PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marie Bienvenu

Publications and source records attributed to Marie Bienvenu.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intra- and interreader agreement of two-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) measurements of pulmonary nodules less than 2 cm in diameter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three readers independently made three serial measurements of each of 54 pulmonary nodules measuring 3-18 mm that had been observed on standard-dose multisection CT images obtained in 24 patients who ranged in age from 36 to 81 years (mean age, 54.6 years). There were 14 women (58%), who ranged in age from 43 to 81 years (mean age, 58.9 years), and 10 men (42%), who ranged in age from 36 to 65 years (mean age, 48.5 years). The largest transverse cross-sectional diameter of each nodule was measured at picture archiving and communication system, or PACS, workstations by using high-spatial-resolution reconstructed CT images and identical window settings. Intra- and interreader agreement were determined by using methods described by Bland and Altman: the coefficient of repeatability for intrareader agreement, and methods derived from the 95% limits of agreement defined by Bland and Altman for interreader agreement. RESULTS: The repeatability coefficients were 1.70, 1.32, and 1.51 mm for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement for the difference among readers were -1.73 and 1.73. CONCLUSION: Two-dimensional CT measurements are not reliable in the evaluation of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules.

Adult↗

Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate software designed to calculate pulmonary nodule volume in three dimensions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four solid noncalcified pulmonary nodules measuring 5-18 mm in diameter were studied with computed tomographic (CT) volumetric software. Baseline CT examinations were performed for various indications by using four-detector row multisection CT units, 1.25- or 2.50-mm sections, and a standard reconstruction algorithm. The percentage of successful nodule segmentations, as well as intraobserver variability, interreader agreement, and global repeatability of calculated volumes, was determined on the basis of consecutive measurements performed three times by three different radiologists by using the Bland and Altman method. The software was used to calculate the doubling time of 22 nodules for which a final diagnosis and comparable CT scans were available. RESULTS: Fifty-two (96%) of the 54 nodules were successfully segmented, allowing their volume to be calculated. Repeatability was high: There was no variation in the nine measurements of 35 (67%) of the 52 nodules. The coefficient of variation for the remaining 17 nodules (33%) was 2.26%. Bland and Altman 95% limits of acceptability, calculated on the basis of log-transformed data, yielded a maximum software measurement error of 6.38% of the previous volume measurement. Doubling time ranged from 4 to 188 years for the 13 benign nodules and from 37 to 216 days for the nine malignant nodules. CONCLUSION: Software volumetric analysis yielded repeatable estimates for 96% of the nodules examined. All software-calculated doubling times were in keeping with the benign or malignant nature of the nodules.

Adult↗