PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marc Cohen

Publications and source records attributed to Marc Cohen.

59 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Combination of low molecular weight heparins with antiplatelet agents in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: an update.

This article reviews the use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and antiplatelet agents in the treatment of unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), which together account for 1 million hospitalisations annually in the US alone. Mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in these conditions is currently approximately 8 to 16% at 1 month, and there is a need to optimise treatment further. Since their introduction, LMWHs have been shown to be successful and well tolerated in the treatment of unstable angina and NSTEMI, but differences have been seen in their efficacy compared with the parent compound, unfractionated heparin (UFH). A meta-analysis of all LMWHs, grouped, versus UFH showed equivalent efficacy and safety. The LMWHs dalteparin sodium and nadroparin calcium have independently been shown to be as effective as UFH. However, enoxaparin sodium has been shown to have greater clinical efficacy than UFH in patients with unstable angina (UA)/NSTEMI. One area of new research is patients with UA/NSTEMI who later undergo percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and early data suggest enoxaparin can be safely used as an anticoagulant instead of UFH in these patients. There is a wealth of data for glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists (abciximab, eptifibatide, lamifiban, and tirofiban), although some are conflicting. Recent meta-analyses suggest that some benefit is conferred by using these compounds, particularly in patients who undergo PCI. Recent trials have focussed on combining GP IIb/IIIa antagonists with LMWH, and although data is still scant, the ACUTE (Anti-thrombotic Combination Using Tirofiban and Enoxaparin) and ACUTE II studies indicate the safety and potential clinical benefit of combining enoxaparin with tirofiban in patients with UA/NSTEMI not undergoing PCI, compared with UFH and tirofiban. The NICE (National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin) 4 study collected data on the combination of enoxaparin and abciximab in patients undergoing PCI, and both safety and efficacy data compared well with historical data collected on the use of UFH with abciximab. The more recent NICE 3 study extended this finding to the combination of enoxaparin with abciximab, tirofiban or eptifibatide. The safety of two doses of dalteparin and abciximab had also been investigated, with the higher dose the efficacious, and also with safety, in patients undergoing PCI. In addition, a GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes) IV substudy found that dalteparin had equivalent safety to UFH when co-administered with abciximab in patients not undergoing PCI. The NICE 3 and 4 trials were not randomised comparisons, and as such there results must be interpreted with caution. Recently, the CRUISE (Coronary Revascularisation Utilizing Integrelin [eptifibatide] and Single-bolus Enoxaparin) and INTERACT (Integrelin and Enoxaparin randomised assessment of Acute Coronary Syndromes Treatment) studies have provided evidence for both the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin combined with eptifibatide in non-ST elevation patients with acute coronary syndromes. A further study (SYNERGY [Superior Yield of the New strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and GlYcoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors]) will investigate the efficacy of the combination of enoxaparin with abciximab versus that of UFH and abciximab in a large cohort of 8000 patients. The use of GP IIb/IIIa agents and LMWH in patients with UA/STEMI has led to their use in those with ST-elevation MI, and studies indicate LMWH is efficacious and can be used safely as an adjunct to thrombolysis. New studies will investigate the use of these agents in patients with STEMI not undergoing thrombolysis and we await the results of these studies.

Angina, Unstable↗
PubMed2002

The use of nursing home and assisted living facilities among private long-term care insurance claimants: the experience of disabled elders.

Little is known about individuals in nursing homes (NHs) and assisted living facilities (ALFs) who receive private long-term care (LTC) insurance benefits. No one knows whether claimants and/or their families feel they are getting good value for their premiums, or whether the presence of private insurance influences the type of care people get. This brief provides descriptive information on disabled private LTC insurance policyholders receiving LTC benefits in these settings, comparing them to institutionalized elders who lack such insurance. The information shows that private LTC insurance benefits are targeted to individuals with significant functional and/or cognitive impairments; that claimants are satisfied with their policies although many report unmet needs; and that private LTC insurance gives claimants access to alternatives to nursing home care.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

The impact of private long-term care insurance on claimants: formal and informal care in the community.

Policy makers show continuing interest in the potential for long-term care (LTC) insurance to save public money by reducing pressure on the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Although the purchase of LTC insurance is being encouraged by government - through tax incentives and the offering of private LTC insurance as an option for public employees - little is known about how benefits are used, whether those claiming benefits feel they are getting good value for their money, and whether the patterns of formal (paid) and informal (unpaid) service use differ for insurance claimants compared to similarly disabled persons without private LTC insurance. This brief provides information on older people claiming LTC insurance benefits and compares their experiences to those of non-privately insured older people who need LTC. We conclude that LTC insurance is an important source of support for those who lack informal support from family and friends. However, LTC insurance remains a complex product; claimants need help in using their benefits to obtain the appropriate level and quality of care and in understanding at the time of purchase how much protection they need.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Association of carotid artery intima-media thickness with complex aortic atherosclerosis in patients with recent stroke.

This study was undertaken to determine whether carotid intima-media thickness can predict complex aortic atherosclerosis. A retrospective review was conducted of 64 consecutive patients who underwent transesophageal echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography for evaluation of recent ischemic stroke at MCP Hahnemann University, Medical College of Pennsylvania Hospital between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 1999. The mean age was 65+/-14 years and 59% of the patients were women. Thirty-nine patients (61%) had carotid atherosclerosis (defined as an intima-media thickness > or =1 mm) and seven patients (11%) had complex aortic atherosclerosis (defined as the presence of protruding atheroma > or =4 mm thick, mobile atherosclerotic debris, or plaque ulceration in any aortic segment by transesophageal echocardiography). Compared to patients without complex aortic atherosclerosis, patients with complex aortic atherosclerosis were more likely to have hypercholesterolemia (19% vs 57%, p = 0.05) and a carotid intima-media thickness of 2 mm or greater (35% vs 86%, p = 0.02). A carotid intima-media thickness of 2 mm or more had 86% sensitivity, 65% specificity, 23% positive predictive value, 97% negative predictive value, 2.5 positive likelihood ratio, and 0.22 negative likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of complex aortic atherosclerosis. Carotid intimamedia thickness measurement can be used to noninvasively estimate the probability of complex aortic atherosclerosis. A carotid intima-media thickness less than 2 mm makes complex aortic atherosclerosis very unlikely.

Aged↗