PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marc A Pfeffer

Publications and source records attributed to Marc A Pfeffer.

107 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Value of the electrocardiogram in predicting left ventricular enlargement and dysfunction after myocardial infarction.

To identify electrocardiographic predictors of left ventricular enlargement or persistent dysfunction following a myocardial infarction. Baseline and predischarge 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) from 272 patients with anterior myocardial infarction who were enrolled in the Healing and Early Afterload Reducing Therapy trial were evaluated and related to echocardiographic data obtained at baseline and day 90. ST-segment elevation, QRS score, and number of negative T waves were assessed at both time points. The majority of patients (87%; n = 237) received reperfusion therapy. Multivariate models were used to adjust for potential confounders, including maximal creatine kinase level and ejection fraction at baseline. None of the baseline electrocardiographic variables independently predicted ventricular enlargement or recovery of function. In contrast, the sum of ST- and maximum ST-segment elevation, and the number of leads with ST-segment elevation > or =1 mm in the predischarge ECG, were independent predictors of ventricular enlargement from baseline to day 90. Each lead with ST-segment elevation > or =1 mm was associated with 3.5 mL of ventricular enlargement (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6 to 5.5 mL; P <0.0001). Similarly, the sum of ST-segment elevation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.89; P <0.0001), the maximum ST-segment elevation (OR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.45; P <0.0001), and the number of leads with ST-segment elevation > or =1 mm (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.74; P <0.0001) were independently associated with a lower likelihood of recovery of function at day 90. Predischarge ECG may be a useful tool for early identification of patients at risk of ventricular enlargement and persistent dysfunction following myocardial infarction.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion (VALIANT) trial: baseline characteristics in context.

BACKGROUND: The VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion (VALIANT) trial compared outcomes with: (1) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEI) with the reference agent captopril; (2) angiotensin-receptor blockade (ARB) with valsartan; or (3) both in patients with heart failure (HF) and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) after myocardial infarction (MI). AIMS: a goal of this active-control trial was to simulate conditions that would lead current practitioners to use ACEIs. Thus, we compared characteristics of VALIANT patients with those of patients in placebo-controlled trials that established ACEIs as standard treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected demographic, clinical, medication and imaging information from 14703 patients in 24 countries. This high-risk population was a median 65.8 years old, and 31.1% were female. Most (51.8%) showed imaging evidence of LVSD at enrollment. Most (72%) had Killip class>/=II HF. Patients received evidence-based therapies at rates similar to those of contemporary MI trials and at an improved rate compared with prior placebo-controlled ACEI trials. CONCLUSION: VALIANT represents the largest globally representative cohort enrolled with HF and/or LVSD after MI. Patients were similar to those in placebo-controlled ACEI trials while reflecting improvements in evidence-based care. With enrollment complete, VALIANT is poised to define the optimal strategy for renin-angiotensin system blockade after MI to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Adverse mortality effect of central sympathetic inhibition with sustained-release moxonidine in patients with heart failure (MOXCON).

BACKGROUND: The association between sympathetic activation and mortality in chronic heart failure and the favorable effect of beta blocking drugs has raised the possibility of therapeutic efficacy for central sympathetic inhibition with sustained-release (SR) moxonidine, an imidazoline receptor agonist. METHODS: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was initiated in 425 centers in 17 countries with a plan to enter 4533 patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction. Moxonidine SR or matching placebo was titrated to a target dose of 1.5 mg BID. The trial was powered to detect a 20% reduction in mortality, which required a total of 724 deaths. FINDINGS: An early increase in death rate and adverse events in the moxonidine SR group led to premature termination of the trial because of safety concerns after 1934 patients were entered. Final analysis revealed 54 deaths (5.5%) in the moxonidine SR group and 32 deaths (3.4%) in the placebo group during the active treatment phase. Survival curves revealed a significantly (P=0.012) worse outcome in the moxonidine SR group. Hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction and adverse events were also more frequent in the moxonidine SR group. Plasma norepinephrine was significantly decreased by moxonidine SR (-18.8% from baseline) vs. placebo (+6.9%). INTERPRETATION: Early termination of the trial limited conclusions regarding the long-term effects of central sympathetic inhibition. Nonetheless, the excess early mortality and morbidity suggest the likelihood of an adverse effect of moxonidine SR and raise concerns regarding the efficacy of generalized sympathetic inhibition in heart failure.

