Maria Montez | PubMed Health

PubMed2004

Evaluating diagnosis-based risk-adjustment methods in a population with spinal cord dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To examine performance of models in predicting health care utilization for individuals with spinal cord dysfunction. DESIGN: Regression models compared 2 diagnosis-based risk-adjustment methods, the adjusted clinical groups (ACGs) and diagnostic cost groups (DCGs). To improve prediction, we added to our model: (1) spinal cord dysfunction-specific diagnostic information, (2) limitations in self-care function, and (3) both 1 and 2. SETTING: Models were replicated in 3 populations. PARTICIPANTS: Samples from 3 populations: (1) 40% of veterans using Veterans Health Administration services in fiscal year 1997 (FY97) (N=1,046,803), (2) veteran sample with spinal cord dysfunction identified by codes from the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modifications (N=7666), and (3) veteran sample identified in Veterans Affairs Spinal Cord Dysfunction Registry (N=5888). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inpatient, outpatient, and total days of care in FY97. RESULTS: The DCG models (R(2) range,.22-.38) performed better than ACG models (R(2) range,.04-.34) for all outcomes. Spinal cord dysfunction-specific diagnostic information improved prediction more in the ACG model than in the DCG model (R(2) range for ACG,.14-.34; R(2) range for DCG,.24-.38). Information on self-care function slightly improved performance (R(2) range increased from 0 to.04). CONCLUSIONS: The DCG risk-adjustment models predicted health care utilization better than ACG models. ACG model prediction was improved by adding information.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Dual-system use: are there implications for risk adjustment and quality assessment?

The authors examined the implications of dual-system use for risk adjustment and quality assessment. The sample (n = 34 151) included all veterans dually enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) and the private sector in 1998 with (1) an inpatient discharge from either a VA or Medicare setting for 1 of 6 conditions/procedures and (2) inpatient and/or outpatient use in both the VA and private sector. The authors used the Diagnostic Cost Groups risk-adjustment system to obtain concurrent and prospective health status (relative risk scores) using veterans' Medicare diagnoses only, VA diagnoses only, and diagnoses from both systems. Both concurrent and prospective relative risk scores increased when diagnoses from both systems were used; the population's disease profile also was affected. The authors conclude that it is important to capture the true disease burden of the population by obtaining diagnoses from all health care systems providing care to facilitate meaningful comparisons of performance.

Aged↗