phenotypically diverse forms of defective tooth enamel development. AI has been reported to exhibit a variety of inheritance patterns, and several loci have been identified that are associated with AI. We have performed a genome-wide scan in a large Brazilian family segregating an autosomal dominant form of AI and mapped a novel locus to 8q24.3. A maximum multipoint LOD score of 7.5 was obtained at marker D8S2334 (146,101,309 bp). The disease locus lies in a 1.9 cM (2.1 Mb) region according to the Rutgers Combined Linkage-Physical map, between a VNTR marker (at 143,988,705 bp) and the telomere (146,274,826 bp). Ten candidate genes were identified based on gene ontology and microarray-facilitated gene selection using the expression of murine orthologues in dental tissue, and examined for the presence of a mutation. However, no causative mutation was identified.

Amelogenesis Imperfecta↗
PubMed2006

Altering biomineralization by protein design.

To create a bioceramic with unique materials properties, biomineralization exploits cells to create a tissue-specific protein matrix to control the crystal habit, timing, and position of the mineral phase. The biomineralized covering of vertebrate teeth is enamel, a distinctive tissue of ectodermal origin that is collagen-free. In forming enamel, amelogenin is the abundant protein that undergoes self-assembly to contribute to a matrix that guides its own replacement by mineral. Conserved domains in amelogenin suggest their importance to biomineralization. We used gene targeting in mice to replace native amelogenin with one of two engineered amelogenins. Replacement changed enamel organization by altering protein-to-crystallite interactions and crystallite stacking while diminishing the ability of the ameloblast to interact with the matrix. These data demonstrate that ameloblasts must continuously interact with the developing matrix to provide amelogenin-specific protein to protein, protein to mineral, and protein to membrane interactions critical to biomineralization and enamel architecture while suggesting that mutations within conserved amelogenin domains could account for enamel variations preserved in the fossil record.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2006

NF-Y and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha synergistically activate the mouse amelogenin gene.

Amelogenin is the major protein component of the forming enamel matrix. In situ hybridization revealed a periodicity for amelogenin mRNA hybridization signals ranging from low to high transcript abundance on serial sections of developing mouse teeth. This in vivo observation led us to examine the amelogenin promoter for the activity of transcription factor(s) that account for this expression aspect of the regulation for the amelogenin gene. We have previously shown that CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPalpha) is a potent transactivator of the mouse X-chromosomal amelogenin gene acting at the C/EBPalpha cis-element located in the -70/+52 minimal promoter. The minimal promoter contains a reversed CCAAT box (-58/-54) that is four base pairs downstream from the C/EBPalpha binding site. Similar to the C/EBPalpha binding site, the integrity of the reversed CCAAT box is also required for maintaining the activity of the basal promoter. We therefore focused on transcription factors that interact with the reversed CCAAT box. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays we demonstrated that NF-Y was directly bound to this reversed CCAAT site. Co-transfection of C/EBPalpha and NF-Y synergistically increased the promoter activity. In contrast, increased expression of NF-Y alone had only marginal effects on the promoter. A dominant-negative DNA binding-deficient NF-Y mutant (NF-YAm29) dramatically decreased the promoter activity both in the absence or presence of exogenous expression of C/EBPalpha. We identified protein-protein interactions between C/EBPalpha and NF-Y by a co-immunoprecipitation analysis. These results suggest that C/EBPalpha and NF-Y synergistically activate the mouse amelogenin gene and can contribute to its physiological regulation during amelogenesis.

