PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marc De Kock

Publications and source records attributed to Marc De Kock.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Patient-controlled analgesia in the management of postoperative pain.

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is a delivery system with which patients self-administer predetermined doses of analgesic medication to relieve their pain. Since its introduction in the early 1980s, the daily management of postoperative pain has been extensively optimised. The use of PCA in hospitals has been increasing because of its proven advantages over conventional intramuscular injections. These include improved pain relief, greater patient satisfaction, less sedation and fewer postoperative complications. All PCA modes contain the following variables: initial loading dose, demand dose, lockout interval, background infusion rate and 1-hour or 4-hour limits. Morphine is the most studied and most commonly used intravenous drug for PCA. In spite of the fact that it is the 'first choice' for PCA, other opioids have been successfully used for this option. The most observed adverse effects of opioid-based PCA are nausea and vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression, sedation, confusion and urinary retention. Although intravenous PCA is the most studied route of PCA, alternative routes have extensively been described in the literature. PCA by means of peridural catheters and peripheral nerve catheters are the most studied. Recently, transdermal PCA has been described. The use of peripheral or neuraxial nerve blocks is recommended to avoid the so called opioid tolerance observed with the intravenous administration of opioids. Numerous studies have shown the superiority of epidural PCA to intravenous PCA. The beneficial postoperative effects of epidural analgesia are more apparent for high-risk patients or those undergoing higher risk procedures. PCA with peripheral nerve catheters results in increased postoperative analgesia and satisfaction for surgery on upper and lower extremities. Serious complications occur rarely with these catheters. With the introduction of an Acute Pain Service, management of postoperative pain can be improved. This will also help to minimise adverse effects related to PCA and to avoid lethal mishaps.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Intraoperative epidural analgesia combined with ketamine provides effective preventive analgesia in patients undergoing major digestive surgery.

BACKGROUND: As a broader definition of preemptive analgesia, preventive analgesia aims to prevent the sensitization of central nervous system, hence the development of pathologic pain after tissular injury. To demonstrate benefits from preventive treatment, objective measurement of postoperative pain such as wound hyperalgesia and persistent pain should be evaluated. The current study assessed the role and timing of epidural analgesia in this context. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blinded trial, 85 patients scheduled to undergo neoplastic colonic resection were included. All the patients received a thoracic epidural catheter, systemic ketamine at a antihyperalgesic dose, and general anesthesia. Continuous infusion of analgesics belonging to the same class was administered by either intravenous or epidural route before incision until 72 h after surgery. Patients were allocated to four groups to receive intraoperative intravenous lidocaine-sufentanil-clonidine or epidural bupivacaine-sufentanil-clonidine followed postoperatively by either intravenous (lidocaine-morphine-clonidine) or epidural (bupivacaine-sufentanil-clonidine) patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale), analgesic consumption, wound area of punctuate hyperalgesia, residual pain, and analgesics needed from 2 weeks until 12 months were recorded. RESULTS: Analgesic requirements, visual analog scale scores, and area of hyperalgesia were significantly higher in the intravenous treatment group (intravenous-intravenous), and more patients reported residual pain from 2 weeks until 1 yr (28%). Although postoperative pain measurements did not differ, postoperative epidural treatment (intravenous-epidural) was less effective to prevent residual pain at 1 yr (11%; P = 0.2 with intravenous-intravenous group) than intraoperative one (epidural-epidural and epidural-intravenous groups) (0%; P = 0.01 with intravenous-intravenous group). CONCLUSION: Combined with an antihyperalgesic dose of ketamine, intraoperative epidural analgesia provides effective preventive analgesia after major digestive surgery.

Adult↗

The short-lasting analgesia and long-term antihyperalgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine in patients undergoing colonic surgery.

