PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marc Zelter

Publications and source records attributed to Marc Zelter.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Inspiratory resistances facilitate the diaphragm response to transcranial stimulation in humans.

BACKGROUND: Breathing in humans is dually controlled for metabolic (brainstem commands) and behavioral purposes (suprapontine commands) with reciprocal modulation through spinal integration. Whereas the ventilatory response to chemical stimuli arises from the brainstem, the compensation of mechanical loads in awake humans is thought to involve suprapontine mechanisms. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis by examining the effects of inspiratory resistive loading on the response of the diaphragm to transcranial magnetic stimulation. RESULTS: Six healthy volunteers breathed room air without load (R0) and then against inspiratory resistances (5 and 20 cmH2O/L/s, R5 and R20). Ventilatory variables were recorded. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was performed during early inspiration (I) or late expiration (E), giving rise to motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the diaphragm (Di) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB). Breathing frequency significantly decreased during R20 without any other change. Resistive breathing had no effect on the amplitude of Di MEPs, but shortened their latency (R20: -0.903 ms, p = 0.03) when TMS was superimposed on inspiration. There was no change in APB MEPs. CONCLUSION: Inspiratory resistive breathing facilitates the diaphragm response to TMS while it does not increase the automatic drive to breathe. We interpret these findings as a neurophysiological substratum of the suprapontine nature of inspiratory load compensation in awake humans.

Airway Resistance↗

Dyspnea as a noxious sensation: inspiratory threshold loading may trigger diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in humans.

Dyspnea, a leading respiratory symptom, shares many clinical, physiological, and psychological features with pain. Both activate similar brain areas. The neural mechanisms of dyspnea are less well described than those of pain. The present research tested the hypothesis of common pathways between the two sensations. Six healthy men (age 30-40 yr) were studied. The spinal nociceptive flexion reflex (RIII) was first established in response to electrical sural stimulation. Dyspnea was then induced through inspiratory threshold loading, forcing the subjects to develop 70% of their maximal inspiratory pressure to inhale. This led to progressive inhibition of the RIII reflex that reached 50 +/- 12% during the fifth minute of loading (P < 0.001), was correlated to the intensity of the self-evaluated respiratory discomfort, and had recovered 5 min after removal of the load. The myotatic H-reflex was not inhibited by inspiratory loading, arguing against postsynaptic alpha motoneuron inhibition. Dyspnea, like pain, thus induced counterirritation, possibly indicating a C-fiber stimulation and activation of diffuse noxious inhibitory descending controls known to project onto spinal dorsal horn wide dynamic range neurons. This confirms the noxious nature of certain types of breathlessness, thus opening new physiological and perhaps therapeutic perspectives.

Adult↗

Responses of the diaphragm to transcranial magnetic stimulation during wake and sleep in humans.

UNLABELLED: The human ventilation depends on bulbospinal and corticospinal commands. This study assessed their interactions in five healthy volunteers (two men, age 25-35) through the description of diaphragm and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) motor potentials (DiMEPs, abpMEPs) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during relaxed expiration and tidal inspiration and during wake and sleep. NREM decreased corticospinal excitability and REM further did so, for both the diaphragm and the APB. During wake, inspiration shortened supine DiMEPs latencies (expiration 18.56+/-1.90ms; inspiration 17.37+/-1.48ms, P<0.001). This persisted during sleep in an augmented manner (expiration: 21.05+/-1.39ms; inspiration 18.69+/-1.17ms, P=0.002). Inspiration had no effect on apbMEPs during wake and sleep. IN CONCLUSION: (1) the tidal bulbospinal input to phrenic motoneurones is sufficient to modulate the throughput of the corticospinal pathway to these neurones; (2) this modulation is best seen after the sleep related removal of corticospinal and/or afferent inputs.

