Biomedical subjects

Margot W Beukers

Publications and source records attributed to Margot W Beukers.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

ZM241385, DPCPX, MRS1706 are inverse agonists with different relative intrinsic efficacies on constitutively active mutants of the human adenosine A2B receptor.

The human adenosine A(2B) receptor belongs to class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In our previous work, constitutively active mutant (CAM) human adenosine A(2B) receptors were identified from a random mutation bank. In the current study, three known A(2B) receptor antagonists, 4-{2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo-[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl}phenol (ZM241385), 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), and N-(4-acetylphenyl)-2-[4-(2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-2,6-dioxo-1,3-dipropyl-1H-purin-8-yl)phenoxy]acetamide (MRS1706) were tested on wild-type and nine CAM A(2B) receptors with different levels of constitutive activity in a yeast growth assay. All three compounds turned out to be inverse agonists for the adenosine A(2B) receptor because they were able to fully reverse the basal activity of four low-level constitutively active A(2B) receptor mutants and to partially reverse the basal activity of three medium-level constitutively active A(2B) receptor mutants. We also discovered two highly constitutively active mutants whose basal activity could not be reversed by any of the three compounds. A two-state receptor model was used to explain the experimental observations; fitting these yielded the following relative intrinsic efficacies for the three inverse agonists ZM241385, DPCPX, and MRS1706: 0.14 +/- 0.03, 0.35 +/- 0.03, and 0.31 +/- 0.02, respectively. Moreover, varying L, the ratio of active versus inactive receptors in this model, from 0.11 for mutant F84L to 999 for two highly constitutively active mutants yielded simulated dose-response curves that mimicked the experimental curves. This study is the first description of inverse agonists for the human adenosine A(2B) receptor. Moreover, the use of receptor mutants with varying levels of constitutive activity enabled us to determine the relative intrinsic efficacy of these inverse agonists.

Adenosine A2 Receptor Agonists↗

PubMed2006

A two-entropies analysis to identify functional positions in the transmembrane region of class A G protein-coupled receptors.

Residues in the transmembrane region of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important for ligand binding and activation, but the function of individual positions is poorly understood. Using a sequence alignment of class A GPCRs (grouped in subfamilies), we propose a so-called "two-entropies analysis" to determine the potential role of individual positions in the transmembrane region of class A GPCRs. In our approach, such positions appear scattered, while largely clustered according to their biological function. Our method appears superior when compared to other bioinformatics approaches, such as the evolutionary trace method, entropy-variability plot, and correlated mutation analysis, both qualitatively and quantitatively.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2006

Structure-affinity relationships of adenosine A2B receptor ligands.

Many selective and high affinity agonists and antagonists have been developed for the adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors. Very recently such compounds have been identified for the adenosine A(2B) receptors. This review presents an overview of the structure-affinity relationships of antagonists and agonists for this receptor subtype as published in the scientific and patent literature. To date the most selective >370-fold, high affinity adenosine A(2B) receptor antagonist is the xanthine analog, compound 16 (8-(1-(3-phenyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl)methyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1,3-dipropyl-1H-purine-2,6(3H,7H)-dione). The pyrrolopyrimidine analog OSIP339391 (73) is slightly less selective, 70-fold, but has a higher affinity 0.41 nM compared to 1 nM for compound 16. Other promising classes of compounds with selectivities ranging from 10- to 160-fold and affinities ranging from 3 to 112 nM include triazolo, aminothiazole, quinazoline, and pyrimidin-2-amine analogs. Progress has also been achieved concerning the development of selective high affinity agonists for the adenosine A(2B) receptor. For years the most potent, albeit non-selective adenosine A(2B) receptor agonist was (S)PHPNECA (88). Last year, a new class of non-ribose ligands was reported. Several compounds displayed selectivity with respect to adenosine A(2A) and A(3) receptors. In addition, full and partial agonists for the adenosine A(2B) receptor were identified with EC(50) values of 10 nM (LUF5835, 103) and 9 nM (LUF5845, 105), respectively.

Adenosine A2 Receptor Agonists↗

PubMed2005

Allosteric modulators affect the internalization of human adenosine A1 receptors.

To study the effect of allosteric modulators on the internalization of human adenosine A(1) receptors, the receptor was equipped with a C-terminal yellow fluorescent protein tag. The introduction of this tag did not affect the radioligand binding properties of the receptor. CHO cells stably expressing this receptor were subjected during 16 h to varying concentrations of the agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) in the absence or presence of 10 microM of the allosteric enhancer PD 81,723 ((2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl)-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methanone) or the allosteric inhibitor SCH-202676 (N-(2,3-diphenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5(2H)-ylidene)methanamine). CPA itself was able to internalize 25% and 40% of the receptors at a concentration of 400 nM or 4 muM, respectively. Addition of either PD 81,723 or SCH-202676 alone had no effect on internalization. However, with PD 81,723 a slight amount of internalization was obtained already at 40 nM of CPA and at 400 nM CPA 59% of the receptors internalized. SCH-202676 on the other hand effectively prevented CPA-induced internalization of the receptor.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2005

A series of ligands displaying a remarkable agonistic-antagonistic profile at the adenosine A1 receptor.

