Biomedical subjects

Marc S Wold

Publications and source records attributed to Marc S Wold.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Replication protein A directs loading of the DNA damage checkpoint clamp to 5'-DNA junctions.

The heterotrimeric checkpoint clamp comprises the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 subunits (Rad17/3/1, the 9-1-1 complex in humans). This DNA damage response factor is loaded onto DNA by the Rad24-RFC (replication factor C-like complex with Rad24) clamp loader and ATP. Although Rad24-RFC alone does not bind to naked partial double-stranded DNA, coating of the single strand with single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA (replication protein A) causes binding of Rad24-RFC via interactions with RPA. However, RPA-mediated binding is abrogated when the DNA is coated with RPA containing a rpa1-K45E (rfa1-t11) mutation. These properties allowed us to determine the role of RPA in clamp-loading specificity. The Rad17/3/1 clamp is loaded with comparable efficiency onto naked primer/template DNA with either a 3'-junction or a 5'-junction. Remarkably, when the DNA was coated with RPA, loading of Rad17/3/1 at 3'-junctions was completely inhibited, thereby providing specificity to loading at 5'-junctions. However, Rad17/3/1 loaded at 5'-junctions can slide across double-stranded DNA to nearby 3'-junctions and thereby affect the activity of proteins that act at 3'-termini. These studies show a unique specificity of the checkpoint loader for 5'-junctions of RPA-coated DNA. The implications of this specificity for checkpoint function are discussed.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

PubMed2006

Functional assays for replication protein A (RPA).

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein. RPA is conserved in all eukaryotes and is essential for DNA replication, DNA repair, and recombination. RPA also plays a role in coordinating DNA metabolism and the cellular response to DNA damage. Assays have been established for many of these reactions. This chapter provides an overview of the methods used for analyzing RPA-DNA interactions, RPA-protein interactions, and functional activities of RPA. Methods are also discussed for visualizing RPA in the cell and analyzing the effects of RPA function on cell cycle progression in mammalian cells.

Chromatography, Affinity↗

PubMed2006

Identification of genomic sites that bind the Drosophila suppressor of Hairy-wing insulator protein.

Eukaryotic genomes are divided into independent transcriptional domains by DNA elements known as insulators. The gypsy insulator, a 350-bp element isolated from the Drosophila gypsy retrovirus, contains twelve degenerate binding sites for the Suppressor of Hairy-wing [Su(Hw)] protein. Su(Hw) associates with over 500 non-gypsy genomic sites, the functions of which are largely unknown. Using a bioinformatics approach, we identified 37 putative Su(Hw) insulators (pSIs) that represent regions containing clustered matches to the gypsy insulator Su(Hw) consensus binding sequence. The majority of these pSIs contain fewer than four Su(Hw) binding sites, with only seven showing in vivo Su(Hw) association, as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation. To understand the properties of the pSIs, these elements were tested for enhancer-blocking capabilities using a transgene assay system. In a complementary set of experiments, effects of the pSIs on transcriptional regulation of genes at the natural genomic location were determined. Our data suggest that pSIs have complex genomic functions and, in some cases, establish insulators. These studies provide the first direct evidence that the Su(Hw) protein contributes to the regulation of gene expression in the Drosophila genome through the establishment of endogenous insulators.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Secondary structure and dynamics of an intrinsically unstructured linker domain.

The transient secondary structure and dynamics of an intrinsically unstructured linker domain from the 70 kDa subunit of human replication protein A was investigated using solution state NMR. Stable secondary structure, inferred from large secondary chemical shifts, was observed for a segment of the intrinsically unstructured linker domain when it is attached to an N-terminal protein interaction domain. Results from NMR relaxation experiments showed the rotational diffusion for this segment of the intrinsically unstructured linker domain to be correlated with the N-terminal protein interaction domain. When the N-terminal domain is removed, the stable secondary structure is lost and faster rotational diffusion is observed. The large secondary chemical shifts were used to calculate phi and psi dihedral angles and these dihedral angles were used to build a backbone structural model. Restrained molecular dynamics were performed on this new structure using the chemical shift based dihedral angles and a single NOE distance as restraints. In the resulting family of structures a large, solvent exposed loop was observed for the segment of the intrinsically unstructured linker domain that had large secondary chemical shifts.

DNA Replication↗

PubMed2004

Replication protein A (RPA) phosphorylation prevents RPA association with replication centers.