Adult↗

Diaphragmatic dysfunction in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Polymyositis, dermatopolymyositis, and inclusion body myositis imply chronic inflammation of skeletal muscles. Pulmonary complications include aspiration pneumonia, interstitial pneumonitis, or respiratory muscle myositis. This study aims at better describing their impact on respiratory muscle. Twenty-three consecutive patients (12 PM, 5 DM, 6 IBM) were studied (static inspiratory and expiratory pressures; diaphragm function in terms of the mouth and transdiaphragmatic pressure responses to bilateral phrenic stimulation). Pulmonary parenchymatous abnormalities were mild (6 cases) or absent. The mouth pressure produced by phrenic stimulation was 6.83+/-3.01 cm H2O, with 18 patients (78%) diagnosed with diaphragm weakness (<10 cm H2O) and lower values in DM (4.35+/-1.48 cm H2O) than in IBM and in PM (P<0.05). Diaphragm weakness is frequent and probably overlooked in inflammatory myopathies. Further studies are needed to delineate the clinical relevance of these results.

Aged↗

Upper airway afferents are sufficient to evoke the early components of respiratory-related cortical potentials in humans.

Repeated inspiratory occlusions in humans elicit respiratory-related cortical potentials, the respiratory counterpart of somatosensory-evoked potentials. These potentials comprise early components (stimulus detection) and late components (cognitive processing). They are considered as the summation of several afferent activities from various part of the respiratory system. This study assesses the role of the upper airway as a determinant of the early and late components of the potentials, taking advantage of the presence of a tracheotomy in patients totally or partially deafferented. Eight patients who could breathe either through the mouth or through a tracheotomy orifice (whole upper airway bypassed) were studied (4 quadriplegic patients with phrenic pacing, 4 patients with various sources of inspiratory pump dysfunction). Respiratory-related evoked potentials were recorded in CZ-C3 and CZ-C4. They were consistently present after mouth occlusions, with a first positive P1 and a first negative N1 components of normal latencies (P1: 40.4 +/- 6.1 ms in CZ-C3 and 47.6 +/- 7.6 ms in CZ-C4; N1: 84.4 +/- 27.1 ms in CZ-C3 and 90.2 +/- 17.4 ms in CZ-C4) and amplitudes. Tracheal occlusions did not evoke any cortical activity. Therefore, in patients with inspiratory pump dysfunction, the activation of upper airway afferents is sufficient to produce the early components of the respiratory-related evoked cortical potentials. Per contra, in this setting, pulmonary afferents do not suffice to evoke these components.

Adult↗

Comparison of bedside measurement of cardiac output with the thermodilution method and the Fick method in mechanically ventilated patients.

INTRODUCTION: Bedside cardiac output determination is a common preoccupation in the critically ill. All available methods have drawbacks. We wished to re-examine the agreement between cardiac output determined using the thermodilution method (QTTHERM) and cardiac output determined using the metabolic (Fick) method (QTFICK) in patients with extremely severe states, all the more so in the context of changing practices in the management of patients. Indeed, the interchangeability of the methods is a clinically relevant question; for instance, in view of the debate about the risk-benefit balance of right heart catheterization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen mechanically ventilated passive patients with a right heart catheter in place were studied (six women, 12 men; age, 39-84 years; simplified acute physiology scoreII, 39-111). QTTHERM was obtained using a standard procedure. QTFICK was measured from oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, and arterial and mixed venous oxygen contents. Forty-nine steady-state pairs of measurements were performed. The data were normalized for repeated measurements, and were tested for correlation and agreement. RESULTS: The QTFICK value was 5.2 +/- 2.0 l/min whereas that of QTTHERM was 5.8 +/- 1.9 l/min (R = 0.840, P < 0.0001; mean difference, -0.7 l/min; lower limit of agreement, -2.8 l/min; upper limit of agreement, 1.5 l/min). The agreement was excellent between the two techniques at QTTHERM values <5 l/min but became too loose for clinical interchangeability above this value. Tricuspid regurgitation did not influence the results. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: No gold standard is established to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients. The thermodilution method has known limitations that can lead to inaccuracies. The metabolic method also has potential pitfalls in this context, particularly if there is increased oxygen consumption within the lungs. The concordance between the two methods for low cardiac output values suggests that they can both be relied upon for clinical decision making in this context. Conversely, a high cardiac output value is more difficult to rely on in absolute terms.

