Images in clinical medicine. Milwaukee shoulder.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Marcia S Genta.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To review the most recent information on the incidence, clinical course, pathology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of rheumatoid vasculitis (RV), including the still scanty data on the use of biologics. METHODS: PubMed and MEDLINE databases (1950-2006) were searched for the key words "vasculitis" and "rheumatoid arthritis"; and "rheumatoid arthritis" and "extra-articular manifestations." All relevant articles in English and French were reviewed. Additional words used in follow-up research include "anti-TNF," "rituximab," "IL-1 receptor antagonists," and "CTLA-4 Ig," all in conjunction with "vasculitis." Pertinent secondary references were also retrieved. RESULTS: RV is an inflammatory condition of the small- and medium-sized vessels that affects a subset of patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (approximately 1 to approximately 5%). It has a vast array of clinical manifestations with a predilection for the skin (peripheral gangrene, deep cutaneous ulcers) and the peripheral nervous system (mononeuritis multiplex). Because of the lack of specific signs and symptoms, the diagnosis relies on the exclusion of other causes of similar lesions (diabetes, atherosclerosis, drug reactions, infection, neoplasias) and, ideally, on the histopathological demonstration of necrotizing vasculitis. Despite the availability of a host of promising new drugs for the treatment of RA, no clinical trials have tested their efficacy in RV; therefore, its management remains largely empirical. CONCLUSIONS: Although RV has apparently been decreasing over the last 2 decades, possibly as a consequence of the more energetic approach to the management of RA currently used, it remains an important complication of RA that needs to be promptly recognized and treated.
OBJECTIVES: TNF-alpha inhibitors have been effective in randomized controlled studies for the treatment of RA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, laboratory, and radiological responses in a cohort of unselected patients with RA treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors in the community. METHODS: Using the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis, a centralized system of data gathering for RA patients, we obtained the following information regarding patients treated with a TNF-alpha inhibitor in the Geneva Canton before 02/2003: demographics; clinical data (disease activity, functional status, treatments received and type of TNF-alpha inhibitor used); laboratory and radiographic data. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients (mean age = 60.5 years) with long-standing disease (mean duration = 12.5 years) were analyzed. Sixteen patients (24%) discontinued anti-TNF-alpha, half within the first 6 months of the study. Mean DAS score decreased from 4.8+ /- 0.4 to 3.8 +/- 0.4 (P < 0.01); HAQ scores (mean = 1.35) remained unchanged; pain, evaluated on a 10-point scale, decreased from 5.0 at baseline to 3.3 (P < 0.001). CRP values decreased steadily from 17.9 at baseline to 5.6 at 20 months or later. The progression of radiographic damage decelerated in 30 patients, accelerated in 12, and remained unchanged in one. CONCLUSIONS: The responses of this community-based group of patients with severe, long-standing RA to TNF-alpha inhibitors revealed a reassuring similarity to those of patients enrolled in controlled clinical trials.