PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Malcolm Ranson

Publications and source records attributed to Malcolm Ranson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Novel therapeutic targets in lung cancer: Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins from laboratory to clinic.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Despite the introduction of new agents and schedules, chemotherapy still obtains unsatisfactory overall response rates, rare complete remissions and responses of relatively short duration. The inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPS) are a family of caspase inhibitors that selectively bind and inhibit caspases-3, -7, and -9. As caspase activation is central to apoptosis, novel therapeutic drugs that target IAPs enabling apoptosis to occur have potential as a treatment of malignancy. Several agents that target core components of the apoptotic signalling pathway are currently at an early stage of development. This review reports the progress being made in characterising the IAP family, with a focus on the available data relevant to the treatment of lung cancer.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2006

Lomeguatrib, a potent inhibitor of O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase: phase I safety, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic trial and evaluation in combination with temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: A major mechanism of resistance to temozolomide involves the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase (ATase). The main aims of this phase I trial were to determine an ATase-depleting dose (ADD) of lomeguatrib, a potent pseudosubstrate inhibitor, and to define a suitable dose of temozolomide to be used in combination with lomeguatrib in patients with advanced cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Lomeguatrib was administered at dose levels of 10 to 40 mg/m2 days 1 to 5, as a single agent, and also in combination with temozolomide. Once the ADD of lomeguatrib was identified, the dose of temozolomide in combination was increased, in successive patient cohorts, from 50 to 175 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 of a 28-day cycle to define the maximal tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of the combination. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. More than 95% ATase depletion within 4 hours of the first dose was achieved in peripheral blood mononuclear cells at lomeguatrib doses of > or =10 mg/m2/d i.v. or > or =20 mg/m2/d orally, and tumor biopsies showed > or =92% ATase depletion. At the ADD of lomeguatrib i.v., the maximal tolerated dose of temozolomide in combination was 150 mg/m2 days 1 to 5. The dose limiting toxicity of the combination of lomeguatrib and temozolomide was myelosuppression. The toxicity of lomeguatrib alone was minimal. In 23 patients with measurable disease, one complete response was seen and 12 patients had stable disease for at least 3 months. CONCLUSION: This first administration of lomeguatrib to man successfully established an oral ADD of lomeguatrib and identified a combination regimen with temozolomide suitable for future clinical evaluation.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2006

Where next for gefitinib in patients with lung cancer?

Gefitinib belongs to the small-molecule class of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. It was given conditional approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2003 for treatment of advanced, chemorefractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but was relabelled for restricted use for patients that were already receiving and benefiting from it after the negative result of the phase III Iressa Survival Evaluation in Advanced Lung Cancer (ISEL) trial. By contrast, erlotinib, another EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, showed an overall survival benefit compared with placebo and best supportive care in the National Cancer Institute of Canada's BR21 trial, and now has full FDA approval for treatment of patients with NSCLC who have progressed after treatment with chemotherapy. Although the ISEL trial result was negative overall, preplanned subgroup analyses showed a significant overall survival benefit for gefitinib treatment in never-smokers and in patients of Asian origin. Here, we review the clinical experience with gefitinib and, in light of the licensing of erlotinib, address the lessons learned, the ongoing trials, and whether scope remains for clinical development of gefitinib in selected patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Recent advances in targeting regulators of apoptosis in cancer cells for therapeutic gain.

Apoptosis is a fundamental cellular death process that is essential for normal tissue homeostasis, whose deregulation is associated with several human disease states, including cancer. Increased understanding of cancer biology has led to the hypothesis that although cancer cells are inherently resistant to the engagement of apoptosis due to the deregulation of molecular components of core apoptotic machinery or of survival signalling cascades, they are primed to die as a result of microenvironmental and oncogenic proapoptotic stress. Recently, deeper insight into the molecular regulation of apoptosis and, specifically, into its deregulation in cancer has led to the development of promising therapies to restore apoptosis and enable selective tumour cell kill. It is hoped that these mechanism-based therapies will exhibit less problematic toxicity profiles than those of conventional agents. Moreover, the development of tailored therapies directed at malignancies bearing specific alterations in apoptotic or survival signalling components may be used in combination approaches to overcome the resistance to other forms of treatment.