Mammalian replication protein A (RPA) undergoes DNA damage-dependent phosphorylation at numerous sites on the N terminus of the RPA2 subunit. To understand the functional significance of RPA phosphorylation, we expressed RPA2 variants in which the phosphorylation sites were converted to aspartate (RPA2(D)) or alanine (RPA2(A)). Although RPA2(D) was incorporated into RPA heterotrimers and supported simian virus 40 DNA replication in vitro, the RPA2(D) mutant was selectively unable to associate with replication centers in vivo. In cells containing greatly reduced levels of endogenous RPA2, RPA2(D) again did not localize to replication sites, indicating that the defect in supporting chromosomal DNA replication is not due to competition with the wild-type protein. Use of phosphospecific antibodies demonstrated that endogenous hyperphosphorylated RPA behaves similarly to RPA2(D). In contrast, under DNA damage or replication stress conditions, RPA2(D), like RPA2(A) and wild-type RPA2, was competent to associate with DNA damage foci as determined by colocalization with gamma-H2AX. We conclude that RPA2 phosphorylation prevents RPA association with replication centers in vivo and potentially serves as a marker for sites of DNA damage.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Replication protein A interactions with DNA: differential binding of the core domains and analysis of the DNA interaction surface.

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric (70, 32, and 14 kDa subunits), eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein required for DNA recombination, repair, and replication. The three subunits of human RPA are composed of six conserved DNA binding domains (DBDs). Deletion and mutational studies have identified a high-affinity DNA binding core in the central region of the 70 kDa subunit, composed of DBDs A and B. To define the roles of each DBD in DNA binding, monomeric and tandem DBD A and B domain chimeras were created and characterized. Individually, DBDs A and B have a very low intrinsic affinity for ssDNA. In contrast, tandem DBDs (AA, AB, BA, and BB) bind ssDNA with moderate to high affinity. The AA chimera had a much higher affinity for ssDNA than did the other tandem DBDs, demonstrating that DBD A has a higher intrinsic affinity for ssDNA than DBD B. The RPA-DNA interface is similar in both DBD A and DBD B. Mutational analysis was carried out to probe the relative contributions of the two domains to DNA binding. Mutation of polar residues in either core DBD resulted in a significant decrease in the affinity of the RPA complex for ssDNA. RPA complexes with pairs of mutated polar residues had lower affinities than those with single mutations. The decrease in affinity observed when polar mutations were combined suggests that multiple polar interactions contribute to the affinity of the RPA core for DNA. These results indicate that RPA-ssDNA interactions are the result of binding of multiple nonequivalent domains. Our data are consistent with a sequential binding model for RPA, in which DBD A is responsible for positioning and initial binding of the RPA complex while DBD A together with DBD B direct stable, high-affinity binding to ssDNA.

Conserved Sequence↗

PubMed2003

Chemical shift changes provide evidence for overlapping single-stranded DNA- and XPA-binding sites on the 70 kDa subunit of human replication protein A.

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA- (ssDNA) binding protein that can form a complex with the xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA). This complex can preferentially recognize UV-damaged DNA over undamaged DNA and has been implicated in the stabilization of open complex formation during nucleotide excision repair. In this report, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to investigate the interaction between a fragment of the 70 kDa subunit of human RPA, residues 1-326 (hRPA70(1-326)), and a fragment of the human XPA protein, residues 98-219 (XPA-MBD). Intensity changes were observed for amide resonances in the (1)H-(15)N correlation spectrum of uniformly (15)N-labeled hRPA70(1-326) after the addition of unlabeled XPA-MBD. The intensity changes observed were restricted to an ssDNA-binding domain that is between residues 183 and 296 of the hRPA70(1-326) fragment. The hRPA70(1-326) residues with the largest resonance intensity reductions were mapped onto the structure of the ssDNA-binding domain to identify the binding surface with XPA-MBD. The XPA-MBD-binding surface showed significant overlap with an ssDNA-binding surface that was previously identified using NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Overlapping XPA-MBD- and ssDNA-binding sites on hRPA70(1-326) suggests that a competitive binding mechanism mediates the formation of the RPA-XPA complex. To determine whether a ternary complex could form between hRPA70(1-326), XPA-MBD and ssDNA, a (1)H-(15)N correlation spectrum was acquired for uniformly (15)N-labeled hRPA70(1-326) after the simultaneous addition of unlabeled XPA-MBD and ssDNA. In this experiment, the same chemical shift perturbations were observed for hRPA70(1-326) in the presence of XPA-MBD and ssDNA as was previously observed in the presence of ssDNA alone. The ability of ssDNA to compete with XPA-MBD for an overlapping binding site on hRPA70(1-326) suggests that any complex formation between RPA and XPA that involves the interaction between XPA-MBD and hRPA70(1-326) may be modulated by ssDNA.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed2003

The phosphorylation domain of the 32-kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA) modulates RPA-DNA interactions. Evidence for an intersubunit interaction.