Adenosine receptor agonists are usually variations of the natural ligand, adenosine. The ribose moiety in the ligand has previously been shown to be of great importance for the agonistic effects of the compound. In this paper, we present a series of nonadenosine ligands selective for the adenosine A(1) receptor with an extraordinary pharmacological profile. 2-Amino-4-benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl-6-(2-hydroxyethylsulfanyl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (70, LUF 5853) shows full agonistic behavior comparable with the reference compound CPA, while also displaying comparable receptor binding affinity (K(i) = 11 nM). In contrast, compound 58 (2-amino-4-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)-6-(2-hydroxyethylsulfanyl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile, LUF 5948) has a binding affinity of 14 nM and acts as an inverse agonist. Also present within this same series are compounds that show neutral antagonism of the adenosine A(1) receptor, for example compound 65 (2-amino-4-(4-difluoromethoxyphenyl)-6-(2-hydroxyethylsulfanyl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile, LUF 5826).

Adenosine A1 Receptor Agonists↗

PubMed2005

Techniques: how to boost GPCR mutagenesis studies using yeast.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the major targets of today's medicines. To elucidate the mechanism of activation of GPCRs and the interaction of these receptors with their G proteins, mutagenesis studies have proven to be a powerful tool and have provided insight into the structure and function of GPCRs. Random mutagenesis is useful in this respect particularly when combined with a robust screening assay that is based on the functional properties of the mutants. In this article, the use of random mutagenesis combined with a functional screening assay in yeast is described and compared with alternative approaches such as site-directed mutagenesis per se, alanine/cysteine scanning and another screening assay, receptor selection and amplification technology (R-SAT). Screening in yeast of randomly mutated GPCRs has proven successful in the identification of ligands for orphan receptors and in high-throughput approaches. Moreover, it has provided substantial insight into G-protein coupling and receptor activation.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

2,4,6-trisubstituted pyrimidines as a new class of selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonists.

Adenosine receptor antagonists usually possess a bi- or tricyclic heteroaromatic structure at their core with varying substitution patterns to achieve selectivity and/or greater affinity. Taking into account molecular modeling results from a series of potent adenosine A1 receptor antagonists, a pharmacophore was derived from which we show that a monocyclic core can be equally effective. To achieve a compound that may act at the CNS we propose imposing a restriction related to its polar surface area (PSA). In consequence, we have synthesized two novel series of pyrimidines, possessing good potency at the adenosine A1 receptor and desirable PSA values. In particular, compound 30 (LUF 5735) displays excellent A1 affinity (Ki = 4 nM) and selectivity (< or =50% displacement of 1 muM concentrations of the radioligand at the other three adenosine receptors) and has a PSA value of 53 A2.

Adenosine A1 Receptor Antagonists↗

PubMed2004

New, non-adenosine, high-potency agonists for the human adenosine A2B receptor with an improved selectivity profile compared to the reference agonist N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine.

The adenosine A(2B) receptor is the least well characterized of the four known adenosine receptor subtypes because of the absence of potent, selective agonists. Here, we present five non-adenosine agonists. Among them, 2-amino-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-6-(1H-imidazol-2-ylmethylsulfanyl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile, 17, LUF5834, is a high-efficacy partial agonist with EC(50) = 12 nM and 45-fold selectivity over the adenosine A(3) receptor but lacking selectivity versus the A(1) and A(2A) subtypes. Compound 18, LUF5835, the 3-hydroxyphenyl analogue, is a full agonist with EC(50) = 10 nM.

Adenosine A2 Receptor Agonists↗

PubMed2004

Random mutagenesis of the human adenosine A2B receptor followed by growth selection in yeast. Identification of constitutively active and gain of function mutations.

To gain insight in spontaneous as well as agonist-induced activation of the human adenosine A2B receptor, we applied a random mutagenesis approach in yeast to create a large number of receptor mutants and selected mutants of interest with a robust screening assay based on growth. The amino acid sequence of 14 mutated receptors was determined. All these mutated receptors displayed constitutive activity. In particular, single-point mutations at T42A, V54L, and F84S and a triple-point mutation at N36S, T42A, and T66A resulted in high constitutive activity. In addition, a C-terminally truncated (after Lys269) mutant, Q214L I230N V240M V250M N254Y T257S K269stop, was highly constitutively active. The T42A, V54L, and F84S mutants showed a considerable decrease, 4.9- to 6.9-fold, in the EC50 value of 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), an adenosine analog. Combined mutation of I242T, K269R, V284A, and H302Q, as well as F84L together with S95G, resulted in an even greater potency of NECA of 10- and 18-fold, respectively. In fact, all constitutively active mutants had an increased potency for NECA. This suggests that the wild-type (wt) human A2B receptor itself is rather silent, which may explain the low affinity of agonists for this receptor. To verify the ability of the mutant receptors to activate mammalian second messenger systems, cAMP experiments were performed in CHO cells stably expressing the wt and T42A receptors. These experiments confirmed the increased sensitivity of T42A for NECA, because the EC50 values of T42A and the wt receptor were 0.15 +/- 0.04 and 1.3 +/- 0.4 microM, respectively.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

N6-cyclopentyl-2-(3-phenylaminocarbonyltriazene-1-yl)adenosine (TCPA), a very selective agonist with high affinity for the human adenosine A1 receptor.