UNLABELLED: In this study, we investigated the antihyperalgesic effect of clonidine after surgery. Sixty patients undergoing right colic resection were studied. Patients were randomized to receive prior to general anesthesia a 2-mL intrathecal (IT) injection of 300 microg of clonidine or saline, or 10 mg of bupivacaine. General anesthesia was achieved using a target concentration propofol infusion and monitored using bispectral index. Postoperative analgesia was provided by morphine IV given through a patient-controlled analgesia device. Postoperative analgesia was assessed by morphine requirements and visual analog scale pain scores at rest, cough, and movement during the first 72 h. Mechanical hyperalgesia was measured by von Frey filaments. Patients were questioned regarding residual pain at 2 wk,1, 6, and 12 mo. The patient-controlled analgesia morphine requirements were significantly smaller in the IT clonidine group (31.5 +/- 12 versus 91 +/- 25.5 and 43 +/- 15 mg, respectively, in groups clonidine, saline, and bupivacaine: P < 0.05 at 72 postoperative hours). The area of hyperalgesia at 72 h was 3 +/- 5 cm(2) in the clonidine group versus 90 +/- 30 and 35 +/- 20 cm(2) in the saline and bupivacaine groups (P < 0.05). At 6 mo, fewer patients in the clonidine group experienced residual pain than in the saline group (0 of 20 versus 6 of 20, P < 0.05). We conclude that both intraoperative spinal clonidine and bupivacaine improve immediate postoperative analgesia. IT clonidine was, however, more potent than IT bupivacaine to reduce postoperative secondary hyperalgesia. IMPLICATIONS: Spinal clonidine contributes to the reduction of secondary hyperalgesia in patients recovering from abdominal surgery.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Cavocaval adult liver transplantation and retransplantation without venovenous bypass and without portocaval shunting: a prospective feasibility study in adult liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The original method of liver transplantation (LT) included recipient inferior vena cava (IVC) resection and the use of extracorporeal venovenous bypass (VVB). Refinements in technique permit transplantation to be done with IVC preservation and without VVB use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between November 1993 and November 2000, 202 consecutive grafts were performed in 188 adults (>/=16 years of age). Twelve patients (6.4%) received two and three retransplants (re-LT). Split grafting was performed 19 times (19 of 202 grafts, 9.4%). Risk factors included United Network of Organ Sharing status I (n=30, 16%), previous right upper abdominal surgery (n=32, 17.1%), caudate lobe encirclement of IVC (n=65, 32.2%), IVC (n=24, 11.9%), and splanchnic venous modification (n=58, 30.9%), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (n=34, 16.8%), giant (>5 kg) liver tumor (n=6, 3%), septic necrosis of the caudate lobe (n=1, 0.5%), and previous cavocaval (n=13, 6.4%) or classical LT (n=5, 2.5%). RESULTS: IVC preservation, avoidance of IVC cross clamping and of VVB use were possible in 98.9%, 93%, and 99.5% of 183 primary LT and in 89.5%, 84.2%, and 89.5% of 19 re-LT. Temporary portocaval shunting was never applied. Perioperative mortality was 1.2%. There was no allotransfusion in 73 (36%) grafts and 45 (22%) patients were immediately extubated. Permanent hepatic vein and caval problems were encountered in three (1.5%) grafts. One patient needed stent placement to treat IVC stenosis. Actual 3- and 12-month patient survival for whole, re-LT, and right-lobe split LT groups were 94.7%, 94.1%, 94.7%, 88.2%, 94.1%, and 89%. Three-month graft survival rates for these groups were 92.6%, 94.7%, and 84.2%. CONCLUSIONS: LT with IVC preservation and without VVB use and portocaval shunting is possible in nearly all primary transplants and in the majority of re-LT.

Adult↗

Can determining the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of volatile anesthetic be used as an objective tool to assess antinociception in animals?

UNLABELLED: We intended to evaluate the reliability of the minimum anesthetic alveolar concentration (MAC)-sparing effect as an objective measure of the antinociceptive properties of a drug. For this purpose, we tested different variables and analyzed the significance of the results obtained. In a first set of experiments, we studied rats under mechanical ventilation and sevoflurane anesthesia. Outcome variables such as gross purposeful movements consecutive to tail clamping, paw withdrawal consecutive to increasing pressure, and cardio-circulatory reactivity (MACBAR) after these stimuli were recorded. In a second set of experiment, sevoflurane-anesthetized rats under spontaneous breathing conditions were used. Thermal stimuli were compared with pressure. The MAC-sparing effect of several doses of sufentanil and clonidine was evaluated in both anesthetized and awake rodents. When considering the stimulus applied, larger concentrations of sevoflurane were required to suppress reactivity after tail clamp than after paw pressure or radiant heat (1.81 +/- 0.28 versus 1.45 +/- 0.22 and 1.53 +/- 0.26; P < 0.05). For the two first stimuli, no significant differences were noted between the concentrations that suppress motor or cardio-circulatory reactions. All doses of sufentanil tested significantly reduced (P < 0.05) the different MAC values except the smallest one (0.005 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1)) that significantly increased MACBAR in ventilated animals and both MAC and MACBAR in spontaneously breathing rodents (P < 0.05). Clonidine, at its optimal dose (10 micro g/kg), significantly reduced both MAC and MACBAR to the same degree. In awake animals submitted to radiant heat or pressure challenge, none of the clonidine doses nor sufentanil doses (0.005 and 0.07) were active. In conclusion, the MAC-sparing effect provides several reliable and quantifiable variables that allow comparison between different analgesic substances. However, the observations made are not simply the result of antinociceptive effects of the tested drugs but rather that of complex interactions between these drugs and a halogenated vapor. IMPLICATIONS: The MAC-sparing effect provides several variables that allow comparison between different analgesic substances. However, the observations made are not simply the result of the antinociceptive effects of the tested drugs but rather the result of complex interactions between these drugs and a halogenated vapor.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