Delayed-Action Preparations↗
PubMed2002

Ventricular remodeling does not accompany the development of heart failure in diabetic patients after myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients are at increased risk for heart failure (HF) and other adverse events after myocardial infarction (MI). Left ventricular (LV) enlargement after MI is also associated with the same increased risk. We used data from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) echocardiographic substudy to test the hypothesis that diabetes was associated with increased LV enlargement after MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred twelve nondiabetic and 100 diabetic patients underwent echocardiographic assessment at baseline and 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after MI. HF developed in 30% of diabetic and 17% of nondiabetic patients during follow-up (P<0.001). Baseline LV diastolic size, ejection fraction, and infarct segment length were similar between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Diabetic patients demonstrated less LV enlargement between baseline and 2 years than nondiabetic patients (0.9+/-11.1 cm2 versus 3.8+/-10.9 cm2, P=0.047). In patients who developed HF, LV diastolic dilatation (10.0+/-12.4 cm2 versus 3.7+/-13.1 cm2, P=0.06) and systolic dilatation (4.6+/-11.8 versus 0.91+/-12.1, P=0.017) were greater in nondiabetic than in diabetic patients. LV dilatation between baseline and 2 years was a predictor of HF in nondiabetic patients, but not in diabetic patients, even after excluding patients with recurrent MI and adjusting for history of hypertension, prior MI, age, treatment group, and smoking. Diabetes modified the relationship between ventricular enlargement and the risk of HF (P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The increased incidence of HF after MI in diabetic patients is not explained by a greater propensity for LV remodeling.

Diabetes Complications↗
PubMed2002

Omapatrilat reduces pulse pressure and proximal aortic stiffness in patients with systolic hypertension: results of the conduit hemodynamics of omapatrilat international research study.

BACKGROUND: Increased pulse pressure, an indicator of conduit vessel stiffness, is a strong independent predictor of cardiovascular events in hypertensive cohorts, which suggests that reduction of conduit vessel stiffness may be desirable in hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed changes in pulse pressure and conduit vessel stiffness in a 12-week double-blind, randomized clinical trial that compared monotherapy with the ACE inhibitor enalapril 40 mg daily (n=87) versus the vasopeptidase (dual ACE and neutral endopeptidase) inhibitor omapatrilat 80 mg daily (n=80) in patients with systolic hypertension. Patients were withdrawn from antihypertensive medications 1 to 2 weeks before enrollment, and systolic pressure was confirmed to be > or =160 mm Hg. With the use of calibrated tonometry and pulsed Doppler, pulsatile hemodynamics were assessed before randomization and at 12 weeks. Characteristic impedance (Z(c)), a direct measure of the stiffness of the central aorta, was calculated from the ratio of changes in carotid pressure and aortic flow in early systole. Omapatrilat compared with enalapril produced greater reductions in peripheral (-8.2+/-12.2 versus -4.0+/-12.2 mm Hg, P<0.05) and central (-10.2+/-16.2 versus -3.2+/-16.9 mm Hg, P<0.01) pulse pressures and Z(c) (237+/-83 to 208+/-70 versus 225+/-87 to 231+/-94 dyne x s/cm(5), P<0.001); the latter remained significant (P<0.05) after adjusting for change in mean pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Greater reductions in pulse pressure and Z(c) in hypertensive subjects treated with omapatrilat compared with enalapril suggest that aortic stiffness is maintained by specific, partially reversible mechanisms and underscore a potential role for pharmacological modulation of natriuretic peptides in the treatment of hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Safety and tolerability of pravastatin in long-term clinical trials: prospective Pravastatin Pooling (PPP) Project.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic decisions regarding pharmacological therapy should be based on safety and tolerability as well as efficacy data. Clinical trials designed to assess efficacy are often insufficiently powered to generate reliable safety data. METHODS AND RESULTS: The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS), the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE), and Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) studies collectively accumulated >112 000 person-years of exposure in double-blind randomized trials comparing placebo and pravastatin (40 mg once daily). During 5 years of exposure, the incidence of fatal and nonfatal cancers was similar between pravastatin and placebo groups. No differences in noncardiovascular serious adverse events were detected. With >243 000 blood sample analyses, the percentage of patients with any abnormal liver function test after baseline sampling was similar (>3x the upper limit of normal for alanine aminotransferase: 128 [1.4%] versus 131 [1.4%] patients for pravastatin versus placebo, respectively). Study medication was withdrawn in 3 pravastatin and 7 placebo patients due to creatine phosphokinase elevations; no cases of mild or severe myopathy were reported. A Cox regression model considering treatment group, age, diabetes, smoking, whether primary or secondary prevention study, and cardiovascular serious adverse events indicates that the likelihood of discontinuing pravastatin was less than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective analysis indicates that during prolonged exposure, 40 mg of pravastatin is well tolerated, with no excess of noncardiovascular serious adverse events, including liver function abnormalities and laboratory and clinical evidence for myositis. These extensive safety and tolerability data provide important information for therapeutic decisions regarding this pharmacological agent.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Right ventricular dysfunction and risk of heart failure and mortality after myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of right ventricular (RV) function in patients after a myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND: Right ventricular function has been shown to predict exercise capacity, autonomic imbalance and survival in patients with advanced heart failure (HF). METHODS: Two-dimensional echocardiograms were obtained in 416 patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction [LVEF] < or = 40%) from the Survival And Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) echocardiographic substudy (mean 11.1 +/- 3.2 days post infarction). Right ventricular function from the apical four-chamber view, assessed as the percent change in the cavity area from end diastole to end systole (fractional area change [FAC]), was related to clinical outcome. RESULTS: Right ventricular function correlated only weakly with the LVEF (r = 0.12, p = 0.013). On univariate analyses, the RV FAC was a predictor of mortality, cardiovascular mortality and HF (p < 0.0001 for all) but not recurrent MI. After adjusting for age, gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, previous MI, LVEF, infarct size, cigarette smoking and treatment assignment, RV function remained an independent predictor of total mortality, cardiovascular mortality and HF. Each 5% decrease in the RV FAC was associated with a 16% increased odds of cardiovascular mortality (95% confidence interval 4.3% to 29.2%; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular function is an independent predictor of death and the development of HF in patients with LV dysfunction after MI.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Coronary heart disease in patients with low LDL-cholesterol: benefit of pravastatin in diabetics and enhanced role for HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides as risk factors.