Four subtypes of adenosine receptors are currently known, that is, A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) receptors. Interestingly, quite substantial species differences exist especially between human and rat A(3) receptors. As a result, ligands such as CCPA, which are very selective for the rat A(1) receptor versus the human A(3) receptor, are substantially less selective when the human A(1) and A(3) receptors are compared. New 2-substituted and 2,N(6)-disubstituted adenosines were synthesized, and their affinities for the human adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) receptors were determined. Although large substituents on the C2-position are generally thought to yield adenosine A(2A) receptor selective ligands, the reported series of 2-triazeno-substituted adenosines had a very high affinity for the A(1) receptor. For example, 2-(3-phenylaminocarbonyltriazene-1-yl)adenosine had an affinity of 6.1 +/- 1.3 nM for the human adenosine A(1) receptor. Introduction of a diphenethyl substituent at the N(6)-position of this compound resulted in a high-affinity agonist, 3.1 +/- 0.9 nM, for the human adenosine A(1) receptor with 316- and 45-fold selectivity versus the human A(2A) and human A(3) receptors, respectively. The most selective, high-affinity human adenosine A(1) receptor agonist was the disubstituted compound N(6)-cyclopentyl-2-(3-phenylaminocarbonyltriazene-1-yl)adenosine (TCPA). TCPA had an affinity of 2.8 +/- 0.8 nM for the human adenosine A(1) receptor and was 75-fold and 214-fold selective versus the human A(2A) and human A(3) receptors, respectively. In addition, TCPA was a full agonist and inhibited the forskolin-induced cAMP production of CHO cells stably transfected with the human adenosine A(1) receptor with an IC(50) of 1.5 +/- 0.5 nM.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2002

Modulation of agonist responses at the A(1) adenosine receptor by an irreversible antagonist, receptor-G protein uncoupling and by the G protein activation state.

Potency and intrinsic activity of agonists depend on ligand structure, but are also regulated by receptor-G protein stoichiometry. A potential functional reserve in adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated G protein activation was investigated by stimulation of guanosine-5'-(gamma-[35S]thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding by the full agonist 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) and the partial agonist 5'-deoxy-5'-methylthioadenosine (MeSA). Pretreatment of rat brain membranes with the irreversible antagonist 1-propyl-3-[3-[[4-(fluorosulfonyl)benzoyl]oxy]-propyl]-8-cyclopentylxanthine revealed no classical receptor reserve for either agonist. The functional significance of the G protein coupling state of the receptor and occupancy of G proteins by guanine nucleotides was assessed after partial uncoupling of receptor-G protein complexes with N-ethylmaleimide and in the presence of increasing GDP concentrations. Agonist EC(50) values in G protein activation were increased after NEM pretreatment and at higher GDP concentrations, and a decrease in the relative intrinsic activity of MeSA was observed. The shift of agonist concentration-response curves to the right, the decrease in maximal effects and the decrease in relative intrinsic activity of the partial agonist point to a functional reserve which has to be attributed to GDP-free receptor-G protein complexes. The mechanisms of action of FSCPX, NEM and GDP were fully consistent with the two-state model of receptor activation. The apparent reserve revealed by GDP reflects a shift from spontaneously active GDP-free receptor-G protein complexes (RG)(*), which can bind [35S]GTPgammaS, to (RG) occupied by GDP. The abundance of (RG)(*) is favored by agonists and by the absence of GDP.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

tGRAP, the G-protein coupled receptors mutant database.

The searchable mutant database tGRAP (previously called tinyGRAP) at the University of Tromsø contains data on mutated G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). All data have been extracted from scientific papers and entered manually into the database. The current version of the tGRAP mutant database (tGRAP.uit.no, release 10, April 2001) contains around 10 500 mutants extracted from almost 1400 research papers containing mutant data on five families of GPCRs, i.e. Family A, rhodopsin-like; Family B, secretin-like; Family C, metabotropic glutamate-like; Family D, pheromone; Family E, cAMP receptors. A query form provides rapid and simple access to relevant mutant information. In addition to this query form, a tool that enables the user to access mutation data via sequence alignments has been introduced. The ability to access mutant data from such alignments increases the usefulness of the mutant database and facilitates comparison of mutagenesis data between receptors. Moreover, this tool allows the construction of tailor-made sequence alignment views from any combination of receptors belonging to the same class. The database is available at http://tGRAP.uit.no/.

Amino Acid Sequence↗