PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Margaret R O'Donnell

Publications and source records attributed to Margaret R O'Donnell.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia secondary to chemoradiotherapy for Ewing sarcoma. Report of two cases and concise review of the literature.

Survivors of childhood solid tumors including Ewing sarcoma (ES) have an increased risk of secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) as a consequence of exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiation (see: Bhatia S, Sklar C. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:124-132). The most common hematologic SMNs are myelodysplasia (MDS) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is uncommon in this patient population, and Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) ALL in particular, is rare. We report herein two cases of young adult patients who were both diagnosed with Ph+ ALL 19 years after successful treatment for ES with combined modality therapy. A review of the relevant literature follows the case reports.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Acute myeloid leukemia.

Advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have not yet led to major improvements in disease-free and overall survival of adults with this disease. Only about one-third of those between ages 18-60 who are diagnosed with AML can be cured; disease-free survival is rare and current therapy devastating in older adults. In this chapter, challenges in the management of the adult with AML are discussed, including ongoing questions concerning the optimal choice of induction and postremission therapy such as the rationale for and role of allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation in a variety of settings, the special considerations pertaining to the older patient, and the development of new, so-called targeted therapies. In Section I, Dr. Richard Stone reviews state-of the-art therapy in AML in the era of change from a morphological to a genetically based classification system. Questions being addressed in ongoing randomized cooperative group trials include anthracycline dose during induction, the efficacy of drug-resistance modulators, and the utility of pro-apoptotic agents such as the anti-bcl-2 antisense oligonucloetide. Developmental therapeutics in AML include drug resistance modulation, anti-angiogenic strategies, immunotherapy, and signal transduction-active agents, particularly the farnesyl transferase inhibitors as well as those molecules that inhibit the FLT3 tyrosine kinase, activated via mutation in 30% of patients. In Section II Dr. Margaret O'Donnell discusses the role of stem cell transplantation in AML. Several advances including expanded donor pools, the movement toward peripheral blood stem cell collection, newer immunosuppressive drugs and antifungals, and particularly the advent of nonmyeloablative transplant have made the allogeneic option more viable. The subset-specific role for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support and/or for allogeneic transplant in AML patients in first remission is outlined. Although preconceived notions about the role of transplant abound, the clinical data supporting a risk-adapted approach are covered. Finally, guidance concerning the use of nonmyeloablative or reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation is provided. In Section III Dr. Mikkael Sekeres reviews the approach to the older patient with AML. Unique biological and therapeutic considerations make AML in this age group a vastly different disease than that in younger adults. The outcome data, including the role of specific anthracylines, hematopoietic growth factors, and drug-resistance modulators, are summarized. Communicating with older adults with AML and their families regarding selection of the optimal treatment strategy, often a stark choice between induction chemotherapy and palliative care, is covered.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Interleukin-2 after autologous stem-cell transplantation for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.

PURPOSE: To determine the disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity of administering interleukin-2 (IL-2) immunotherapy early after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) to simulate a graft versus leukemia effect observed in allogeneic transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission received a single consolidation of high-dose cytarabine-idarubicin at a median of 1.1 month postremission with the intent to proceed to ASCT and IL-2 9 x 10(6) U/m(2)/24 h for 4 days, followed by 10 days of IL-2 1.6 x 10(6) U/m(2)/24 h on hematologic recovery. RESULTS: Eighty-four percent of patients received the intended ASCT, and 68% of patients received IL-2 treatment. With a median follow-up of 39.4 months (range, 1.2 to 76.3 months), the 2-year cumulative probability of DFS for all 56 patients is 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55% to 80%) and 74% (95% CI, 57% to 85%) for the 39 patients undergoing IL-2 treatment after ASCT. The 2-year cumulative probability of DFS for favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable cytogenetics is 88% (95% CI, 59% to 97%), 48% (95% CI, 26% to 67%), and 70% (95% CI, 23% to 93%), respectively. Toxicities from IL-2 were mainly thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, fever, and fluid retention. Two septic deaths occurred during neutropenia, which includes one during consolidation and one during transplant, for an overall 4% mortality rate. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a moderate dose of IL-2 after high-dose cytarabine-idarubicin-mobilized ASCT is associated with a low regimen-related toxicity and may improve DFS. A phase III study of IL-2 is now warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Outcome after induction chemotherapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia is not improved with mitoxantrone and etoposide compared to cytarabine and daunorubicin: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Complete remission and long-term survival rates are low for older adults treated for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Because of favorable phase 2 data using mitoxantrone and etoposide, we conducted a phase 3 study (SWOG-9333) in which patients over 55 years of age with previously untreated AML were randomized to receive mitoxantrone (10 mg/m(2) per day x 5) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2) per day x 5) [ME], or cytarabine (200 mg/m(2) per day x 7) and daunorubicin (45 mg/m(2) per day x 3) [AD] as induction therapy. The randomization was stratified by age, onset of leukemia, and multidrug resistance phenotype. Over a 4-year period, 328 eligible patients from 66 institutions were enrolled. The complete remission rate was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26%-41%) for patients in the ME and 43% (CI 35%-51%) for patients in the AD treatment arm (one-tailed P value.96). The rates of resistant disease were 43% (CI 35%-51%) and 34% (CI 27%-42%), respectively, for the 2 treatment arms (one-tailed P value.95). The estimated overall survival at 2 years was 11% (CI 6%-15%) and 19% (CI 12%-25%) for patients randomized to ME and to AD induction therapy, respectively (one-tailed P value.99). After accounting for the independent prognostic factors associated with survival (karyotype, performance status, age, white blood cell count), exploratory analysis suggested there was a worse survival for patients who received ME compared with AD induction therapy (2-tailed P value.0066). We conclude that the results of our study do not demonstrate any benefit to the use of ME induction chemotherapy instead of AD in older patients with AML.

Acute Disease↗