Amelogenin↗
PubMed2006

3. Protein-protein interactions of the developing enamel matrix.

Extracellular matrix proteins control the formation of the inorganic component of hard tissues including bone, dentin, and enamel. The structural proteins expressed primarily in the enamel matrix are amelogenin, ameloblastin, enamelin, and amelotin. Other proteins, like biglycan, are also present in the enamel matrix as well as in other mineralizing and nonmineralizing tissues of mammals. In addition, the presence of sulfated enamel proteins, and "tuft" proteins has been examined and discussed in relation to enamel formation. The structural proteins of the enamel matrix must have specific protein-protein interactions to produce a matrix capable of directing the highly ordered structure of the enamel crystallites. Protein-protein interactions are also likely to occur between the secreted enamel proteins and the plasma membrane of the enamel producing cells, the ameloblasts. Such protein-protein interactions are hypothesized to influence the secretion of enamel proteins, establish short-term order of the forming matrix, and to mediate feedback signals to the transcriptional machinery of these cells. Membrane-bound proteins identified in ameloblasts, and which interact with the structural enamel proteins, include Cd63 (cluster of differentiation 63 antigen), annexin A2 (Anxa2), and lysosomal-associated glycoprotein 1 (Lamp1). These and related data help explain the molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for the removal of the organic enamel matrix during the events of enamel mineralization, and how the enamel matrix influences its own fate through signaling initiated at the cell surface. The knowledge gained from enamel developmental studies may lead to better dental and nondental materials, or materials inspired by Nature. These data will be critical to scientists, engineers, and dentists in their pursuits to regenerate an entire tooth. For tooth regeneration to become a reality, the protein-protein interactions involving the key dental proteins must be identified and understood. The scope of this review is to discuss the current understanding of protein-protein interactions of the developing enamel matrix, and relate this knowledge to enamel biomineralization.

Amelogenin↗
PubMed2006

Using the yeast two-hybrid assay to discover protein partners for the leucine-rich amelogenin peptide and for tuftelin-interacting protein 11.

The established structural proteins of the enamel matrix are amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. Historically, tuftelin and tuftelin-interacting protein 11 (TFIP11) have also been discussed as possible enamel proteins. Protein complexes are achieved by protein-protein interactions, and it is protein complexes that control biomineralization. The purpose of our recent studies was to catalog protein partners for these proteins that are, or have been, implicated in tooth formation. We used the sensitive yeast two-hybrid assay to identify proteins that interact directly with amelogenin, ameloblastin, enamelin, the leucine-rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP) and TFIP11. In this manuscript we refer to, or document, potential protein partners for the proteins listed above. The yeast two-hybrid assay may ultimately prove to be a valuable proteomics methodology for using to decipher molecular events that ultimately result in enamel biomineralization.

Amelogenin↗
PubMed2006

Transcription factor sumoylation and factor YY1 serve to modulate mouse amelogenin gene expression.

Amelogenin proteins are essential in the control of enamel biomineralization and the amelogenin gene therefore is spatiotemporally regulated to ensure proper amelogenin protein expression. In this study, we examined the role of sumoylation to alter CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPalpha) activity, and performed a search using a protein/DNA array system for other proteins that act co-operatively with C/EBPalpha to alter amelogenin expression. We observed that C/EBPalpha was modified by sumoylation, and that this modification played an indirect inhibitory role on the regulation of C/EBPalpha activity which appeared to act through other transcription factors. The protein/DNA array allowed us to single out the transcription factor, YY1, which acts in the absence of direct DNA binding to repress both the basal amelogenin promoter activity and C/EBPalpha-mediated transactivation. Taken together, these pathways may account for part of the physiological modulation of the amelogenin gene expression in accordance with tooth developmental and enamel biomineralization requirements.

Amelogenesis↗
PubMed2006

Amelogenins regulate expression of genes associated with cementoblasts in vitro.