Alkaloids↗
PubMed2005

Preclinical evaluation of the pharmacodynamic properties of 2,5-diaziridinyl-3-hydroxymethyl-6-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to investigate the cellular accumulation, DNA cross-linking ability, and cellular toxicity of RH1 (2,5-diaziridinyl-3-[hydroxymethyl[-6-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone), a novel DNA alkylating agent currently in clinical trials. In addition, the in vivo efficacy of RH1 formulated in different vehicles was also compared. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: RH1 is activated by the two-electron reducing enzyme NQO1 [NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase] forming a potent cytotoxic agent that cross-links DNA. We have used whole blood, cell lines, and primary explanted tumor cultures to measure both the cellular accumulation, DNA cross-linking, and cytotoxicity of RH1. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of RH1 formulated in different vehicles were measured in vivo using the validated comet-X assay in mice bearing human tumor xenografts. RESULTS: Accumulation of RH1 was shown to be both time and concentration dependent, reaching a maximum after 2 hours and correlated well with DNA cross-linking measurements. DNA cross-linking in vitro could be detected at low (1-10 nmol/L) concentrations after as little as 2 hours exposure. In primary tumor cultures, RH1 induces much higher levels of DNA cross-links at lower doses than either mitomycin C or cisplatin. In vivo efficacy testing using polyvinyl pyrrolidone, saline, or cyclodextrin as vehicles showed DNA cross-links readily detectable in all tissues examined and was enhanced when given in cyclodextrin compared with polyvinyl pyrrolidone or saline. CONCLUSIONS: RH1 represents a potent bioreductive anticancer drug, which may prove effective in the treatment of cancers, particularly those that overexpress NQO1. DNA cross-linking can be reliably measured in tissue using the validated comet-X assay.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Phase I investigation of recombinant anti-human vascular endothelial growth factor antibody in patients with advanced cancer.

We assessed the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the recombinant humanized IgG4 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, HuMV833, in patients with advanced cancer. Cohorts of patients with progressive solid tumours received escalating doses of HuMV833 as a 1-h intravenous (I.V.) infusion on days 1, 15, 22, and 29. Twenty patients (median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 1) were accrued. HuMV833 infusions were well tolerated and there were no grade III or IV toxicities definitely related to the antibody. Grade I or II toxicities probably related to the antibody included fatigue, dyspnoea and rash. There were two episodes of asymptomatic hypocalcaemia, one at grade III and one grade IV, which were recorded in early follow-up. There were eight grade I episodes of asymptomatic elevation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and two grade III events; one in a patient receiving 1 mg/kg and the other receiving extended doses of 10 mg/kg. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a non-linear kinetic and an elimination half-life of between 8.2 (0.3 mg/kg) and 18.7 (10 mg/kg) days. One patient with ovarian cancer experienced a partial response (PR) of 9 months duration and eight had disease stabilisation (SD) including one patient with colorectal carcinoma whose disease was stable for 14 months. In 13 of the 14 samples taken from 12 patients, the plasma concentration of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) was reduced 24 h after drug administration. HuMV833 is safe and lacked DLT at doses up to 10 mg/kg on this schedule. Multiple doses were well tolerated, despite occasional asymptomatic elevations in APTT. By combining pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicity data, we can identify doses of 1 and 3mg/kg for further investigation. HuMV833 appears to possess some clinical activity.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Interstitial lung disease in lung cancer: separating disease progression from treatment effects.

