PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mariam Rubbani

Publications and source records attributed to Mariam Rubbani.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Visualization of spinal injection procedures using gadolinium contrast.

STUDY DESIGN: A series of six case reports. OBJECTIVE: The case reports demonstrate successful use of gadolinium contrast for visualization of spinal injection procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A variety of spinal injection procedures were performed with gadolinium contrast. Adequate visualization was accomplished with gadolinium in performing these injections and demonstrated that it is a viable alternative to nonionic iodinated contrast materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The case reports included a chart review, performance of spinal injections with gadolinium under fluoroscopic guidance, and postprocedure follow-up at 2 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Gadolinium was visible under fluoroscopy in all six cases, demonstrating its value in performing spinal injection procedures as an alternative to nonionic iodinated contrast materials. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium is a viable alternative to nonionic iodinated contrast materials for visualization of spinal injection procedures.

Contrast Media↗

Functional deficits in athletes with a history of low back pain: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether athletes with a history of low back pain (LBP) would, on average, perform slower on a timed 20-m shuttle run as compared with a normal athletic population. DESIGN: A timed shuttle run to evaluate residual functional limitations in college athletes with resolved LBP. SETTING: National College Athletic Association (NCAA) division I college. PARTICIPANTS: NCAA division I athletes (161 men, 50 women). INTERVENTION: A timed 20-m shuttle run. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Each athlete was timed in a divided 20 m (66 ft) run in which 2 taped lines were positioned 6.7 m (22 ft) apart. RESULTS: Of 211 athletes evaluated, 27 had been treated for LBP during the previous year. Currently asymptomatic athletes with a recent history of LBP were slower (6.3s vs 5.8s) during performance of the timed 20-m shuttle run than athletes without LBP (P=.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with resolved LBP were slower than a matched group of normal athletes without LBP in the timed 20-m shuttle run. Further research is needed to support these findings and to understand fully the influence of the kinetic chain and the effects of both gender and sport on the observed findings.

Adult↗