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric (subunits of 70, 32, and 14 kDa) single-stranded DNA-binding protein that is required for DNA replication, recombination, and repair. The 40-residue N-terminal domain of the 32-kDa subunit of RPA (RPA32) becomes phosphorylated during S-phase and after DNA damage. Recently it has been shown that phosphorylation or the addition of negative charges to this N-terminal phosphorylation domain modulates RPA-protein interactions and increases cell sensitivity to DNA damage. We found that addition of multiple negative charges to the N-terminal phosphorylation domain also caused a significant decrease in the ability of a mutant form of RPA to destabilize double-stranded (ds) DNA. Kinetic studies suggested that the addition of negative charges to the N-terminal phosphorylation domain caused defects in both complex formation (nucleation) and subsequent destabilization of dsDNA by RPA. We conclude that the N-terminal phosphorylation domain modulates RPA interactions with dsDNA. Similar changes in DNA interactions were observed with a mutant form of RPA in which the N-terminal domain of the 70-kDa subunit was deleted. This suggested a functional link between the N-terminal domains of the 70- and 32-kDa subunits of RPA. NMR experiments provided evidence for a direct interaction between the N-terminal domain of the 70-kDa subunit and the negatively charged N-terminal phosphorylation domain of RPA32. These findings suggest that phosphorylation causes a conformational change in the RPA complex that regulates RPA function.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Analysis of the human replication protein A:Rad52 complex: evidence for crosstalk between RPA32, RPA70, Rad52 and DNA.

The eukaryotic single-stranded DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), is essential for DNA replication, and plays important roles in DNA repair and DNA recombination. Rad52 and RPA, along with other members of the Rad52 epistasis group of genes, repair double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs). Two repair pathways involve RPA and Rad52, homologous recombination and single-strand annealing. Two binding sites for Rad52 have been identified on RPA. They include the previously identified C-terminal domain (CTD) of RPA32 (residues 224-271) and the newly identified domain containing residues 169-326 of RPA70. A region on Rad52, which includes residues 218-303, binds RPA70 as well as RPA32. The N-terminal region of RPA32 does not appear to play a role in the formation of the RPA:Rad52 complex. It appears that the RPA32CTD can substitute for RPA70 in binding Rad52. Sequence homology between RPA32 and RPA70 was used to identify a putative Rad52-binding site on RPA70 that is located near DNA-binding domains A and B. Rad52 binding to RPA increases ssDNA affinity significantly. Mutations in DBD-D on RPA32 show that this domain is primarily responsible for the ssDNA binding enhancement. RPA binding to Rad52 inhibits the higher-order self-association of Rad52 rings. Implications for these results for the "hand-off" mechanism between protein-protein partners, including Rad51, in homologous recombination and single-strand annealing are discussed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Replication protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage.

Defects in cellular DNA metabolism have a direct role in many human disease processes. Impaired responses to DNA damage and basal DNA repair have been implicated as causal factors in diseases with DNA instability like cancer, Fragile X and Huntington's. Replication protein A (RPA) is essential for multiple processes in DNA metabolism including DNA replication, recombination and DNA repair pathways (including nucleotide excision, base excision and double-strand break repair). RPA is a single-stranded DNA-binding protein composed of subunits of 70-, 32- and 14-kDa. RPA binds ssDNA with high affinity and interacts specifically with multiple proteins. Cellular DNA damage causes the N-terminus of the 32-kDa subunit of human RPA to become hyper-phosphorylated. Current data indicates that hyper-phosphorylation causes a change in RPA conformation that down-regulates activity in DNA replication but does not affect DNA repair processes. This suggests that the role of RPA phosphorylation in the cellular response to DNA damage is to help regulate DNA metabolism and promote DNA repair.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The N-terminal domain of the large subunit of human replication protein A binds to Werner syndrome protein and stimulates helicase activity.

Werner syndrome (WS) is a recessive inherited human disease characterized by the early onset of aging. The gene mutated in WS encodes a DNA helicase that unwinds the double helical structure of DNA in the 3'-->5' direction as well as a 3'-->5' exonuclease. Our previous studies indicated that the activity of Werner syndrome helicase (WRN) could be stimulated by human replication protein A (hRPA), a heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA binding protein. We now localize the interaction between WRN and hRPA by measuring the stimulation of helicase activity and the binding of WRN by hRPA and its derivatives. The large subunit of hRPA (hRPA70) stimulates WRN helicase to the same extent as the hRPA heterotrimer, whereas the dimer of the two smaller subunits (hRPA 32.14) does not stimulate. By examining hRPA70 mutants with progressive deletions from either the C- or N-terminus, we found that the domain responsible for stimulation lies in the N-terminal half of the protein. By using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to examine physical interaction between WRN and the same deletion mutants, we found that the WRN-binding motif is located within amino acids 100-300 and overlaps with the single-stranded DNA binding domain (amino acids 150-450). We suggest that hRPA, by engaging in both protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions, facilitates unwinding events catalyzed by WRN helicase during DNA synthetic processes. These data should help further elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of genetic instability and premature aging phenotypes manifested by WS.

Amino Acid Sequence↗