An improved porcine model of stable methacholine-induced bronchospasm.

OBJECTIVE: To validate an animal model replicating the pathophysiological characteristics of severe induced bronchospasm observed in humans, with a high level of stability permitting measurements such as the assessment of ventilation-perfusion relationships with the multiple inert gas elimination technique. DESIGN AND SETTING: Experimental study in an animal research laboratory. SUBJECTS: 13 piglets (age 3-4 months) were studied and 7 underwent the complete protocol INTERVENTIONS: The animals were anesthetized and paralyzed. Mechanical ventilation was initiated in a volume-controlled mode. Ventilatory parameters were adjusted to obtain normocapnia and were maintained constant during the bronchospasm. Methacholine was administered via a synchronized nebulizer and progressively adjusted to obtain a stable twofold increase in peak inspiratory pressure. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary physiological data including assessment of lung mechanics and measurement of ventilation-perfusion relationships were obtained before and during the bronchospasm. Peak inspiratory pressure increased from 19.7+/-2.9 to 44.4+/-7.1 cmH(2)O during the bronchospasm. The latter remained stable over 2 h. Respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and ventilation-perfusion distribution changes typical of those observed in severe bronchospasm in humans were observed in all animals. CONCLUSIONS: The present experimental model replicates some of the physiopathological characteristics of severe human bronchospasm, and its stability should facilitate studies of the effects of different ventilatory modes in the setting of acute severe asthma.

Animals↗

The analgesic efficacy of bilateral combined superficial and deep cervical plexus block administered before thyroid surgery under general anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: In this study we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of combined deep and superficial cervical plexus block in patients undergoing thyroidectomy under general anesthesia. For this purpose, 39 patients undergoing elective thyroid surgery were randomized to receive a bilateral combined deep and superficial cervical block (14 mL per side) with saline (Group 1; n = 13), ropivacaine 0.5% (Group 2; n = 13), or ropivacaine 0.5% plus clonidine 7.5 microg/mL (Group 3; n = 13). Deep cervical plexus block was performed with a single injection (8 mL) at the C3 level. Superficial cervical plexus block consisted of a subcutaneous injection (6 mL) behind the lateral border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. During surgery, the number of additional alfentanil boluses was significantly reduced in Groups 2 and 3 compared with Group 1 (1.3 +/- 1.0 and 1.1 +/- 1.0 vs 2.6 +/- 1.0; P < 0.05). After surgery, the opioid and non-opioid analgesic requirements were also significantly reduced in Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05) during the first 24 h. Except for one patient in Group 3, who experienced transient anesthesia of the brachial plexus, no side effect was noted in any group. We conclude that combined deep and superficial cervical plexus block is an effective technique to alleviate pain during and immediately after thyroidectomy. IMPLICATIONS: Combined deep and superficial cervical plexus block is an effective technique to reduce opioid requirements during and after thyroid surgery.

