PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Manuel Jiménez-Navarro

Publications and source records attributed to Manuel Jiménez-Navarro.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Influence of high homocysteine and low folate plasmatic levels in medium-term prognosis after acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: To test prospectively whether moderate hyperhomocysteinemia and low folate levels could have an influence in the prognosis of 155 patients who presented with an acute coronary syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 13.4+/-7.4 months, patients with low folate levels had higher percentages of cardiovascular death and major cardiovascular events (33% vs. 5%, p<0.001; 44% vs. 22%, p<0.05) and patients with high homocysteine levels had a higher percentage of major cardiovascular events (31% vs. 14.5%, p<0.03). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates analysis showed that patients with low folate levels had a significantly higher probability of cardiovascular death and lower free-of-events survival (log rank statistic: 21.17, p<0.001 and 6.59, p=0.01). Patients with high homocysteine levels had a lower free-of-events survival (log rank statistic: 4.95, p=0.02). Different survival multivariate analysis model showed that the presence of low folate levels was an independent predictor of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 8.85, 95% confidence interval 2.6-29.3, p<0.000) and high homocysteine levels was identified as independent predictor of major cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval 1.07-5.12, p<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Low folate levels and moderate hyperhomocysteinemia were identified as independent predictors of cardiovascular events in the follow-up.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Impact of diabetes on mortality in patients with myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a major risk factor for developing coronary heart disease. In patients with diabetes who survived myocardial infarction (MI), less is known about subsequent morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the effects of diabetes in post-MI patients with left ventricular dysfunction on cardiovascular events and death. METHODS: The Survival and Ventricular Enlargement, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial, evaluated the efficacy of captopril vs placebo in 2231 patients following acute MI with left ventricular dysfunction defined as an ejection fraction less than or equal to 40%. Patients were randomly assigned to captopril or placebo 3 to 16 days following MI and were followed up for 2 to 5 years (mean, 3.5 years). RESULTS: Among the 2231, 496 (22.2%) were patients with a history of diabetes, of which 168 (33.9%) were treated with insulin. Patients with diabetes were significantly older; more likely to be women; have a history of prior MI or hypertension; be obese or manifest Killip class II or greater; and have higher systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and heart rate, as well as lower ejection fraction. During follow-up, 31.3% of patients with diabetes and 20.1% of nondiabetic patients died (P<.001). Furthermore, 50% of the patients with diabetes had at least 1 major cardiovascular event compared with 32.3% among the nondiabetic patients (P<.001). In multivariate analysis that adjusted for all significant differences in baseline characteristics, patients with diabetes had a 39% higher total mortality (P = .001) and 49% more cardiovascular events (P = .001). Among the patients with diabetes, baseline insulin treatment was associated with a greater risk of death (41.1% vs 26.2%; P = .001) and cardiovascular events (58.3% vs 45.7%; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who survived MI with left ventricular dysfunction, diabetes increased risk of death from all causes even after controlling for differences in other risk factors. Patients with diabetes treated with insulin have a particularly higher mortality risk. Patients with diabetes who survived MI with left ventricular dysfunction, in particular those receiving insulin, are at high risk of subsequent mortality and cardiovascular events and thus require intensive risk factor modification, as well as evaluation for novel therapies.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Should we treat patients with moderately severe stenosis of the left main coronary artery and negative FFR results?

BACKGROUND: The prognostic importance of significant left main coronary artery disease is unequivocal. However, moderate lesions of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) are sometimes found in patients presenting significant stenosis in other coronary arteries or equivocal symptoms. The ability of myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) to predict coronary events could be useful in the decision-making process in these patients. The present study was designed to investigate the occurrence of cardiac events in patients with coronary syndromes and LMCA stenosis of moderate severity in whom FFR failed to show an haemodynamic significant repercussion of the LMCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 27 consecutive patients (mean age 62.7 +/- 10.5 years) with moderate stenoses (30-50%) of the LMCA. In seven patients who presented significantly reduced FFR (< 0.75) at the LMCA level (Group A), coronary revascularization of this vessel was performed. In 20 patients with negative FFR (greater than or equal to 0.75) at the LMCA level (Group B), the LMCA stenosis was not revascularized, being the revascularization procedures (if any) limited to other arteries with significant obstructions. During a mean follow-up period of 26.2 +/- 12.1 months, clinical events occurred in 3 patients in the whole group. One patient with positive FFR died during coronary bypass surgery. Two group B patients were surgically revascularized 4 months and 4 years after the initial coronariography. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with coronary lesions of moderate severity on the LMCA and negative FFR may constitute a subgroup of good prognosis in the follow-up. Our findings suggest that negative FFR is a potentially useful indicator of the likelihood of cardiac events, and thus represents a useful aid in clinical decision-making in the hemodynamics laboratory.

Coronary Angiography↗