PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marcin Polkowski

Publications and source records attributed to Marcin Polkowski.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for colorectal-cancer screening are based solely on age and family history of cancer, not sex. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the data from a large colonoscopy-based screening program that included 50,148 participants who were 40 to 66 years of age. People 40 to 49 years of age were eligible only if they had a family history of cancer of any type. Of the 43,042 participants 50 to 66 years of age, 13.3% reported a family history of colorectal cancer, as did 66.3% of the 7106 participants who were 40 to 49 years of age. We defined advanced neoplasia as cancer or adenoma that was at least 10 mm in diameter, had high-grade dysplasia, or had villous or tubulovillous histologic characteristics, or any combination thereof. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify associations between participants' characteristics and advanced neoplasia in a primary (or derivation) data set, and we confirmed the associations in a secondary (or validation) data set. RESULTS: Advanced neoplasia was detected in 2553 (5.9%) participants 50 to 66 years of age and in 243 (3.4%) participants 40 to 49 years of age. The rate of complications during colonoscopy was 0.1%, and no participants died. In the validation set, a logistic-regression model showed that male sex was independently associated with advanced neoplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.52 to 1.98; P<0.001). In each age group (40 to 49 years, 50 to 54 years, 55 to 59 years, and 60 to 66 years), the number of persons who would have to undergo colorectal-cancer screening in order to detect one advanced neoplasia was significantly lower in men than in women (23 vs. 36, 17 vs. 28, 12 vs. 22, and 10 vs. 18, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We detected advanced neoplasia at a significantly higher rate in men than in women, which may warrant refinement of the screening recommendations for colorectal cancer.

Adenoma↗

Submucosal lesions.

Most of the submucosal lesions encountered on endoscopy are benign; however, the fact that some of them may be malignant considerably influences the attitude toward the whole group. This article reviews the current status of endosonography in the management of submucosal lesions and focuses on determining the risk of malignancy. The predictive value of various endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) features and their combinations and the capabilities and limitations of EUS-guided fine needle biopsy are discussed. Other issues addressed include differentiation between extraluminal compressions and true submucosal lesions, EUS-assisted endoscopic removal of submucosal lesions, and the potential role of catheter-based endosonography in the setting of submucosal lesions. Problems related to the surveillance of patients with submucosal lesions who are not candidates for surgical treatment are outlined. An overview of the recent changes in the pathologic classification of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors and their impact on the role of EUS in the management of submucosal lesions is given.

Endosonography↗

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for development of duodenal ulcer in Helicobacter pylori-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Although Helicobacter pylori is a significant etiologic factor of peptic ulcer disease, it remains unknown why ulcers develop only in the minority of infected individuals. AIM: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the association between the presence of duodenal ulcer in H. pylori-infected patients and different risk factors. METHODS: A total of 122 H. pylori-infected patients were enrolled; 79 had duodenal ulcer and 43 gastritis. Univariate analysis was conducted using either Fisher's exact test or exact Cochrane-Armitage trend test. In multivariate analysis the logistic model was used. RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated six factors (male sex, smoking, antral H. pylori density, CAGA presence in antrum, and VACA s1a presence in antrum and corpus). Four factors (sex, smoking-alcohol index, H. pylori density index, and CAGA index) were found to be significant in multivariate analysis. The best model predicting duodenal ulcer included male sex, smoking, presence of H. PYLORI on histopathology in antrum and CAGA presence in corpus. CONCLUSION: Although several risk factors were significantly associated with duodenal ulcer, we failed in the identification of either a single risk factor or a set of factors that can unequivocally differentiate patients with ulcer from those with gastritis.

Adolescent↗