Lung cancer often develops in individuals with pre-existing pulmonary and cardiac pathology. Many of these individuals with pre-existing pathology are also at risk of occupational lung disease. New and worsening symptoms can be secondary to pre-existing pathology, progressive cancer or treatment. Pulmonary toxicity, including interstitial lung disease, following radiotherapy and conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy (e.g. cyclophosphamide, bleomycin), has been recognised for many years. Pulmonary toxicity also occurs with the newer classes of cytotoxic agents, including the deoxycytidine analogue gemcitabine. A small percentage (0.88%) of patients treated with the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib have developed interstitial lung disease. This complication has been reported at a higher frequency in Japanese patients than in US patients (1.9% vs 0.34%, respectively) and in those with pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis. This review discusses the difficulties in both recognition and treatment of gefitinib-associated interstitial lung disease. Symptoms are vague, such as dyspnoea, cough and fever and can be difficult to differentiate from progressive disease, co-existing morbidity and new pulmonary pathology. Diagnosis is, therefore, by rigorous investigation to exclude all other differential diagnoses. Treatment, at present, is supportive and includes discontinuation of gefitinib, oxygen supplementation, high-dose corticosteroids and antibacterials.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of gefitinib with rifampicin, itraconazole and metoprolol.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gefitinib (IRESSA, ZD1839), an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been approved in several countries for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Preclinical studies were conducted to determine the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes involved in the metabolism of gefitinib and to evaluate the potential of gefitinib to cause drug interactions through inhibition of CYP isoenzymes. Based on these findings, three clinical studies were carried out to investigate pharmacokinetic drug interactions in vivo with gefitinib. METHODS: In preclinical studies radiolabelled gefitinib was incubated with: (i) hepatic microsomal protein in the presence of selective CYP inhibitors; and (ii) expressed CYP enzymes. Human hepatic microsomal protein was incubated with selective CYP substrates in the presence of gefitinib. Clinical studies were all phase I, open-label, single-centre studies; two had a randomised, two-way crossover design and the third was nonrandomised. The first and second studies investigated the pharmacokinetics of gefitinib in the presence of a potent CYP3A4 inducer (rifampicin [rifampin]) or inhibitor (itraconazole) in healthy male volunteers. The third study investigated the effects that gefitinib had on the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol, a CYP2D6 substrate, in patients with solid tumours. RESULTS: The results of preclinical studies demonstrated that CYP3A4 is involved in the metabolism of gefitinib and that gefitinib is a weak inhibitor of CYP2D6 activity. In clinical studies when gefitinib was administered in the presence of rifampicin, geometric mean (gmean) maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were reduced by 65% and 83%, respectively; these changes were statistically significant. When gefitinib was administered in the presence of itraconazole, gmean AUC increased by 78% and 61% at gefitinib doses of 250 and 500 mg, respectively; these changes also being statistically significant. Coadministration of metoprolol with gefitinib resulted in a 35% increase in the metoprolol area under plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration; this change was not statistically significant. There was no apparent change in the safety profile of gefitinib as a result of coadministration with other agents. CONCLUSIONS: Although CYP3A4 inducers may reduce exposure to gefitinib, further work is required to define any resultant effect on the efficacy of gefitinib. Exposure to gefitinib is increased by coadministration with CYP3A4 inhibitors, but since gefitinib is known to have a good tolerability profile, a dosage reduction is not recommended. Gefitinib is unlikely to exert a clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of drugs that are dependent on CYP2D6-mediated metabolism for their clearance, but the potential to increase plasma concentrations should be considered if gefitinib is coadministered with CYP2D6 substrates that have a narrow therapeutic index or are individually dose titrated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Single-dose clinical pharmacokinetic studies of gefitinib.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the five clinical studies presented in this article was to investigate the single-dose pharmacokinetics of gefitinib (IRESSA, ZD1839), an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in healthy volunteers and patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Studies 1 and 3-5 recruited healthy male volunteers aged 18-65 years; study 2 recruited male or female patients aged>or=18 years with any solid malignant tumour expressing EGFR and refractory to standard therapy. Gefitinib administration was as follows: study 1 (bioavailability in healthy volunteers; n=12)--intravenous infusion of 50 or 100 mg followed by a single oral dose of 250 mg; study 2 (bioavailability in cancer patients; n=19)--intravenous infusion of 50 mg followed by a single oral dose of 250 mg; study 3 (intrasubject variability; n=24)--two single oral doses of 250 mg; study 4 (dose-proportionality; n=15)--three single oral doses of 50-500 mg; study 5 (effect of food; n=26)--two single doses of 250 mg under either fed or fasted conditions. In all studies, venous blood samples for determination of gefitinib plasma concentrations were collected at predetermined intervals. Plasma concentrations of gefitinib were measured using liquid-liquid extraction after basification followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Appropriate pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Study 1: Oral bioavailability of a gefitinib 250 mg dose was 57% in healthy volunteers. Absorption was moderately slow, with geometric mean (gmean) peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 85 ng/mL (range 43.5-110 ng/mL) reached 5 hours following an oral dose of 250 mg. Study 2: Oral bioavailability of a gefitinib 250 mg dose was 59% in patients. Absorption was again moderately slow, with gmean Cmax of 159 ng/mL (range 48.7-324 ng/mL) typically reached 3 hours (range 1-8 hours) following an oral dose of 250 mg. Study 3: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinfinity) and Cmax were variable--up to 15-fold between subjects and 2-fold within an individual. Study 4: AUCinfinity and Cmax increased with dose across the range of 50-500 mg, and increased dose-proportionally up to 250 mg. Study 5: Small, clinically insignificant increases in AUCinfinity and Cmax were seen in the presence of food (32% and 37%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The gefitinib 250 mg tablet is orally bioavailable in both healthy volunteers and cancer patients; bioavailability is independent of dose and unaffected by food to any clinically significant extent. Gefitinib undergoes rapid plasma clearance and has an extensive volume of distribution, resulting in a pharmacokinetic profile supportive of a once-daily dosage regimen.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Apoptosis pathway-targeted drugs--from the bench to the clinic.

