Biomedical subjects

Manfred R Moeller

Publications and source records attributed to Manfred R Moeller.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

High-potency marijuana impairs executive function and inhibitory motor control.

Human performance studies have usually relied on low-potency marijuana (4% THC) for determining THC-induced impairment. The present study was designed to assess the effects of high-potency marijuana (13% THC) on human performance. In all, 20 recreational users of marijuana participated in a double-blind, placebo controlled, three way cross-over study. The treatments consisted of single doses of 0, 250, and 500 microg/kg THC. Performance tests were conducted at regular intervals between 15 min and 6 h postsmoking and included measures of motor control (Critical tracking task), executive function (Tower of London) motor impulsivity (Stop signal task), and risk taking (Iowa gambling task). THC significantly impaired performance in the Critical tracking task and decreased the number of correct decisions in the Tower of London task. In addition, THC significantly increased stop reaction time and the proportions of commission and omission errors in the Stop signal task. THC-induced impairments lasted up to 6 h postsmoking as indicated by the absence of a THC x Time after smoking interaction. Effect sizes for performance impairments produced by THC 250 microg/kg were relatively low but generally increased by a factor of two in case of THC 500 microg/kg. These data suggest that high potency marijuana consistently impairs executive function and motor control. Use of higher doses of THC in controlled studies may offer a reliable indication of THC induced impairment as compared to lower doses of THC that have traditionally been used in performance studies.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Driving under the influence of drugs -- evaluation of analytical data of drugs in oral fluid, serum and urine, and correlation with impairment symptoms.

A study was performed to acquire urine, serum and oral fluid samples in cases of suspected driving under the influence of drugs of abuse. Oral fluid was collected using a novel sampling/testing device (Dräger DrugTest System). The aim of the study was to evaluate oral fluid and urine as a predictor of blood samples positive for drugs and impairment symptoms. Analysis for cannabinoids, amphetamine and its derivatives, opiates and cocaine was performed in urine using the Mahsan Kombi/DOA4-test, in serum using immunoassay and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) confirmation and in oral fluid by GC-MS. Police and medical officer observations of impairment symptoms were rated and evaluated using a threshold value for the classification of driving inability. Accuracy in correlating drug detection in oral fluid and serum were >90% for all substances and also >90% in urine and serum except for THC (71.0%). Of the cases with oral fluid positive for any drug 97.1% of corresponding serum samples were also positive for at least one drug; of drug-positive urine samples this were only 82.4%. In 119 of 146 cases, impairment symptoms above threshold were observed (81.5%). Of the cases with drugs detected in serum, 19.1% appeared not impaired which were the same with drug-positive oral fluid while more persons with drug-positive urine samples appeared uninfluenced (32.7%). The data demonstrate that oral fluid is superior to urine in correlating with serum analytical data and impairment symptoms of drivers under the influence of drugs of abuse.

Amphetamines↗

PubMed2004

Poppy seed consumption and toxicological analysis of blood and urine samples.

Poppy seeds contain morphine in different amounts. Reported concentrations are up to 294 mg morphine/kg poppy seeds. Since penalties based on Street Traffic Law (parapgraph 24a StVG) in Germany (administrative offence) require definitive proof of morphine in blood samples, and the "Grenzwertkommission" in consultation with the Ministry of Transportation recommended a threshold of free morphine of 10 ng/mL, the question arose whether the consumption of poppy seeds can lead to a blood concentrations equal or higher than 10 ng/mL of free morphine. Therefore, five volunteers ate poppy seed products (50 mg morphine/kg poppy seeds). In urine, all on-site tests were enzyme immunologically positive for opiates and were positive to morphine by GC/MS. All the blood samples were negative to morphine by EIA and to free morphine by GC/MS. However, after hydrolysis, morphine was detected by GC/MS in all cases. Accordingly, in Germany, penalties based on parapgraph 24a StVG are not likely to cause road users any concerns should they have consumed poppy seeds. Driver Licensing Authorities, however, should be advised of this problem to avoid unjustified legal measures.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Improved and validated method for the determination of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 11-hydroxy-THC and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC in serum, and in human liver microsomal preparations using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

