PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marcia Smith

Publications and source records attributed to Marcia Smith.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinical outcomes following manual physical therapy and exercise for hip osteoarthritis: A case series.

STUDY DESIGN: Case series describing the outcomes of individual patients with hip osteoarthritis treated with manual physical therapy and exercise. CASE DESCRIPTION: Seven patients referred to physical therapy with hip osteoarthritis and/or hip pain were included in this case series. All patients were treated with manual physical therapy followed by exercises to maximize strength and range of motion. Six of 7 patients completed a Harris Hip Score at initial examination and discharge from physical therapy, and 1 patient completed a Global Rating of Change Scale at discharge. OUTCOMES: Three males and 4 females with a median age of 62 years (range, 52-80 years) and median duration of symptoms of 9 months (range, 2-60 months) participated in this case series. The median number of physical therapy sessions attended was 5 (range, 4-12). The median increase in total passive range of motion of the hip was 82 degrees (range, 70 degrees-86 degrees). The median improvement on the Harris Hip Score was 25 points (range, 15-38 points). The single patient who completed the Global Rating of Change Scale at discharge reported being "a great deal better." Numeric pain rating scores decreased by a mean of 5 points (range, 2-7 points) on 0-to-10-point scale. DISCUSSION: All patients exhibited reductions in pain and increases in passive range of motion, as well as a clinically meaningful improvement in function. Although we can not infer a cause and effect relationship from a case series, the outcomes with these patients are similar to others reported in the literature that have demonstrated superior clinical outcomes associated with manual physical therapy and exercise for hip osteoarthritis compared to exercise alone.

Aged↗

Obstetric forceps training using visual feedback and the isometric strength testing unit.

OBJECTIVE: This is a descriptive study that tested the maximum traction residents could apply to forceps during simulations. Visual feedback was then used to reinforce an optimal range of traction, and the ability of residents to reproduce this pull when blinded was assessed. METHODS: Fifty-five residents participated in 6 pulling exercises using an isometric strength testing unit with a real-time computer printout of the force applied. Maximum traction was determined for male and female residents in standing and sitting positions. Visual feedback was then used to estimate whether residents could be trained to reproduce an optimal force range of 30-45 pounds. Data were analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: When asked to produce a maximum pull, male residents could generate significantly more force than females in the standing and sitting positions (P < .001). In general, all residents of both sexes generated more traction in the sitting position than in the standing position. The mean maximum traction produced by men in the standing and sitting positions was 69.5 and 85.8 pounds, respectively. For women, the mean maximum force generated was 45.5 pounds in the standing position and 61.3 pounds in the sitting position. Residents could easily reproduce an appropriate force in the short term after training by computer-assisted visual feedback. CONCLUSION: Motor learning tasks using visual feedback can be useful in training practitioners to produce appropriate traction forces during obstetric forceps deliveries. Residents of both sexes, but especially men, can generate traction forces exceeding the recommended limit. Unless tempered by training, forces generated from the sitting position in particular can often exceed the preferred range. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3.

Adult↗