Biomedical subjects

Marco Agrifoglio

Publications and source records attributed to Marco Agrifoglio.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Left common carotid artery as inflow site in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Porcelain aorta is associated to significantly increased risk of atheromatous embolization in patients who undergo cardiac surgery. We described three cases in which coronary artery bypass grafting was performed off-pump and the saphenous vein graft was anastomosed proximally to the left common carotid artery. This technique permitted avoidance of ascending aortic manipulation and reduce the risk of atheromatous embolization.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

[Off-pump coronary bypass surgery: pros and cons].

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is a well established surgical option for patients candidate to coronary artery bypass. Current evidence suggests that there are no differences between off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery in terms of major perioperative outcomes such as perioperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and renal failure, whereas off-pump coronary surgery seems to reduce some minor complications like atrial fibrillation, transfusion requirements, and postoperative hospital stay. However, some recent papers suggest that graft patency may be lower for grafts performed with the off-pump technique. In this paper we review current knowledge about pros and cons of off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

PubMed2005

Preoperative assessment of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: is the clinical Allen test adequate?

BACKGROUND: The clinical Allen test (AT) is widely adopted as the only preoperative assessment of the hand collateral circulation before radial artery (RA) harvest as a coronary artery bypass graft. Nevertheless, in some cases it may be misleading because of clinically undetectable anatomic anomalies of the forearm arteries. METHODS: We evaluated the nondominant forearm arterial circulation by echo color Doppler (ECD) technique and by performing static and dynamic tests such as the AT, snuffbox test (SBT), and palmar arch test (PAT) in 150 patients who underwent elective coronary artery revascularization with a RA graft. RESULTS: Although the clinical AT was normal in all patients, in 8 patients (5.3%) preoperative ECD AT, SBT, and PAT did contraindicate RA harvesting. We did not harvest the RA in these patients. In the remaining 142 patients the RA was harvested. We did not observe any case of postoperative forearm or hand ischemia. We examined the blood flow to the hand in all patients at both 5 days and 24 months after surgery. In all patients ECD showed adequate hand perfusion and a significant increase of the peak flow velocity in the ulnar artery at both follow-up times. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical AT may be not sufficient to assess the hand collateral flow and the quality of the RA as a coronary artery bypass graft in at least 5% of patients. The ECD technique, performed during static and dynamic tests, does offer a safer and more objective preoperative noninvasive evaluation and it may have an important role also from the medicolegal point of view.

Blood Flow Velocity↗

PubMed2005

Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing off-pump with on-pump coronary artery bypass graft patency.

BACKGROUND: Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB) is increasingly becoming a widely used technique and challenges conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting as the standard surgical therapy for coronary artery disease. Little information, however, is available concerning postoperative performance of bypass grafts done with this new technique. The aim of this study is to assess differences in graft patency between OPCAB and coronary artery bypass grafting by meta-analysis of data published in randomized trials. METHODS: A literature search for the period beginning January 1990 until December 2004 supplemented with manual bibliographic review was performed for all peer-reviewed English-language publications. A systematic overview (meta-analysis) of randomized trials was conducted to assess differences between OPCAB and coronary artery bypass grafting in graft occlusion rates. RESULTS: Literature search yielded five comparable randomized studies, for a total of 872 and 998 grafts performed during OPCAB and coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, respectively. Meta-analysis of these studies showed an increased risk of graft occlusion in the OPCAB group of patients, both when all the studies were analyzed together (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence intervals, 1.15 to 1.99; p = 0.003), and when low-quality (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence intervals, 1.05 to 2.03; p = 0.02) and high-quality (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence intervals, 0.99 to 2.75; p = 0.05) studies were analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative analysis of the few prospective randomized studies currently available in the literature documents a reduction in postoperative patency of coronary artery bypass grafts performed during OPCAB procedures. The risk of reduced graft patency needs to be considered when choosing OPCAB as tailored strategy for selected patients.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

PubMed2005

The role of tissue factor and P-selectin in the procoagulant response that occurs in the first month after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: It has been previously shown that a persistent (up to 1 month) prothrombotic status occurs after coronary bypass surgery performed both on pump and off pump. To assess the pathways involved in the occurrence of postoperative prothrombotic state, in this study we evaluated plasma, monocyte-bound, and platelet-bound tissue factor expression, as well as platelet and soluble P-selectin expression, up to 1 month after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Thirty patient candidates for coronary surgery were randomized to undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 15) or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 15). Blood samples were collected before the intervention, after protamine administration, and 4, 8, and 30 days after surgical intervention. RESULTS: Plasma tissue factor levels were significantly higher than baseline both in the on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group (from protamine administration up to 4 postoperative days) and in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group (at 4 postoperative days), with no differences between groups. Basal and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated monocyte tissue factor expression, as well as basal and adenosine diphosphate-stimulated platelet tissue factor expression, did not show significant variations over time and were similar in the on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting groups throughout the course of the study. Platelet expression of P-selectin, both basal and after adenosine diphosphate stimulation, did not significantly change over time and was not different in the on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting groups. Soluble P-selectin levels in plasma were significantly higher in patients receiving on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting only at the time point after protamine administration, whereas this variable behaved similarly in the on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting groups for the whole postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative tissue factor and P-selectin expression did not differ between the on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting groups. The distinct increase of plasma tissue factor occurring after both surgical procedures might represent a mechanism that might explain, in part, the early postoperative prothrombotic state occurring after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Aged↗