A validated method for the quantification of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and its main metabolites 11-hydroxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (OH-THC) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) in serum is presented. The substances were isolated by solid-phase extraction, derivatised by methylation, and analysed by means of GC-MS in the selected ion monitoring mode. Quantitation was achieved by the addition of deuterated analogues as internal standards. The method was linear up to 10 ng/ml for THC and OH-THC, and up to 50 ng/ml for THC-COOH. The limits of quantification were 0.62 ng/ml for THC, 0.68 ng/ml for OH-THC and 3.35 ng/ml for THC-COOH. The limits of detection for the least intensive ions were 0.52 ng/ml for THC, 0.49 ng/ml for OH-THC and 0.65 ng/ml for THC-COOH. The method was validated according to the requirements of the Journal of Chromatography B. The method has been routinely used on samples from drivers suspected of "driving under the influence". In addition to the forensic application, a cross-validation was carried out by applying the method developed for serum to human liver microsomal preparation samples.

Dronabinol↗

PubMed2002

Drugs of abuse monitoring in blood for control of driving under the influence of drugs.

Driving under the influence of drugs is an issue of growing concern in the industrialized countries as a risk and a cause for road accidents. In forensic toxicology, the increasing number of samples for determination of drugs in blood is mainly due to zero-tolerance laws in several countries and well-trained police officers who can better recognize drivers under the influence of drugs of abuse. This review describes procedures for detection of the following drugs of abuse in whole blood, plasma, and serum: amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxy methamphetamine (MDMA), N-ethyl-3, 4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDEA), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), cannabinoids (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC], 11-hydroxy-delta-9-THC, 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta-9-THC), cocaine, benzoylecgonine, ecgonine methyl ester, cocaethylene, the opiates (heroin, 6-monoacetylmorphine, morphine, or codeine), and methadone as well as gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB), lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), phencyclidine (PCP), and psilocybin/psilocin. For many of the analytes, sensitive immunologic methods for screening are available. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is still the state-of-the-art method for confirmatory analysis or for screening and confirmation in one step. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) procedures for such purposes are also included in this review. Basic data about the biosample assayed, internal standard, workup, GC or LC column and mobile phase, detection mode, reference data, and validation data of each procedure are summarized in two tables.

Accidents, Traffic↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Screening for drugs of abuse in oral fluid--correlation of analysis results with serum in forensic cases.

The testing of saliva or oral fluid at the roadside could be a powerful tool to detect drivers under the influence of drugs and has several advantages over urine screening. In 177 cases of individuals suspected of driving under the influence of drugs, oral fluid was collected at the roadside and analyzed in parallel to serum samples. The study was performed to investigate the variability of oral fluid analysis results in relation to blood/serum. In 45% of the cases single-drug use was found, and in 50% poly-drug use was found. Cannabis was most prevalent (78%), and 70% of these individuals were also positive for tetrahydrocannabinol in serum. Overall, 97% of oral fluid samples positive for any substance were also positive in serum. Comparing data of oral fluid and serum for amphetamine, MDMA, morphine, benzoylecgonine, and tetrahydrocannabinol, the sensitivities were 100%, 97%, 87%, 87%, and 92%, respectively. Overall specificity and accuracy were in the range of 91-98%. Discrepancies between a negative oral fluid sample and a positive serum sample could be explained by analytical insensitivity in the lower volume of oral fluid analyzed (estimated for 0.1 mL confirmation vs. 1 mL of serum) or a shorter detection window in oral fluid. The low prevalence of discrepancies with positive oral fluid and negative serum results (2-9% of the cases) may be explained by persistent oral contamination especially for orally consumed drugs, like MDMA and cannabis. It is concluded that the detection of a psychoactive substance in oral fluid taken at the roadside is highly predictive for the detection of the corresponding drug or its metabolite in serum. Oral fluid testing is therefore suitable for the efficient confirmation of drug use of drivers suspected of being under the influence of drugs.

Automobile Driving↗