Maria C Kjellsson | PubMed Health

PubMed2004

The back-step method--method for obtaining unbiased population parameter estimates for ordered categorical data.

A significant bias in parameters, estimated with the proportional odds model using the software NONMEM, has been reported. Typically, this bias occurs with ordered categorical data, when most of the observations are found at one extreme of the possible outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess, through simulations, the performance of the Back-Step Method (BSM), a novel approach for obtaining unbiased estimates when the standard approach provides biased estimates. BSM is an iterative method involving sequential simulation-estimation steps. BSM was compared with the standard approach in the analysis of a 4-category ordered variable using the Laplacian method in NONMEM. The bias in parameter estimates and the accuracy of model predictions were determined for the 2 methods on 3 conditions: (1) a nonskewed distribution of the response with low interindividual variability (IIV), (2) a skewed distribution with low IIV, and (3) a skewed distribution with high IIV. An increase in bias with increasing skewness and IIV was shown in parameters estimated using the standard approach in NONMEM. BSM performed without appreciable bias in the estimates under the 3 conditions, and the model predictions were in good agreement with the original data. Each BSM estimation represents a random sample of the population; hence, repeating the BSM estimation reduces the imprecision of the parameter estimates. The BSM is an accurate estimation method when the standard modeling approach in NONMEM gives biased estimates.

Bias↗

PubMed2004

Estimating bias in population parameters for some models for repeated measures ordinal data using NONMEM and NLMIXED.

The application of proportional odds models to ordered categorical data using the mixed-effects modeling approach has become more frequently reported within the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic area during the last decade. The aim of this paper was to investigate the bias in parameter estimates, when models for ordered categorical data were estimated using methods employing different approximations of the likelihood integral; the Laplacian approximation in NONMEM (without and with the centering option) and NLMIXED, and the Gaussian quadrature approximations in NLMIXED. In particular, we have focused on situations with non-even distributions of the response categories and the impact of interpatient variability. This is a Monte Carlo simulation study where original data sets were derived from a known model and fixed study design. The simulated response was a four-category variable on the ordinal scale with categories 0, 1, 2 and 3. The model used for simulation was fitted to each data set for assessment of bias. Also, simulations of new data based on estimated population parameters were performed to evaluate the usefulness of the estimated model. For the conditions tested, Gaussian quadrature performed without appreciable bias in parameter estimates. However, markedly biased parameter estimates were obtained using the Laplacian estimation method without the centering option, in particular when distributions of observations between response categories were skewed and when the interpatient variability was moderate to large. Simulations under the model could not mimic the original data when bias was present, but resulted in overestimation of rare events. The bias was considerably reduced when the centering option in NONMEM was used. The cause for the biased estimates appears to be related to the conditioning on uninformative and uncertain empirical Bayes estimate of interindividual random effects during the estimation, in conjunction with the normality assumption.

Bias↗