It is an exciting time for cancer researchers in the field of apoptotic cell death. The avalanche of discoveries over the past decade or so regarding how apoptosis is regulated begins to be exploited for therapeutic benefit as the first apoptosis-targeted drugs enter early clinical trials. This chapter provides a selective review on the development of such drugs. We also outline issues regarding the regulation and design of early clinical trials of this type of molecularly targeted agent. Finally, we discuss the biomarkers and surrogate pharmacodynamic endpoint assays currently available to chart the efficacy of apoptosis-inducing anticancer therapy.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2004

Dual repair modulation reverses Temozolomide resistance in vitro.

Temozolomide is an alkylating agent that mediates its cytotoxic effects via O(6)-methylguanine (O(6)-meG) adducts in DNA and their recognition and processing by the postreplication mismatch repair system (MMR). O(6)-meG adducts can be repaired by the DNA repair protein O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase (MGMT), which therefore constitutes a major resistance mechanism to the drug. Resistance to Temozolomide can also be mediated by loss of MMR, which is frequently mediated by methylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. Methylation of hMLH1 can be reversed by treatment of cells with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, while the MGMT pseudosubstrate O(6)-(4-bromothenyl)guanine (PaTrin-2) can deplete MGMT activity. Using a drug-resistant cell line which expresses MGMT and has methylated hMLH1, we show that while either of these treatments can individually sensitize cells to Temozolomide, the combined treatment leads to substantially greater sensitization. The increased sensitization is not observed in matched MMR proficient cells.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2004

Sensitization of a human ovarian cancer cell line to temozolomide by simultaneous attenuation of the Bcl-2 antiapoptotic protein and DNA repair by O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase.