Amelogenins are major proteins expressed by ameloblasts during development of the crown (enamel and dentin). These matrix proteins guide crystal habits of the mineral phase of developing enamel and are possible regulators of other genes/proteins during development and maturation of crown and root (dentin and cementum). This study focused on defining the effect that a specific proteolytic cleavage product of amelogenin, tyrosine-rich amelogenin peptide (TRAP), has on cementoblast behavior. Immortalized cementoblasts (OCCM-30) were exposed to TRAP in vitro. Cells treated with TRAP were evaluated for cell proliferation, gene expression for osteocalcin (OCN), osteopontin (OPN), and bone sialoprotein (BSP), and induction of mineral nodule formation. No significant difference in cell proliferation was found between vehicle-treated cells and those treated with TRAP for up to 9 d after treatment. Gene expression of OCN, OPN, and BSP in TRAP-treated cementoblasts showed down-regulation, up-regulation, and no significant change, respectively, relative to vehicle control. A marked decrease in mineral nodule formation was found in cells treated with TRAP compared with the vehicle control, in a dose-dependent manner. These data, along with our previous results demonstrating similar activity with full-length amelogenin and leucine-rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP), suggest that amelogenin-like molecules regulate mesenchymal cell behavior.

Amelogenin↗
PubMed2005

Dentin sialoprotein and dentin phosphoprotein overexpression during amelogenesis.

The gene for dentin sialophosphoprotein produces a single protein that is post-translationally modified to generate two distinct extracellular proteins: dentin sialoprotein and dentin phosphoprotein. In teeth, dentin sialophosphoprotein is expressed primarily by odontoblast cells, but is also transiently expressed by presecretory ameloblasts. Because of this expression profile it appears that dentin sialophosphoprotein contributes to the early events of amelogenesis, and in particular to those events that result in the formation of the dentino-enamel junction and the adjacent "aprismatic" enamel. Using a transgenic animal approach we have extended dentin sialoprotein or dentin phosphoprotein expression throughout the developmental stages of amelogenesis. Overexpression of dentin sialoprotein results in an increased rate of enamel mineralization, however, the enamel morphology is not significantly altered. In wild-type animals, the inclusion of dentin sialoprotein in the forming aprismatic enamel may account for its increased hardness properties, when compared with bulk enamel. In contrast, the overexpression of dentin phosphoprotein creates "pitted" and "chalky" enamel of non-uniform thickness that is more prone to wear. Disruptions to the prismatic enamel structure are also a characteristic of the dentin phosphoprotein overexpressing animals. These data support the previous suggestion that dentin sialoprotein and dentin phosphoprotein have distinct functions related to tooth formation, and that the dentino-enamel junction should be viewed as a unique transition zone between enamel and the underlying dentin. These results support the notion that the dentin proteins expressed by presecretory ameloblasts contribute to the unique properties of the dentino-enamel junction.

Amelogenesis↗
PubMed2005

Fluoride induces endoplasmic reticulum stress in ameloblasts responsible for dental enamel formation.

The mechanism of how fluoride causes fluorosis remains unknown. Exposure to fluoride can inhibit protein synthesis, and this may also occur by agents that cause endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. When translated proteins fail to fold properly or become misfolded, ER stress response genes are induced that together comprise the unfolded protein response. Because ameloblasts are responsible for dental enamel formation, we used an ameloblast-derived cell line (LS8) to characterize specific responses to fluoride treatment. LS8 cells were growth-inhibited by as little as 1.9-3.8 ppm fluoride, whereas higher doses induced ER stress and caspase-mediated DNA fragmentation. Growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible proteins (GADD153/CHOP, GADD45alpha), binding protein (BiP/glucose-responsive protein 78 (GRP78), the non-secreted form of carbonic anhydrase VI (CA-VI), and active X-box-binding protein-1 (Xbp-1) were all induced significantly after exposure to 38 ppm fluoride. Unexpectedly, DNA fragmentation increased when GADD153 expression was inhibited by short interfering RNA treatment but remained unaffected by transient GADD153 overexpression. Analysis of control and GADD153(-/-) embryonic fibroblasts demonstrated that caspase-3 mediated the increased DNA fragmentation observed in the GADD153 null cells. We also demonstrate that mouse incisor ameloblasts are sensitive to the toxic effects of high dose fluoride in drinking water. Activated Ire1 initiates an ER stress response pathway, and mouse ameloblasts were shown to express activated Ire1. Ire1 levels appeared induced by fluoride treatment, indicating that ER stress may play a role in dental fluorosis. Low dose fluoride, such as that present in fluoridated drinking water, did not induce ER stress.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2005

Enamel matrix protein interactions.

