PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Marco Sanduzzi-Zamparelli

Publications and source records attributed to Marco Sanduzzi-Zamparelli.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Long-term follow-up of a phase 1/2 trial of anti-GDF-15 antibody visugromab plus anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab in anti-PD-1/-L1 relapsed/refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy is a major unmet need. Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF-15) has been identified as a key resistance factor for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Visugromab, a neutralizing anti-GDF-15 antibody, plus the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab (V+N) was evaluated in the first-in-human phase 1/2a GDFATHER-01 trial in heavily pretreated participants with locally advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsq NSCLC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), stringently defined as anti-PD-1/PD-L1-relapsed/refractory, and showed encouraging objective responses. This analysis reports long-term follow-up of these three phase 2 expansion cohorts of the GDFATHER-01 trial. METHODS: Seventy-seven participants with nsq NSCLC (N=22), UC (N=27), and HCC (N=28) received visugromab (10 mg/kg) plus nivolumab (240 mg) every two weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Objective response rates (RECIST v1.1) were 18.2% for nsq NSCLC (4/22; 95%CI 5.2-40.3), 18.5% for UC (5/27; 95%CI 6.3-38.1), and 14.3% for HCC (4/28; 95%CI 4.0-32.7). Median duration of response (DoR) was 32.2 months (95%CI 5.5-38.0), 28.8 months (95%CI 7.4-39.4), and 19.4 months (95%CI 5.8-39.7; with protracted recruitment), respectively, with 7/13 responses (53.8%) ongoing. Confirmed complete response or complete metabolic response (CR or CMR) among responders was 61.5% (8/13), with 7/8 ongoing. In addition, 46.2% (6/13) of responders achieved a deeper response on V+N per RECIST v1.1 than with the prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy; median DoR on V+N was 28.8 months (95%CI 7.4-38.0) versus 12.0 months (95%CI 8.0-24.0) on initial anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. V+N was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In heavily pretreated, advanced/metastatic participants with nsq NSCLC, UC, or HCC who were anti-PD-1/PD-L1-relapsed/refractory, V+N achieved deep and durable objective responses. The observed DoR, depth of response, and CR+CMR rate among responders exceeded those reported for their initial anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. These findings suggest that GDF-15 blockade with visugromab can overcome resistance and enhance the magnitude and durability of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 responses, and warrant further exploration in randomized trials. REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT04725474, Registration date: 25 January 2021; EudraCT, TRN: 2020-002103-19, Registration date 16 Dec 2020.

Humans

International Liver Cancer Association (ILCA) white paper on hepatocellular carcinoma risk stratification and surveillance.

Major research efforts in liver cancer have been devoted to increasing the efficacy and effectiveness of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As with other cancers, surveillance programmes aim to detect tumours at an early stage, facilitate curative-intent treatment, and reduce cancer-related mortality. HCC surveillance is supported by a large randomised-controlled trial in patients with chronic HBV infection and several cohort studies in cirrhosis; however, effectiveness in clinical practice is limited by several barriers, including inadequate risk stratification, underuse of surveillance, and suboptimal accuracy of screening tests. There are several proposed strategies to address these limitations, including risk stratification algorithms and biomarkers to better identity at-risk individuals, interventions to increase surveillance, and emerging imaging- and blood-based surveillance tests with improved sensitivity and specificity for early HCC detection. Beyond clinical validation, data are needed to establish clinical utility, i.e. increased early tumour detection and reduced HCC-related mortality. If successful, these data could facilitate a precision screening paradigm in which surveillance strategies are tailored to individual HCC risk to maximise overall surveillance value. However, practical and logistical considerations must be considered when designing and implementing these validation efforts. To address these issues, ILCA (the International Liver Cancer Association) adjourned a single topic workshop on HCC risk stratification and surveillance in June 2022. Herein, we present a white paper on these topics, including the status of the field, ongoing research efforts, and barriers to the translation of emerging strategies.

Humans