Task Force 5: training in nuclear cardiology: endorsed by the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Manuel D Cerqueira.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging is being performed with increasing frequency over exercise stress. Dipyridamole and adenosine have a high side-effect profile, provide higher than needed coronary artery flow rates, and use a relatively complicated method of administration. Based on preclinical animal work, three selective adenosine A2A receptor agonists, regadenoson (CVT3146), binodenoson (MRE0470 or WRC0470), and apadenoson (BMS068645 or ATL146e), may overcome these limitations and are now in Phase III studies as pharmacologic stress agents. For single-photon emission CT imaging, binodenoson and regadenoson were concordant with adenosine images for detection and quantitation of ischemia. Despite the high A2A selectivity of binodenoson and regadenoson in preclinical studies, subjective side effects attributable to other adenosine receptor subtypes were still observed in human studies and are similar to or slightly lower than adenosine. There have been no reports of atrioventricular block or bronchospasm with either regadenoson or binodenoson in published trials.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: Regadenoson, a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist, was evaluated for tolerability and effectiveness as a pharmacological stress agent for detecting reversible myocardial hypoperfusion when combined with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). BACKGROUND: Adenosine and dipyridamole are nonselective adenosine agonists currently used as pharmacologic stressors. Despite proven safety, these agents often cause undesirable side effects and require a continuous infusion. METHODS: This Phase II, multicenter, open-label trial was conducted in 36 patients who had demonstrated ischemia on a 6-min adenosine SPECT imaging study within the previous 2 to 46 days. Patients received regadenoson as a rapid intravenous bolus dose of 400 microg (n = 18) or 500 microg (n = 18). The radiopharmaceutical was then delivered within one minute. The SPECT images were acquired in a standard manner and uniformly processed at a central laboratory. Regadenoson and adenosine studies were presented in random order and interpreted blindly with a 17-segment model by three observers. Additionally, quantitative analysis was performed with 4D-MSPECT software (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan). RESULTS: Overall agreement for the presence of reversible hypoperfusion was 86%. The 400-mug dose was better tolerated. Overall, regadenoson was well-tolerated; side effects (e.g., chest discomfort, flushing, dyspnea) were generally mild in severity and self-limiting. High-grade atrioventricular block and bronchospasm were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Regadenoson is well-tolerated and seems as effective as adenosine for detecting and quantifying the extent of hypoperfusion observed with SPECT perfusion imaging. Phase III clinical trials are now underway, given the promise of regadenoson's reduced side effects and simplicity of bolus administration.
Under the auspices of the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC), an appropriateness review was conducted for radionuclide cardiovascular imaging (RNI), specifically gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI). The review assessed the risks and benefits of the imaging test for several indications or clinical scenarios and scored them based on a scale of 1 to 9, where the upper range (7 to 9) implies that the test is generally acceptable and is a reasonable approach, and the lower range (1 to 3) implies that the test is generally not acceptable and is not a reasonable approach. The mid range (4 to 6) implies that the test may be generally acceptable and may be a reasonable approach for the indication. The indications for this review were primarily drawn from existing clinical practice guidelines and modified based on discussion by the ACCF Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the Technical Panel members who rated the indications. The method for this review was based on the RAND/UCLA approach for evaluating appropriateness, which blends scientific evidence and practice experience. A modified Delphi technique was used to obtain first- and second-round ratings of 52 clinical indications. The ratings were done by a Technical Panel with diverse membership, including nuclear cardiologists, referring physicians (including an echocardiographer), health services researchers, and a payer (chief medical officer). These results are expected to have a significant impact on physician decision making and performance, reimbursement policy, and future research directions. Periodic assessment and updating of criteria will be undertaken as needed.
Adenosine and dipyridamole, the currently available vasodilators for myocardial perfusion imaging, produce hyperemic coronary flow by stimulating A(2A) adenosine receptors on arteriolar vascular smooth muscle cells. However, both vasodilators nonselectively activate A(1), A(2B), and A(3) adenosine receptors, which contributes to common undesirable effects. In the development of a novel pharmacologic stress agent, more selective agonism of the A(2A) receptor subtype would be desirable. Currently, 2 selective A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists are being evaluated in phase 3 studies as pharmacologic stress agents. The highly selective, potent, low-affinity A(2A) adenosine agonist regadenoson (also known as CVT-3146) holds significant potential as a pharmacologic stress agent, based on available results from experimental and clinical trials. Regadenoson produces maximal hyperemia quickly and maintains it for an optimal duration that is practical for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. Regadenoson's simple rapid bolus administration and short duration of hyperemic effect point to an advantage of enhanced control for the clinician.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.