Biomedical subjects

Marco Riboldi

Publications and source records attributed to Marco Riboldi.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Patient set-up verification by infrared optical localization and body surface sensing in breast radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical application of a technique for patient set-up verification in breast cancer radiotherapy, based on the 3D localization of a hybrid configuration of surface control points. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An infrared optical tracker provided the 3D position of two passive markers and 10 laser spots placed around and within the irradiation field on nine patients. A fast iterative constrained minimization procedure was applied to detect and compensate patient set-up errors, through the control points registration with reference data coming from treatment plan (markers reference position, CT-based surface model). RESULTS: The application of the corrective spatial transformation estimated by the registration procedure led to significant improvement of patient set-up. Median value of 3D errors affecting three additional verification markers within the irradiation field decreased from 5.7 to 3.5 mm. Errors variability (25-75%) decreased from 3.2 to 2.1 mm. Laser spots registration on the reference surface model was documented to contribute substantially to set-up errors compensation. CONCLUSIONS: Patient set-up verification through a hybrid set of control points and constrained surface minimization algorithm was confirmed to be feasible in clinical practice and to provide valuable information for the improvement of the quality of patient set-up, with minimal requirement of operator-dependant procedures. The technique combines conveniently the advantages of passive markers based methods and surface registration techniques, by featuring immediate and robust estimation of the set-up accuracy from a redundant dataset.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2006

Robust frameless stereotactic localization in extra-cranial radiotherapy.

In the field of extra-cranial radiotherapy, several inaccuracies can make the application of frameless stereotactic localization techniques error-prone. When optical tracking systems based on surface fiducials are used, inter- and intra-fractional uncertainties in marker three-dimensional (3D) detection may lead to inexact tumor position estimation, resulting in erroneous patient setup. This is due to the fact that external fiducials misdetection results in deformation effects that are poorly handled in a rigid-body approach. In this work, the performance of two frameless stereotactic localization algorithms for 3D tumor position reconstruction in extra-cranial radiotherapy has been specifically tested. Two strategies, unweighted versus weighted, for stereotactic tumor localization were examined by exploiting data coming from 46 patients treated for extra-cranial lesions. Measured isocenter displacements and rotations were combined to define isocentric procedures, featuring 6 degrees of freedom, for correcting patient alignment (isocentric positioning correction). The sensitivity of the algorithms to uncertainties in the 3D localization of fiducials was investigated by means of 184 numerical simulations. The performance of the implemented isocentric positioning correction was compared to conventional point-based registration. The isocentric positioning correction algorithm was tested on a clinical dataset of inter-fractional and intra-fractional setup errors, which was collected by means of an optical tracker on the same group of patients. The weighted strategy exhibited a lower sensitivity to fiducial localization errors in simulated misalignments than those of the unweighted strategy. Isocenter 3D displacements provided by the weighted strategy were consistently smaller than those featured by the unweighted strategy. The peak decrease in median and quartile values of isocenter 3D displacements were 1.4 and 2.7 mm, respectively. Concerning clinical data, the weighted strategy isocentric positioning correction provided the reduction of fiducial registration errors, featuring up to 61.7% decrease in median values (versus 46.8% for the unweighted strategy) of initial displacements. The weighted strategy proved high performance in minimizing the effects of fiducial localization errors, showing a great potential in improving patient setup. The clinical data analysis revealed that the application of a robust reconstruction algorithm may provide high-quality results in patient setup verification, by properly managing external fiducials localization errors.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

3D optoelectronic analysis of interfractional patient setup variability in frameless extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate size and frequency of interfractional patient setup variability in hypofractionated stereotactic extracranial radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Infrared optical 3D tracking of surface markers was applied to quantify setup variability on 51 patients. Isocenter position repeatability was assessed by means of frameless anatomic calibration and was compared with portal image evaluation. Specific data analysis allowed for compensation of patients' breathing movements and for separation of the effects of operator-dependent misalignments and respiration-induced displacements. Effects of patient position (supine vs. prone) and treatment table configuration were investigated. RESULTS: Patient positioning assisted by the optical tracking device allowed reducing displacements of surface control points within the 3-mm range. Errors in isocenter localization were in the range of a few millimeters. This was in agreement with the portal image evaluation. Breathing motion introduced appreciable errors, which increased control points and isocenter 3D variability. This effect was significantly higher than those related to other investigated factors. CONCLUSIONS: The role of infrared optical tracking devices for patient positioning is assessed on a large patient population. Their use in the frame of high-precision radiotherapy is emphasized by the application of related methodologies for breathing phase detection and frameless isocenter localization.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗

PubMed2004

Dosimetric effects within target and organs at risk of interfractional patient mispositioning in left breast cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of interfraction setup uncertainties on the dose distribution within the clinical target volume (CTV) and the organs at risk (OAR) of left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing external radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Interfractional setup errors were assessed by measuring surface control points displacements during 89 irradiation sessions in 4 patients, by means of opto-electronic localization. The measured position deviations were fed back to the treatment planning system for the evaluation of the corresponding dosimetric effects within CTV and OARs (lung, heart). RESULTS: Results revealed errors above 5 mm on some of the control points, but corresponding volumetric variations were on average below 2% for both the CTV within the 95-105% dose range and the OARs receiving more than 50% and 90% of the prescribed dose. A specific sensitivity to the setup errors was found as a function of the treatment plan design, leading to isolated cases exhibiting volumetric variations of CTV and OARs exceeding 2%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the potential increase of treatment quality provided by the systematic patient position verification and highlights the role of opto-electronic position detection systems for the real-time check of patient setup errors and the evaluation of the corresponding dosimetric consequences, as a way to achieve consistent dose delivery.

Analysis of Variance↗