Adult↗

Spinal alpha(2)-adrenoceptors are involved in the MACbar-sparing effect of systemic clonidine in rats.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the central or spinal mechanism involved in the MACbar-sparing effect of systemic clonidine by using intrathecal alpha-adrenergic antagonist administration. The minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane that blocks cardiovascular response to a noxious stimulus (MACbar(sevo)) was determined in rats after treatment with IV saline, IV clonidine 10 micro g/kg, intrathecal (IT) or IV phentolamine 50 micro g, IT or IV yohimbine 200 micro g, IT or IV prazosin 30 micro g, or the combination of IV clonidine and the different IT or IV alpha-adrenergic antagonists. In the studied model, the MACbar(sevo) of saline-treated controls was 2.10 +/- 0.8. After clonidine administration, it decreased to 1.07 +/- 0.4. The IT administration of phentolamine and yohimbine did not modify the MACbar(sevo) of naïve rats, whereas in IV clonidine-treated animals, it totally suppressed the MAC-sparing effect of this drug (phentolamine) or even significantly increased (yohimbine) the MACbar(sevo) (2.78 +/- 1) when compared with controls (P < 0.05). IT prazosin alone significantly reduced the MACbar(sevo) (0.35 +/- 0.3; P< 0.05) and suppressed any hemodynamic reaction when combined with IV clonidine. The IV administration of the different alpha-adrenergic antagonists had no significant effect on the MACbar(sevo) of controls or IV clonidine-treated animals. These results argue for a spinal mechanism of action involved in the MACbar-sparing effect of systemic clonidine. Moreover, the spinally administered alpha-antagonists displayed different effects in rats under sevoflurane anesthesia than those reported in awake animals. IMPLICATIONS: Using intrathecal alpha-adrenergic antagonist administration, we demonstrated that a spinal mechanism is involved in the MACbar-sparing effect of systemic clonidine in rats.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Perineural alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor activation inhibits spinal cord neuroplasticity and tactile allodynia after nerve injury.

BACKGROUND: Nerve injury in animals increases alpha(2)-adrenoceptor expression in dorsal root ganglion cells and results in novel excitatory responses to their activation, perhaps leading to the phenomenon of sympathetically maintained pain. In contrast to this notion, peripheral alpha(2)-adrenoceptor stimulation fails to induce pain in patients with chronic pain. We hypothesized that alpha(2) adrenoceptors at the site of nerve injury play an inhibitory, not excitatory role. METHODS: Partial sciatic nerve ligation was performed on rats, resulting in a reduction in withdrawal threshold to tactile stimulation. Animals received perineural injection at the injury site of clonidine, saline, or clonidine plus an alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist, and withdrawal threshold was monitored. Immunohistochemistry was performed on the sciatic nerve ipsi- and contralateral to injury and on the spinal cord. RESULTS: Clonidine reduced this hypersensitivity in a dose-dependent manner, and this was blocked by an alpha(2A)-preferring antagonist. Perineural clonidine injection had a slow onset (days) and prolonged duration (weeks). Systemic or intrathecal clonidine, or transient neural blockade with ropivacaine, had short lasting or no effect on hypersensitivity. alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor immunostaining was increased near the site of peripheral nerve injury, both in neurons and in immune cells (macrophages and T lymphocytes). Phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein (pCREB) in lumbar spinal cord was increased ipsilateral to nerve injury, and this was reduced 1 week after perineural clonidine injection. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that peripheral alpha(2) adrenoceptors are concentrated at the site of peripheral nerve injury, and their activation receptors produce long-lasting reductions in abnormal spinal cord gene activation and mechanical hypersensitivity.

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists↗

'Balanced analgesia' in the perioperative period: is there a place for ketamine?

We investigated whether intraoperative 'subanesthetic doses' of ketamine have a postoperative anti-hyperalgesic and an analgesic effect and which is the preferential route of administration, either systemic (intravenous, i.v.) or epidural. One hundred patients scheduled for rectal adenocarcinoma surgery under combined epidural/general anesthesia were included. Before skin incision all the patients received an epidural bolus followed by an infusion of continuous bupivacaine/sufentanil/clonidine mixture. They were randomly assigned to receive no ketamine (group 1), i.v. ketamine at the bolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.125 mg/kg per h (group 2), 0.5 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg per h (group 3), epidural ketamine 0.25 mg/kg and 0.125 mg/kg per h (group 4), or 0.5 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg per h (group 5). All i.v. and epidural analgesics were stopped at the end of surgery and patients were connected to an i.v. morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Short-term postoperative analgesia (72 h) was assessed by pain visual analog scale scores at rest, cough, and movements as well as by PCA requirements. Wound mechanical hyperalgesia was evaluated and residual pain was assessed by asking the patients at 2 weeks, and 1, 6, and 12 months. The area of hyperalgesia and morphine PCA requirements were significantly reduced in group 3. These patients reported significantly less residual pain until the sixth postoperative month. These observations support the theory that subanesthetic doses of i.v. ketamine (0.5 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.25 mg/kg per h) given during anesthesia reduce wound hyperalgesia and are a useful adjuvant in perioperative balanced analgesia. Moreover, they show that the systemic route clearly is the preferential route.

Aged↗