Temozolomide is an alkylating agent that mediates its cytotoxic effects via O(6)-methylguanine (O(6)-meG) adducts in DNA. O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase (MGMT) can repair such adducts and therefore constitutes a major resistance mechanism to the drug. MGMT activity can be attenuated in vitro and in vivo by the pseudosubstrate O(6)-(4-bromothenyl)guanine (PaTrin-2, Patrin, Lomeguatrib), which in clinical trials is in combination with temozolomide. Resistance to cytotoxic agents can also be mediated by the Bcl-2 protein, which inhibits apoptosis and is frequently up-regulated in tumor cells. Attenuation of Bcl-2 expression can be affected by treatment of cells with the antisense oligonucleotide, oblimersen sodium (Genasense), currently in phase III clinical trials in combination with the methylating agent dacarbazine. Using a human ovarian cancer cell line (A2780) that expresses both Bcl-2 and MGMT, we show that cells treated with active dose levels of either oblimersen (but not control reverse sequence or mismatch oligonucleotides) or PaTrin-2 are substantially sensitized to temozolomide. Furthermore, the exposure of oblimersen-pretreated cells to PaTrin-2 leads to an even greater sensitization of these cells to temozolomide. Thus, growth of cells treated only with temozolomide (5 microg/mL) was 91% of control growth, whereas additional exposure to PaTrin-2 alone (10 micromol/L) or oblimersen alone (33 nmol/L) reduced this to 81% and 66%, respectively, and the combination of PaTrin-2 (10 micromol/L) and oblimersen (33 nmol/L) reduced growth to 25% of control. These results suggest that targeting both Bcl-2 with oblimersen and MGMT with PaTrin-2 would markedly enhance the antitumor activity of temozolomide and merits testing in clinical trials.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2003

Phase III trial of gemcitabine and carboplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin or mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The authors compared gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) with mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIC) or mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP) in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The primary objective was survival. Secondary objectives were time to disease progression, response rates, evaluation of toxicity, disease-related symptoms, World Health Organization performance status (PS), and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: Three hundred seventy-two chemotherapy-naïve patients with International Staging System Stage III/IV NSCLC who were ineligible for curative radiotherapy or surgery were randomized to receive either 4 cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15) plus carboplatin (area under the serum concentration-time curve, 5; given on Day 1) every 4 weeks (the GC arm) or MIC/MVP every 3 weeks (the MIC/MVP arm). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in median survival (248 days in the MIC/MVP arm vs. 236 days in the GC arm) or time to progression (225 days in the MIC/MVP arm vs. 218 days in the GC arm) between the 2 treatment arms. The 2-year survival rate was 11.8% in the MIC/MVP arm and 6.9% in the GC arm. The 1-year survival rate was 32.5% in the MIC/MVP arm and 33.2% in the GC arm. In the MIC/MVP arm, 33% of patients responded (4 complete responses [CRs] and 57 partial responses [PRs]) whereas in the GC arm, 30% of patients responded (3 CRs and 54 PRs). Nonhematologic toxicity was comparable for patients with Grade 3-4 symptoms, except there was more alopecia among patients in the MIC/MVP arm. GC appeared to produce more hematologic toxicity and necessitated more transfusions. There was no difference in performance status, disease-related symptoms, or QoL between patients in the two treatment arms. Fewer inpatient stays for complications were required with GC. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study failed to demonstrate any difference in efficacy between the newer regimen of GC and the older regimens of MIC and MVP. Cancer 2003;98:542-53.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Pharmacokinetic, biochemical and clinical effects of dimethyltriazenoimidazole-4-carboxamide-bischloroethylnitrosourea combination therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