UNLABELLED: The recognized structural proteins of the enamel matrix are amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. While a large volume of data exists showing that amelogenin self-assembles into multimeric units referred to as nanospheres, other reports of enamel matrix protein-protein interactions are scant. We believe that each of these enamel matrix proteins must interact with other organic components of ameloblasts and the enamel matrix. Likely protein partners would include integral membrane proteins and additional secreted proteins. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to identify and catalog additional proteins that play a significant role in enamel formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the yeast two-hybrid assay to identify protein partners for amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. Once identified, RT-PCR was used to assess gene transcription of these newly identified and potential "enamel" proteins in ameloblast-like LS8 cells. RESULTS: In the context of this yeast assay, we identified a number of secreted proteins and integral membrane proteins that interact with amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. Additionally, proteins whose functions range from the inhibition of soft tissue mineralization, calcium ion transport, and phosphorylation events have been identified as protein partners to these enamel matrix proteins. For each protein identified using this screening strategy, future studies are planned to confirm this physiological relationship to biomineralization in vivo. CONCLUSION: Identifying integral membrane proteins of the secretory surface of ameloblast cells (Tomes' processes) and additional enamel matrix proteins, based on their abilities to interact with the most abundant enamel matrix proteins, will better define the molecular mechanisms of enamel formation at its most rudimentary level.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2004

The COOH terminus of the amelogenin, LRAP, is oriented next to the hydroxyapatite surface.

The organic matrix in forming enamel consists largely of the amelogenin protein self-assembled into nanospheres that are necessary to guide the formation of the unusually long and highly ordered hydroxyapatite (HAP) crystallites that constitute enamel. Despite its ability to direct crystal growth, the interaction of the amelogenin protein with HAP is unknown. However, the demonstration of growth restricted to the c-axis suggests a specific protein-crystal interaction, and the charged COOH terminus is often implicated in this function. To elucidate whether the COOH terminus is important in the binding and orientation of amelogenin onto HAP, we have used solid state NMR to determine the orientation of the COOH terminus of an amelogenin splice variant, LRAP (leucine-rich amelogenin protein), which contains the charged COOH terminus of the full protein, on the HAP surface. These experiments demonstrate that the methyl 13C-labeled side chain of Ala46 is 8.0 A from the HAP surface under hydrated conditions, for the protein with and without phosphorylation. The experimental results provide direct evidence orienting the charged COOH-terminal region of the amelogenin protein on the HAP surface, optimized to exert control on developing enamel crystals.

Alanine↗
PubMed2004

Overexpression of TRAP in the enamel matrix does not alter the enamel structural hierarchy.

The secreted, full-length amelogenin is the dominant protein of the forming enamel organ. As enamel mineralization progresses, amelogenin is quickly subjected to proteolytic activity, and eliminated from the enamel environment. Mature enamel contains only traces of structural proteins, including enamelin and the sheath protein ameloblastin. In addition, a proteolytic fragment of amelogenin, known as the tyrosine-rich amelogenin peptide or TRAP, is present in low but isolatable quantities. By overexpressing TRAP during enamel development we sought to determine if such overexpression would result in structural alterations to the mature enamel. We reasoned that overexpressing a protein associated with enamel maturation, at an inappropriate developmental stage, would result in alterations to the enamel protein assembly and hence, alterations in enamel structure and morphology. As judged by transmission and scanning electron microscopy, the enamel formed by overexpressing TRAP showed little morphological differences when compared to the enamel of normal nontransgenic animals. Based on scanning electron-microscopic images, there was modest hypomineralization evident in the interrod enamel of the TRAP-overexpressing animals. However, this finding was inconsistent and inconsequential from a structural and functional perspective. From these results it appears that additional amounts of TRAP protein in the immature enamel matrix are not sufficient to alter the properties of the enamel extracellular matrix to an extent that the hierarchical structure of mature enamel is altered.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2004

In vivo overexpression of tuftelin in the enamel organic matrix.