Adult↗

The best peak expiratory flow is flow-limited and effort-independent in normal subjects.

Recently, it has been suggested that peak expiratory flow (PEF) may be determined by the wave speed flow-limiting mechanism. In six normal male subjects (age = 33 +/- 8 years) performing expiratory forced vital capacity (FVC) maneuvers, a negative expiratory pressure (NEP) of -10 cm H2O was randomly applied at the beginning of maximal expiration to assess changes in PEF as compared with baseline. During FVC maneuvers, the expiratory effort was measured by changes in esophageal pressure (Pes), as either peak expiratory Pes-Pes at end expiratory lung volume (DeltaPes(peak)) or maximal rate of rise of Pes (dPes/dt(max)). In each experimental condition, at least three FVC maneuvers with comparable expiratory effort were selected for analysis for each subject. With similar DeltaPes(peak) (107.2 +/- 34.9 versus 111.7 +/- 40.5 cm H2O) and dPes/dt(max) (1181 +/- 518 versus 1177 +/- 546 cm H2O/second) PEF amounted to 10.84 +/- 1.08 L/second and to 10.82 +/- 1.03 L/second with and without NEP, respectively. These data show that PEF obtained by normal subjects to the best of their abilities (best PEF) does not increase with NEP and indicate that the best PEF is a flow-limited and effort-independent parameter, reflecting only lung and airways mechanics as the other subsequent maximal expiratory flows achieved during the FVC maneuver.

Adult↗

Mild intermittent asthma: CT assessment of bronchial cross-sectional area and lung attenuation at controlled lung volume.

PURPOSE: To evaluate, with thin-section computed tomography (CT), changes in bronchial cross-sectional area and lung attenuation induced by bronchial stimulation in patients with mild intermittent asthma, at a given lung volume monitored with pneumotachography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with mild intermittent asthma who were nonsmokers (National Institutes of Health staging) and six nonsmoking healthy volunteers, age and sex ratio-matched, were examined by using helical thin-collimation CT at the level of basal bronchi at 65% of total lung capacity. Three sets of acquisitions were obtained: at baseline and after inhalation of methacholine and then salbutamol. Cross-sectional areas of bronchi greater than 4 mm(2) were segmented and calculated from CT images. Lung attenuation was measured in the anterior, lateral, and posterior areas of the right lung parenchyma. Gas trapping was evaluated by using thin-section CT at residual volume in six of the patients with asthma. Statistical analysis included two factors repeated-measurement analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Bronchial cross-sectional areas and lung attenuation did not vary significantly compared with baseline values following bronchial challenge in healthy volunteers or patients with asthma. However, in patients with asthma, bronchial cross-sectional areas were significantly smaller than in healthy volunteers, except after inhalation of salbutamol. Lung attenuation and anteroposterior attenuation gradient were significantly higher in patients with asthma than in healthy patients (P <.001). Air-trapping scores were significantly higher after methacholine challenge. CONCLUSION: Helical thin-collimation CT at controlled lung volume and at full expiration associated with bronchial challenge may help evaluate bronchoreactivity and inflammation in mild intermittent asthma.

Adult↗

Effects of neck flexion and mouth opening on inspiratory flow dynamics in awake humans.

Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) can assess airflow dynamics of the upper airway (UA) during wakefulness in man. Using PNS, we aimed to assess the impact of neck flexion and mouth opening in promoting UA unstability. Measurements were made during nasal breathing in seven healthy subjects (ages = 23-39 yr; one woman). Surface diaphragm electromyogram, esophageal pressure referenced to mask pressure, and flow were recorded during diaphragm twitches with neck in neutral position and mouth closed and then with neck flexion and/or mouth opening. Twitches always exhibited a flow-limited pattern. Flow-limiting driving pressure (Pd) and peak Pd were increased by neck flexion (P < 0.01) without significant change in the corresponding flows. UA resistances at these flow values were higher with the neck flexed (P < 0.05). Mouth opening alone did not exert any significant influence. We conclude that the position of the neck has a discernible impact on the flow behavior through the nonphasically active UA faced with a negative Pd.

Abdominal Muscles↗