We assessed whether split dosing with the methylating agent DTIC is an effective strategy for inactivating the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine DNA-ATase in order to decrease tumour resistance to BCNU. ATase levels in PBMCs were used as a surrogate for tumour ATase depletion to determine whether this correlated with either the pharmacokinetics of DTIC and its major metabolite AIC or other clinical sequelae. Two 1 hr infusions of DTIC (400 mg/m(2)) 4 hr apart followed another 4 hr later by BCNU (75 mg/m(2)) were administered every 6 weeks in 7 patients with heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer. The extent and kinetics of ATase depletion and recovery in PBMCs varied not only between patients but also between cycles in the same patient. Serial FNAs showed heterogeneity in tumour ATase expression but no clear pattern of change in ATase activity. DTIC and AIC exhibited biphasic clearance from the blood, consistent with a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model. The AUC of AIC was strongly correlated with the percentage decrease in PBMC ATase levels. There were no clinical responses, and toxicity in neutrophils and platelets was marked. Split-dose DTIC therefore does not appear to be a clinically effective approach to overcome O(6)-alkylating agent resistance in advanced breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Improvements in quality of life and disease-related symptoms in phase I trials of the selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 in non-small cell lung cancer and other solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The feasibility and utility of assessing quality of life (QoL) and disease-related symptoms in patients with advanced cancer have been evaluated in two Phase I clinical trials of p.o. administered ZD1839 ('Iressa'), an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) questionnaires, including disease-specific subscales for lung, head and neck, colorectal, prostate, and ovarian cancer, were completed by patients in two open-label, Phase I, escalating multiple-dose safety and tolerability trials. RESULTS: In 157 patients, 92% of whom had received prior therapy, compliance in returning FACT questionnaires was 87% (European/Australian trial) and 57% (United States trial). This did not appear to be influenced by dose level or tumor type. For patients with colorectal, prostate, or ovarian cancer, median QoL [FACT and Trial Outcome Index (TOI)] scores deteriorated over time. In contrast, for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or head and neck cancer, median FACT and TOI scores did not deteriorate significantly, and in the United States trial, head and neck cancer scores improved significantly over time. In patients with NSCLC, symptom-related scores measured by the Lung Cancer Subscale of FACT-L appeared sensitive to clinical change. CONCLUSIONS: QoL (FACT-L) questionnaires were used successfully in the Phase I clinical trials of ZD1839. They appeared to be a sensitive tool to monitor clinical changes for the five tumor types in these trials and showed that ZD1839 has the potential to improve patients' QoL.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Technology evaluation: ABX-EGF, Abgenix/Amgen.

Abgenix and Amgen (formerly Immunex) are developing ABX-EGF, a human monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, for potential use in the treatment of cancer. ABX-EGF is undergoing phase II trials in patients with renal, colorectal, prostate and non-small-cell lung cancers. By July 2002, phase III trials for these indications were planned to start in 2003.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Molecular imaging and biological evaluation of HuMV833 anti-VEGF antibody: implications for trial design of antiangiogenic antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent angiogenic cytokine, and various inhibitory agents, including specific antibodies, have been developed to block VEGF-stimulated angiogenesis. We developed HuMV833, a humanized version of a mouse monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody (MV833) that has antitumor activity against a number of human tumor xenografts, and investigated the distribution and biologic effects of HuMV833 in patients in a phase I trial. METHODS: Twenty patients with progressive solid tumors were treated with various doses of HuMV833 (0.3, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg). Positron emission tomography with (124)I-HuMV833 was used to measure the antibody distribution in and clearance from tissues. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure the vascular permeability surface area product with a first-pass pharmacokinetic model (k(fp)) to determine tumor vascular permeability. RESULTS: The antibody was generally well tolerated, although the incremental dose, phase I study design, and pharmacodynamic endpoints could not identify the optimum biologically active dose. Antibody distribution and clearance were markedly heterogeneous between and within patients and between and within individual tumors. HuMV833 distribution to normal tissues also varied among patients, but the antibody was cleared from these tissues in a homogeneous fashion. Permeability was strongly heterogeneous between and within patients and between and within individual tumors. All tumors showed a reduction in k(fp) 48 hours after the first treatment (median = 44%; range = 4%-91%). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the heterogeneity in tumor biology with respect to antibody uptake and clearance, we suggest that either intrapatient dose escalation approaches or larger, more precisely defined patient cohorts would be preferable to conventional strategies in the design of phase I studies with antiangiogenic compounds like HuMV833.

Animals↗