The primary sequences of human and mouse tuftelin are 89% identical. Both proteins comprise 390 amino acids and produce an acidic protein with an isoelectric point of 5.7, and an unmodified molecular weight of 44 kD. Using fluorescent-tagged tuftelin and amelogenin plasmid constructs we saw little evidence that these two enamel proteins colocalize in ameloblast-like LS-8 cells. Tuftelin is primarily localized to distinct 'speckled' domains within the cell cytoplasm. In an attempt to better define a physiological function for tuftelin during amelogenesis, we have produced transgenic mice that overexpress tuftelin in ameloblasts and subsequently the enamel matrix. Tuftelin overexpression impacts dramatically upon the enamel crystallite habit and the enamel prismatic structure. Overexpressing tuftelin results in gross imperfections in enamel that is evident both at the nanoscale and the mesoscale. The most notable difference observed in the transgenic animals, when compared to wild-type animals, is an apparent loss of restricted growth of enamel crystallites along their a-axis and b-axis. This equates to a change in the crystallite aspect ratio. In the transgenic animals the crystallite structures appear more 'plate'-like in contrast to the symmetric, 'ribbon'-like crystallite morphology that is a characteristic feature of mammalian enamel.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2004

Leucine-rich amelogenin peptide: a candidate signaling molecule during cementogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Cementum is a critical mineralized tissue; however, control of its formation remains undefined. One hypothesis is that enamel matrix proteins/peptides secreted by ameloblasts and/or epithelial rest cells contribute to the control of cementum formation via epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Here, we focused on determining whether or not leucine-rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP), translated from an alternatively spliced amelogenin RNA, altered cementoblast behavior. METHODS: Immortalized murine cementoblasts (OCCM-30) were exposed to LRAP and evaluated for: 1) proliferative activity; 2) gene expression using Northern blot for Cbfal (core binding factor alpha-1); OCN (osteocalcin), OPN (osteopontin), and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for OPG (osteoprotegerin); and RANKL (receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand); 3) signaling pathway using inhibitors of PKA (THFA), PKC (GF109203X), and MAPK (UO126); and 4) mineralization evaluated by von Kossa and Alizarin-red. RESULTS: LRAP had no effect on cell proliferation up to 6 days, with a decrease in cell growth observed at the highest dose by 9 days versus untreated cells. LRAP down regulated OCN and up regulated OPN in a dose- and time-response fashion, and inhibited the capacity of mineral nodule formation. Transcripts for OPG were increased in LRAP-treated cells compared to control, but RANKL mRNA levels were not affected. Core binding factor alpha (Cbfa) mRNA, expressed constitutively, was not affected by LRAP. Signaling pathway assays suggested involvement of the MAPK pathway, since the addition of the MAPK inhibitor suppressed OPN expression in LRAP-treated cells. CONCLUSION: Leucine-rich amelogenin peptide appears to have a direct effect on cementoblast activity that may prove significant during development as well as in regeneration of periodontal tissues.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

A transgenic animal model resembling amelogenesis imperfecta related to ameloblastin overexpression.

Genetic diseases that affect tooth enamel are grouped under the classification amelogenesis imperfecta. Human pedigrees and experiments on transgenic and null mice have all demonstrated that mutations to the secreted proteins amelogenin, enamelin, and enamelysin result in visibly, structurally, or mechanically defective enamel. In an attempt to better define a physiologic function for ameloblastin during enamel formation, we have produced transgenic mice that misexpress the ameloblastin gene. These transgenic animals exhibit imperfections in their enamel that is evident at the nanoscale level. Specifically, ameloblastin overexpression influences enamel crystallite habit and enamel rod morphology. These findings suggest enamel crystallite habit and rod morphology are influenced by the temporal and spatial expression of ameloblastin and may implicate the role of the ameloblastin gene locus in the etiology of a number of undiagnosed autosomally dominant cases of amelogenesis imperfecta.

Amelogenesis Imperfecta↗