BACKGROUND: In two large secondary prevention trials of pravastatin, risk reduction was not significant in participants who had low baseline LDL-C concentrations (that is, <125 mg/dL). We conducted exploratory analyses of participant characteristics, lipid risk factors, and risk reduction in this group. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 13 173 participants with coronary heart disease (CHD), 2607 had baseline LDL-C <125 mg/dL. Those with LDL-C <125 compared with > or =125 mg/dL were more likely to be diabetic (15% versus 9%), hypertensive (46 versus 41%), and male (89% versus 83%); they had higher triglycerides (169 versus 154 mg/dL), lower HDL-C (36.5 versus 38 mg/dL), and similar body mass index (27 kg/m2); and pravastatin lowered their LDL-C by 36 mg/dL (32%) versus 45 mg/dL (29%). During 5.8-year (mean) follow-up, HDL-C and triglycerides were both significantly stronger predictors of recurrent CHD events in participants with LDL-C <125 than > or =125 mg/dL. In diabetic participants with low LDL-C, pravastatin decreased CHD events from 34% to 22% (relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.83; P=0.004), significantly different from the effect in nondiabetic participants with low LDL-C (P interaction, 0.005) (event rate, 21%; relative risk, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.27]). There were trends toward risk reduction in smokers and in those with low HDL-C, <40 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CHD who have low LDL-C, diabetics have much higher subsequent CHD event rates than do nondiabetics. Pravastatin reduced the event rate in diabetics to that of nondiabetic participants. The results also suggest enhanced therapeutic potential for improving HDL-C and triglycerides in patients with CHD who have low LDL-C concentrations.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Heart failure.

Although heart failure is common, disabling, and deadly, there are now many effective treatments, at least for patients with low left-ventricular ejection fraction. For all, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and beta blockers are the essential disease-modifying treatments, improving symptoms, reducing hospital admissions, and increasing survival. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators also improve survival. For patients with persistent symptoms, angiotensin-receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists have additional benefits. These treatments are now preferred to digoxin, although this drug can still be useful at an earlier stage in patients with atrial fibrillation. In some patients with persistently severe symptoms and a wide QRS on the electrocardiogram, cardiac resynchronisation therapy also reduces mortality and morbidity. The role of other markers of ventricular dys-synchrony is under investigation. There is growing evidence that left-ventricular assist devices are indicated in some patients with end-stage heart failure. Organised delivery of care also improves outcome. However, there is still no firmly evidence-based treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Many new pharmacological, device, and surgical treatments for heart failure are currently under evaluation in clinical trials, and other approaches, including stem-cell treatment, are at an earlier stage of investigation.

Heart Failure↗