PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marcus Müllner

Publications and source records attributed to Marcus Müllner.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Mortality of patients with pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal disorder with highly varying mortality rates. To provide information that is more precise for prospective intervention studies, we analysed the data of our patients with PE, defining clinically relevant subgroups with respect to their individual mortality rates. METHODS: We studied 283 consecutive patients with confirmed PE diagnosis, with respect to demographic data, risk factors for thromboembolic disease and clinical signs. In addition, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions such as blood gas analysis (BGA), lactate and D-dimer determination, electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, spiral computer tomography (Spiral CT), ventilation/perfusion lung scintigraphy (V/Q-Scan), thrombolytic therapy, mechanical ventilation, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), were accounted for. Study endpoint was mortality rates on day three. RESULTS: Overall, mortality rate was 15% (42 of 283). Mortality rates differed considerably; 95% of patients with cardiac arrest on arrival (21 of 22), 85% of patients with cardiac arrest--not in hospital (28 of 33), 80% of patients receiving mechanical ventilation (40 of 50), 77% of patients needing cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the first 24 hours (37 of 48), 37% of patients with syncope (18 of 49), 30% of patients receiving thrombolytic treatment (25 of 87), 26% of patients on whom lactate measurement was performed (36 of 139), 18% of patients on whom blood gas analysis was done (35 of 197), 17% of patients on whom echocardiography was performed (34 of 195), 8% of patients with twelve complete lead ECG recordings (21 of 262) and D-Dimer determination (12 of 148), 2% of patients tested on Spiral CT (5 of 226) and 1% where a V/Q-Scan was performed (1 of 74). CONCLUSION: Patients with PE who received mechanical ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and thrombolytic treatment had very high mortality rates of 80, 77 and 30% respectively. However, patients stable enough for diagnostic procedures as Spiral CTs and V/Q-Scans had mortality rates of 1 to 2%. These facts are to be considered when planning pulmonary embolism intervention trials in which reduction of mortality is a defined endpoint.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

C-reactive protein and mortality in patients with acute aortic disease.

OBJECTIVE: The association of acute-phase reaction and outcome of patients with acute vascular diseases is controversial. The prognostic value of admission C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with acute aortic aneurysm or dissection has not yet been investigated. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study including 255 consecutive patients from an aneurysm registry with symptomatic thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm and/or dissection in an emergency department of a tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: Patients were included who had symptoms of aortic disease admitted between 1 January 1992 and 31 November 1998 and were followed up until 31 December 1999 for survival. MEASUREMENTS: Admission CRP (mg/dl) levels were categorized in quartiles: quartile 1, less than 0.5; quartile 2, 0.50-1.30; quartile 3, 1.31-6.30; quartile 4, higher than 6.30. Each group contained about 60 patients. RESULTS: Cumulative mortality 1, 3, and 6 months after presentation was 32%, 37%, and 40%, respectively. Increased CRP levels were independently associated with mortality, adjusted for age, sex, hemodynamic shock, mechanical ventilation, coronary artery disease, aortic rupture, hemoglobin, diabetes, and treatment strategy (surgery vs. conservative). Hazard ratios in patients with CRP levels in quartiles 2-4 compared to quartile 1 were 0.7, 1.8, and 2.6, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated admission CRP values in patients with symptomatic aortic aneurysm/dissection were independently associated with poor prognosis. CRP levels higher than 6.3 mg/dl indicate a high risk for short-term mortality.

Acute-Phase Reaction↗
PubMed2002

Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: The use of complex statistical models to adjust for confounding is common in medical research. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and adequacy of adjustment for confounding in medical articles. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: 34 scientific medical journals with a high impact factor. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of reporting on methods used to adjust for confounding in 537 original research articles published in January 1998. RESULTS: Of the 537 articles, 169 specified that adjustment for confounding was used. In 1 paper in 10, it was unclear which statistical method was used or for which variables adjustment was made. In 45% of papers, it was not clear how multicategory or continuous variables were treated in the analysis. Inadequate reporting was less frequent if an author was affiliated with a department of statistics, epidemiology, or public health and if articles were published in journals with a high impact factor. CONCLUSIONS: Details of methods used to adjust for confounding are frequently not reported in original research articles.

Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic↗
PubMed2002

Editorial independence at medical journals owned by professional associations: a survey of editors.

The purpose of this study was to assess the degree of editorial independence at a sample of medical journals and the relationship between the journals and their owners. We surveyed the editors of 33 medical journals owned by not-for-profit organizations ("associations"), including 10 journals represented on the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (nine of which are general medical journals) and a random sample of 23 specialist journals with high impact factors that are indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The main outcome measures were the authority to hire, fire, and oversee the work of the editor; the editor's tenure and financial compensation; control of the journal's budget; publication of material about the association; and the editor's perceptions about editorial independence and pressure over editorial content. Of the 33 editors, 23 (70%) reported having complete editorial freedom, and the remainder reported a high level of freedom (a score of > or = 8, where 10 equals complete editorial freedom and 1 equals no editorial freedom). Nevertheless, a substantial minority of editors reported having received at least some pressure in recent years over editorial content from the association's leadership (42%), senior staff (30%), or rank-and-file members (39%). The association's board of directors has the authority to hire (48%) or fire (55%) the editor for about half of the journals, and the editor reports to the board for 10 journals (30%). Twenty-three editors (70%) are appointed for a specific term (median term = 5 years). Three-fifths of the journals have no control over their profit, and the majority of journals use the association's legal counsel and/or media relations staff. Stronger safeguards are needed to give editors protection against pressure over editorial content, including written guarantees of editorial freedom and governance structures that support those guarantees. Strong safeguards are also needed because editors may have less freedom than they believe (especially if they have not yet tested their freedom in an area of controversy).

Australia↗
PubMed2002

Active epistaxis at ED presentation is associated with arterial hypertension.

Epistaxis and hypertension are frequent in the general population, but an association is still controversial. Aim of this retrospective cohort study was to test if active epistaxis at emergency department (ED) presentation is associated with hypertension. Patients with active epistaxis at ED presentation (n = 271; 73%) were compared with controls without active bleeding (n = 101; 27%). By multivariate logistic regression modeling we found that active epistaxis was independently associated with history of hypertension (odds ratio 2.8 [95% CI 1.4 to 5.6; P =.004] adjusted for age, gender, rhinitis, diffuse bleeding, and malignant diseases). Patients with active epistaxis had higher blood pressure at presentation compared with controls (systolic blood pressure 165 v 153 mmHg, P <.001, diastolic blood pressure 85 v 77 mmHg, P <.001). Active epistaxis at ED presentation is associated with arterial hypertension.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2001

Which treatment for low back pain? A factorial randomised controlled trial comparing intravenous analgesics with oral analgesics in the emergency department and a centrally acting muscle relaxant with placebo over three days [ISRCTN09719705].

BACKGROUND: About two thirds of adults suffer from backpain at some time during their life. In the emergency room many patients with acute back pain are treated with intravenous non-steroidal analgesics. Whether this treatment is superior to oral administration of non-steroidal analgesics is unknown. Intravenous administration, however, requires considerable amounts of resources and accounts for high workload in busy clinics. In the further course centrally acting muscle relaxants are prescribed but the effectiveness remains unclear. The objective of this study is on the one hand to compare the effectiveness of intravenous with oral non-steroidal analgesics for acute treatment and on the other hand to compare the effectiveness of a centrally active muscle relaxant with placebo given for three days after presentation to the ED (emergency department). METHODS/DESIGN: This study is intended as a randomised controlled factorial trial mainly for two reasons: (1) the sequence of treatments resembles the actual proceedings in every-day clinical practice, which is important for the generalisability of the results and (2) this design allows to take interactions between the two sequential treatment strategies into account. There is a patient preference arm included because patients preference is an important issue providing valuable information: (1) it allows to assess the interaction between desired treatment and outcome, (2) results can be extrapolated to a wider group while (3) conserving the advantages of a fully randomised controlled trial. CONCLUSION: We hope to shed more light on the effectiveness of treatment modalities available for acute low back pain.

Journal Article↗